7 sep 2018
Capitals de Washington
Messages dans les forums
Messages par jour
Sujets de discussion
It’s not a lot of money, but there’s red flags here. Undrafted, but that’s fine if he’s a late bloomer, but he had a decent D+2 season, and international games, and wasn’t drafted as an overager when he was 20, small red flag.
Signed at age 22 in May of 2018, after he appeared in the Olympics, and seemed to do well. That’s good.
Since then he has been a Chicago Blackhawk, a Pittsburgh Penguin, a Buffalo Sabre, and now an Edmonton Oiler, huge red flag. That’s Galchenyuk movement there.
I’m going to say it’s a good signing, but somethings off with this guy,
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Danny12357</b></div><div>I think Pietrangelo's deal is right around fair market value. Chances are he out performs in the next few years, but gives back some of that value later on. The problem is always that fans and teams never really remember the good years when the player has declined below what the cap hit is worth, but today, I think this deal is fine for Pietrangelo, but it's right on that line of fair.
Where this kind of goes off the rails for me, is that they didn't get much better, and they took on additional cap space. Pietrangelo replaces Schmidt at 5 on 5 and on the PK, however the gap in those areas isn't large, at least not $2.9M worth. If Pietrangelo doesn't get PP1 time, it will be hard for him to justify the additional cost and risk over Schmidt. If he does, I doubt he can act as enough of an upgrade on Theodore to justify the cost.
Vegas is still a very strong team, and Lehner was a great value add, but losing a reasonable (but overpaid) 2nd line center, and upgrading Schmidt to Pietrangelo, I don't know that they are really any better than they were. So it feels like a lot of moving parts to make a splash, but not necessarily like a firm plan to improve in any particular area.</div></div>
Really exactly how I feel.