PARAMÈTRES D’AFFICHAGE
Basculer en mode sombre
Thème automatique
COTES DES PARIS
Cotes activées
LANGUE
EN
SE CONNECTER
S'INSCRIRE
FORUMS
ARCHIVES ▾
ARCHIVES
Masses salariales des années antérieures
(Premium)
Arizona Coyotes Final Roster
Articles
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2017 - Vegas
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2021 - Seattle
CBA ▾
CBA
FAQ - Convention collective
FAQ - Rapports de dépistage
Historique des masses salariales
Rémunération maximale du contrat d’entrée
FAQ - Liste des blessés à long terme
FAQ - Rachats de contrat
FAQ - Offre Hostile
FAQ - Ballottage
FAQ - Liste de réserve
FAQ - Repêchage d'expansion
COTES
DÉPISTAGE
CALCS ▾
CALCS
Calculateur de rachat de contrat
Calculateur de ballottage
Calculateur d’offre qualificative
Calculateur d’arbitrage
Calculateur d'offre hostile
Calculateur d'impôt sur le revenu
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY ▾
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY
Sommaire
Alignements détaillés
Gardiens partants
Mises à jour - Statuts des joueurs
Historique des blessures
OUTILS ▾
OUTILS
Tableau de repêchage
Comparables de contrats
Équipes affiliées
Essais professionnels
Joueurs - Liste de réserve
(Premium)
Suivi des dépenses salariales
(Premium)
Rapports de dépistage
Cas d’arbitrage
Entraîneurs
Directeurs généraux
Joueurs appartenant à la formation au moment du gel - COVID
Clauses d'échange entrant en vigueur
(Premium)
JOUEURS ▾
JOUEURS
Joueurs autonomes
Joueurs actifs
Joueurs inactifs
Contrats 35 ans et +
Contrats d’entrée
Reports du contrat d'entrée
NTC-NMC
Gains en carrière
Comparables de contrats
Essais professionnels
Rapports de dépistage
Coût par point
Coût par arrêt
Transactions
Signatures
Mouvements de personnel
Historique des blessures
Historique du ballottage
Salaire retenu
Historique des rachats de contrat
ÉQUIPES ▾
CONFÉRENCE DE L'OUEST
PACIFIQUE
Ducks d'Anaheim
Flames de Calgary
Oilers d'Edmonton
Kings de Los Angeles
Sharks de San Jose
Kraken de Seattle
Canucks de Vancouver
Golden Knights de Vegas
CENTRALE
Blackhawks de Chicago
Avalanche du Colorado
Stars de Dallas
Wild du Minnesota
Predators de Nashville
Blues de St-Louis
Utah Hockey Club
Jets de Winnipeg
CONFÉRENCE DE L'EST
MÉTROPOLITAINE
Hurricanes de la Caroline
Blue Jackets de Columbus
Devils du New Jersey
Islanders de New York
Rangers de New York
Flyers de Philadelphie
Penguins de Pittsburgh
Capitals de Washington
ATLANTIQUE
Bruins de Boston
Sabres de Buffalo
Red Wings de Detroit
Panthers de la Floride
Canadiens de Montréal
Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Lightning de Tampa Bay
Maple Leafs de Toronto
INTERACTIF ▾
OUTILS INTERACTIFS
Fauteuil - DG (Simulateur de formation personnalisée)
Repêchage simulé
Simulateur de transactions (propositions de transactions)
RECHERCHER
FAUTEUIL - DG
REPÊCHAGE SIMULÉ
SIMULATEUR DE TRANSACTIONS
ÉQUIPES ▾
Ducks d'Anaheim
Bruins de Boston
Sabres de Buffalo
Flames de Calgary
Hurricanes de la Caroline
Blackhawks de Chicago
Avalanche du Colorado
Blue Jackets de Columbus
Stars de Dallas
Red Wings de Detroit
Oilers d'Edmonton
Panthers de la Floride
Kings de Los Angeles
Wild du Minnesota
Canadiens de Montréal
Predators de Nashville
Devils du New Jersey
Islanders de New York
Rangers de New York
Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Flyers de Philadelphie
Penguins de Pittsburgh
Sharks de San Jose
Kraken de Seattle
Blues de St-Louis
Lightning de Tampa Bay
Maple Leafs de Toronto
Utah Hockey Club
Canucks de Vancouver
Golden Knights de Vegas
Capitals de Washington
Jets de Winnipeg
JOUEURS ▾
Joueurs autonomes
Joueurs actifs
Joueurs inactifs
Contrats 35 ans et +
Contrats d’entrée
Reports du contrat d'entrée
NTC-NMC
Gains en carrière
Rapports de dépistage
Coût par point
Coût par arrêt
Transactions
Signatures
Mouvements de personnel
Historique des blessures
Historique du ballottage
Salaire retenu
Historique des rachats de contrat
Comparables de contrats
Essais professionnels
OUTILS ▾
Tableau de repêchage
Comparables de contrats
Rapports de dépistage
Cas d’arbitrage
Essais professionnels
Entraîneurs
Directeurs généraux
Joueurs appartenant à la formation au moment du gel - COVID
Joueurs - Liste de réserve
(Premium)
Suivi des dépenses salariales
(Premium)
Clauses d'échange entrant en vigueur
(Premium)
Équipes affiliées
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY ▾
Sommaire
Alignements détaillés
Gardiens partants
Mises à jour - Statuts des joueurs
CALCS ▾
Calculateur de rachat de contrat
Calculateur de ballottage
Calculateur d’offre qualificative
Calculateur d’arbitrage
