PARAMÈTRES D’AFFICHAGE
Basculer en mode sombre
Thème automatique
COTES DES PARIS
Cotes activées
LANGUE
EN
SE CONNECTER
S'INSCRIRE
FORUMS
ARCHIVES ▾
ARCHIVES
Masses salariales des années antérieures
(Premium)
Articles
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2017 - Vegas
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2021 - Seattle
CBA ▾
CBA
FAQ - Convention collective
FAQ - Rapports de dépistage
Historique des masses salariales
Rémunération maximale du contrat d’entrée
FAQ - Liste des blessés à long terme
FAQ - Rachats de contrat
FAQ - Offre Hostile
FAQ - Ballottage
FAQ - Liste de réserve
FAQ - Repêchage d'expansion
COTES
19
DÉPISTAGE
CALCS ▾
CALCS
Calculateur de rachat de contrat
Calculateur de ballottage
Calculateur d’offre qualificative
Calculateur d’arbitrage
Calculateur d'offre hostile
Calculateur d'impôt sur le revenu
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY ▾
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY
Sommaire
Alignements détaillés
Gardiens partants
Mises à jour - Statuts des joueurs
Historique des blessures
OUTILS ▾
OUTILS
Tableau de repêchage
Comparables de contrats
Équipes affiliées
Essais professionnels
Joueurs - Liste de réserve
(Premium)
Suivi des dépenses salariales
(Premium)
Rapports de dépistage
Cas d’arbitrage
Entraîneurs
Directeurs généraux
Joueurs appartenant à la formation au moment du gel - COVID
Clauses d'échange entrant en vigueur
(Premium)
JOUEURS ▾
JOUEURS
Joueurs autonomes
Joueurs actifs
Joueurs inactifs
Contrats 35 ans et +
Contrats d’entrée
Reports du contrat d'entrée
NTC-NMC
Gains en carrière
Comparables de contrats
Essais professionnels
Rapports de dépistage
Coût par point
Coût par arrêt
Transactions
Signatures
Mouvements de personnel
Historique des blessures
Historique du ballottage
Salaire retenu
Historique des rachats de contrat
ÉQUIPES ▾
CONFÉRENCE DE L'OUEST
PACIFIQUE
Ducks d'Anaheim
Flames de Calgary
Oilers d'Edmonton
Kings de Los Angeles
Sharks de San Jose
Kraken de Seattle
Canucks de Vancouver
Golden Knights de Vegas
CENTRALE
Coyotes de l'Arizona
Blackhawks de Chicago
Avalanche du Colorado
Stars de Dallas
Wild du Minnesota
Predators de Nashville
Blues de St-Louis
Jets de Winnipeg
CONFÉRENCE DE L'EST
MÉTROPOLITAINE
Hurricanes de la Caroline
Blue Jackets de Columbus
Devils du New Jersey
Islanders de New York
Rangers de New York
Flyers de Philadelphie
Penguins de Pittsburgh
Capitals de Washington
ATLANTIQUE
Bruins de Boston
Sabres de Buffalo
Red Wings de Detroit
Panthers de la Floride
Canadiens de Montréal
Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Lightning de Tampa Bay
Maple Leafs de Toronto
INTERACTIF ▾
OUTILS INTERACTIFS
Fauteuil - DG (Simulateur de formation personnalisée)
Repêchage simulé
Simulateur de transactions (propositions de transactions)
RECHERCHER
FAUTEUIL - DG
REPÊCHAGE SIMULÉ
SIMULATEUR DE TRANSACTIONS
ÉQUIPES ▾
Ducks d'Anaheim
Coyotes de l'Arizona
Bruins de Boston
Sabres de Buffalo
Flames de Calgary
Hurricanes de la Caroline
Blackhawks de Chicago
Avalanche du Colorado
Blue Jackets de Columbus
Stars de Dallas
Red Wings de Detroit
Oilers d'Edmonton
Panthers de la Floride
Kings de Los Angeles
Wild du Minnesota
Canadiens de Montréal
Predators de Nashville
Devils du New Jersey
Islanders de New York
Rangers de New York
Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Flyers de Philadelphie
Penguins de Pittsburgh
