SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

LAkingsfan77777

Membre depuis
23 déc. 2021
Équipe favorite
Kings de Los Angeles
Deuxième équipe favorite
Maple Leafs de Toronto
Messages dans les forums
168
Messages par jour
0.2
Forum: Armchair-GM14 févr. à 22 h 48
Sujet: Mcdavid
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>dgibb10</b></div><div>I just listed every player who met the qualifications of being 35 or older and making 7 mill+. I didn’t say they were all washed up

“Seen as a horrible overpay”

Again, it seems like you once again just don’t know what it costs to bring in a top flight UFA from another team.

Since you don’t have to trade assets or use a draft pick to acquire a player, it costs more in MONEY.

The guys I listed as comparables were simply the guys who went to new teams as UFAs. You can hate it if you want but that’s what it costs to get a top flight UFA to come to your team.

Tavares, gaudreau, Panarin, Bobrovsky, Pietrangelo, Hamilton. That’s what it costs.

Makar if he wasn’t an RFA would have made a ****ton more than 9.5 million.

RFAs cost less than UFAs to get the same quality player. This is an indisputable fact.

4-5 mill on the UFA market gets you very little. If Mercer was 30 years old and done developing.

But it seems to be a pattern that you don’t understand the concept of primes, development, and aging.</div></div>

No you just overvalue your players it's honestly crazyyyyy how much you do that. a 50 pt player is not a 8 Mil player. and I guaranteed your wrong about Nemec. he most likely won't be as good as them.

and yet again he isn't a 1st line D man. he's literally only there cuz Hamilton is out. and once again, you are giving so much value to a guy who has only played 31 games in the NHL. your not even being reasonable on him and mercer. you think a 19 yr old is like the best D in the world when he's not. teams pay UFAs what they think their worth and sometimes they are off which results in the fews guys you mentions.

your neglecting to mention good UFAs actually worth their contracts or better then what they paid.

FWD:
- Duchene
- Danault
- Zuccarello
- Giroux
- Trocheck
- Hyman
- Evander Kane
- Patrick Kane
- Marchment
- Burakovsky
- Verhaeghe
- O'Reilly
- Vatrano
Now I specifically brought these guys up because they are either on par with Mercer or just straight up better.

DEF
- Tanev
- Graves
- Zub

you got to look for these contracts. it's harder to find D cuz not many good ones going free agency.

the only reason why players like power and sanderson get those contracts is because their team is pretty much putting a wager on that player being worth that contract in the future. they seen glimpses of them and liked it enough for them to hand these contracts out. Nemec has only played 31 games so no team will throw 10 mil on him because there's no guarantee. if they miss and Nemec doesn't become anything then they need to live w a waste of 10 mil.

If I'm given Nemec 10 mil he needs to prove he's worth it. he's 31 games into his career I'm sure he'll become something but no one can say he'll be one of the best D in the league by the end of that 10 mil.

Another factor is that Nemec would need to prove he is worth 10 mil of a teams cap. if Nemec would ask for 10 mil no team in the league would give him it. especially when there is multiple better more secure options.

And yet again just because a player is an RFA doesn't mean they can't leave. They can demand a trade or just refuse to sign with the team.

finally, you proved your whole point wrong bringing up Power and Sanderson. RFAs sign big deals like this all the time BECAUSE THEY ARE WORTH THE MONEY or the team simply believes they will be before the contract is up. bridge deals are normally signed when either a player believes they will be worth more in a few years or if they need to be for a teams cap. using this logic I should expect to see on the offseason for 8 mil but the absolute most he'll get is 6.

again stop using established and proven NHL veteran's contracts as "proof" that Nemec is worth 10 on the open market. he simply isn't even near that and you need to come back down to reality. using your logic, Danault should be worth 8, duchene is worth like 11 mil, and Hyman would be worth something like 13-15mil on the market.

Please do the league a favour and never become a GM. you would literally destroy a franchise with your horrible contracts.
Forum: Armchair-GM14 févr. à 19 h 23
Sujet: Mcdavid
Forum: Armchair-GM14 févr. à 19 h 15
Sujet: Mcdavid
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>dgibb10</b></div><div>Every single one of the players you mentioned signed their deal as an RFA except hedman and Josi, both of whom took discounts to stay with their teams.

You seem to lack insight into what it costs to bring a new UFA into your team (not retain an existing player), the concept of RFA in general, the concept of player development, the concept of inflation, and just general knowledge.

NHL deals are more than 1 year long you know that right?

Here are some recent UFA dmen who went to new teams and what they got:
Alex Pietrangelo: 10.8% of cap from ages 30-37
Dougie Hamilton: 11.4% of cap from ages 28-34
Seth Jones: 11.66% of cap from ages 28-35

on 10 mill AAV for Nemec that would be 11.4% of the cap for ages 19-27.

I would rather have Nemec from age 19-27 than any of those guys over the age ranges they were signed at.

Sanderson and Power got 8+ mill with 4 years of RFA control left.

In terms of forwards an 8 mill deal for Mercer would be
9.1% of the cap from ages 22-30

The caliber of player you can bring in at that cost is:
Alex Killorn from age 33-37 for 7.5% of the cap
JVR from ages 29-33 for 8.81% of the cap
Nazem Kadri from ages 31-38 for 8.5% of the cap.

