PARAMÈTRES D’AFFICHAGE
Basculer en mode sombre
Thème automatique
COTES DES PARIS
Cotes activées
LANGUE
EN
SE CONNECTER
S'INSCRIRE
FORUMS
ARCHIVES ▾
ARCHIVES
Masses salariales des années antérieures
(Premium)
Articles
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2017 - Vegas
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2021 - Seattle
CBA ▾
CBA
FAQ - Convention collective
FAQ - Rapports de dépistage
Historique des masses salariales
Rémunération maximale du contrat d’entrée
FAQ - Liste des blessés à long terme
FAQ - Rachats de contrat
FAQ - Offre Hostile
FAQ - Ballottage
FAQ - Liste de réserve
FAQ - Repêchage d'expansion
COTES
19
DÉPISTAGE
CALCS ▾
CALCS
Calculateur de rachat de contrat
Calculateur de ballottage
Calculateur d’offre qualificative
Calculateur d’arbitrage
Calculateur d'offre hostile
Calculateur d'impôt sur le revenu
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY ▾
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY
Sommaire
Alignements détaillés
Gardiens partants
Mises à jour - Statuts des joueurs
Historique des blessures
OUTILS ▾
OUTILS
Tableau de repêchage
Comparables de contrats
Équipes affiliées
Essais professionnels
Joueurs - Liste de réserve
(Premium)
Suivi des dépenses salariales
(Premium)
Rapports de dépistage
Cas d’arbitrage
Entraîneurs
Directeurs généraux
Joueurs appartenant à la formation au moment du gel - COVID
Clauses d'échange entrant en vigueur
(Premium)
JOUEURS ▾
JOUEURS
Joueurs autonomes
Joueurs actifs
Joueurs inactifs
Contrats 35 ans et +
Contrats d’entrée
Reports du contrat d'entrée
NTC-NMC
Gains en carrière
Comparables de contrats
Essais professionnels
Rapports de dépistage
Coût par point
Coût par arrêt
Transactions
Signatures
Mouvements de personnel
Historique des blessures
Historique du ballottage
Salaire retenu
Historique des rachats de contrat
ÉQUIPES ▾
CONFÉRENCE DE L'OUEST
PACIFIQUE
Ducks d'Anaheim
Flames de Calgary
Oilers d'Edmonton
Kings de Los Angeles
Sharks de San Jose
Kraken de Seattle
Canucks de Vancouver
Golden Knights de Vegas
CENTRALE
Coyotes de l'Arizona
Blackhawks de Chicago
Avalanche du Colorado
Stars de Dallas
Wild du Minnesota
Predators de Nashville
Blues de St-Louis
Jets de Winnipeg
CONFÉRENCE DE L'EST
MÉTROPOLITAINE
Hurricanes de la Caroline
Blue Jackets de Columbus
Devils du New Jersey
Islanders de New York
Rangers de New York
Flyers de Philadelphie
Penguins de Pittsburgh
Capitals de Washington
ATLANTIQUE
Bruins de Boston
Sabres de Buffalo
Red Wings de Detroit
Panthers de la Floride
Canadiens de Montréal
Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Lightning de Tampa Bay
Maple Leafs de Toronto
INTERACTIF ▾
OUTILS INTERACTIFS
Fauteuil - DG (Simulateur de formation personnalisée)
Repêchage simulé
Simulateur de transactions (propositions de transactions)
RECHERCHER
FAUTEUIL - DG
REPÊCHAGE SIMULÉ
SIMULATEUR DE TRANSACTIONS
ÉQUIPES ▾
Ducks d'Anaheim
Coyotes de l'Arizona
Bruins de Boston
Sabres de Buffalo
Flames de Calgary
Hurricanes de la Caroline
Blackhawks de Chicago
Avalanche du Colorado
Blue Jackets de Columbus
Stars de Dallas
Red Wings de Detroit
Oilers d'Edmonton
Panthers de la Floride
Kings de Los Angeles
Wild du Minnesota
Canadiens de Montréal
Predators de Nashville
Devils du New Jersey
Islanders de New York
Rangers de New York
Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Flyers de Philadelphie
Penguins de Pittsburgh
Sharks de San Jose
Kraken de Seattle
Blues de St-Louis
Lightning de Tampa Bay
Maple Leafs de Toronto
Canucks de Vancouver
Golden Knights de Vegas
Capitals de Washington
Jets de Winnipeg
JOUEURS ▾
Joueurs autonomes
Joueurs actifs
Joueurs inactifs
Contrats 35 ans et +
Contrats d’entrée
Reports du contrat d'entrée
NTC-NMC
Gains en carrière
Rapports de dépistage
Coût par point
Coût par arrêt
Transactions
Signatures
Mouvements de personnel
Historique des blessures
Historique du ballottage
Salaire retenu
Historique des rachats de contrat
Comparables de contrats
Essais professionnels
OUTILS ▾
Tableau de repêchage
Comparables de contrats
Rapports de dépistage
Cas d’arbitrage
Essais professionnels
Entraîneurs
Directeurs généraux
Joueurs appartenant à la formation au moment du gel - COVID
Joueurs - Liste de réserve
(Premium)
