PARAMÈTRES D’AFFICHAGE
Basculer en mode sombre
Thème automatique
COTES DES PARIS
Cotes activées
LANGUE
EN
SE CONNECTER
S'INSCRIRE
FORUMS
ARCHIVES ▾
ARCHIVES
Masses salariales des années antérieures
(Premium)
Articles
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2017 - Vegas
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2021 - Seattle
CBA ▾
CBA
FAQ - Convention collective
FAQ - Rapports de dépistage
Historique des masses salariales
Rémunération maximale du contrat d’entrée
FAQ - Liste des blessés à long terme
FAQ - Rachats de contrat
FAQ - Offre Hostile
FAQ - Ballottage
FAQ - Liste de réserve
FAQ - Repêchage d'expansion
COTES
DÉPISTAGE
CALCS ▾
CALCS
Calculateur de rachat de contrat
Calculateur de ballottage
Calculateur d’offre qualificative
Calculateur d’arbitrage
Calculateur d'offre hostile
Calculateur d'impôt sur le revenu
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY ▾
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY
Sommaire
Alignements détaillés
Gardiens partants
Mises à jour - Statuts des joueurs
Historique des blessures
OUTILS ▾
OUTILS
Tableau de repêchage
Comparables de contrats
Équipes affiliées
Essais professionnels
Joueurs - Liste de réserve
(Premium)
Suivi des dépenses salariales
(Premium)
Rapports de dépistage
Cas d’arbitrage
Entraîneurs
Directeurs généraux
Joueurs appartenant à la formation au moment du gel - COVID
Clauses d'échange entrant en vigueur
(Premium)
JOUEURS ▾
JOUEURS
Joueurs autonomes
Joueurs actifs
Joueurs inactifs
Contrats 35 ans et +
Contrats d’entrée
Reports du contrat d'entrée
NTC-NMC
Gains en carrière
Comparables de contrats
Essais professionnels
Rapports de dépistage
Coût par point
Coût par arrêt
Transactions
Signatures
Mouvements de personnel
Historique des blessures
Historique du ballottage
Salaire retenu
Historique des rachats de contrat
ÉQUIPES ▾
CONFÉRENCE DE L'OUEST
PACIFIQUE
Ducks d'Anaheim
Flames de Calgary
Oilers d'Edmonton
Kings de Los Angeles
Sharks de San Jose
Kraken de Seattle
Canucks de Vancouver
Golden Knights de Vegas
CENTRALE
Coyotes de l'Arizona
Blackhawks de Chicago
Avalanche du Colorado
Stars de Dallas
Wild du Minnesota
Predators de Nashville
Blues de St-Louis
Jets de Winnipeg
CONFÉRENCE DE L'EST
MÉTROPOLITAINE
Hurricanes de la Caroline
Blue Jackets de Columbus
Devils du New Jersey
Islanders de New York
Rangers de New York
Flyers de Philadelphie
Penguins de Pittsburgh
Capitals de Washington
ATLANTIQUE
Bruins de Boston
Sabres de Buffalo
Red Wings de Detroit
Panthers de la Floride
Canadiens de Montréal
Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Lightning de Tampa Bay
Maple Leafs de Toronto
INTERACTIF ▾
OUTILS INTERACTIFS
Fauteuil - DG (Simulateur de formation personnalisée)
Repêchage simulé
Simulateur de transactions (propositions de transactions)
RECHERCHER
FAUTEUIL - DG
REPÊCHAGE SIMULÉ
SIMULATEUR DE TRANSACTIONS
ÉQUIPES ▾
Ducks d'Anaheim
Coyotes de l'Arizona
Bruins de Boston
Sabres de Buffalo
Flames de Calgary
Hurricanes de la Caroline
Blackhawks de Chicago
Avalanche du Colorado
Blue Jackets de Columbus
Stars de Dallas
Red Wings de Detroit
Oilers d'Edmonton
Panthers de la Floride
Kings de Los Angeles
Wild du Minnesota
Canadiens de Montréal
Predators de Nashville
Devils du New Jersey
Islanders de New York
Rangers de New York
Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Flyers de Philadelphie
Penguins de Pittsburgh
Sharks de San Jose
Kraken de Seattle
Blues de St-Louis
Lightning de Tampa Bay