Any rebuilding team would jump at the chance to offer these contracts and get these players for the majority of their primes.</div></div>

Wow that is a big increase and Jones is also well known as one of the worst contracts in the league. Unless Hamilton is playing like last year every single year I would say he is also overpaid. Pietro is the only one that is actually reasonable and is still good. You attack my knowledge when you literally think Nemec is worth 10 and Mercer is worth 8.

and Sanderson and Power are WAYYYYYYYY better than Nemec.
Forum: Armchair-GM14 févr. à 18 h 28
Sujet: Mcdavid
Forum: Armchair-GM14 févr. à 18 h 25
Sujet: Mcdavid
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>dgibb10</b></div><div>The RFA system is built to devalue players and help teams save money.

As a 1st time RFA with no arbitration rights, 4x4 would be more than reasonable to walk him straight to UFA. Again I can go up to 4x5 if you want but that's the reality of bridge deals in the NHL.

If mercer today hit the UFA market, things would be a lot different.

You see what teams pay for guys in their 30s? If he could be a UFA I'd be shocked if Mercer got less than 8 million dollars a year from a team on a 7 year deal from age 22-29 right through his prime.

Don't believe me, go look at what Elias Lindholm is gonna get this offseason and tell me if you'd rather have him from age 30-38, or mercer from age 22-30

If 19 year old Nemec hit UFA today he'd fetch 10+ AAV in an instant for his age 19-26 years</div></div>

Well you would be surprised then. No one is offering them anything close to those deals. Nemec is not worth more than Makar he isn't even half of the player. and Mercer is around 3-4 Mil player. signing him to 8mil would instantly be one of the worst contracts in the league. if thats the case your saying mercer is just as good as hughes, better than Bratt, and hischier. and almost as good as Stamkos, Zibanejad, Jason Robertsson, and Tage Thompson. and stop calling him a top 6 when he's isnt even in ur top 6.

also for perspective, your saying Nemec is more valuable than Makar, Fox, Hedman, Josi, Morrisey, and Theodore. you seriously value your players too highly. come here saying a 19 yr rookie with 31 games of experience is one of the best D in the league. you need to humble yourself
Forum: Armchair-GM14 févr. à 15 h 57
Sujet: Mcdavid
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>dgibb10</b></div><div>I'm talking about if they traded point after his rookie year when he was 10th in calder voting, or after his 2nd year when he had 32 goals and 66 points
Or Cirilli after his 2nd year at 21.

You would have had them sell off guys like point cirilli sergachev and cernak after the loss to CBJ for win now pieces.
Instead they moved out JT Miller, Girardi, Callahan, Gourde. Older pieces are what they moved out. They kept their 20-22 year old effective roster <div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>dgibb10</b></div><div>I'm talking about if they traded point after his rookie year when he was 10th in calder voting, or after his 2nd year when he had 32 goals and 66 points
Or Cirilli after his 2nd year at 21.

You would have had them sell off guys like point cirilli sergachev and cernak after the loss to CBJ for win now pieces.
Instead they moved out JT Miller, Girardi, Callahan, Gourde. Older pieces are what they moved out. They kept their 20-22 year old effective roster players.

And they won a cup. Would they have won that cup if they instead kept JT miller and traded away Brayden Point?</div></div>



And they won a cup. Would they have won that cup if they instead kept JT miller and traded away Brayden Point?</div></div>

It makes no sense to compare these guys to point. Sure Mercer has similar number in a rookie season but he is not going to become a point and after Point's rookie year he was proven, Holtz and Nemec are still unproven. and they never would've traded point, the miller trade was just to free up cap. and I'm sure they're a little upset not having him now seeing what he turned into. they also had no choice but to let gourde go they literally couldn't stop it. and why would they sell just after a single playoff loss?

again I'm not saying the Devils should sell all their prospects. your just so high on your own prospects that you don't think Mcdavid could ever have the value of your unproven prospects.
Forum: Armchair-GM14 févr. à 15 h 36
Sujet: Mcdavid
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>dgibb10</b></div><div>Tampa Bay won in LARGE part because of Brayden Point. If they traded him away for win now help in 2017 would they have won 2 cups?
Tampa Bay made the conference finals in 2011 after missing the playoffs for a number of years. In 2012 they were in a similar spot to NJD on the outside of the playoffs looking in. Did they buy? Nope they actually sold, and that pick turned into Andrei Vasilevsky.
They were contenders for YEARS with Ben Bishop. Did they trade Vasy for win now help?
Another massive part of their cups was Sergachev who they traded for and developed
They held cirelli, another crucial part of their cups.</div></div>

at that time point wasn't known as a great prospect. If they got an offer for McDavid that included point then they would've accepted. Tampa didn't really sell. the trade you reference was tampa trading for Quincey and immediately flipping him for the first. that isn't selling that's just a great deal for Tampa. Cirelli was never seen as a great prospect either. Tampa is great at drafting and they made hits later in the draft which is what NJ could still do but NJ is honestly just a meh drafter, you almost only get hits with 1sts.

Meier's contract makes him have significantly less value. he just isn't good with the Devils and the cap just needed to work.

and there isn't a need for the Devils to go all out right now you simply said you wouldnt even give Edmonton want NSH wants for Saros for McDavid