93 MILLION TOPS SHORT TERM IS THE KEY FOR WE

That bridge contract is like a suspension bridge over a puddle.

Agreed mate, it is very high. Wanted to demonstrate how high we can go on a bridge while maintaining flexibility. Perhaps all this is media driven and he comes in lower but seems like this could be realistic. I'm really hoping 8m x 3y gets it done.

Why does your name say federer? Federer is rodger federer and he is known as being amazing or the best. You on the other hand suck. Marner at 8 by 3??!!! You drunk??!! If that was a possibility it would be down by now. No way if he wanted 8 by 3 leafs would still try and low ball him. Like come on. Its 10 mil minimum. If rodger federer is the best this video is you. Find this guys name and change your name on capfriendly to it but remove federer. https://youtu.be/a2IrVSX1IPk

Thanks, its so cool you spent the time to reply with such an insightful, thought provoking addition to the conversation. This is simply an exercise in what bridge deals would work to maintain reasonable and competitive roster flexibility. I did not state i think anything would happen, I stated my hope, and of course I hope a perfectly reasonable 8 mil bridge deal will happen. 10 million as you stated is ridiculous for a bridge contract. Id love to hear your thoughts on the roster flexibility options laid out here.