PARAMÈTRES D’AFFICHAGE
Basculer en mode sombre
Thème automatique
COTES DES PARIS
Cotes activées
LANGUE
EN
SE CONNECTER
S'INSCRIRE
FORUMS
ARCHIVES ▾
ARCHIVES
Masses salariales des années antérieures
(Premium)
Articles
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2017 - Vegas
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2021 - Seattle
CBA ▾
CBA
FAQ - Convention collective
FAQ - Rapports de dépistage
Historique des masses salariales
Rémunération maximale du contrat d’entrée
FAQ - Liste des blessés à long terme
FAQ - Rachats de contrat
FAQ - Offre Hostile
FAQ - Ballottage
FAQ - Liste de réserve
FAQ - Repêchage d'expansion
COTES
DÉPISTAGE
CALCS ▾
CALCS
Calculateur de rachat de contrat
Calculateur de ballottage
Calculateur d’offre qualificative
Calculateur d’arbitrage
Calculateur d'offre hostile
Calculateur d'impôt sur le revenu
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY ▾
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY
Sommaire
Alignements détaillés
Gardiens partants
Mises à jour - Statuts des joueurs
Historique des blessures
OUTILS ▾
OUTILS
Tableau de repêchage
Comparables de contrats
Équipes affiliées
Essais professionnels
Joueurs - Liste de réserve
(Premium)
Suivi des dépenses salariales
(Premium)
Rapports de dépistage
Cas d’arbitrage
Entraîneurs
Directeurs généraux
Joueurs appartenant à la formation au moment du gel - COVID
Clauses d'échange entrant en vigueur
(Premium)
JOUEURS ▾
JOUEURS
Joueurs autonomes
Joueurs actifs
Joueurs inactifs
Contrats 35 ans et +
Contrats d’entrée
Reports du contrat d'entrée
NTC-NMC
Gains en carrière
Comparables de contrats
Essais professionnels
Rapports de dépistage
Coût par point
Coût par arrêt
Transactions
Signatures
Mouvements de personnel
Historique des blessures
Historique du ballottage
Salaire retenu
Historique des rachats de contrat
ÉQUIPES ▾
CONFÉRENCE DE L'OUEST
PACIFIQUE
Ducks d'Anaheim
Flames de Calgary
Oilers d'Edmonton
Kings de Los Angeles
Sharks de San Jose
Kraken de Seattle
Canucks de Vancouver
Golden Knights de Vegas
CENTRALE
Coyotes de l'Arizona
Blackhawks de Chicago
Avalanche du Colorado
Stars de Dallas
Wild du Minnesota
Predators de Nashville
Blues de St-Louis
Jets de Winnipeg
CONFÉRENCE DE L'EST
MÉTROPOLITAINE
Hurricanes de la Caroline
Blue Jackets de Columbus
Devils du New Jersey
Islanders de New York
Rangers de New York
Flyers de Philadelphie
Penguins de Pittsburgh
Capitals de Washington
ATLANTIQUE
Bruins de Boston
Sabres de Buffalo
Red Wings de Detroit
Panthers de la Floride
Canadiens de Montréal
Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Lightning de Tampa Bay
Maple Leafs de Toronto
INTERACTIF ▾
OUTILS INTERACTIFS
Fauteuil - DG (Simulateur de formation personnalisée)
Repêchage simulé
Simulateur de transactions (propositions de transactions)
RECHERCHER
FAUTEUIL - DG
REPÊCHAGE SIMULÉ
SIMULATEUR DE TRANSACTIONS
ÉQUIPES ▾
Ducks d'Anaheim
Coyotes de l'Arizona
Bruins de Boston
Sabres de Buffalo
Flames de Calgary
Hurricanes de la Caroline
Blackhawks de Chicago
Avalanche du Colorado
Blue Jackets de Columbus
Stars de Dallas
Red Wings de Detroit
Oilers d'Edmonton
Panthers de la Floride
Kings de Los Angeles
Wild du Minnesota
Canadiens de Montréal
Predators de Nashville
Devils du New Jersey
Islanders de New York
Rangers de New York
Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Flyers de Philadelphie
Penguins de Pittsburgh
Sharks de San Jose
Kraken de Seattle
