SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

xNogaitx

xNogaitx
Membre depuis
6 juin 2018
Équipe favorite
Canadiens de Montréal
Deuxième équipe favorite
Capitals de Washington
Messages dans les forums
89
Messages par jour
0.0
Forum: Armchair-GMmer. à 0 h 30
Sujet: Looking at 2-years ahead
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>drambui</b></div><div>thats an interesting contract for necas.</div></div>

Screwed up - he's indeed likely signing a Caufield type of contract (7 years x 7.75M)

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>reelnb</b></div><div>I'm not even going to bother commenting on the value

I don't get why the Habs crowd on here is so obsessed with Anton Lundell. If you're going to trade so much for him, why is he on the 4th line?</div></div>

Value is there taking comps like Fiala.
It's a two-yrs out post, so you also need to factor in Dvorak who will be in a contract renewal year. He likely fetches you another 2nd + late pick on top of the 1st + 2nd already provided.
That's more than Fiala (as Faber wasn't a known thing at the time of the deal)

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Caniac2000</b></div><div>Necas is going to make around what Caufield makes, and that isn't even close for his trade value. *Maybe* if you sent the Habs pick, with it likely top 10, the Canes would have interest, but otherwise, this gets laughed at</div></div>

That was a mistake of me doing Lundell/Necas contracts quickly on my phone, but yes 7x7.75M.

Lundell going on the 4th is just a testament of the team depth if those moves happen. This isn't the 24/25 habs, this is a projection of the 25/26 team.
Forum: Armchair-GM7 oct. 2022 à 2 h 29
Sujet: Starting lineup
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Hammerwise</b></div><div>Hahaha, thought about it....I think for PHI it covers while Couturier is out or Morgan Frost can't deliver, but MTL would have to add something really. a 4th and 5th. Its really a move PHI doesn;t have to make, but Dvorak and Scott Laughton can both play C or LW, and if Dvorak can rebound, maybe PHI moves him for more, but MTL would jump on that offer at the moment.</div></div>

Oh my, at first I thought you mentioned Mtl sending Dvorak + FLO's 1st (in '23, which they have) in exchange for future considerations. I did not realize that Philly had FLO's 1st next year.

Am sure the Habs could attach one of their 4th rounders (3) this year to facilitate such a trade, which probably makes sense now considering Couturier's injury.
Forum: Armchair-GM14 oct. 2020 à 17 h 40
Sujet: Boeser and Gallagher
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>dzad96</b></div><div>Trade is fair value IMO, probably even an overpay if you guarantee a gallagher resign. Just can't see why VAN would trade Boeser.</div></div>

That's what I went for actually. There is no reason in hell Vancouver should be moving Boeser in my opinion, but apparently management is trying to sooo!

So with that in mind, Montreal here gets a guy that will be their 1RW for years to come. At the expense of a low end 1RW (Gallagher), a 3rd liner that drives the play (supposedly enquired often by other teams around the league) in Lehkonen, a recent early 2nd rounder RW with NHL speed that performed well internationally against his peers in Ylonen.

Ylonen has been overshadowed by Romanov's progression but remains a legit prospect nevertheless.

And then the part that can be negotiated I guess is the 1st round pick. If it's really an overkill maybe a 2nd would suffice? Or 2 x 2nds?
Forum: Armchair-GM18 sept. 2020 à 13 h 15
Forum: Armchair-GM28 août 2020 à 11 h 31
Sujet: OEL to the Habs amp Domi to BUF
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>justaBoss</b></div><div>While ARI really needs picks after their penalty, that offer is quite poor for their best D-man.

BUF might consider taking that, but without retention.</div></div>

Define poor. A young Dman that's top 10 in the D under 22 years old is poor? He might not be putting up huge numbers yet, but a lot of so called prospects that people would value higher than Mete have yet to prove their ability to play in the league.
Poehling has had a bad year, but is still a recent WCJ MVP and has 2C potential. Lots of analysts see his floor as a reliable two-way 3C.

Both fit with the age group of the new core. On top of that 16OA + 55/56OA are key for a team trying to get picks and get younger.

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Xqb15a</b></div><div>BUF trade is easy no, they need talent on ELC’s not mercurial players who aren’t as good as they think.

AZ trade is interesting but they aren’t going to trade OEL AND retain money.</div></div>

It's been reported they don't to pick at 8th once again for the 10th year. 8th is on the table for an offensive 2C, which is what Domi is.

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Gordon_Bombay</b></div><div>How would you explain those trades?

I think Mete and Poehling have little value. So I think the offer you made might get you Dvorak alone, but not both.