Maple Leafs de Toronto
Canucks de Vancouver
Golden Knights de Vegas
Capitals de Washington
Jets de Winnipeg
JOUEURS ▾
Joueurs autonomes
Joueurs actifs
Joueurs inactifs
Contrats 35 ans et +
Contrats d’entrée
Reports du contrat d'entrée
NTC-NMC
Gains en carrière
Rapports de dépistage
Coût par point
Coût par arrêt
Transactions
Signatures
Mouvements de personnel
Historique des blessures
Historique du ballottage
Salaire retenu
Historique des rachats de contrat
Comparables de contrats
Essais professionnels
OUTILS ▾
Tableau de repêchage
Comparables de contrats
Rapports de dépistage
Cas d’arbitrage
Essais professionnels
Entraîneurs
Directeurs généraux
Joueurs appartenant à la formation au moment du gel - COVID
Joueurs - Liste de réserve
(Premium)
Suivi des dépenses salariales
(Premium)
Clauses d'échange entrant en vigueur
(Premium)
Équipes affiliées
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY ▾
Sommaire
Alignements détaillés
Gardiens partants
Mises à jour - Statuts des joueurs
CALCS ▾
Calculateur de rachat de contrat
Calculateur de ballottage
Calculateur d’offre qualificative
Calculateur d’arbitrage
Calculateur d'offre hostile
Calculateur d'impôt sur le revenu
RAPPORTS DE DÉPISTAGE
COTES
CBA▾
FAQ - Convention collective
FAQ - Rapports de dépistage
Historique des masses salariales
Rémunération maximale du contrat d’entrée
FAQ - Rachats de contrat
FAQ - Liste des blessés à long terme
FAQ - Offre Hostile
FAQ - Ballottage
FAQ - Liste de réserve
FAQ - Repêchage d'expansion
ARCHIVES ▾
Masses salariales des années antérieures
(Premium)
Articles
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2017 - Vegas
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2021 - Seattle
FORUMS
SE CONNECTER
S'INSCRIRE
EN
Basculer en mode sombre
Cotes activées
Wadejos123
Membre depuis
5 mai 2017
Équipe favorite
Blackhawks de Chicago
Messages dans les forums
8269
Messages par jour
3.3
MESSAGES
SUJETS
MENTIONS "J'AIME"
ÉQUIPES VIA FAUTEUIL-DG
Forum:
Armchair-GM
il y a 13 heures
Sujet:
Just curious
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Wadejos123</b></div><div>I think we switch gears summer of 2025. Team should naturally improve a little bit going into next year, but hawks need to secure one more high lotto pick. If we snag one of Celebrini, Demidov, or Lindstrom this June and then another top 5-7 pick next year I'll be very good about this core personally</div></div>
As Tom Petty sang “the waiting is the hardest part”. Ultimately it all depends on how the players we’ve drafted develop. They all play like Vlasic , it will be sooner, they go like Reichel, it may be put off longer.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
il y a 13 heures
Sujet:
If hes available Hawks should be in
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Wadejos123</b></div><div>This guy you are responding too is a prime example of why you can't just look at point totals on elite prospects and call that a scouting report</div></div>
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>seanrushton</b></div><div>That's a fair point</div></div>
For sure. You also can't watch or know every player inside and out. I think it is ok to use a quick look at stats, but it should go along side the players history, whether that is controversy or injury, etc., what your own team needs, what the other team needs, what fans think, and what pundits think, in order to make determinations and valuations.