Blues de St-Louis
Lightning de Tampa Bay
Maple Leafs de Toronto
Canucks de Vancouver
Golden Knights de Vegas
Capitals de Washington
Jets de Winnipeg
JOUEURS ▾
Joueurs autonomes
Joueurs actifs
Joueurs inactifs
Contrats 35 ans et +
Contrats d’entrée
Reports du contrat d'entrée
NTC-NMC
Gains en carrière
Rapports de dépistage
Coût par point
Coût par arrêt
Transactions
Signatures
Mouvements de personnel
Historique des blessures
Historique du ballottage
Salaire retenu
Historique des rachats de contrat
Comparables de contrats
Essais professionnels
OUTILS ▾
Tableau de repêchage
Comparables de contrats
Rapports de dépistage
Cas d’arbitrage
Essais professionnels
Entraîneurs
Directeurs généraux
Joueurs appartenant à la formation au moment du gel - COVID
Joueurs - Liste de réserve
(Premium)
Suivi des dépenses salariales
(Premium)
Clauses d'échange entrant en vigueur
(Premium)
Équipes affiliées
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY ▾
Sommaire
Alignements détaillés
Gardiens partants
Mises à jour - Statuts des joueurs
CALCS ▾
Calculateur de rachat de contrat
Calculateur de ballottage
Calculateur d’offre qualificative
Calculateur d’arbitrage
Calculateur d'offre hostile
Calculateur d'impôt sur le revenu
RAPPORTS DE DÉPISTAGE
COTES
CBA▾
FAQ - Convention collective
FAQ - Rapports de dépistage
Historique des masses salariales
Rémunération maximale du contrat d’entrée
FAQ - Rachats de contrat
FAQ - Liste des blessés à long terme
FAQ - Offre Hostile
FAQ - Ballottage
FAQ - Liste de réserve
FAQ - Repêchage d'expansion
ARCHIVES ▾
Masses salariales des années antérieures
(Premium)
Articles
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2017 - Vegas
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2021 - Seattle
FORUMS
SE CONNECTER
S'INSCRIRE
EN
Basculer en mode sombre
Cotes activées
RinksideOps
Membre depuis
20 avr. 2018
Messages dans les forums
82
Messages par jour
0.0
MESSAGES
SUJETS
MENTIONS "J'AIME"
ÉQUIPES VIA FAUTEUIL-DG
Forum:
Armchair-GM
17 avr. 2019 à 11 h 35
Sujet:
Theres Always Next Year
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>pharrow</b></div><div>Sure and CBJ didn't just pound your lineup up and down the boards and all over the ice for 4 games.
Barré-Boulet, Point, Kucherov, (he's what 5'11 if that), Johnson. That's four of your top 6 who are small players.
Then you wonder why the other team comes out and beats on your lineup. Yeah I'm sure you will win a lot of games in the regular season. But if you haven't figured it out by now, come the playoffs the game is different. You better be ready to hit and be hit. This is two years now where TB was simply out physicaled up and down the ice.
Speed and skill only goes so far when the other team is willing to plaster you all over the boards.</div></div>
I get that guys like Foligno/Anderson/Dubinsky make the Blue Jackets appear more heavy, but the only way Columbus pounded the Lightning up and down the boards was through effort and puck control. CBJ is actually a slightly lighter and younger team than TBL and the Lightning out-hit the Blue Jackets 144-117 in the series. Four of CBJ's Top 6 (Duchene, Atkinson, Panarin, and Dzingel) are all under 200lb, and their entire top line is under 6'0". Also, according to CapFriendly's depth charts, both teams have only 8 skaters above 200lb, so it's not like Columbus had an arsenal of big guys that would crush all of the small Lightning players.