Sharks de San Jose
Kraken de Seattle
Blues de St-Louis
Lightning de Tampa Bay
Maple Leafs de Toronto
Canucks de Vancouver
Golden Knights de Vegas
Capitals de Washington
Jets de Winnipeg
JOUEURS ▾
Joueurs autonomes
Joueurs actifs
Joueurs inactifs
Contrats 35 ans et +
Contrats d’entrée
Reports du contrat d'entrée
NTC-NMC
Gains en carrière
Rapports de dépistage
Coût par point
Coût par arrêt
Transactions
Signatures
Mouvements de personnel
Historique des blessures
Historique du ballottage
Salaire retenu
Historique des rachats de contrat
Comparables de contrats
Essais professionnels
OUTILS ▾
Tableau de repêchage
Comparables de contrats
Rapports de dépistage
Cas d’arbitrage
Essais professionnels
Entraîneurs
Directeurs généraux
Joueurs appartenant à la formation au moment du gel - COVID
Joueurs - Liste de réserve
(Premium)
Suivi des dépenses salariales
(Premium)
Clauses d'échange entrant en vigueur
(Premium)
Équipes affiliées
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY ▾
Sommaire
Alignements détaillés
Gardiens partants
Mises à jour - Statuts des joueurs
CALCS ▾
Calculateur de rachat de contrat
Calculateur de ballottage
Calculateur d’offre qualificative
Calculateur d’arbitrage
Calculateur d'offre hostile
Calculateur d'impôt sur le revenu
RAPPORTS DE DÉPISTAGE
COTES
CBA▾
FAQ - Convention collective
FAQ - Rapports de dépistage
Historique des masses salariales
Rémunération maximale du contrat d’entrée
FAQ - Rachats de contrat
FAQ - Liste des blessés à long terme
FAQ - Offre Hostile
FAQ - Ballottage
FAQ - Liste de réserve
FAQ - Repêchage d'expansion
ARCHIVES ▾
Masses salariales des années antérieures
(Premium)
Articles
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2017 - Vegas
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2021 - Seattle
FORUMS
SE CONNECTER
S'INSCRIRE
EN
Basculer en mode sombre
Cotes activées
bigbrit93
bigbrit93
Membre depuis
18 oct. 2016
Équipe favorite
Bruins de Boston
Deuxième équipe favorite
Sharks de San Jose
Messages dans les forums
314
Messages par jour
0.1
MESSAGES
SUJETS
MENTIONS "J'AIME"
ÉQUIPES VIA FAUTEUIL-DG
Forum:
Armchair-GM
27 janv. 2022 à 18 h 46
Sujet:
Final Chance for a Run
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Snowball</b></div><div>
But still dont like the third pair, and honestly don’t think cliffy is the answer with forbort or Reilly on the LD. I honestly don’t have a potential target to throw out there without doing some looking but can’t imagine the cost being overly exspensive for bottom pair reliable RD</div></div>
A guy I was thinking of is Hakanpaa at Dallas. He's a big man (6'6", 220) who hits a whole lot. Him and Forbert could be a nice 3rd pair to just beat up opponents, but that means losing out on Reilly's puck moving ability. With the mock here, I felt the 3rd pair gave the same sort of dual zone abilities as Carlo and Gryz. One guy is offensively gifted and the other is a big defense-first guy. But Hakanpaa just signed with Dallas this offseason so I don't know if there's any willingness to trade.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
27 janv. 2022 à 16 h 56
Sujet:
Final Chance for a Run
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Snowball</b></div><div>Personally I’d put sweeny’s 2021 disgrace, I mean foligno down to the 4th, keep coyle at 3C with haula and steen on the sides if this was to happen.
