PARAMÈTRES D’AFFICHAGE
Basculer en mode sombre
Thème automatique
COTES DES PARIS
Cotes activées
LANGUE
EN
SE CONNECTER
S'INSCRIRE
FORUMS
ARCHIVES ▾
ARCHIVES
Masses salariales des années antérieures
(Premium)
Articles
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2017 - Vegas
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2021 - Seattle
CBA ▾
CBA
FAQ - Convention collective
FAQ - Rapports de dépistage
Historique des masses salariales
Rémunération maximale du contrat d’entrée
FAQ - Liste des blessés à long terme
FAQ - Rachats de contrat
FAQ - Offre Hostile
FAQ - Ballottage
FAQ - Liste de réserve
FAQ - Repêchage d'expansion
COTES
19
DÉPISTAGE
CALCS ▾
CALCS
Calculateur de rachat de contrat
Calculateur de ballottage
Calculateur d’offre qualificative
Calculateur d’arbitrage
Calculateur d'offre hostile
Calculateur d'impôt sur le revenu
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY ▾
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY
Sommaire
Alignements détaillés
Gardiens partants
Mises à jour - Statuts des joueurs
Historique des blessures
OUTILS ▾
OUTILS
Tableau de repêchage
Comparables de contrats
Équipes affiliées
Essais professionnels
Joueurs - Liste de réserve
(Premium)
Suivi des dépenses salariales
(Premium)
Rapports de dépistage
Cas d’arbitrage
Entraîneurs
Directeurs généraux
Joueurs appartenant à la formation au moment du gel - COVID
Clauses d'échange entrant en vigueur
(Premium)
JOUEURS ▾
JOUEURS
Joueurs autonomes
Joueurs actifs
Joueurs inactifs
Contrats 35 ans et +
Contrats d’entrée
Reports du contrat d'entrée
NTC-NMC
Gains en carrière
Comparables de contrats
Essais professionnels
Rapports de dépistage
Coût par point
Coût par arrêt
Transactions
Signatures
Mouvements de personnel
Historique des blessures
Historique du ballottage
Salaire retenu
Historique des rachats de contrat
ÉQUIPES ▾
CONFÉRENCE DE L'OUEST
PACIFIQUE
Ducks d'Anaheim
Flames de Calgary
Oilers d'Edmonton
Kings de Los Angeles
Sharks de San Jose
Kraken de Seattle
Canucks de Vancouver
Golden Knights de Vegas
CENTRALE
Coyotes de l'Arizona
Blackhawks de Chicago
Avalanche du Colorado
Stars de Dallas
Wild du Minnesota
Predators de Nashville
Blues de St-Louis
Jets de Winnipeg
CONFÉRENCE DE L'EST
MÉTROPOLITAINE
Hurricanes de la Caroline
Blue Jackets de Columbus
Devils du New Jersey
Islanders de New York
Rangers de New York
Flyers de Philadelphie
Penguins de Pittsburgh
Capitals de Washington
ATLANTIQUE
Bruins de Boston
Sabres de Buffalo
Red Wings de Detroit
Panthers de la Floride
Canadiens de Montréal
Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Lightning de Tampa Bay
Maple Leafs de Toronto
INTERACTIF ▾
OUTILS INTERACTIFS
Fauteuil - DG (Simulateur de formation personnalisée)
Repêchage simulé
Simulateur de transactions (propositions de transactions)
RECHERCHER
FAUTEUIL - DG
REPÊCHAGE SIMULÉ
SIMULATEUR DE TRANSACTIONS
ÉQUIPES ▾
Ducks d'Anaheim
Coyotes de l'Arizona
Bruins de Boston
Sabres de Buffalo
Flames de Calgary
Hurricanes de la Caroline
Blackhawks de Chicago
Avalanche du Colorado
Blue Jackets de Columbus
Stars de Dallas
Red Wings de Detroit
Oilers d'Edmonton
Panthers de la Floride
Kings de Los Angeles