Don't get me wrong, I'm not completely arguing against big players. I just don't get the argument that they need to be in the top 6 over more skilled players. Weight can be beneficial for defensemen (all of Tampa's D-men are over 200lbs by the way) and for bottom 6 players, who can't always rely on skill and need to win board battles or lay a hit to knock the opposition off the puck. With the way the league is now, most of the biggest point producers are smaller, and big players who can also score are becoming few and far between. I know the Lightning's big-3 didn't live up to expectations, but Panarin, Duchene, and Atkinson drove the offense for the whole series. If you gave the same minutes to the heavy bottom 6 guys like Foligno, Dubinsky and Jenner, I can guarantee you they would not have been able to out-score the Lighting.
TL;DR: The Lighting are actually bigger and hit more than Columbus did. Big players do have a place in hockey, but unless they also have the skill, they should not be in the top 6.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
16 avr. 2019 à 20 h 11
Sujet:
Theres Always Next Year
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>BOLTLOVER1</b></div><div>Tonight .. Columbus 5 .. Tampa 2</div></div>
You seem to really love those Bolts
Forum:
Armchair-GM
16 avr. 2019 à 20 h 10
Sujet:
Theres Always Next Year
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>pharrow</b></div><div>a collection of 5'10 or less players trying to play in a tom wilson league. That will end well.</div></div>
First off, the big tough guys are being phased out, and second, what team are you talking about exactly? Half of Tampa is over 200lbs and all but 6 of them are 6'0" or taller.
The league is changing, and if you try to prioritize size over skill for the entire roster, you'll end up like Edmonton.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
16 avr. 2019 à 17 h 4
Sujet:
Dont Panic and Over-Correct
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>BOLTLOVER1</b></div><div>Leadership change .. Cooper or Stamkos .. Stamkos a MINUS 5 this playoff after being a minus most of this year .. 5 on 5 stat .. other issue is we WAY too small and scrawny .. only 2 forwards over 200lbs and they on 3rd/4th line .. team is constricted and cultured for regular season .. Chicago with their guys never had these issues</div></div>
It's a different league now. It's getting smaller, faster and more skilled. Plus every single defensemen is over 200 except Stralman, which is half their team! Trying to make everyone big is what got the Oilers into their mess. Wouldn't you want an 18:00 per night player to be the most skilled guy you could find? And you can't possibly say that a third round exit is a choke. That's so hard to do in this league, especially three times in a row. Granted, losing the 3-2 leads is a choke, but the Capitals were notorious for Game 7 losses, and they eventually got over it by sticking with the same core and learning from their mistakes. I know it's frustrating, I'm pissed too, but just be patient.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
16 avr. 2019 à 16 h 50
Sujet:
Theres Always Next Year
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>BOLTLOVER1</b></div><div>Agree with your moves and add Volkov and maybe 2 other Crunch guys .. but trading Gourde is like shooting Daenerys dragon in the small toe .. ain't going to do crap .. head needs to be hit like the Night King did .. and for Tampa that Cooper or Stamkos</div></div>
Look, I get it. This is a terrible playoffs so far, but you don't set an NHL win record by being a bad team. These guys have shown that they're capable of winning, even in the playoffs. In the past four years, they have made the Cup Final once and the Conference Final twice. Even though they didn't win, that is not a team that has a history of choking. There's so much luck involved in hockey (running into hot goalies, hitting posts, injuries, etc.) that making the Final 4 in each of their last 3 playoff appearances is an incredible feat.
When was the last time that blowing a team up has ever worked? Just look at Washington. A few years ago, everyone was saying that they were the biggest chokers. Trotz was on the hook and everyone was speculating if Ovi was gonna get traded, but they didn't touch their core. They retooled around it, and they eventually won. I think every team needs one big disappointment before they can put it together, and this is it for the Lightning. They got their wake-up call and now just gotta keep it together.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
16 avr. 2019 à 16 h 35
Sujet:
2019-20 Cap Crunch
Thank you for being smart enough to call up prospects (I haven't seen a lot of that on here), but I don't think you actually have to make all these moves. Send all but one young winger down because it's better for their development to play top line minutes in the AHL than to be scratched/on the 4th line in the NHL (Paquette did a good enough job to resign for that role), and it will save you about $2M in scratches. Benn is getting old, so I'd rather sign Rutta (who might even be cheaper).
