SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

Oggsford_Blues

Ducks Fly Together
Membre depuis
26 févr. 2016
Équipe favorite
Capitals de Washington
Deuxième équipe favorite
Capitals de Washington
Messages dans les forums
259
Messages par jour
0.1
Forum: NHL Signings14 janv. 2020 à 12 h 30
Forum: NHL Signings13 sept. 2019 à 21 h 18
This was a close deal for me to say whether or not I liked the value of, but the pro's far outweigh the cons.

The downside, the deal itself is expensive, and is high compared to the previous market for 2nd contracts on RFA wingers, and likely going to look a little high even after his peers this year sign. For those reasons. It's hard to say how high compared to those other deals, but I have a feeling this will be the biggest AAV of any of the 2nd contracts.

The upside is that Dubas was given what most called an impossible task. There were hockey analysts that Guaranteed that Nylander would be traded because there was no way to sign all of the big 3 after the Tavares contract. Then it was assumed that young wingers like Kapanen and Johnsson would likely be sacrificed, but instead they were signed to solid deals. Most thought Toronto wouldn't be able to address their blueline or take on additional cap hit until the Marner scenario was taken care of, but instead they make a trade where they get a reasonable 3rd line center and their coveted RHD as well as move out the Marleau and Zaitsev contracts. Then it was assumed that Marner would be sitting to start the year, and that the only solution was a bridge deal, but instead Marner is signed for a term that isn't 5 years.

The reality is the Leafs are likely going into the season as a top 5-6 team in the NHL, they are at the cap but their core is locked up to considerable term, their team is young and their window should be several years, and their cap situation actually starts ease up when they are no longer riding the constant LTIR carousel and Ceci's deal comes off the books. Considering how impossible the to do list seemed, and the most people would have assumed the Leafs current depth chart wouldn't be cap compliant if it had been handed to you without salaries next to the names back when they announced the $81.5M cap, it's hard to say it's a bad deal. It's certainly not a steal, but to call it bad seems just factually incorrect considering the undertaking, and I think having it done with no missed games just puts it over the line to being positive.
Forum: NHL Trades19 juill. 2019 à 23 h 20
Forum: NHL Signings5 juill. 2019 à 12 h 36
Forum: NHL Signings6 juin 2019 à 16 h 44
Forum: NHL Trades25 févr. 2019 à 11 h 24
Forum: NHL Signings29 juill. 2018 à 17 h 24
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>jasondomitrovic</b></div><div>Jack Johnson played for TORTS last season so I means nothing as Torts ruins players as he has done in every team he has coached. Jack will have great chance to learn more from Gonchar who makes D players better every time. Environment is crucial for true success and Jack is very pleased to be out of Columbus. AND Jack Johnson got 5 years Mr. Genius. I don't care how old Tom Wilson is or not he is Drastically overpaid.</div></div>

Yeah Seth Jones and dubois look terrible and torts is ruining their career.

He also made the decision to get jones who finished top 3 in Norris voting? But yeah your knowledge in him and how he ruins players is great.

Kinda like the pens and cole right?

And gonchar is good but a lump of **** is just a lump of ****. No matter what you mold it into it will just be ****

Wilson should have made 4 million. Drastically over paid would be 8 million not 5 million. But again mr genius Tom Wilson playing top line minutes has shown he can handle it. I can repost numbers but what’s the point you’ll just come back with the generic he’s a goon 4th lines thing so why beat the dead horse right?

Facts : Wilson plays amazing on the top line. Averaged .75ppg and won a cup.

He is “overpaid” by 1 million. But so is Johnson haglin eichel ....etc. I used some penguins just so you can follow what I’m saying easier.

Point being last year everyone laughed and said kuzy and orlov were overpaid and those same people aren’t saying anything..........

This is a signing that’s better judged after next season assuming caps are sober and actually training
Forum: NHL Signings15 juill. 2018 à 17 h 35
<strong>HONEST OPINION</strong>

<strong>Yes </strong>- This is contract is good value for 3 years.
<strong>Yes </strong>- Domi's contract is good value for 2 years.
<strong>Yes</strong> - Armia's contract is good value for this year.
<strong>Yes</strong> - Gallagher's contract is good value for 3 more years.

But do you know what Montreal will definitely not be worrying about for the next 3 years? Cap Space.

They're in the middle of a "re-tool" and if everything works out perfectly, they'll be a cup contender again in about....3 Years.

And if things do go perfectly....Danault, Domi, Armia and Gallagher will all be huge contributors to that success.

Which means the best case scenario has all 4 of them receiving massive raises in near future....because they took short-term CapFriendy deals while we had plenty of cap space.

So we can look forward to those pay raises in 3 years....but at the same time:

<strong>Weber </strong>- will be a geriatric care patient making $7,900,000 for another 5 years.
<strong>Price </strong>- may or may not look like Carey Price, but will still be making $10,500,000 for another 5 years.
<strong>Alzner</strong> - will have completed his transformation into a traffic cone, but still making $4,625,000 per year.
<strong>Shaw </strong> - will be the leagues wealthiest 4th line grinder, and still making $3,900,000 per year.
<strong>Mete, Poehling, Kotkaniemi, Juulsen, etc.</strong> will be finished or finishing their ELC's and looking for cash.

So ya....based on the Montreal's current situation....I think Bergy should've tried to get these guys on long-term deals....even if they were more expensive (and he definitely should have locked up the guys with consistent NHL track records....some of them were ripe for long-term discounts).

But if I'm being honest....I don't believe he thought about any of this before negotiating....because they all got signed pretty quick.

And I don't think he has a plan to get rid of the albatross (and future albatross) contracts on the roster....which will only get harder to move with time.

<strong>So now I'm worried that any glimmer of a bright future will eventually force Bergevin to purge that future away.

And I can only guess how those trades will turn out with Bergy at the helm. </strong>
Forum: NHL Signings12 juill. 2018 à 17 h 37
worst signing of the offseason.

he can't play hockey

he can't fight

he doesn't protect his teammates

what he does:
- take up a roster spot
- drag his line down
- stage boring and useless fights

I hate this watching this guy "play" hockey and you playing Cody McLeod is wasting your 4th line. NYR have a perfectly serviceable 4th liner in Fast, but to no ones surprise, the Rangers 4th line struggled mightily when McLeod was on the ice.

just look at these stats. they don't do the eye test justice - by the eye test, he is even worse.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="550" data-lang="en"><p lang="und" dir="ltr">????? <a href="https://t.co/fJ6IZ7q7TX">pic.twitter.com/fJ6IZ7q7TX</a></p>&mdash; Corey Sznajder (@ShutdownLine) <a href="https://twitter.com/ShutdownLine/status/1017493760052211713?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 12, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>


unforgotten how he failed to do the one thing he was hired to do - protect his teammates. both Vesey and Staal got horribly banged up with McLeod watching and not even retaliating later (which I don't like but the sole chance of this happening is enough for some to defend signings like this. it doesn't work. it never has. it never will).

this signing is inexcusable and sends the wrong message, blocks the path for guys like Lettieri and will inevitably lead to someone sitting in the pressbox who doesn't deserve it. **** it, I'd much rather have Glass back.