Wild du Minnesota
Canadiens de Montréal
Predators de Nashville
Devils du New Jersey
Islanders de New York
Rangers de New York
Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Flyers de Philadelphie
Penguins de Pittsburgh
Sharks de San Jose
Kraken de Seattle
Blues de St-Louis
Lightning de Tampa Bay
Maple Leafs de Toronto
Canucks de Vancouver
Golden Knights de Vegas
Capitals de Washington
Jets de Winnipeg
JOUEURS ▾
Joueurs autonomes
Joueurs actifs
Joueurs inactifs
Contrats 35 ans et +
Contrats d’entrée
Reports du contrat d'entrée
NTC-NMC
Gains en carrière
Rapports de dépistage
Coût par point
Coût par arrêt
Transactions
Signatures
Mouvements de personnel
Historique des blessures
Historique du ballottage
Salaire retenu
Historique des rachats de contrat
Comparables de contrats
Essais professionnels
OUTILS ▾
Tableau de repêchage
Comparables de contrats
Rapports de dépistage
Cas d’arbitrage
Essais professionnels
Entraîneurs
Directeurs généraux
Joueurs appartenant à la formation au moment du gel - COVID
Joueurs - Liste de réserve
(Premium)
Suivi des dépenses salariales
(Premium)
Clauses d'échange entrant en vigueur
(Premium)
Équipes affiliées
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY ▾
Sommaire
Alignements détaillés
Gardiens partants
Mises à jour - Statuts des joueurs
CALCS ▾
Calculateur de rachat de contrat
Calculateur de ballottage
Calculateur d’offre qualificative
Calculateur d’arbitrage
Calculateur d'offre hostile
Calculateur d'impôt sur le revenu
RAPPORTS DE DÉPISTAGE
COTES
CBA▾
FAQ - Convention collective
FAQ - Rapports de dépistage
Historique des masses salariales
Rémunération maximale du contrat d’entrée
FAQ - Rachats de contrat
FAQ - Liste des blessés à long terme
FAQ - Offre Hostile
FAQ - Ballottage
FAQ - Liste de réserve
FAQ - Repêchage d'expansion
ARCHIVES ▾
Masses salariales des années antérieures
(Premium)
Articles
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2017 - Vegas
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2021 - Seattle
FORUMS
SE CONNECTER
S'INSCRIRE
EN
Basculer en mode sombre
Cotes activées
Swedenheim
Membre depuis
5 sept. 2020
Équipe favorite
Ducks d'Anaheim
Deuxième équipe favorite
Canucks de Vancouver
Messages dans les forums
514
Messages par jour
0.4
MESSAGES
SUJETS
MENTIONS "J'AIME"
ÉQUIPES VIA FAUTEUIL-DG
Forum:
NHL Signings
15 août 2021 à 0 h 55
Sujet:
Anaheim Ducks signed Sasha Pastujov (3 Years / $880,000 AAV)
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Canesfan21_</b></div><div>Quite possibly could end up as the Steal of the draft , great pick by the Ducks.</div></div>
I, too, have high hopes for this kid.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
9 août 2021 à 18 h 3
Sujet:
Rakell to CAR
Forget about the conditional - why would the canes trade a decent prospect and two picks for a rental? He doesn’t re-sign with the Canes, he’s a veteran top 9 forward and will ask for more then they will pay. This is not a Canes move, maybe last year when he had an extra year of term.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
9 août 2021 à 17 h 17
Sujet:
Rakell to CAR
There are no conditional picks for players re-signing anymore.