If you do all that, you would have enough money to only have to move one $5-6M player. Although Callahan is the anchor contract, he only has one more year and they could get a pick instead of giving one away if they move someone like Gourde. He had a terrible back half of the year and Miller is a year younger and more versatile. I think one of the prospects will be ready to replace Gourde in the next few years anyway, so might as well get him out now while there is still value.
Let me know what you think!
Forum:
Armchair-GM
16 avr. 2019 à 16 h 19
Sujet:
Help for cup next year
Overall, not too bad, but the free agent signings kinda leave a bad taste in my mouth. DSP had one good playoff run, but is now in the minors, and you shouldn't pay Kruger $1M to be a backup. The Lightning have good (and cheaper) prospects, so I'd rather call them up and bump Joseph down to the 4th line instead of spending almost $2M for players who won't play every game. I do like your idea of bringing in Faulk to bolster the defense, but Cal Foote could be ready to play in a similar role. You could maybe wait until the trade deadline so you can assess Foote's play and if you still want to add, bringing in Faulk at the deadline would only require a few picks. Lastly, I get that they need cap space, but I'd rather move Gourde over Callahan or Miller. Miller is more proven/versatile, and although Callahan is kind of an anchor, he only has one year left and I think Gourde might get passed in the depth chart soon anyway by a prospect. Plus, you wouldn't have to give up a 1st to move Gourde.
I know calling up prospects can be risky, but the Lighting usually do a good job with it. Let me know what you think!
Forum:
Armchair-GM
16 avr. 2019 à 15 h 57
Sujet:
Line Idea for Game 4
Putting their top two centers on the same line is very ...bold... to say the least, but at this point, that might be what they need. Interesting idea.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
25 févr. 2019 à 16 h 54
Sujet:
take on me
You're literally downgrading on both players. Why would you ever do this?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
22 févr. 2019 à 14 h 24
Sujet:
Granlund
Honestly, I think Faulk for Granlund straight up is pretty fair. Both 26, both having a bit of a down year, both have 2 years left on their contracts. Maybe throw in a mid-round pick with Faulk since he's probably having a slightly worse year, but you don't need to add Wallmark.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
20 févr. 2019 à 23 h 19
Sujet:
Deadline
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Canesfan14</b></div><div>I agree the struggling ducks wouldn't move a key young piece. also if sending a big package to Ottawa why not for duchene I feel like he'd be more valuable to the team and Ottawa said theyre willing to trade him.</div></div>
Agreed. Although Stone might fit in their system better since he's very versatile, Carolina needs center depth so I think Duchene might edge out Stone as the better option.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
20 févr. 2019 à 23 h 15
Sujet:
Veteran leadership
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>ChasingPuckBunnies</b></div><div>My thought process was it’s the same amount of money and gets them someone who can play on the right side with Larsson when he comes up</div></div>
Oh yeah I get that. I think they'd probably go for someone younger and cheaper though.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
19 févr. 2019 à 14 h 2
Sujet:
Opinions - Ducks retool
Yeah Ducks aren't parting with Terry for a 3rd line center, and Johnsson is the only valuable piece in the TOR trade and he's a bottom 6 guy. Adding on a mediocre pick and a guy who can't even crack the Toronto roster isn't going to get the Leafs anything valuable, let alone Montour.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
19 févr. 2019 à 13 h 58
Sujet:
Veteran leadership
Ducks have enough overpaid veteran leadership as it is. They don't need more.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
19 févr. 2019 à 13 h 56
Sujet:
Deadline
Not a chance you get Steel for that price. The guy is better than half the first round picks in his draft, so the Ducks will want at least one 1st rounder and then some. Not to mention that they are rebuilding and are looking at Steel to be the center of the future.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
18 févr. 2019 à 12 h 27
Sujet:
2019-20 Ducks
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Rooney11</b></div><div>I would probably play Steel over Kossila looking back lol. They have a lot of good young guys who will get a shot next year either way though.</div></div>
Agreed. Steel is still improving so he will be better than Kossila. Also, Terry doesn't really play center that often, so he should be put on the wing, and Rowney should be in the middle. It would take some line shuffling so you don't force rookies onto the 4th line, but all rookie call ups should be in top-9 roles.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