The Buffalo one is interesting, but if they can draft at 8, they have the possibility to have a guy around for 3 years at a minimal contract who can produce like a 5m player, so I'd rather keep Okposo, but the offer is kind of fair. I just would not make that deal if I were buffalo</div></div>

Let's agree to disagree on Mete &amp; Poehling's values.
Forum: Armchair-GM19 juill. 2020 à 16 h 30
Sujet: Offseason moves
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>SkatinTintin</b></div><div>Why would you help a team in our division. They're heading for cap hell, let them.

You give a top 4 defenseman in Mete for Montour who's a bottom pair d-man.
You give a top 6 forward for a very uncertain prospect and a huge cap dumb.

Giving too much for too little in my opinion</div></div>


I think this is where we disagree. I see Montour as a 3RD (i.e. Petry's replacement) and that's why I would extend him 7 years at $5.5M AAV given the chance.
His situation clearly reeks him stuck on a bad team as Petry was. I see Montour has a guy that will lock the 3RD spot and provide 25-40 pts per year for the next 7 years.

Mete is younger, but likely tops out as a 3LD in his best years producing in the 20-35 pts range while being smaller than Montour. So that's an upgrade for Mtl.

Domi's value is around what 8th overall + a small add would be, which is why I think that by "lowering" the value of that 8th OA pick through a retained Okposo (Habs need a 4th line RW anyway), that a package of Domi + a late 1st could entice them to throw Mittelstadt into the mix.

Again, I see Mittelstadt as a guy that could have a resurgence and somehow could become the centerpiece of this whole trade if he somehow turns into a 55-70 pts guy a la Domi but again, with more size if he can put on some more muscles (he's only 21 afterall.) If not, i'm more than content in that trade to have him become a reliable 3rd line 35-50 pts guy.
Forum: Armchair-GM19 juill. 2020 à 15 h 56
Sujet: Offseason moves
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>SkatinTintin</b></div><div>was the goal to have Buffalo fleece us? Because that's what you did</div></div>

Not how I personally see it.

This year's draft is quite deep. Buffalo's 1st will be one of Perfetti, Sanderson, Holtz, Raymond, Askarov, or Rossi.
I also believe that Mittelstadt could turn things around and become Mtl's 3C / 2LW eventually (With KK &amp; Suzuki at 1 &amp; 2C) with heavy PP usage.
So if on top of that you get Jeff Petry's replacement Montour signed for 7 years. That's a lot of great pieces coming Mtl's way.

Just like Buffalo fixes their 2C problem for many years to bring along Cozens more smoothly. And strengthen their LD side with Mete sliding in behind Dahlin on the left side for the next decade. They'd be one of the best Dcorp at transitions in the league on the left side.

You have to give to get.
Forum: Armchair-GM2 nov. 2019 à 12 h 23
Sujet: Sign amp trade SJS Habs
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>pinslack</b></div><div>Interesting trade

I wouldn't give up on Kulak and Byron yet. If Kulak finds his rhythm he's a bargain, and I doubt a 29 y/o UFA like Dillon will sign a bargain contract.

Karlsson provides 0 offense, he might only be there because of his cap hit. Byron's contract isnt a bargain, but I'm not scared yet that this will be a bad contract. He needs to find his rhythm like Kulak.</div></div>

Yeah so the way I saw it is:
Karlsson is in there for cap space reasons. All likelihood he gets a 4-5 games look &amp; gets swapped with Poehling.
Byron has become expandable with the kids coming up, there's just no room moving forward for him unless you want to hold back the Poehling, Evans, Caufield, Ylonen, etc.

And the reasoning is to have Dillon sign a 4 (or probably 5) years extension. Something around 5 years, 20M that is frontloaded (easier to trade later on if need be.)
Forum: Armchair-GM25 août 2019 à 1 h 16
Sujet: Frolik Puljujarvi vs cap space
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Treize131</b></div><div>Going to have to respectfully disagree.

Other GMs know that we're in this situation so Tre does not have much to bargain with at this time. A deal like this is what we can expect and it's also what we might end up needing depending on how long it takes for Valimaki to get back up to speed. Recovery is one thing but players that miss large chunks of time from the season often don't really get back to 100% until the following season. Reilly is a serviceable defenseman with a low cap hit that can perhaps push Kylington and whoever else they bring on via PTO.</div></div>

Good take. A lot of individuals right now don't seem to notice how heavy of a cap crunch there is around the league. Once we get closer to training camps &amp; all of the RFAs are signed &amp; some of the remaining UFAs get signed to low deals, you'll have maybe 4-6 teams with 4-7M in cap space, and then there will be 10+ teams looking at offloading players like Frolik to get all of their guys in.

In a vacuum, Frolik is usually worth more. But under this context this is a very fair deal. CLG drops two rounds in the draft, and in exchange they get a guy that's younger, can play a few games in the top 4, and that's under contract for an extra year. (Which in this case, could be burried in full.)

Montreal does this because that's buying early on a TDL guy, and gives them an option to move him later in the season at retained salary for a team looking to make a push or to keep him as their own rental.