Suivi des dépenses salariales
(Premium)
Clauses d'échange entrant en vigueur
(Premium)
Équipes affiliées
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY ▾
Sommaire
Alignements détaillés
Gardiens partants
Mises à jour - Statuts des joueurs
CALCS ▾
Calculateur de rachat de contrat
Calculateur de ballottage
Calculateur d’offre qualificative
Calculateur d’arbitrage
Calculateur d'offre hostile
Calculateur d'impôt sur le revenu
RAPPORTS DE DÉPISTAGE
COTES
CBA▾
FAQ - Convention collective
FAQ - Rapports de dépistage
Historique des masses salariales
Rémunération maximale du contrat d’entrée
FAQ - Rachats de contrat
FAQ - Liste des blessés à long terme
FAQ - Offre Hostile
FAQ - Ballottage
FAQ - Liste de réserve
FAQ - Repêchage d'expansion
ARCHIVES ▾
Masses salariales des années antérieures
(Premium)
Articles
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2017 - Vegas
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2021 - Seattle
FORUMS
SE CONNECTER
S'INSCRIRE
EN
Basculer en mode sombre
Cotes activées
iAce
Membre depuis
24 mai 2021
Équipe favorite
Wild du Minnesota
Deuxième équipe favorite
Golden Knights de Vegas
Messages dans les forums
166
Messages par jour
0.2
MESSAGES
SUJETS
MENTIONS "J'AIME"
ÉQUIPES VIA FAUTEUIL-DG
Forum:
Armchair-GM
21 mars à 18 h 7
Sujet:
Version 2
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>mokumboi</b></div><div>No, I was referring to Zucc.</div></div>
Gotcha, he's got another 2 years after this at $4 mill/year. Pretty low for a 70+ point producer. I get the age piece tho. Fair concern, he just hasn't slowed down here. Because of his passing I don't think that takes as much of a decline as other players.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
21 mars à 18 h 5
Sujet:
Version 2
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>DFinn91</b></div><div>It simply comes down to if the Sharks are giving up a potential elite 1C at the start of his career then they need an elite young player at a premium position coming back in return. Rossi is good but he’s probably not going to be an elite 1C. Those picks you included will get you good prospects, but again the likelihood of them turning into truly elite players is low.
The player that fits the bill is Faber. He’s only 21, so even though the Sharks are a few years away from contention he’s still young enough to be in his prime on the next good Sharks team.</div></div>
Honestly, I would probably be more open to trading Boldy than Faber. Just because we have a few wingers coming up that may be able to replace Boldy. Ohgren and Yurov are supposed to be pretty good. I would counter with that but you don't get as many picks back probably.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
21 mars à 18 h 3
Sujet:
Version 2
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>aadoyle</b></div><div>NTU would rather have the rookie than a 34 soon 35 year old Dman</div></div>
I would agree in most cases, but the two things that came to my mind when doing that trade was cap space vs production. The fact you guys have no RD that plays at the level Spurgeon does. The window for Toronto is closing with each season. You have 4 super star forwards and aren't competing for the cup. I root for you each year the Wild get bounced in the First Round. Knies could fit in a young version of the Wild on a second line with Ek who plays a similar game to him. We retained salary for you to build out that roster over the next 3 years and win a championship. Spurgeon would be close to Reilly for you guys. He's been a star with us. Once again, the only reason we trade him is our window isn't in the next 2 years as we have $15 mill in dead cap space. Why waste his talents. He will be 35 when we try to start competing. Why would you want 18 year olds on Toronto when you are competing for a Cup? You're probably right, but it's an Arm-Chair GM, I make swings that try to better both teams.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
21 mars à 17 h 55
Sujet:
Version 2
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>mokumboi</b></div><div>For starters, you need to use a 24-25 template. The 23-24 template no longer applies as the trade deadline has passed.