But do you really see that being enough to win a cup? 2 very dangerous lines, one third line that got great puck possession skills and 4th line grinder? Possible
But the d is where it gets little sketchy, top pair , idk if there’s a better defense in the league to be honest, but after that defense becomes a liability, probably better off to honestly swap Grez and chychrun, let run and Mac shifts overlap here and there to get ice time where it needs to be for both, but then that third pair is kinda sketchy, would really like to see one of forbort or Reilly moved for decent cheap 3 RD rental</div></div>
I think Foligno could ply anywhere on that bottom 6 depending on chemistry. He definitely hasn't been the player I thought the Bs were getting but think his value is still there for either line. I debated on Chychrun being with McAvoy or Carlo, but ultimately went top pair. Gryz and Carlo have proven that they work very well together so I wouldn't hesitate to keep them together.
Overall I think this team would compete strongly for the cup. Our last few playoffs have been one dangerous line that can score, one possession heavy line with some offense (Krecji) and then 2 energy/grinder lines. This team immediately goes in with a top 6 that is filled with scoring playmakers which the Bs desperately needed the last few years. Once team shut down March-Bergy-Pasta the team grinded to a halt. Giroux centering Hall and Pasta means teams have to very much worry about more than just one line.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
27 janv. 2022 à 16 h 33
Sujet:
Final Chance for a Run
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>CMcAvoy73</b></div><div>Capfriendly accounts for proration. Over the cap, move zboril to LTIR and you’re close.</div></div>
Oh I didn't think Capfriendly did account for it in the past. So yeah, Zboril to LTIR and maybe another person sent the other way in the trade and it'd work out.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
26 juill. 2021 à 13 h 59
Sujet:
Offseason
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Gofnut999</b></div><div>Really solid.
Craig Anderson retired</div></div>
Haha well that's on me. I missed that news
Forum:
Armchair-GM
14 juill. 2021 à 14 h 24
Sujet:
Carlo Locked Up
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Xolie</b></div><div>I agree. Suter has declined out of a top 4 position in my opinion, and his veteran presence would help Clifton, who is still young, the role modeling would help him maybe become more of a 2nd pair defenseman later in his career.</div></div>
Yeah Suter is definitely declining, but has still shown he can eat minutes and drive play offensively. Think I saw he was in the 86th percentile when it came to o-zone play. Krug and Carlo worked so well together, which is why I went the initial route of putting Suter with Carlo.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
14 juill. 2021 à 14 h 18
Sujet:
Carlo Locked Up
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Xolie</b></div><div>I see what you're saying, but the Gryz and McAvoy pairing is perfect, Mixing a speedy offensive defenseman with a physical defensive defenseman, that pair has done the Bruins wonders.</div></div>
Yeah these pairings weren't me trying to say Gryz isn't worthy of a top pairing assignment, I think he showed he can handle it. There are also some games (with every defenseman Bruins have) where you wonder what they're doing on D. With McAvoy really taking a jump this year in confidence in the offensive zone, part of my reasoning is that maybe Oleksiak allows him to drive play even more with a big-bodied defenseman next to him.
But a D of:
Gryz-McAvoy
Oleksiak-Carlo
Suter-Clifton
would still work for me.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
14 juill. 2021 à 14 h 13
Sujet:
Carlo Locked Up
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>BruinsFan35</b></div><div>I was thinking the same thing. Both Carlo and Pesce are also two of the most criminally underrated players in the league imo</div></div>
I was thinking he was going to get 4-4.5 for any deal over 4 years, so 4.1 is a value I'm extremely happy with.