Calculateur d'offre hostile
Calculateur d'impôt sur le revenu
RAPPORTS DE DÉPISTAGE
COTES
CBA▾
FAQ - Convention collective
FAQ - Rapports de dépistage
Historique des masses salariales
Rémunération maximale du contrat d’entrée
FAQ - Rachats de contrat
FAQ - Liste des blessés à long terme
FAQ - Offre Hostile
FAQ - Ballottage
FAQ - Liste de réserve
FAQ - Repêchage d'expansion
ARCHIVES ▾
Masses salariales des années antérieures
(Premium)
Arizona Coyotes Final Roster
Articles
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2017 - Vegas
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2021 - Seattle
FORUMS
SE CONNECTER
S'INSCRIRE
EN
Basculer en mode sombre
Cotes activées
Townsy_17
Membre depuis
11 janv. 2017
Équipe favorite
Maple Leafs de Toronto
Messages dans les forums
18
Messages par jour
0.0
MESSAGES
SUJETS
MENTIONS "J'AIME"
ÉQUIPES VIA FAUTEUIL-DG
Forum:
Armchair-GM
29 janv. 2019 à 23 h 20
Sujet:
Projection - realistic
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>LoganOllivier</b></div><div>Maybe if it was still 2009, players playing to 34 is becoming very rare, let alone being worth that kind of money.</div></div>
Muzzin's a clear-cut minute-munching top four defenceman, a consistent possession-driving defender, and someone who doesn't have much of an injury history. I fully believe he will still be a capable player by the time he's 34. Will he be worth the 6.5 by year 3? Maybe not, but it's worth it to have him on the team for those first two years when he is and take a 'loss' on a 4M player by year 3. Besides, 3 years isn't exactly a long-term commitment. The only defencemen who are losing their jobs at 34 either a) can't skate anymore or b) can't move the puck effectively, neither of which Muzzin projects to be. Finally, finding a top 4 defencemen in FA, the only real option at that stage for a team in Toronto's position, would likely cost much more and be around the same age as well, rendering your point moot.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
29 janv. 2019 à 22 h 40
Sujet:
Projection - realistic
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>LoganOllivier</b></div><div>You just signed a 31 year old to a 6+ million dollar deal with term. That is about as poor a decision you can make.</div></div>
Fair enough, you make a good point - truthfully I signed the deal with the current year in mind, not 2021! Consider a revised contract at 6.5 x 3. Brings him to 34, an age in which he should still hypothetically be worth his deal, and re-evaluate from there. Slightly raised cap hit to overcome lack of term.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
14 juill. 2018 à 20 h 56
Sujet:
"Can't Afford Everyone" - *In-Depth*
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Fignn</b></div><div>Gardener is gone they ain’t going to resign him. Johnson just signed for 700k. They will be able keep Marleau for his last season.Hansiney might take less to stay. With the cap going up and if a BIG IF Matthews, Nylander, Mariner take a little discount. They won’t get a stud defensmen maybe two solid D with Rielly and Dermont</div></div> This was for the 19-20 season, so Johnsson's deal would've expired again by then. If Gardiner's demand is reasonable, I don't see a glaring reason aside from his decision-making as to why they shouldn't, especially if the alternative is losing him for nothing. Marleau would be doable, but it'd be uncomfortably close and someone would have to take on Horton's contract. I don;t want Hainsey to stay tbh, his only asset is penalty-killing and the stats say he doesn't even do that well anymore. And finally, as I said, many teams do well without having a superstar on defence - consistency and depth are the keys, especially for a front-loaded team like the Leafs.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
14 juill. 2018 à 20 h 49
Sujet:
"Can't Afford Everyone" - *In-Depth*
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>jp_harvey</b></div><div>Usually, signing 3 depth forward (4th liners) in the summer amount to about 3-3.2M$ (one good depth player at 1.5M$, one young player from within at 750K and one 13th forward at 850K so roughly 3.1M$ instead of the 2.1M$ you had. Only 1M more, but considering the chances that all of W.N./M.M./A.M. gets more than what you projected (odds are high), plus the way you rid the Leafs of 2 bad contracts in a way it wouldn't happen makes us understand it'll definitely be hard for them to stick with that young core.</div></div>