Just as important, nobody is giving you top prospects already contributing in the NHL for old,expensive UFAs. That's just pure fantasy.</div></div>
Thank you for the feedback. I'll change that moving forward. I'm guessing you are referring to the Spurgeon deal? Or what deal were you referring to? I didn't trade UFA's. Each player has term left on their deal.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
21 mars à 17 h 53
Sujet:
Version 2
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Rags21</b></div><div>That doesn’t get you Schneider</div></div>
What does? He plays 3rd pairing D on a stacked d-core. He doesn't have stats that pop out to you. I don't look at points because that wouldn't be fair. I targeted him because he is young, could play behind Faber on a 2nd pairing and replace Spurgeon. In giving up Zucc, we are giving up a point per game player over the past 3 years. He is on a reasonable $4 million dollar contract for the next 2 years and has played for you in the past. I could see him fitting in very well and boosting that 2nd line and helping you guys in the playoffs. Only reason I consider moving Zucc on a team friendly deals, is because of his age and our window isn't the next 2 years. Idk, maybe you guys love his game, I look at how the Penguins ran their franchise for almost 20 years with Crosby. Why keep picks or prospects if you can go get proven results. If this trade went though, and you won a cup. How would you feel?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
21 mars à 17 h 46
Sujet:
Version 2
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>glarson17</b></div><div>I just don’t see San Jose moving their possible 1st ever 1st overall, especially when the pick would be a kid who was a previous Jr shark and he’s the consensus top player in the draft</div></div>
You are probably right! I just wanted to throw a trade out there and see reactions. That pick never moves so it's very much a hypothetical. I'm rooting for you guys to get that pick and not Chicago. I just can't stand they get everything after the bull**** that happened there.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
21 mars à 17 h 44
Sujet:
Version 2
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Rob32sjsharks</b></div><div>Sharks need a #1 C after trading Hertl so as reasonable as this deal is I think we have to say no.</div></div>
Thats fair. What was the reaction for Shark Fans? I was shocked when that deal went though. I thought the return should have been more, Hertl is a big time player, one I wanted the Wild to go after but we have no space to sign anyone. I just got done ranting on trading this pick so I won't bore people with another. It will be interesting to see how the Sharks rebuild and the direction of the club. I'm always rooting for Addison, he never got a fair shake here in Minnesota.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
21 mars à 17 h 40
Sujet:
Version 2
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>DFinn91</b></div><div>Sharks would want Faber if they’re giving up the Celebrini pick.</div></div>
Thats fair, I think he may be the most untouchable piece on our roster. I have a question for you and other fans. What is your window, or how long until this roster actually gets really good? For example, because the Wild are minus $15 mill in cap space, our window couldn't begin for another 2 years. Thats why I would move a guy like Zucc. I see the Sharks window being 3-5 years away, maybe a bit longer. Because of that, I don't think Faber would help a ton for the next 3 years. If you were to trade back this year and get a potential 1-2c and is young, with 2 first round picks. In 3-5 years Rossi is still 25-27 and is in his prime. You get 2 first rounders on top of it to get other talented pieces. I think you are right though, my brain just goes to what that pick will do for you guys. Pick Celebrini, let him sit in the NCAA another year, hopefully start building a roster out for protect him. He isn't Bedard where he was a lock to be a star. If he doesn't pan out to be that guy, you are even further back from being competitive. And if you can't surround him with talent he doesn't develop properly. Just my thoughts and rants. But ultimately that pick doesn't move and you guys get an exciting piece for the future!
Forum:
Armchair-GM
21 mars à 17 h 33
Sujet:
Version 2
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Tbrew</b></div><div>These are solid. Zuccarello is an upgrade the rangers need at forward and the value is maybe slightly skewed to Minny there.
Spurgeon is the guy the leafs keep thinking they’re trading for when they’re sending mid rounders for Lynushkin types. No way they do something that smart
The sharks move is probably the only one that’s off, and that’s only because no one really knows what the value of 1OA is in a trade anymore. That said, it’s closer than Josh Anderson for 1OA that we’re seeing here lmao</div></div>
I've been taking a lot of heat for the trades I've put out. I try to keep both teams in mind when making a trade. I don't think Knies ceiling is as high as I want. He was a gopher and I'm a big fan. But he hardly produces on a line with Matthews, you basically walk into points on his line. I think he could be an effective 2nd line producer and have a very successful career. My thought was to get Spurgeon on a contender and still have 3-4 good years left. Retain salary so they can make other moves to round out their roster. With this direction the Wild could afford it and get a guy I think would fit in well on a line with Ek.