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Xolie</b></div><div>Grzelcyk plays on the first pair for a reason, he creates many opportunities and uses his speed and playmaking abilities to his advantage, by this I can tell you have little knowledge of the Bruins if you think Suter and Oleksiak are better.</div></div>
This is purely for the window the Bruins have left. I think Oleksiak alongside McAvoy would be a very good pairing. I think Carlo with Suter (and also Gryz) will be an extremely effective pairing. Gryz and Carlo have proven in the past how effective they are. Any of the 3 LDs could move up and down depending on chemistry and match ups, these are just the ones I thought would be good to start the year.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
29 juin 2021 à 10 h 31
Sujet:
Here we go again
I like the idea of Mojo purely to try and get Coyle going (I hate that on his contract he needs any motivation though). I'd say that Mojo should be on Coyle's RW with Debrusk at 3 LW. He's proven time and again he can't play off wing, so with these pieces, I'd keep him on his natural side with Coyle at center and Mojo at 3 RW. Then line 2 is the same with Hall-Krejci-Smith which was superb after the trade deadline. I like the size Oleksiak brings and think him and Carlo would be a great shutdown pair, or he could help sure up the defensive side on McAvoy's pair.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
22 juin 2021 à 21 h 38
Sujet:
Revamp the D
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>CMcAvoy73</b></div><div>Maybe. I wouldn’t bank on it though. Ditch the oleksiak deal and go for martinez.</div></div>
Fair. I had Martinez in my last post over him. Thought about adding more size on this roster.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
22 juin 2021 à 21 h 27
Sujet:
Revamp the D
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>CMcAvoy73</b></div><div>Not necessarily saying McCabe would be a bad fit (though i think I’m leaning towards that), but if you’re basing your top pair on WAR, it’s going to be a long season.</div></div>
It was just the post that showed his WAR that surprised me enough to look into him. Somehow in that dumpster fire organization, McCabe has gotten better every year since his draft. I think on a team like Boston he could flourish.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
22 juin 2021 à 21 h 22
Sujet:
Revamp the D
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Jfstompers</b></div><div>Think hall costs a bit more and I don't love mccabe but oleksiak I think would be a good fit with mcAvoy</div></div>
I think Hall maxes out at 6 if he meant it when he said he's made his money and wants a place to call home. I think the Bs could go up to 6.5 with him if needed, but that puts more of a crunch on the other deals. And it's interesting you would have Oleksiak on the 1st pairing, I personally hadn't been looking at him as higher than a 2nd pairing shutdown with Carlo.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
16 juin 2021 à 10 h 48
Sujet:
Re-tool for one last run
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Dekes</b></div><div>interms of defensive ability i do like martinez he is a great shot blocker and his quite decent offensively aswell i just wish he was bigger thats why i asked about ekholm. ive watched lots of vegas games this year but very few on nashville so i didnt know if ekholm was still a top dman like he once was</div></div>
Yeah Ekholm does have a tad more size and physicality than Martinez. For added size, my next thought after McCabe was Oleksiak. He'd bring a massive presence to the left side which we didn't have last year and could be put with Carlo for a shut down pair or with Hakanpaa to be a bruising physical pair.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
15 juin 2021 à 15 h 18
Sujet:
Re-tool for one last run
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Dekes</b></div><div>i like this team a lot, is ekholm a big upgrade for martinez? if so i wouldn't have a problem moving debrusk in package for him and then playing coleman 3rd line and aquiring a different 4th liner</div></div>
I'd say Ekholm is an upgrade. My thought process in not trading for him was with Nashville making the playoffs, and how highly touted he is, it would most likely be at least a 1st round pick and then some needed to get him. With the age of Bruins core, and lack of good prospects, I wanted to keep the 1st and decided to sign Martinez.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
15 juin 2021 à 15 h 0
Sujet:
Re-tool for one last run
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>bhavikp27</b></div><div>"I'd hope 5x5 is enough for him, but there's definitely a chance someone gives more term and more money" Remember a certain David Backes? Or Matt Beleskey?</div></div>
Oh yeah. And I didn't like those deals when they happened. Maybe I'm naïve, but I think Martinez would at least be worth this deal in terms of pushing us to a cup run.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
14 juin 2021 à 10 h 20
Sujet:
Flutos Offseason
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>CD282</b></div><div>Not even close on the Edmonton trade. Even adding a 1st doesn't get Edmonton to come to the table. Five goals, a dozen healthy scratches and a $4.8M QO makes DeBrusk largely worthless.</div></div>