Given the Leafs development system, promoting from within for two fourth line spots isn't far out of the question, and would cost at most 925k each. However, if the Leafs go bargain hunting, as they did with Tyler Ennis and sign them to the league minimum, it's fully doable. Even if nobody you offer during the summer wants to sign for league minimum, wait until training camp season and offer PTOs; usually, those guys are just looking for anyway to stay in the league and would accept anything. As mentioned in the trade sections, and in response to the other comments, the return that I listed wasn't necessarily supposed to be realistic, but rather what a team would *potentially* pay for that asset, as a maximum. And as a whole, this was done in response to those saying one of Nylander/Marner must go, Gardiner won't resign, offer sheet Matthews, etc. - some moves are necessary to rid themselves of bad contracts; that's the reality for every team. I just tried to illustrate that the Leafs can keep their core together and still be able to a) afford it and b) compete at the same time.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
14 juill. 2018 à 20 h 41
Sujet:
"Can't Afford Everyone" - *In-Depth*
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>palhal</b></div><div>Actually the NHL salary cap is pretty straight forward, and hiring a many experts doesn't get around the limitations and rules of the cap.
That Marleau trade isn't happening. Marleau has a total NMC. He isn't been traded to a out of the playoff team just because CapFriendly GMs want cap space. 2019/20 will be his last NHL season and he wants to win a Cup and the possibilities are closer to being a Leafs than Arizona.
If Pysyk is a top pairing Dmen, he isn't getting traded to the Leaf so cheaply or even signed for so little.
For cap reasons logic would say Gardiner can't be resigned. Leafs are hoping two LHD in their system, Borgman and Rosen are NHL ready. If Zaitsev is worth 4.5m, the Leaf should keep him, if he playing to a 4.5m level , no team would trade for without a sweetener or retention.</div></div>
I never said hiring experts would get them around certain limitations, but having guys who know what they're doing and how to effectively use the system is crucial in a salary-capped league. While that's a fair point on regarding Marleau, I do think he could be convinced to waive it, especially if the team he's going to has potential to succeed - hell, maybe he goes back to the Sharks. Pysyk isn't a top pairing defenceman, he's a 3-4 realistically - he's playing on the top pairing to provide support for his partner, like Methot did for Karlsson (not an equivalent, just for the record). Additionally, that deal he's on was signed by the Panthers, not me. Borgman and Rosen are good players, but unless they're late bloomers, I doubt they could ever step into Gardiner's role and be anywhere close in terms of value for him. For Zaitsev, it's not so much the dollar value but rather the term - even if he was worth it, there are better alternatives for cheaper prices, something the Leafs must take advantage of if they want to maintain their forward core. I do agree on the sweetener part if he fails to bounce back however; as that could be truoblesome despite the desperate need for RHD by practically every team.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
14 juill. 2018 à 20 h 31
Sujet:
"Can't Afford Everyone" - *In-Depth*
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>jp_harvey</b></div><div>Lots and lots of words to describe your moves and make sense of 'em to finally realize that you think you're going to get a 2nd round pick for both Zaitsev and Marleau, next year, by trading 'em without retaining any salary/cap hit...pretty much no team will want Zaitsev and his contract after the last season he had. Maybe you were implying that he'll have a huge bounce back season (if so, it wasn't clear)...and for Marleau, at 40+ years old with a 6.25M$ cap hit while TOR are in trouble cap wise, why would any team gives up that much to help them? Do you think other GM's don't foresee Leafs cap situation? No one will make them that kind of gifts. They'll have to overpay and send a good prospect in both deals and get a 4-5-6th round pick from teams in order for them to accept. Everything was realistic, in your proposition, except that...which is very important cause That's the only thing that would make the Leafs cap trouble go away.</div></div> If you read the section on the Marleau/Zaitsev trades, I mentioned at the end that the return doesn't matter to the Leafs, more so that the contracts get off the books. I am saying, considering that fourth liners can get 2nd round picks, getting one from a guy who scored 27 this year doesn't seem unreasonable. Plus, as I outlined, Marleau skates better than most veteran players, would only need to be paid 1.25 in actually money, and would be ideal for a team wanting to reach the cap floor. Zaitsev would be a harder contract to move because of the term, but it's not impossible - I agree that adding an asset is probably what must be done (see my Horton section), but he holds more value than most think.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
