SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

tm0000

Membre depuis
3 juill. 2018
Équipe favorite
Islanders de New York
Messages dans les forums
712
Messages par jour
0.3
Forum: Armchair-GM21 mars à 8 h 57
Sujet: post draft retool
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Garak</b></div><div>CHI declines. CHI will deal with teams that actually want to pay for their cap dumps, they aren't a dumping ground. General rule of thumb for Kyle Davidson should be to take on contracts that actually bring quality assets into the rebuild. We don't need anymore mid to late round picks. The only way I could see him doing this is if he is confident he can flip him at the deadline for a 2nd or better, but another rule of thumb for KD is that he should not be making trades based on POSSIBLE future transactions. If it's a cap dump you pay for it, if you don't want to pay for it, find another team or keep the contract. I don't care how many goals Palmieri has this year, he will be 34 next year, is very expensive, won't put up those kinds of points on a bottom team, and likely won't garner any interest at the deadline. He has been in decline for years, one year isn't going to change that trajectory, only he can change that trajectory and I wouldn't bet on that happening. So, again, pay for him like a cap dump or find someone else. We aren't handing other teams $5M in cap space for what essentially amounts to nothing.</div></div>

Jason Zucker was worth a 6th at the deadline. He had 9 goals when he was traded, and has only had one good season in the last four years. If he's not a negative asset then neither is Palmieri. Chicago doesn't make sense as a destination, but Palms is not a straight cap dump.
Forum: Armchair-GM21 mars à 8 h 50
Sujet: reset for roy
Palmieri is not a cap dump. At the deadline, Arizona got a 6th for Zucker who is 1) having a bad season (11 goals to Palmieri's 22) and 2) more expensive than Palms. I don't think they'll get much for Palms, but a one year rental on a cheap contract should be easily movable. I'd look at Toffoli as a comp - one year of him at $4.25MM was worth a 3rd and a good young roster player (Sharangovich). Palms is not going to be coming off as good a season as Toffoli was, so he won't return a package that good, but a 3rd or a 4th without the player seems reasonable.

I agree with the Hawks fans who don't want to pay for him though; he doesn't make sense for a rebuilding team. He'd only make sense for a playoff team that was looking for some secondary scoring with no long-term commitment required.
Forum: Armchair-GM18 mars à 12 h 38
Sujet: step back and retool
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Snowhawk18</b></div><div>Palmeiri has 21 and counting playing with the likes of Barzal, Horvat, Nelson, Pageau, Lee and Dobson, in Chicago he will be playing with potentially Bedard and hopefully Hall if he comes back healthy. Also, prior to this season Palmeiri had back to back 33 point seasons and didn’t eclipse 20 goals either year, so is this season an anomaly? Players typically don’t get better in their mid 30s.

For the Hawks it is all about team building right now, why invest $5m in a 33 year old winger who can walk at the end of next season? Under this proposal, acquiring Palmeiri would be all about hoping he has another season similar to this year while playing with a less talented roster just so he can be dealt next TDL for a good return… that’s a fool’s bet or moronic as you would put it.

It makes more sense for the Hawks to get their return for acquiring Palmeiri now and then anything they might potentially get at the 2025 TDL is a bonus. If the Islanders don’t like that they can go find a true moron to do business with… I would suggest Grier in San Jose, they guy is clueless.</div></div>

Then Chicago shouldn't trade for him, but to call him a cap dump that the Isles would have to pay to move is just dumb.
Forum: Armchair-GM18 mars à 12 h 37
Sujet: step back and retool
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Garak</b></div><div>They actually are very comparable for multiple reasons. They are forwards with a history of high end play at the NHL level, are about the same age, declining, at a similar point in their career, are overpaid, both struggled to play a full season in recent years, and more importantly, the Isles are going to need the cap space. If the Isles aren't served well keeping him around at that cap hit, why would a bunch of cap strapped teams trade valuable assets for one year of a 34 year old with a $5M cap hit based on one decent season? When you look at his body of work in recent years, i'd bet on him dropping off significantly next year, especially joining a new team. Raddysh scored 20 goals last year, is 25 years old, PK's, is on a less than league minimum contract, and no one was willing to pay anything significant for him. He also played like garbage this year, albeit, on a severely depleted Blackhawks roster, but that would've been a much safer bet, yet no one made it.

Again, if the Isles can get something for him, good for them. But, there is a clear reason why Snowhawk used Bailey as a comp. I would bet that the Isles will have to pay to move him if they decide they need to move his contract, and if they do get something for him, it will be very minimal and might even require retention, which is something NYI would probably like to avoid.</div></div>

You have to combine Bailey's last two seasons together to get to as many goals as Palmieri already has this season. Comparing the two is like apples and socket wrenches. Arizona got a 6th for Zucker at the deadline and has half as many goals as Palmieri and a higher cap hit. Like I said, they're not going to get a haul for Palms if they move him, but they absolutely will not need to pay someone to take him.