I'm not as high on Schneider as the Ranger fans are. I get the not wanting to take Zucc but he solves their problems for the next 2 years and have other assets to trade to round out that team. Kappo could be a valuable piece to move to potentially get a decent return. It's less than Ranger fans think. But with their current d-core, I see Schneider being expendable. With the current roster they could be contenders with someone like Zucc on that 2nd line drivng plays. He just doesn't fit our window.
I get the 1st overall hate. No one trades that pick. I'll take the heat but BG needs to get aggressive. Rossi is having a huge year and one we all wish came sooner. The only reason I want to take a swing is for a player that could be a Top 5 center in the league instead of Top 15 potentially. The odds are Minnesota sucks the rest of the season as we just got blown out, we pick 10th and get lucky to get Buium to go next to Faber. And the years just keep going by. If I was GM I would take a massive swing.
Thanks for the post and having a convo around some trades. I always enjoy hearing different perspectives!
Forum:
Armchair-GM
6 févr. à 20 h 10
Sujet:
Wild Idea
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>dgibb10</b></div><div>I expect holtz to be in our top 6 for the next half decade or decade.
Personally I wouldn’t give more than FC for fleury. He’s like 40 and been pretty bad. And has a full NMC. Seems like it would just being doing Minnesota a favour getting them out of needing LTIR and clearing a space for Wallstedt.
I’m not a fan of that long term contract on foligno as well</div></div>
Thats fair on Holtz. In terms of Fleury, it's his last season on the contract, cap isn't an issue. Wallstedt will come up next season although our AHL team is trash. It makes sense to have him up here and away from that situation. I don't disagree with the Foligno take. I don't love the term, but the AAV isn't an issue for me. He's been a huge part of our chemistry and success here. He's an Assistant captain and usually stands up for the team. He's much more appreciated in the playoffs. But the Wild need to retool so he could be a casualty.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
6 févr. à 18 h 22
Sujet:
Destroying Guerins Trash
These are so bad for us. I don't mind the players moving out but the returns just don't fit what the team is doing or realistic. You want to take back Campbell's contract without a massive overpay? Some insiders were saying it would take almost 2 first rounders for another team to eat that contract. He's been unplayable and has even been bad in the AHL. That trade is the worst trade of them all. I think we could find better returns, otherwise not too shabby of an idea
Forum:
Armchair-GM
6 févr. à 18 h 16
Sujet:
Wild Idea
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>dgibb10</b></div><div>Wild overpay on the Minnesota deal</div></div>
Breaking this down as a Wild fan. I agree this is an overpay. Middleton will require an overpay to obtain him and he is better than a 3rd pairing d. He could play number 1 minutes and has for us. Foligno just signed to stay here, but he is a playoff type guy. Is gritty and has found his offensive touch here the past few weeks. Fleury is a wildcard. He would have to consider and ask for the move. We love him here and he's showing better than a back up. If a team's starter has been slumping, I could see him carrying a team in the playoffs. I would expect a deal to look like this:
Fleury - a conditional pick. Is a 3rd but if the team reaches the ECF's it turns into a 2nd. Something along the lines. Maybe not a 3rd but some kind of condition to the pick.
Foligno - if he approves a move. his cap hit is fair, I could see a 2nd and mid level prospect as a return.
Middleton - overpayment, a 1st and low level prospect/NHLer
I'll be honest, I haven't watched much of the Devils this season. I got a bit burned out with the Fiala to Devils drama a few years back. Is Holtz the player you guys thought he would be? He's still young but if you traded him and got a player that is there and helps you win playoff series, would that be a massive issue? What are the expectations of the fan base right now and in the next 3 years?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
6 févr. à 18 h 5
Sujet:
Sorry Not Sorry
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Caerii</b></div><div>Minnesota's pretty much through the buyouts at this point. The time for futures was a couple years ago. Now the only way they trade Kaprizov is if he decides he won't re-sign. Minnesota needs young, NHL ready players to grow with the rest of the core- Boldy, Rossi, Faber, Yurov, Wallstedt, etc.</div></div>
I agree. I think this type of return makes sense if BG has been told Kaprizov wants to move on from Minnesota. If this type of trade landed us the number 1 pick and we were picking say, 3rd overall for our own pick, I could see that making sense. We get Celebrini and Eiserman with an exciting future. But the trade right now doesn't make sense. I don't think you were far off in terms of value. It's a super star that is happy at the moment in a state where we haven't had super stars. Fans will get touchy on this type of move. But I think it's pretty fair and realistic. Also, his NTC starts this summer.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
6 févr. à 17 h 54
Sujet:
My only targets
I like the post format. Show the player you're interested in and see what the asking price is. Spurgeon is out for the season, he has been hampered by an injury all season. He has a 10 team no trade clause that kicks in during the summer. He's a great player in the regular season. The Wild haven't had much playoff success so his numbers fall off there. What is your offer or what is your logic to an offer? The Wild need defensive prospects on both sides, center ice is still a question mark a bit and the next spot we would want to fill is on the right wing. In terms of picks, anything will help us as I imagine we are going to finish in the bottom 5-7 of the league this year. Love to see what you come back with!