22 juin 2018 à 14 h 5
Sujet:
Utilizing the Cap, In-Depth
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>HockeyNM1510</b></div><div>SDP eh</div></div>
While I am a fan of his, I don't follow his podacasts - out of curiosity, what about the post was linked to something I'm assuming was mentioned on the podcast?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
22 juin 2018 à 13 h 49
Sujet:
Utilizing the Cap, In-Depth
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>magoodman9</b></div><div>They have 26 million dollars to spend and they take cap dumps and improve depth? I think they should go all in and take advantage of this situation that they are in</div></div>
I understand where you're coming from, as many teams have their competitive windows close quickly. But doing that could lead to world of cap trouble, or would cost them assets that would drain them. First off, the Nylander contract will eat somewhere between 6-7 million, which drops their available cap to 20-19 million. Outside of Tavares and Carlson, there isn't anyone in this free agency class that I'd be willing to overpay for, and even if there was, I highly doubt most of these players would be willing to sign a one year deal, which they'd have to given the Leafs contractual obligations to Matthews/Marner/Kapanen. They key to their success will be bringing in effective players on cheap deals and young players they could theoretically improve/boost trade value of and then flip. Depth signings like Czarnik and acquiring guys like Eriksson Ek may seem like small moves but mean a lot in the grand scheme of things. Plus, if it ain't broke (fully), no need to fix it (or go all out, in this case)!
Forum:
Armchair-GM
11 janv. 2017 à 23 h 3
Sujet:
Playoff Run?
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>palhal</b></div><div><i>In the Ellis trade which is make by TDL, you give up RHD Polak for RHD Ellis. Not a real help to the Leafs this year. So the trade is 2 years of Ellis for whatever Kapanen turns out to be.
By expansion draft you're right guys like Ellis and some other Dmen that would have been exposed will be dealt. IMO Kapanen is too much to trade for 2 years of Ellis. Think there will be better deals available for Lou.</i></div></div> Uh, I'm pretty sure that Ellis is a clear upgrade over Polak, any day of the week, and would certainly help the Leafs this year, and for years to come - I'd also like to think that Ellis would resign given the right price? More established than Carrick, and would solidify the top 4 for a while. And while I admit that Kapanen is a very good prospect, to acquire a top 4 RHD with offensive capabilities you have to pay up. Leafs have enough prospects on the wing (Bracco, Dzierkals, Grundstrom, Korshkov, etc.), which allow them to make this trade.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
11 janv. 2017 à 15 h 45
Sujet:
Playoff Run?
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Jacketsman61</b></div><div><i>I actually like the Nashville trade. It does benefit both sides. But I have to ask what is your angle on Stajan?</i></div></div> I've been a Leaf fan for years, and to see him back, playing for his hometown team, would be nice. From a manager's perspective, FOs were the key target, with everyone higher than him either too valuable to their respective teams, too expensive, or just not a good fit. All Ben Smith brings to the table is FOs, so I figured I'd improve it for a reasonable price.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
11 janv. 2017 à 15 h 37
Sujet:
Playoff Run?
My first creation on here, don't know why my username didn't show up. Feedback encouraged!
Remerciements à
Guillaume Lambert-Héon
pour l'aide à la traduction de l'anglais au français
SalarySwish
| Masses salariales de la NBA par CapFriendly
Conditions d’utilisation
Politique de confidentialité
Règlements du forum
À propos de nous
FAQ - Convention collective
Nous contacter
Privacy Manager
Follow @CapFriendly
CapFriendly
CapFriendly
© 2024 CapFriendly.com