Forum:
Anaheim Ducks
4 août 2021 à 3 h 25
Sujet:
Ducks vs Kings prospect pool would you rather
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Swedenheim</b></div><div>to be fair I feel like the Ducks second tier gets slept on hard, Thrun and Lacombe are both quality players along with Pastujov and Groulx</div></div>
That might be true. All of those guys are solid prospects, but they're not in the same class as Kaliyev, Kupari, ****emo, Madden, or Thomas. I'd put them on par with someone like Martin Chromiak, which isn't a knock. The kid just put up seven(!) points in a single game in his U20 tournament this week.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">An unreal performance by <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/GoKingsGo?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw" rel="nofollow noreferrer noopener" target="_blank">#GoKingsGo</a> prospect 🇸🇰 Martin Chromiak, who scored SEVEN points tonight. Chromiak had four goals and three assists in Team Slovakia U20’s 8-1 win over Team Denmark U20. All points are in the video.🎥: aisw <a href="https://t.co/wwWo46Y4Yz" rel="nofollow noreferrer noopener" target="_blank">pic.twitter.com/wwWo46Y4Yz</a></p>— Matej Deraj (@MatoDeraj) <a href="https://twitter.com/MatoDeraj/status/1421142233126952962?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw" rel="nofollow noreferrer noopener" target="_blank">July 30, 2021</a></blockquote>
The Kings have several other prospects in that same tier, including guys like Jaret Anderson-Dolan and Aidan Dudas. I didn't even include Lias Andersson, who is having quite the resurgence, scoring at a PPG pace in the AHL last season.
Forum:
Anaheim Ducks
4 août 2021 à 0 h 12
Sujet:
Ducks vs Kings prospect pool would you rather
LA has the better prospect pool, and it's not particularly close.
At the top, the teams are roughly equivalent:
Byfield is a step above Zegras, but not by much.
Turcotte and Clarke are roughly equivalent to MacTavish and Drysdale.
After that is where LA starts to considerably outclass Anaheim. The second tier of offensive prospects includes the following guys:
LA: Kaliyev, Kupari, ****emo, Madden, Thomas, Bjornfot, Faber, Grans
Anaheim: Perreault, Zellweger
I left out guys like Simontival, Chromiak, and Spence that have been absolutely tearing it up in junior and international competitions due to their late draft positions, but those guys are looking like they will be quality adds as well. Everyone else in your list for both teams I would consider to be in a tier below the guys that I listed.
I will give Anaheim the edge in goaltending prospects, as Dostal looks like he could be a quality goaltender. The Kings best options in goal are Ingham and Parik, both of whom could turn into quality NHL goaltenders, but would probably be considered long shots.
Forum:
Anaheim Ducks
4 août 2021 à 0 h 3
Sujet:
Ducks vs Kings prospect pool would you rather
Possible NHL talent is even imo. Ducks have the better squad. Kings have the ceiling.
Forum:
Anaheim Ducks
3 août 2021 à 23 h 49
Sujet:
Ducks vs Kings prospect pool would you rather
I would agree that the Kings are slightly ahead of the Ducks in their rebuild by about a year, as a result I give LA a slight edge.
Forum:
Anaheim Ducks
3 août 2021 à 23 h 49
Sujet:
Ducks vs Kings prospect pool would you rather
I think the Ducks have the higher end top two guys (Zegras and Drysdale >>> Byfield and Clarke personally) but the Kings pool looks a little deeper to me.
Detroit isn’t in bad shape themselves. Seider, Raymond, Cossa, Edvinsson - but we’re further out than LA/ANA
Forum:
Armchair-GM
3 août 2021 à 22 h 27
Sujet:
Fire Bob
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>palhal</b></div><div>At least the Ducks are going to lots of cap next season to rebuild their roster. I can understand that you don't like Murray, but there are many teams in a worse situation than the Ducks.</div></div>
This is a point that is widely overlooked by a lot of the fanbase currently. Bob isn't perfect and has his faults, but there's a lot of teams out there in much worse situations. The biggest gripe on him is usually his lack of activity, which I'll take everyday of the week over the Bennings of the world.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
4 juin 2021 à 2 h 12
Sujet:
Lindholm for 9OA is there a deal to be made
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Radu47</b></div><div>What on earth is going on here
All the comments on this thread are sound, measured and mostly free of vitriol it's like this post (*evangelical preacher voice*) HEALED cap friendly in one go
Taylor Hallelujah! 💒</div></div>
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Swedenheim</b></div><div>Theoretically Lindholm says he will sign a reasonable extension, does that make you cough up the pick and maybe more, Lindholm is certainly not young but he also certainly isn’t old and has a number of good years left in him</div></div>
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Reason</b></div><div>I like the player and their cap hit, however with only one year left before UFA I don't think this makes a lot of sense.