Forum:
Armchair-GM
4 févr. à 21 h 46
Sujet:
big moves
That Faber deal is so bad! That is no where near enough to get Faber from the hometown club. No firsts, low level prospects. Billy G easily hangs up the phone and probably doesn't answer you for awhile. A deal would easily include Knies, Multiple 1sts and that gets you in the ball park. This does absolutely nothing for the Wild.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
23 déc. 2023 à 21 h 22
Sujet:
Devils
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>dgibb10</b></div><div>Vanacek probably only costs a 3rd to dump bc of his age and previous play but he’s certainly a dump.
1st+Vanacek+3rd+2nd for Gus would be an offer tho</div></div>
That probably still isn't enough to get GusBus. It's going to be a late round 1st and 3rd. I don't hate the package, it just doesn't do much for us now. And the pick has to hit for us to break even. I'd rather get a prospect we like in return rather than a late 1st.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
22 déc. 2023 à 18 h 17
Sujet:
Pretty Wild
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Anus_McLeod</b></div><div>I agree that Minnesota wouldn't move Ek and also agree that the fit isn't there. My main point is that Colorado won't be moving that type of package.
I guess my frustration came through with the Eichel comment. That was kinda dumb in retrospect. But like I said, seeing Avs fans trade Byram, a first, etc has struck a nerve. The team isn't paying that kind of price.</div></div>
I don't think they need to trade him. I think a younger 2c that is a bit more dynamic would be beneficial. But the AVs are loaded. I haven't watched many Avs games this year. Getting Landy back next year will provide a huge boost to this team. Thats a massive piece and identity piece to your org.
But the Wild need a few KEY bad season to really make the jump. Imagine Celebrini with Kaprizov and Boldy. Rossi on the 2nd line and Ekkers as the most elite number 3c in history. That changes things quite a bit. I think the Wild need 2-3 more key pieces before they really contend. I would rather see it through the draft.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
22 déc. 2023 à 18 h 1
Sujet:
Ek-cellent
This trade does not happen. It's an Arm-Chair GM so lets play the game. The Avs don't fit because the Wild don't have great center depth. Taking our number 1 for a Top 4 defensemen just doesn't work. Brodin is hurt and will be our number 1 when healthy. A center prospect needs to be coming back or this team needs to commit to being bad for 2-3 years. Which BG has shown no interest in. I think we should be tanking this year. Best case this team makes the playoffs, we hold no threat in the playoffs as currently constructed so we might as well rebuild/add top tier prospects to this org.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
22 déc. 2023 à 17 h 54
Sujet:
Pretty Wild
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Anus_McLeod</b></div><div>Nope, the Wild don't need to do anything they dont want to. But Colorado isn't paying that.
