SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

Mini3pitch87

Membre depuis
19 déc. 2021
Équipe favorite
Canadiens de Montréal
Messages dans les forums
143
Messages par jour
0.2
Forum: Fauteuil - DG11 févr. 2022 à 18 h 49
Forum: Armchair-GM6 févr. 2022 à 22 h 30
Forum: Armchair-GM5 févr. 2022 à 21 h 42
Forum: Fauteuil - DG26 janv. 2022 à 10 h 58
Forum: Armchair-GM22 janv. 2022 à 11 h 13
Sujet: Gettin Pissy With It
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>TrueCanuck</b></div><div>Jack Eichel was dealt for 4 pieces. Eichel is substantially better than Draisatil. You're telling me that you think Draisaitl is better and more valuable than Eichel by 3 assets?

DeBrusk could still easily turn it around and be a 25 goal scorer as a power forward, there's value in him. Stud nicks has proven to be a point producer at every level so far, so there's value there. A pick is what you make of it, but hey Brayden Point in the 3rd round didn't seem too bad.

The point is, a lot of people on here don't seem to know how value works and they spurt out random things that they want or are bias and want too much. But you have to look at how much each player iMovie to the game to determine their value. In the NBA, guys are on the court far more so when a guy like James Harden is dealt for a massive package it makes sense because he impacts the game more. In hockey, guys are lucky to play 25 minutes a night so about 40% of the game (especially forwards). So the impact isn't there. This return for Draisaitl alone is loaded with guys that still take up time and impact (or potential time and impact) that far exceed the 40% of Draisatil.

It's just way overvaluing Draisaitl likely because the user just looks at how many points he records. But points alone don't determine value.</div></div>

You really think eichel is better than draisaitl. You must be joking.
Forum: Fauteuil - DG21 janv. 2022 à 22 h 31
Forum: Armchair-GM19 janv. 2022 à 22 h 46
Forum: Armchair-GM19 janv. 2022 à 22 h 45