For one example of many, there have been a lot of recent proposals from DET fans on here, we know they need cap space and we know a guy like Fabbri is constantly injured and hasn't been producing. We also know that CHI has no other reason to be interested in taking Fabbri's contract aside from being compensated to do so. I don't have to watch Fabbri on a regular basis to know he is a cap dump. I know I have watched Fabbri through the years and that is not particularly impressive relative to the rest of the league and that he is not someone I would target for any reason. And this goes for a lot of players and teams around the league. I'm not going to watch a players entire career over again every time someone proposes some garbage trade. haha. But yeah, scouting prospects is a whole different beast, and, personally, I find it way more fun and exciting.
As for pending free agents like Necas, I use what I know about CHI and Kyle Davidson's intentions. What I know is, they aren't targeting anyone like him or packaging high value assets to acquire them. They are building from within. Also, I know that Necas is not good defensively. All this would do for CHI is cost them valuable assets and create an unnecessary roadblock. I would rather take the assets that come with a cap dump and bank on them having a resurgence and bringing in even more assets at the trade deadline than go overpay for a young player, at this juncture in the rebuild. Maybe in another couple years, though, we can start talking about that kind of move.
But, if KD went out and did something like this, I can't say I wouldn't understand. I just feel like it runs contrary to the plan he has laid out and stuck to thus far.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
il y a 13 heures
Sujet:
Just curious
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Cincod1</b></div><div>Why not? Hawks need some grit and the pipe is bare. Ottawa gets a lottery ticket and we get a proven power forward that can also watch 98’s back</div></div>
Kyle Davidson has showed this far no willingness to switch gears from using picks to build through the draft. He of course will at some point , when he feels confident that he has his nucleus in place. Nothing against Tkachuk, but the Hawks are a lot further away from competing than what he can bring, so the timing is not right to pull the trigger on this type of trade right now.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
il y a 14 heures
Sujet:
If hes available Hawks should be in
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Wadejos123</b></div><div>This guy you are responding too is a prime example of why you can't just look at point totals on elite prospects and call that a scouting report</div></div>
That's a fair point
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Hier à 19 h 7
Sujet:
If hes available Hawks should be in
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>exo2769</b></div><div>I'm open to the idea of at some point you make a quality vs quantity move. I get that part. Seems like a bit much for Necas. I don't dislike him at all. I guess I'd be hoping for something more efficient. Either a better RWer as a UFA or maybe Bowman's prospects like Colton Dach and Nolan Allan plus a 2nd. I just don't think KD is trading away 1sts at this point in time. He's still trying to get his picks/prospect developed/developing. In a summer or two...maybe I could see it then, but it just feels too early for this. Kyle's only had this job for 2 years 1 month and 15 days and Luke not even 2 years yet. I wouldn't rush the rebuild.</div></div>
I'd rather see Laine with 2 years left on the deal, and wouldn't cost as much in trade assets, and gives the Hawks the option of trading him at the deadline in 25/26 or resining him. Laine would light it up with Bedard.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Hier à 17 h 25
Sujet:
If hes available Hawks should be in
I'm open to the idea of at some point you make a quality vs quantity move. I get that part. Seems like a bit much for Necas. I don't dislike him at all. I guess I'd be hoping for something more efficient. Either a better RWer as a UFA or maybe Bowman's prospects like Colton Dach and Nolan Allan plus a 2nd. I just don't think KD is trading away 1sts at this point in time. He's still trying to get his picks/prospect developed/developing. In a summer or two...maybe I could see it then, but it just feels too early for this. Kyle's only had this job for 2 years 1 month and 15 days and Luke not even 2 years yet. I wouldn't rush the rebuild.