Byram has had a rough road so far, but he's still likely going to be a cornerstone for the next decade. The way his value has tanked on this site is crazy. And Avs fans trading him in every post is getting on my nerves.</div></div>
I can agree with Byram's value dropping. I don't think it should, but health is a big part of making a trade. He's a hell of a player and talent. I don't think the fit is right and really the Wild wouldn't want to move on from Ekkers. Hes been big for us and is playing well with Kap and Boldy. For any team to get Ek, it would take a monumental over pay and for a division rival, even more.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
21 déc. 2023 à 21 h 19
Sujet:
Pretty Wild
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Anus_McLeod</b></div><div>Plus plus doesn't matter. What matter is thinking the Avs still need to add after including Byram and a first. That's already too much. And if that's the ask, move on and look elsewhere.</div></div>
So the Wild need to trade their no 1 center to the Avs for a Defensemen that misses significant time each year. A late 1st rounder is the main piece in 2 years. A 2nd in 3 years. Tufte that has played 18 NHL games. And a prospect that is averaging .33-.5 points per game in the AHL. This is the type of return Ek gets on an amazing contract for the next 5+ years? If thats the case, we got lots of goodies for MacKinnon. And this trade doesn't compare to what Eichel and Eichel was going to have a very controversial surgery that hasn't been seen in the NHL. There was talk he might only be 75% of what he was.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
21 déc. 2023 à 11 h 23
Sujet:
Playoff roster
These Ek deals are so bad. How about Mac for a 6th. Ek also has like 6 years left on his deal so retaining on a 6 year contract is not going to happen. It's not just this trade but all trades are quite back. We don't value RJ and Byram would be ok. Our Top 4 on the Right side are Faber who is more valuable than Byram and our Captain Spurgeon. So unless the Wild plan on dealing their Captain this fit doesn't work. We also don't have depth down the middle so it would take quite a bit of an overpayment to consider a move like this.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
21 nov. 2023 à 10 h 36
Sujet:
defence possitbility
No way Minnesota even considers this deal. The return would probably piss Leaf's fan off.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
30 oct. 2023 à 19 h 52
Sujet:
In the name of Research
I love these posts! Teams trying to get creative and we get to have a conversation about it. Realistically Wallstedt doesn't move without a pretty big overpayment. A few things come into play here. First, Minnesota has beyond zero cap space. Dumb but the reality. This means Wallstedt is pretty important moving forward for us because we got this year plus 2 more years of this cap hell. Lastly, what do we need? Center has been our weak point, but Rossi looks to be a player which changes things a bit. Sorry for the rant but this trade gets tricky.
I think the Wild want top end talent. So quality over quantity. Both Hughes are off limits. Hischier is probably close to that. My thoughts are Holtz, Mercer, Nemec and first rounders are the pool to pick from.
Holtz - Can he be a consistent player and can he reach 90% of what people think he can be? I don't know much about this player but I know he was untouchable for Fiala a year and a half ago. Now it feels like he lost some luster. Looking at future lines for the Wild, I see Kaprizov and Boldy on that top line. So could Holtz be the driver on a second line with Ek or Rossi?
Mercer - Not sure where he fits in with the current lineup. Not saying he wouldn't get the respect to make room. But Hartman and Ek seem to be locked in at the 1/2c. Rossi has been locked in at 3c and looks great so far this year. So maybe Mercer slides to the wing. I could see him taking JoJo's spot with Boldy and Ek. Not sure if I love this move on its own. But could be a start of a trade.
Nemec - I think the fit ans timing isn't there for the Wild without a Spurgeon trade. Spurgeon is locked up for 3 more years after this one. And Faber is looking like a beast.
So back to what does a trade look like. I think Holtz and a First maybe a bit more. Holtz have some question marks currently but out of the 3 options he would have to be the one unless the Wild can swing a Spurgeon trade that benefits us. Ultimately no trade happens with Wallstedt and we see if he will be as good as advertised. Great post
Forum:
Armchair-GM
22 juin 2023 à 12 h 24
Sujet:
Future Considerations
Wild hang up
Forum:
Armchair-GM
22 juin 2023 à 11 h 54
Sujet:
Cooley
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>MNBassman</b></div><div>Oh come on! I’m a huge Gopher AND Cooley fan. I guarantee I am more familiar with his game than 99% of people here…
He is definitely not worth 2 Rossis, 2 Addisons, and 2 1st round picks.</div></div>
It cracks me up when people talk about a top 2 pick being worth the world. Take this trade that was debated on Skor North a few days ago. Kaprizov for Bedard. Would you do it? First off it wouldn't be offered that way. Second, like Lafreniere, there is a bust factor to these kids. Not calling Bedard a bust but picks don't equal players. The second overall isn't worth Kaprizov because Fantilli may never pan out to equal Kaprizov production. I can't stand doing trades on here because there's too much uncertainty. Was Kevin Fiala worth the number 2 last year? Probably. We don't know what Nemec will be but Fiala's production probably outweighs most prospects out there. Just my 2 cents
1
2
Suivant
Page 1
Remerciements à
Guillaume Lambert-Héon
pour l'aide à la traduction de l'anglais au français
SalarySwish
| Masses salariales de la NBA par CapFriendly
Conditions d’utilisation
Politique de confidentialité
Règlements du forum
À propos de nous
FAQ - Convention collective
Nous contacter
Privacy Manager
Follow @CapFriendly
CapFriendly
CapFriendly
© 2024 CapFriendly.com