SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

zackhendo

VanFan12
Membre depuis
6 juin 2021
Équipe favorite
Canucks de Vancouver
Messages dans les forums
321
Messages par jour
0.3
Forum: Armchair-GM8 janv. à 1 h 6
Sujet: If were going to gut our futures lets do it right
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>AC14</b></div><div>Well the main thing was I wasn’t commenting on value. Value alone is subjective. Why are they trading him? Do they need to? I was simply putting that Buffalo probably shouldn’t be shelling out guys who are productive for futures with where they’re at. And they probably shouldn’t do so while getting softer.

I don’t follow Buffalo enough to know what their issue is. But I’d imagine it stems from the backend or goaltending. None of that addresses the issues at hand.</div></div>

Obviously none of these proposals are likely. They're made to feel out value and possibility. My point was that that haul is a fairly steep overpay for Tuch. If it were offered theyd have to take it. It never would be though. You're comment is worried about toughness when they're winning a trade by a mile. As for it not being exactly what they need you can move top prospects and 1st round picks for goalies and dmen every offseason and often even in season.
Forum: Armchair-GM3 déc. 2023 à 18 h 11
Sujet: John Gibson
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>JaredOfLondon</b></div><div>try over the last 5. He had a hot start this year and is falling to his regular spot rapidly
his WAR over the seasons
23/24: 0.54 (already pretty much halved from like 5 games ago)
22/23: -1.92
21/22: -0.26
20/21: -1.23
19/20: -3.0</div></div>

Gibson WAR per Evolving Hockey
2023-24: 0.7
2022-23: 0.2
2021-22: 1.6
2020-21: 1.8
2019-20: 1.2

Also...its a number that tells us little unless you are comparing it to someone else...even if that is the current option

Vanecek
2023-24: -0.9
2022-23: 3.6

Blackwood
2022-23: 0.4
2021-22: -0.9
2020-21: 0.3
2019-20: 2.6

Also, its worth noting that Gibson has faced the 2nd most shots and most high danger shots (and 3rd highest % of shots being HD).


So for comparison, compare two guys...

Player X: 0.926 Sv%
Player Y: 0.907 Sv%

Player X: 27 shots per 60.... 7 high-danger, 7 medium, 4 off rebound
Player Y: 35 shots-per-60...11 high-danger, 9 medium, 5 off rebound

That is 8 more shots, 4 more high-danger shots a night for Player Y...

If you flipped them, and they still saved a similar % of various shots, their save% would be

Player X: 0.916 Sv%
Player Y: 0.914 Sv%


(Its Swayman and Gibson)
Forum: Armchair-GM3 déc. 2023 à 16 h 27
Sujet: John Gibson
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>JaredOfLondon</b></div><div>pick one, sv%, HDSV%, Goals saved above expected, WAR, etc etc etc. He's been one of the major reasons the ducks have been so bad, not a victim of it</div></div>

over last two years

<strong>HD Sv% </strong>
Kevin Lankinen: 0.854
Connor Hellebuyck 0.838
<strong>John Gibson: 0.837</strong>
Dan Vladar: 0.835
Carter Hart: 0.831
Stuart Skinner: 0.828
Sam Montembeault: 0.827
Alex Nedeljkovic: 0.824
David Rittich 0.821
Jacob Markstrom: 0.816
Petr Mrazek: 0.813
Eric Comrie: 0.808
Magnus Hellberg: 0.807
James Reimer: 0.801
Kaapo Kahkonen: 0.801
Jake Allen: 0.795
Akira Schmid: 0.794
Vitek Vanecek: 0.789
Cal Petersen: 0.789
Jack Campbell: 0.768

<strong>WAR</strong>
Connor Hellebuyck: 8.3
Stuart Skinner: 3.2
Sam Montembeault: 3.1
Carter Hart: 3.1
Vitek Vanecek: 2.7
Kevin Lankinen: 1.6
Jacob Markstrom: 1.1
<strong>John Gibson: 0.9</strong>
Akira Schmid: 0.9
Alex Nedeljkovic: 0.8
David Rittich: 0.6
Petr Mrazek: 0.3
Dan Vladar: -0.2
Jake Allen: -0.3
James Reimer: -0.3
Magnus Hellberg: -0.5
Cal Petersen: -1.3
Eric Comrie: -1.7
Kaapo Kahkonen: -2.2
Jack Campbell: -3.4


???
Forum: Armchair-GM19 févr. 2023 à 22 h 52
Sujet: Selling Boeser to the meier runner ups
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>fullblowncaniac90</b></div><div>Hard no from carolina, we don't need the cap help. Swap KK with a B prospect and maybe there's a deal here.</div></div>

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>NHLfan10506</b></div><div>Who says Boeser is the consolation prize?

I think a lot of this CAR vs NJD Meier talk is probably one side trying to raise the price on the other. There are likely other teams in play. (And I have my suspicions on which side is the culprit).

Also, are Johnsson and Kotkaniemi similar in value? I thought the latter was held in higher regard in Carolina.</div></div>

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Caniac555</b></div><div>Despite what everyone wants to say - KK has been playing well since Jan 1st</div></div>

My thoughts on KK is essentially: he’s a 3C

If canes fans are saying he’s a 2C, then value is definitely off here. I do not watch every canes game, so outside of war charts and hockey DB it is tough for me to gauge KK value.

If canes don’t need to send any cap back, then 2nd plus Bokk or something is fine too with less retention

I would very happily increase the retention as much as 50% if it means landing a 1st or A prospect in a Boeser trade
Forum: Armchair-GM8 févr. 2023 à 20 h 57
Forum: Armchair-GM6 févr. 2023 à 1 h 52
Sujet: 2023 TDL
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Hockeyfan1234</b></div><div>Whenever someone posts a terrible acgm I wonder if their parents know they are up past their bedtime…
This isn’t a reasonable offer. There is no reason any team pays that much for a goalie that is playing like garbage. You can make all the excuses you want, but facts are facts. He’s been bad this year. There’s plenty of goalies around the league on bad teams that have much better stats than Demko this year.</div></div>

It's all good my parents are aware I'm up past my bedtime.

If you you think this is a, 'first laugh at that offer and hang up" trade, why don't you make an ACGM for a PITT Vancouver Demko trade so we can all be informed as to whats reasonable, after all apparently the Pen's have been showing interest. Lets see how it is received.