Forum:
GM Game 2019-20
sam. à 16 h 46
Sujet:
2021/22 V5 Free Agent Signings
:redwings
Frank Nazar $950,000 x 3 years (IRL ELC)
Forum:
Armchair-GM
lun. à 7 h 57
Sujet:
Next year
I don't hate this at all. We need a vet center and RD. I also wouldn't over do it with the UFAs.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
dim. à 21 h 34
Sujet:
Frank is IN
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Wadejos123</b></div><div>I formally take back anything i've said on this site about Franky needing to go play in rockford next year</div></div>
Maybe finally we can get Foligno/Dickinson off of Bedard's line so that I don't have an aneurysm every time they kill an offensive zone possession from having bricks for hands
Forum:
Armchair-GM
sam. à 14 h 33
Sujet:
2024 opening night
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Wadejos123</b></div><div>Fingers crossed the same translates with EDM. I've been high on him for years and he looked the part last night</div></div>
Same here. He looks great and he comes with already built in offense that he doesn't get enough credit for.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
sam. à 11 h 32
Sujet:
2024 opening night
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>ChiHawk</b></div><div>Was saying that from the perspective of being an RFA, a hometown boy, and the Hawks getting extremely lucky on a bridge deal as a basement number. But market value is a different thing, $3M would be 100% underpaid on a bridge and even more underpaid as a factor into a long term deal thus taking the ability away for Vlasic to really cash in at the age of 24 or 25.</div></div>
How about this.
Contract structure:
Year 1: $5M
Year 2: $5M
Year 3: $5M
Year 4: $5.5M
Year 5: $6.5M
Year 6: $7M
Year 7: $8M
Year 8: $8M
This would put him at a $6.25M cap hit/aav for 8 years, more manageable cap hit, paying him fair market, and locks him up long term. Something like this could work.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
sam. à 11 h 12
Sujet:
2024 opening night
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Wadejos123</b></div><div>I'd argue Vlasic is worth the 5M right now</div></div>
Sure. I could argue that too. But it just isn't how negotiations work. But players generally want to help their team too. AAV is just an average. If they can structure the payment schedule in a way that works for all sides while also driving down the AAV, then it's a win win scenario.
Also, Before anyone else was saying it, I WAS THE ONE who first proposed a $6.5M x 8 year deal for him, and everyone called me crazy for it earlier in the season. Might've even been over the summer when I proposed that.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
sam. à 10 h 53
Sujet:
2024 opening night
This seems pretty spot on directionally to me. Not sure Roslovic or Johnson are the right UFA targets, but those are the two target positions in free agency for sure. Don't like the Ottawa trade. Hawks have no need for Forsberg. Just re-sign Stauber for another season in Rockford. If Sody stinks again, swap them. But overall this seems like a pretty accurate look at next year's team.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
sam. à 10 h 16
Sujet:
2024 opening night
We should stay away from Roslovic, not the right guy for 2C even short term or the Hawks system.
Highly doubt Vlasic would sign an 8 year deal at $5.2M. Remember, as a 22 year rookie against the toughest assignments, he's ranked top 3 defensive players in the defensive zone. If Vlasic were never to improve from this season, unlikely given his age and the improvement from a year ago, he'd be worth $6M minimum to $8M on a 8 year deal. He and his agent are not only wouldn't take a penny less, they will bet on him improving and thus almost certainly don't want a 8 year deal unless it's around $8M which the Hawks probably wouldn't do. For that reason, he's likely a 3 year bridge and going to land anywhere from $3M to $5M on a 3 year bridge deal is my guess. If I'm Chicago though, I'd push to lock him up between $6M and $7M on a 8 year deal as that will look like a bargain in a few years with Vlasic almost certainly improving and the cap continuing to rise. We could be looking at the best shutdown defender in the league in a couple years, and I'd argue if he had played 6 less games last season in the NHL and could qualify for the Calder, he'd be in the conversation right behind Bedard and Faber with a pretty good argument.
