SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

OilednGreasy

Membre depuis
6 mars 2022
Messages dans les forums
784
Messages par jour
1.0
Forum: Armchair-GMil y a 14 heures
Forum: Armchair-GM27 janv. à 10 h 59
Forum: Armchair-GM25 janv. à 16 h 37
Forum: Armchair-GM17 oct. 2023 à 11 h 56
Forum: Armchair-GM17 oct. 2023 à 11 h 54
Forum: Armchair-GM12 oct. 2023 à 12 h 0
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>turtlemountain</b></div><div>You missed the point.

As Fail4Nail said at the very beginning of this whole thing: Makar and Manson &gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; Bouch and Ceci

I responded a few times to your argument that the RD depth for the Avs is worse, but I can summarize for you.

Makar &gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; Bouchard
Manson =/= Ceci

Then you keep coming back to depth defenseman and referencing Vincent Desharnais and a bunch of AHL guys. Calling your 8th and 9th defensemen an upgrade over guys like Sam Malinski et al is a weak argument, especially considering the magnitude of the gap at the top of the depth.

We could keep going on this, but I’m worried that responding another time might awaken you like a sexism sleeper cell again.</div></div>

Quit with the sexism lol. Was making a joke. You're still cherry pickin.

Agreed. Makar better, but not more better compared to Bouchard than Draisaitl is compared to McLeod IMO

Disagree. Ceci better, Mansons hurt to much

= so far

and the most important part and what depth means is Desharnais and possibly Kemp are better than any player the Avs have to put on the right side on the 3rd pair without making their other pairings worse

Also Wanner and Akey are better than Malinski and Clurman IMO. Because depth, and depth, and because the argument was about depth.

The * is you gotta give Toews some credit for Makars success and yes Bouchard got to play with Ekholm, but he played more with rookie Philip Broberg last season