I think VAN would be better off to target a RD preferably a little bit younger and who has more years of team control.</div></div>
Just wanted to say it was awesome to read actual conversation on here for once! Thanks for that.
Forums are so much better when there's discussion instead of arguments.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
3 juin 2021 à 23 h 46
Sujet:
Lindholm for 9OA is there a deal to be made
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Swedenheim</b></div><div>Thank you for the insight and perspective, although I think I’d like challenge you on your position that they are 3-4 years from contention, I follow the Canucks somewhat closely as they are one of my favorite teams and I honestly think that with some smart decisions they could be only 1-2 years away from being a threat. They have plenty of forwards that in 2 years will be effective top 6 players. Petterson Miller Hoglander Podkolzin Boeser Horvat. And A number of D that can be effective in 2 years. Hughes Rathbone Schmidt and if Hamonic and Myers can play like top 4 Dmen just don’t always do. They also have a solid goalie in Demko. I think a presence like Lindholm would catapult them to a somewhat guaranteed playoff position next year given the division. Basically to surmise the Canucks are lucky in the fact that their issues have really nothing to do with their young core. It’s just getting a bit of luck and fixing up their bottom 6 and improving their D a bit that needs to be worked out. I think this would cover the latter. And worst case scenario you could have a left side on defense that guarantees a solid Dman is on the ice at any given moment similar to Tampa’s model.</div></div>
It's definitely a possibility and I sure hope you are correct! I do like their core, I just have no faith in JB!
I do think they will be a playoff team possibly next year, more likely the year after, but I think they are 3-4 years away from competing with the likes of the AV's, TB, CAR etc.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
3 juin 2021 à 23 h 24
Sujet:
Lindholm for 9OA is there a deal to be made
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Swedenheim</b></div><div>I don’t think Terry requested a trade I thought the rumor was ANA may have been shopping him</div></div>
Maybe not an official trade request, but the quote from Friedman is as follows:
"One young player who might be up for a change of scenery is Troy Terry in Anaheim. I’m starting to hear some conversation about him and whether or not he might go somewhere else to get a change from the Ducks"
Could be interpreted in different ways, I suppose, but it definitely sounds like there was something there.
<a href="/users/OldNYIfan" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">@OldNYIfan</a> Do you have any insight or opinions on the matter?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
3 juin 2021 à 23 h 18
Sujet:
Lindholm for 9OA is there a deal to be made
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Swedenheim</b></div><div>Theoretically Lindholm says he will sign a reasonable extension, does that make you cough up the pick and maybe more, Lindholm is certainly not young but he also certainly isn’t old and has a number of good years left in him</div></div>
It would be more appealing. I definitely think Lindholm is worth a first plus, however if VAN is going to trade their first I am not sure Lindholm is the best fit for the team. The team needs D improvements but would prefer right side upgrades.
Concerns fit wise for VAN from my perspective would be:
VAN is still likely 3-4 years away from contending which would be pushing Lindholm into his 30's and likely into a state of decline.
VAN is high on Jack Rathbone becoming a solid top 4 LD in the very near future. With Hughes also playing the left side, VAN hopes to be set in this position for years to come.
VAN traded away their 1&2 round picks last year and don't appear to have a lot of future players coming in on ECL's. If they trade away top picks for players without some form of team control on team friendly deals, they could continue to have cap issues long term.
Greater need for improvement on the right side.
All that being said JB tried hard to acquire OEL last year, a desperation move in my opinion, and he is likely going to be even more desperate to improve the team this year, so I could definitely see him having interest, I would think VAN would probably have to add prospect though.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
3 juin 2021 à 23 h 15
Sujet:
Lindholm for 9OA is there a deal to be made
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Nighthawk</b></div><div>I like Lindholm a lot but another LHD for 9th doesn't address needs.</div></div>
You don't think that your chances of re-signing Lindholm are better than your chances of re-signing Edler, and your results wouldn't be better if you do?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
3 juin 2021 à 23 h 2
Sujet:
Lindholm for 9OA is there a deal to be made
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Swedenheim</b></div><div><strong>nothing like a trade request</strong>, but he is a valuable piece that may not want to resign with the team given its current affairs. Also stuff like while he isn’t old he may not necessarily be in the right age window for the new core.