I think the Hawks bring in a cheap RHD vet for 1 or 2 years until Rinzel (or Levshunov if the Hawks draft him) are ready for the show. Keep rotating Del Mastro, Kaiser, Crevier and Philips all getting chances to play 20 games on the left side 3rd line. The good news is all 4 have shown they can play in the league to varying degrees with Del Mastro probably ahead of the class of 4. Certainly at least 1 or 2 will get moved in the next couple years. The question mark to me is Allan. Can Allan play on his off-side in the NHL and be good enough in a 3rd line role? He's played a fair amount on his off-side, so could be interesting or perhaps the Hawks don't think highly enough of him. My rankings of those 5 are as follows; Del Mastro, Kaiser, Crevier, Alan, Phillips in that order. It's a logjam for sure.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
jeu. à 12 h 6
Sujet:
Two years out
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Wadejos123</b></div><div>The Seth Jones hate is so annoying. I understand fans of other teams trying to poke fun at us, because we did overpay both in the acquisition and contract, but the hawks fans I don't get it. It's like they don't watch the games (considering we aern't very good, they probably don't) because Jones is still good. If he made 8M and the 1st we sent didn't end up being Jiricek no one would care</div></div>
Exactly. Some fans don't know how to check their bias.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
7 avr. à 7 h 3
Sujet:
Two years out
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>SlickWilly</b></div><div>If the kids arent getting extensions to make the Jones contract at least a little bit of a problem in the next 7 years, then the rebuild was unsuccessful. All these first round picks, you'd hope the average on their first extensions after the ELC is around 5 million (Bedard and Demidov become stars and make upwards of 8-9 mil, Nazar/Korchinski/Moore/Rinzel all a bit lower). Throw in a upper tier free agent signing, in this scenario its Rantanen, if these guys arent forcing an issue to at least make some tough decisions, then we have an issue.</div></div>
Like <a href="/users/Wadejos123" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">@Wadejos123</a> said, your timing is off. The only point at which the Jones contract has any chance of becoming even a little bit of an issue is in the last 2 or 3 years of his deal. Even then, it should be more than manageable. But chances are, when most of these kids sign they will need a year or two in the AHL, which leaves the team a much smaller sample size from which to base their second contract on. Which means they get bridge/prove-it deals. Some of them will even slide a year or two, extending their ELC's to 5 years.
Also, Jones has been good. Stop feeding the bull$hit machine about him being bad. He is fine, he is here, we need to get over it and move on. His contract has become part of the plan already. KD and his team have had, and will have, plenty of time to plan accordingly.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
5 avr. à 21 h 15
Sujet:
Next year no Lotto
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Wadejos123</b></div><div>I think moving cap will be a little cheaper this summer than it was last year with the cap rising 6-7M</div></div>
The cap is rising around $5M, not 6-7. But that doesn't matter. That money will be eaten up so quickly. These large raises will be short lived. Players will be looking for a bigger piece of the pie. Tons of players around the league are due new contracts. It really isn't as much money as you would think, in terms of cap implications. It may have an effect on the price of moving cap, but the difference will be marginal.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
6 avr. à 7 h 1
Sujet:
Lundell OS
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Ledge_And_Dairy</b></div><div>Completely missed my point. It's not at all realistic to expect a player to actively sabotage themselves or their team at a cup chance. The Hawks are nowhere near contending and the Panthers are clearly contenders. Unless Lundell feels the Panthers offer is genuinely insulting like 1-1.5M, he will almost certainly stay</div></div>
Completely missed my point.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
5 avr. à 21 h 43
Sujet:
Lundell OS
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Ledge_And_Dairy</b></div><div>Oh the Offer Sheets from bottom feeder are starting up again? Reminder that the player has to actually sign the deal</div></div>
Proposing an offer sheet isn't just about trying to be sneaking and stealing a player. It shows a certain cap hit at which FLA would have a hard time keeping him and another team could have him, all for a 2nd round pick, illustrating a starting point for trade value. It starts a discussion, it isn't meant to offend or troll fans of the other team.
I would personally give significantly more that a 2nd for Lundell.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
3 avr. à 19 h 46
Sujet:
Next year no Lotto
Interesting idea for the Lee trade. That seems like something the Isles might go for. Definitely like it for the Hawks. I'd hate giving up Phillips in the Mikheyev deal. He should take that 2nd just to move. I'm also hoping Hawks can upgrade from Blackwell and Megna as depth guys.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
3 avr. à 18 h 32
Sujet:
Next year no Lotto
Deal
Forum:
Armchair-GM
3 avr. à 9 h 23
Sujet:
An actual NHL team
I agree w/ <a href="/users/Wadejos123" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">@Wadejos123</a>. Hawks won't target a player like Lindholm, and he probably won't sign a 2 year deal on a rebuilding team anyway. I also think Nazar at least starts next season in Rockford. Don't like Bedard on a wing. Rest of it seems ok though.