I wouldn't say Debrusk and Jesse are a 1st away. Did Debrusk forget to show up this year? Yes. But he never had less than 35 points in his first three years. I agree picks are probably added to get it done, this was just to show the player I felt matched best what the Bruins would expect for a Debrusk trade.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
14 juin 2021 à 10 h 9
Sujet:
Flutos Offseason
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Gofnut999</b></div><div>That Reilly contract is gross. He’s a 3rd pair defenseman. Couple of years at around 2 is max i’d go. Otherwise he can walk.</div></div>
Yeah I thought it was a huge contract. My thoughts before reading Fluto's post were no more than 3 years for Reilly. I think him and Carlo pair well together, and with a full offseason together you'd hope they'd have that chemistry that they didn't have after trade deadline due to injuries.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
31 janv. 2020 à 12 h 37
Sujet:
Is Deangelo being shopped
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>shmoeman</b></div><div>Its just not worth it for the Bruins with Carlo and McAvoy on the right side and another PP specialist in Krug. Would rather use the assets to get someone up front imo</div></div>
That's fair. Seeing the post just got me wondering if he'd be needed/wanted and if it would be worth it for the Bs.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
31 janv. 2020 à 12 h 36
Sujet:
Is Deangelo being shopped
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Bcarlo25</b></div><div>What on earth would make you think backes is coming off the books?</div></div>
With Sweeney's statement that Backes won't report to Providence, you have to feel that they're either actively looking to move him and his contract or that he might be looking at retirement after he gets his pay for this year.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
31 janv. 2020 à 12 h 29
Sujet:
Is Deangelo being shopped
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>NYR_Mike</b></div><div>I would hate to see them move on from him, but I do not think this deal gets it done. Also i wouldn't believe anything that site says but I am curious.
He currently sits 8th among defenseman in points. Curious to see what type of offers they get though, they would probably ask for Studnicka because why the hell wouldn't you and most likely if not definitely get denied.
I assume the price will be high though, I am a rangers fan obviously but young puck moving RHD who put up points are not cheap. Curious to see how other fans feel.</div></div>
My assumption when I clicked the article is that the price would be sky-high, but to see Roslovic and a 2nd as their "top offer" was surprising. I would assume any deal revolving around a 1st would probably want an extension in place.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
31 janv. 2020 à 12 h 24
Sujet:
Is Deangelo being shopped
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Ryminister_27</b></div><div>Lol. Your best bet is to never trust anything that site posts. It's all false information and they never have reliable sources. It's click bait</div></div>
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>shmoeman</b></div><div>that account is the worst account ever. Only for clicks. Would recommend just never clicking on those articles lol</div></div>
It's fun reading the crazy ideas they have though. Like yesterday they mentioned Eichel should be on the move from Buffalo.
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>ON3M4N</b></div><div>So he's going to be to expensive for the Rangers, but Boston can sign him with guys like Krug, Chara, DeBrusk and other all needing new deals. He's not even need as your playing him on your 3rd pair.</div></div>
And I think we're looking at Backes coming off the books, and potentially Chara too depending on how this season ends for the Bruins. And me having him on the third pairing doesn't mean I feel he isn't needed here. I think having that puck moving defensemen on the right side is immensely important for the Bs. You could rotate him and Carlo as the games progress depending on the need of the team. Need offense? Deangelo gets more time to try and get the breakouts going. Need to shut them down? Carlo gets more time against the top players to limit chances. And I think you could see him driving PP2 for the Bs. He's more Krug-like than McAvoy and I think that could help turn PP2 into a more reliable scoring unit.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
20 janv. 2020 à 19 h 58
Sujet:
Move Coming
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>PuckLuck_77</b></div><div>The issue is that the Kings would not accept Toffoli for Heinen, unless they're just hoping to flip him. Cost-control doesn't necessarily matter to the Kings. They're not in any sort of cap crunch. But the biggest issue is that Heinen would take up a spot at the expansion draft. What the Kings are looking for in return for Toffoli is some combination of expansion draft-exempt prospects or picks in the upcoming draft. Heinen is not either of those.
Lauzon+Shen+2nd for Martinez isn't bad on it's own. I'm still not a fan of the quality of players coming back, but it's closer than Heinen for Toffoli. Lauzon would be available for Seattle to pick, Shen wouldn't which is good. But Shen has 8 points in 30 games. Not exactly lighting the world on fire.
I still think the Kings say no. Just doesn't fit what they want, and they should be able to get more from selling the two separately to other teams.</div></div>
I think Heinen better fits the Kings than people think. He's a solid two-way middle six forward who is starting to regain his confidence in shooting.