Basically this is all hypothetical</div></div>
Just on the topic of trade requests, what ever came of the reports that Troy Terry wanted a change of scenery? It kind of came out of nowhere and I never heard much follow up. Do you know what the situation is there/whether the Ducks might be willing to move him?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
3 juin 2021 à 23 h 13
Sujet:
Lindholm for 9OA is there a deal to be made
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>CMcAvoy73</b></div><div>If I’m anaheim i need more.</div></div>
I respectfully disagree. there's a difference between Kapanen for a mid-first and a good prospect and the ninth overall selection. I'd be thrilled with the pick alone.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
3 juin 2021 à 23 h 9
Sujet:
Lindholm for 9OA is there a deal to be made
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>exo2769</b></div><div>Unless ANA knows something about Linholm that we don't, why would they trade away a bona-fide top pair dman for the attempt of a top pair dman? Did he ask to be traded?</div></div>
Because he's only got one year left on his contract. The assumption is that he doesn't indicate a desire to re-sign here.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
3 juin 2021 à 22 h 56
Sujet:
Lindholm for 9OA is there a deal to be made
As great a player as Lindholm is, that seems a bit risky from the Canucks perspective. He's only got the one year left and they're not a lock for the playoffs. Could easily result in a one and done with no results to show for it.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
3 juin 2021 à 22 h 47
Sujet:
Lindholm for 9OA is there a deal to be made
I like the player and their cap hit, however with only one year left before UFA I don't think this makes a lot of sense.
I think VAN would be better off to target a RD preferably a little bit younger and who has more years of team control.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
3 juin 2021 à 22 h 48
Sujet:
Lindholm for 9OA is there a deal to be made
Unless ANA knows something about Linholm that we don't, why would they trade away a bona-fide top pair dman for the attempt of a top pair dman? Did he ask to be traded?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
3 juin 2021 à 22 h 50
Sujet:
Lindholm for 9OA is there a deal to be made
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>exo2769</b></div><div>Unless ANA knows something about Linholm that we don't, why would they trade away a bona-fide top pair dman for the attempt of a top pair dman? Did he ask to be traded?</div></div>
no but if you think about it they are rebuilding and will want as many top picks as possible. I see the ducks rebuild being a slow one as many of the vets will most likely retire and it will take a few years for the young guns to become bonified stars.
but if they want to move the #9OA why not take home boy Rielly ;)
Forum:
Armchair-GM
3 juin 2021 à 22 h 50
Sujet:
Lindholm for 9OA is there a deal to be made
What on earth is going on here
All the comments on this thread are sound, measured and mostly free of vitriol it's like this post (*evangelical preacher voice*) HEALED cap friendly in one go
Taylor Hallelujah! 💒
Forum:
Armchair-GM
3 juin 2021 à 22 h 43
Sujet:
Lindholm for 9OA is there a deal to be made
I like Lindholm a lot but another LHD for 9th doesn't address needs.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
3 juin 2021 à 22 h 32
Sujet:
Lindholm for 9OA is there a deal to be made
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Swedenheim</b></div><div>Lindholm is a bonafide top pair Dman but is he someone the Nucks would pay big for? Curious to see what others think and how this deal could be valued by each side</div></div>
Really good comment
Hm.
With the desperation in Vancouver maybe happens?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
3 juin 2021 à 22 h 10
Sujet:
Lindholm for 9OA is there a deal to be made
If I’m anaheim i need more.
1
2
Suivant
Page 1
Remerciements à
Guillaume Lambert-Héon
pour l'aide à la traduction de l'anglais au français
SalarySwish
| Masses salariales de la NBA par CapFriendly
Conditions d’utilisation
Politique de confidentialité
Règlements du forum
À propos de nous
FAQ - Convention collective
Nous contacter
Privacy Manager
Follow @CapFriendly
CapFriendly
CapFriendly
© 2024 CapFriendly.com