SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

XQOM

Xavier
Membre depuis
26 août 2020
Équipe favorite
Maple Leafs de Toronto
Messages dans les forums
93
Messages par jour
0.1
Forum: Armchair-GM24 mai 2021 à 15 h 27
Forum: Armchair-GM19 mai 2021 à 20 h 48
Sujet: Possibly maybe not so much
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>The_Rocket</b></div><div>Jost is really defensively sound 3C who is an RFA with a low QO and his 4 years younger than Reilly. Timmons is a really good RHD prospect who is expansion draft exempt and has had a ton of success in the AHL and is right on track in his development. He would have at least as much value as let’s say a Liljegren, if not more value.

Rielly is a really good offensive defenseman with one year left on his contract, but he would be at best the 4th best D-man on the Avs. His WAR% is propped up from his really good 2018/2019 season. His career averages suggest he is a one dimensional offensive Dman, not much better than a Tyson Barrie or something along those lines. I could definitely see a team starving for offense on the back end giving up a 1st for him, but I can’t see a team giving up two young cost controlled players in important roles trading for 1 year of a offensive Dman</div></div>

You bring up Tyson Barrie as an example. They got one of the better 2C's in the league on a cheap contract for one year of Barrie + 3C. I think you are undervaluing a top 15 (scoring) D thats on a relatively cheap contract, although Jost is strong defensively, giving up Rielly is not worth it at his production level. Connor Timmins has potential to become stronger, but at 22 years old with 33 games of NHL experience, it just doesn't come close to even one year of Rielly's value. Your point about Rielly not fitting with the Avs is very true, it just doesn't make sense for either team, Avs already have imo the best D core in the league, they dont and shouldnt give up good role players. It also doesnt make sense for the leafs to trade him to the Avs because his value is lowered due to not fitting with the team. But overall you are under valuating Rielly or overvaluing Jost and Timmins. This trade was bad the second he clicked the teams
Forum: Mock-Draft15 mai 2021 à 14 h 46
Forum: Mock-Draft1 avr. 2021 à 12 h 36
Forum: Mock-Draft8 janv. 2021 à 2 h 41
Sujet: Redraft
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Ledge_And_Dairy</b></div><div>I'm not denying he had a great season because he did, that's why I said he moves up to the first round in a redraft. However saying he is top 10 with almost zero NHL experience is just pure homerism.

As for your comparisons, sure he has the edge on Tomasino (should be noted Tomasino is also a center so that raises his value) but the WHL is a lower scoring league than the OHL and the NCAA is significantly lower due to playing with people ranging from age 18-24 on average (with a larger portion of those players being on the older end)</div></div>

The scoring in WHL, NCAA is a lot lower, but a 55 goal 86 point 46 games season in the OHL is still more impressive then a PPG in the NCAA
I'm not dying the homerism, but by saying "moves up to the first round" are you implying he is a late first?
Cause that's just more wrong then my homerism (top 10) take
Doesn't he have the 5th most NHL experience in this group btw? idk. You don't have to think about NHL experience after the top 3
Without bias I could 100% argue a top 15.
Also this year Robertson is going to play at least his 7 games, maybe more at 19 years old on the best 5v5 scoring team in the past few years.

The real answer will probably end up being in between our takes. I can't wait to find out.
Forum: Mock-Draft7 janv. 2021 à 18 h 52
Sujet: Redraft
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Ledge_And_Dairy</b></div><div>Tomasino had 100 points in the exact same league, Zegras and Newhook were both over a ppg in the NCAA, Byram was over a ppg in the WHL, Cozens had 85 in 51 in the WHL, McMichael had a higher ppg than Robertson in the OHL, Dustin Wolf won 3 goalie of the year awards. Sorry to tell you but Robertson's only stand out thing was his goal scoring

In a redraft right now nobody but you is taking Robertson in the top 10</div></div>

You realize Robertson only played 46 games.
If Robertson played the same amount of games as Tomasino he was on pace for 116 points
If Robertson played the same amount of games as Cozens he was on pace for 95

(Full OHL season) Robertson was on pace for 81 GOALS, &gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; PPG in NCAA

Only one thats close is McMicheal (adjusted to the same about of games)
McMicheal - 47 Goals 102 Points
Robertson - 62 Goals 97 Points
Idk, I'm taking the 5 less points for the 15 more goals player

I'm not gonna compare a goalie.

The only reason he would drop again out of the top 10 is because he is 5'9. He is also the youngest of them.
Obviously goals and assists aren't everything and I understand dropping him due to size and the other players having higher ceiling, but you cannot deny his historic season.
Forum: Mock-Draft3 janv. 2021 à 4 h 15
Sujet: Re-Doing the 2019 draft (Lots of World Junior Players)
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>HatterTParty</b></div><div>Like I said, they were each awful in their own ways and history shows that even more. Ya can’t say one deserves to be over the other a year on. As far as I’m concerned, 1-3 is still the same. In five years time, sure, we can readdress this, but to suggest Dach was light years better then the other two is just brutal. That’s basically setting the bar as low as possible to make him look good.</div></div>

You are putting words into my mouth.
Never said "Dach was light years better"
Dach and Hughes had VERY similar seasons (Interchanging them is fine). Kakko had a historically bad season so I ranked him lower. All of them are really close.
I saw you respond to HatterTParty, Zegras hasn/t done enough to prove why he should be moved into the top 3
He had a great season in the NCAA, but not enough to overtake any of their spots.
This list can change very fast, but for right now I feel like its pretty decent (I'd make a few changes)
Forum: Mock-Draft2 janv. 2021 à 23 h 53
Sujet: Re-Doing the 2019 draft (Lots of World Junior Players)
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>HatterTParty</b></div><div>You also gotta remember, the trifecta of hughes, Kakko, and Dach had one of the worst statistical rookie years cumulative in the history of the NHL. As such, saying that Dach was better than Hughes by certain numbers isn’t saying much at all. They each we’re bad in their own ways.

Also, Trevor Zegras is a monster, pure and simple. He is BY FAR the best pure playmaker in the 2019 draft class. I truly believe he’ll be the best player in the draft class.

1. Zegras
2. Hughes
3. Kakko
4. Dach

Suffice to say, I’d take Zegras over any player in that draft at present in a redraft.</div></div>

Such recency bias. Just because he is killing it at the NHL doesn't mean he deserves a spot over any of the three NHLers.
Kakko had such an awful first season so i'm going Dach &gt; Kakko.
Zegras' NCAA season was good but doesn't move him near the 1st pick.