17 févr. 2019 à 15 h 16
Sujet:
Best Cap Team with ELCs
I can maybe see your point, since his success could possibly be attributed to Kucherov. However, Point has the 2nd most points per game among centers this year and was great defensively in the playoffs last year against Boston, even without Kuch on his line. So given that, Point is easily a top 5 center in the league when paired with Kucherov. If he didn't have those two players on his wings, he would probably be moved down the lineup, but he has great chemistry with Kucherov so that line should definitely be 1st or at least 2nd behind Crosby and the Bruins.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
13 févr. 2019 à 10 h 47
Sujet:
NSLO
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Ragsandbluesfan</b></div><div>So trading an old winger for picks and a 2C in his prime for a backup and a pick dont signal a rebuild? Its not going to kickstart it, because they dont need to, they just need to accept it</div></div>
An old backup does nothing to help a rebuild, and you'll be lucky if a 2nd rounder does. A "rebuild" doesn't mean just get rid of anything you can to waive a white flag and send a message that the team is rebuilding. It means get future assets and focus on development instead of short-term success. Henrique can definitely be traded for a guaranteed 1st and/or young prospects, or he can be used to help develop rookies on the Ducks since he is a steady player. Your Henrique trade does neither.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
13 févr. 2019 à 10 h 40
Sujet:
Carlyles Fault
Uh, this is a pretty bad roster that doesn't even fit under the cap
Forum:
Armchair-GM
13 févr. 2019 à 10 h 37
Sujet:
Realistic Rebuild
I think it's pretty clear that the Ducks can not win a cup with this roster, even after adding a player like Duchene (who has never been over a point-per-game player until this season). Even still, a top UFA FWD will probably get at least $9Mx8 since the Ducks will have to out bid other teams, and that will be a pretty ugly contract considering it goes until he's 36. He'll be 32 when Lindholm and Manson are up, and if you're worried about resigning them now, think of how hard it will be with $9M less in cap space devoted to a player past his prime. Our defensive core is still pretty young, and our future at forward looks bright. In 3 years, the Ducks could very well have a deadly and deep forward group:
Rakell-Steel-Terry
Comtois-Getlzaf-Sprong
Jones-Henrique-Kase
Ritchie-Lundestrom-Sherwood
All 7 of the top 9 players not named Getzlaf or Henrique are capable of scoring 60-80 points in a season (like Duchene has is his career) if they develop properly, so that should be the focus. You get the deep roster you want and you're not stuck with some out-dated player costing more than the rest of your roster. And like I said before, if it turns out that Getzlaf is too old to resign in 2 years, then that's when you can start making big moves to fill in the gap rather than assume any need before you see what the team turns into.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
12 févr. 2019 à 17 h 33
Sujet:
Realistic Rebuild
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Jah1722</b></div><div>I agree with virtually everything you’ve said. They don’t need to rebuild to be competitive again. They’ve got the pieces. Getzlaf is still a solid number 1C if he gets re-engaged. Perry has 40 points last season and although he doesn’t look 100% confident with his knee quite yet he’s actually created a few chances and had a few of his own. I could see the ducks buying out Kesler but if they don’t re-sign silfverberg they will still have decent cap space and maybe finding a taker for the final season of Eaves would open up more. Henrique is underrated. He’s very good with his stick defensively has improved immensely on face offs since he first arrived and scores big goals. I don’t see him going anywhere unless the offer is just too good to say no. I haven’t seen what Steel has done lately but like you said he struggled early this season in both leagues. I could see him starting next year in the AHL tho. I think Terry and Jones are almost locks for the opening night rosters next season. Comtois’ first season as a pro in the AHL follows the Ducks development of most prospects. All that said this team needs to add a scorer. I’m fairly confident this team can get back to being a good defensive team but they’ve struggled to score. This season even worse than past and with a pretty deep fwd UFA group I could see them bringing in a piece or possibly 2.</div></div>
Yeah, Steel's been pretty good lately. Had a 4-point night a week ago and has been on a point-per-per game pace mid season. The reason I didn't call up Jones is because there aren't enough roster spots on the wing, and I don't want to put a scoring prospect on the 4th line. I think a center spot will open up with Kesler's situation, which is why I brought up Steel.