Forum:
Mock-Draft
31 mars à 14 h 20
Sujet:
2024 Mock Draft - Would you be happy ?
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Wadejos123</b></div><div>Hawks do not accept that trade up. We'd need at least one of your extra first's plus something else to move from 2 to 6</div></div>
Exactly, that value is painfully inadequate. Hawks would need more quality going their way.
I.E. Read either one of Slafkovsky, Huston, Reinbacher, or Ghule on TOP of the 6th OVA.
Which pains me to say, as a Wild fan.
Besides, Hawks are better off grabbing Demidov @2nd OVA. Pairing him with Bedard is going to cause problems for the rest of the league for the next decade plus. So if the Hawks DID move down, I'd be extremely grateful and happy. 😉
Forum:
Armchair-GM
30 mars à 8 h 11
Sujet:
Offseason
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Wadejos123</b></div><div>My issue with Lindstrom is that if he wasn't big he wouldn't be getting drafted this high. On a skill level I think Demidov is a lot better than him, and now Lindstrom is having some back/neck injury too? I won't be upset if the hawks take him but he's not my first pick either</div></div>
Demidov and Lindstrom are completely different players. Lindstrom is better than Demidov at most things, though. Demidov is certainly the more skilled and electrifying offensive forward with superstar potential, but Lindstrom is absolutely the more well rounded, projectable, all situations, 200ft player. If Demidov's offense doesn't translate, which is entirely possible, he will be a bust. Not that I don't love Demidov's game, but it's a risk when drafting high skill offensively geared players.
If you are gonna say "(insert player) is only being considered to be drafted this high because they are big", look no further than Levshunov. That kid is MASSIVELY overrated. Lindstrom is big and it is a clear advantage, but his game is not dependent on his size or physicality. I would even go so far to say that he is better defensively than Levshunov. His motor, compete, confidence, and intelligence are very high. The fact that he already knows how to use his size is a GREAT thing. Most guys get drafted due to size and have no clue how to use it and have to learn on the job and then everyone gets mad when they can't do it.
Again, I don't mind the idea of trading back, but a late 1st two years from now is not enough to get it done.
Also, none of my criticism of Demidov would stop me from drafting him 2nd overall. I would be cool with either player there. And there are a few others that, if CHI did take them at 2nd overall, I would understand and just hope for the best.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
29 mars à 22 h 15
Sujet:
Offseason
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Wadejos123</b></div><div>Catton is still really really good, so if you can add another 1st I think it's worth the drop. To me Catton, Lindstrom, Levshunov, Parekh are in a tier at 3-6, with Demidov alone at 2 and Celebrini at 1 of course. So if you can get an extra first and stay within that same tier I think it is worth it</div></div>
For sure. Catton is great and likely has a very successful NHL career ahead of him. But, I don't think the tiers are quite like that. Demidov and Lindstrom are clearly ahead of the rest, after Celebrini. I don't think that package is worth trading back, though. The difference in value between 5th and 2nd OA is much larger than a single 1st, that is likely in 2026, and that will likely be late. I would still be interested in trading back, but it takes a lot more. Also, hypothetically, if Demidov IS the clear #2, why wouldn't we just take him? Top 6 forwards are probably our biggest need, after all, and we need more sure thing top 6 forwards, not more "maybe" top 6 forwards. We REALLY do not need more quantity. We need more quality at this point.
1
2
Suivant
Page 1
Remerciements à
Guillaume Lambert-Héon
pour l'aide à la traduction de l'anglais au français
SalarySwish
| Masses salariales de la NBA par CapFriendly
Conditions d’utilisation
Politique de confidentialité
Règlements du forum
À propos de nous
FAQ - Convention collective
Nous contacter
Privacy Manager
Follow @CapFriendly
CapFriendly
CapFriendly
© 2024 CapFriendly.com