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>shmoeman</b></div><div>Why are we giving up assets for a dman we dont need?</div></div>
Martinez would be a good add for the Bs. Do we "need" him? No, but he solidifies that third pair and is a considerable upgrade from John Moore or Kevin Miller. And he's controlled through next season as well so you're not as vulnerable if Chara decides to retire.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
7 janv. 2020 à 16 h 53
Sujet:
Move before deadline
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>ON3M4N</b></div><div>The thing is though (and I'm a huge Heinen guy), Boston is deep at LW. We're asking guys like Bjork and Heinen to play their off-wing because we don't have room for them all. DeBrusk is unlikely to move as a potential 30 goal scorer, Bjork has more upside than Heinen and Marchand is locked in for a while. They also have Frederic and Lauko down in Providence, so I could see them making Heinen available in a deal</div></div>
The last speculation I saw on Twitter from one of the big fan run news accounts was that Bjork and Heinen were the two names they were being told were coming up in talks most often with the Bruins. I'm also a fan of Heinen's, but if I'm choosing between him and Bjork I'm driving Heinen to the airport myself.
I'm excited to see Bjork tested on Krecji's right tonight though. He's definitely a guy I envision in the top 6, by it on Krecji's left/right or Bergy's right.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
7 janv. 2020 à 14 h 46
Sujet:
Move before deadline
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>ON3M4N</b></div><div>A young roster player + good prospect + 2nd is above market value.</div></div>
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Dachs_cock</b></div><div>Toffoli isn’t hot this year. I’d think Zboril and a 3rd is more fair.</div></div>
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>bsilk18</b></div><div>Being a rental brings down the value a good amount. If he had like 4 years on the deal, it would be much closer to realistic, but as a rental its a huge overpayment</div></div>
Appreciate the critique. Seeing as Bs would need at least some cap out the door, do you think Heinen and a 3rd/4th is enough? Or do you think Heinen doesn't carry enough value?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
7 janv. 2020 à 13 h 55
Sujet:
Move before deadline
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Dachs_cock</b></div><div>Waaaaay too much</div></div>
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>ON3M4N</b></div><div>Overpayment. Take out Heinen and it's closer.</div></div>
I agree it's an overpayment, but don't you feel this is going to most likely be the rate for one of the three best wingers on the trade market?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
9 déc. 2019 à 16 h 54
Sujet:
Possible move to dump Backes
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>F50marco</b></div><div>The team can choose to either put him on IR or LTIR. LTIR means they can spend above the cap ceiling by his cap hit in order to replace him if they wanted to. IR there isn't any cap relief, the player just doesn't count as an active player on the roster anymore. So they can add another player to the roster and go over the 23 man limit. But once again, no cap relief. There is also some differences in how long the player must be "injured" for to apply for either category. If you have small injury that only has you miss 1-2 games or whatever, you can't go on LTIR because the player must not be able to enter the lineup for X amount of days to qualify for LTIR. Its so teams can't "cheat" the system. They still do however but its technically legal.
Ottawa has him on IR solely so that they can stay above the salary cap floor while not having to pay him. That's it.
Late edit: Ottawa purposefully doesn't want players that they have to pay actual dollars to. They actively want Gaborik because they aren't paying him but his cap is helping them reach the floor. So Backes being healthy enough to play at least a little forces them to have to pay him. They don't want that at. They'd prefer a 700K player instead of Backes so they can keep the salary overall lower.</div></div>
Appreciate the input, I didn't realize that's how the difference between IR and LTIR worked.
Bcarlo25- I know he struggled last year, but he's back on a 20 goal pace this year. Do you not think he has the skill set to gel and succeed with Krecji?
1
2
Suivant
Page 1
Remerciements à
Guillaume Lambert-Héon
pour l'aide à la traduction de l'anglais au français
SalarySwish
| Masses salariales de la NBA par CapFriendly
Conditions d’utilisation
Politique de confidentialité
Règlements du forum
À propos de nous
FAQ - Convention collective
Nous contacter
Privacy Manager
Follow @CapFriendly
CapFriendly
CapFriendly
© 2024 CapFriendly.com