Also, I totally get the draw of a UFA, but the market is just too high lately. Not only does signing a UFA forward get rid of a roster spot for a rookie, but the Ducks would ultimately be paying too much and for too long. I like the Toronto model of using rookies to fill in spots, and just keeping the core they had before (JVR, Kadri, Bozak, Reilly, Gardiner, etc.). I think Edmonton jumped the gun by making trades and signing UFAs (Lucic, Hall for Larsson, Russel) before they really knew what they had. If they would've seen the development of Nurse and Klefbom and the inability of McDavid, Draisaitl, and RNH to carry the forward group by themselves without more skill around them, they wouldn't be in this position of signing old, slow forwards and hastily trading for defense at the expense of their talent up front. Give it a year or two, and then you can push for free agents when you see a window opening.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
12 févr. 2019 à 16 h 36
Sujet:
Ducks
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>MTLFAN27</b></div><div>You'd probably get Juulsen, Evans, and a 1st</div></div>
I thin Juulsen and a 1st is a good start, but I don't anticipate Evans to aspire to much. Shattenkirk got a 1st, cond. 2nd, and a prospect and he was just a rental. Fowler has 8 years left on his deal, and will probably be good for most of them. I would want at least another late-round 1st, or to swap Evans for a young roster player like Lehkonen. My logic behind this is that while Fowler has his flaws, he has proven to be a 1st line player, and you can't really say that about Juulsen or the 1st, and Lehkonen seems to be struggling to break 30 points.
I would be happier with Juulsen, 1st, 1st or Juulsen, 1st Lehkonen. If it helps, it can be a conditional pick based on player performance (ie. goes down to a 2nd if Lehkonen gets 40+ points or Juulsen plays an average of 20+ minutes in his first Ducks season).
Forum:
Armchair-GM
12 févr. 2019 à 14 h 30
Sujet:
Ducks
I heard about the rumor with Montreal. At this time, I would be hesitant but I'm not entirely against it. The Ducks have Mahura in the pipeline, who is a very good offensive-defenseman that could replace Fowler in the future. I don't really see any of our prospects being defensively sound enough to replace Lindholm, which is why I am so against trading him, but Fowler was never the best in his own end, so I wouldn't mind trying out Mahura in a larger playmaking role, since the Ducks wouldn't be making too much of a defensive sacrifice. It's risky, but worst case, Montour and Lindholm have both run a power-play before so I think they could manage.
Do you have any ideas of what you would trade for him?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
12 févr. 2019 à 14 h 5
Sujet:
Big Anaheim trade
Then buy him out. Ducks don't make the trade unless they get some financial compensation to sign a player similar to Rakell.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
12 févr. 2019 à 14 h 0
Sujet:
Ducks
Are you seriously trading the Ducks' best defenseman (who is signed long term at a great deal) for a second line winger and a bust who will probably never make the NHL full time? Come on.
The Silfverberg trade is good though!
Premier
2
3
Suivant
Page 2
Remerciements à
Guillaume Lambert-Héon
pour l'aide à la traduction de l'anglais au français
SalarySwish
| Masses salariales de la NBA par CapFriendly
Conditions d’utilisation
Politique de confidentialité
Règlements du forum
À propos de nous
FAQ - Convention collective
Nous contacter
Privacy Manager
Follow @CapFriendly
CapFriendly
CapFriendly
© 2024 CapFriendly.com