Éditer l'avatar
  • png, jpeg
  • La grandeur minimale recommandée se veut de 800px par 800px
  • Grandeur maximale: 1MB
Glisser l'image pour repositionner
Sauvegarder
Annuler

Wadejos123

Membre depuis
5 mai 2017
Équipe favorite
Blackhawks de Chicago
Messages dans les forums
4980
Messages par jour
3.23
Sujets de discussion
747
Forum: Armchair-GMThu at 6:40 pm
Sujet: Yotes get 11 OA back
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>OldNYIfan</b></div><div>I think that you're off your usually accurate aim here. Leave Seabrook out of it (for purposes of this discussion). In my opinion, Dvorak is worth more than the first, and Garland is worth more than the first, but let's assume that the value is even in both cases (especially when factoring in term). Each player is surely worth more than Kurashev and the future second. Alternatively, look at it this way: Arizona trades two quality top-6 forwards who are reaching towards their peak performance years. In return, Arizona gets effectively a prospect unlikely to have the same impact as either Coyote this season and maybe next plus two draft picks, the later of which probably won't hit the NHL until 2024-2025. I can't see it.</div></div>

My thinking is that the 11th pick is more valuable than two picks in the late 20s. If I made this same proposal with the 2021 and 2022 picks but we assume they are both late 20's does that make it better? I don't think it does. Unless it's a goalie, the pick at 11 is likley ready sooner than 3-4 years from now like you suggested, and likley is of the same caliber or more likley better than garland or dvorak. If you think the guy at that pick isn't gonna be that then you have no faith in your scouting depatment. I get that no draft pick is a guarentee, but 11th OA still holds more value than you are suggesting in my opinion