PARAMÈTRES D’AFFICHAGE
Basculer en mode sombre
Thème automatique
COTES DES PARIS
Cotes activées
LANGUE
EN
SE CONNECTER
S'INSCRIRE
FORUMS
ARCHIVES ▾
ARCHIVES
Masses salariales des années antérieures
(Premium)
Articles
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2017 - Vegas
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2021 - Seattle
CBA ▾
CBA
FAQ - Convention collective
FAQ - Rapports de dépistage
Historique des masses salariales
Rémunération maximale du contrat d’entrée
FAQ - Liste des blessés à long terme
FAQ - Rachats de contrat
FAQ - Offre Hostile
FAQ - Ballottage
FAQ - Liste de réserve
FAQ - Repêchage d'expansion
COTES
DÉPISTAGE
CALCS ▾
CALCS
Calculateur de rachat de contrat
Calculateur de ballottage
Calculateur d’offre qualificative
Calculateur d’arbitrage
Calculateur d'offre hostile
Calculateur d'impôt sur le revenu
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY ▾
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY
Sommaire
Alignements détaillés
Gardiens partants
Mises à jour - Statuts des joueurs
Historique des blessures
OUTILS ▾
OUTILS
Tableau de repêchage
Comparables de contrats
Équipes affiliées
Essais professionnels
Joueurs - Liste de réserve
(Premium)
Suivi des dépenses salariales
(Premium)
Rapports de dépistage
Cas d’arbitrage
Entraîneurs
Directeurs généraux
Joueurs appartenant à la formation au moment du gel - COVID
Clauses d'échange entrant en vigueur
(Premium)
JOUEURS ▾
JOUEURS
Joueurs autonomes
Joueurs actifs
Joueurs inactifs
Contrats 35 ans et +
Contrats d’entrée
Reports du contrat d'entrée
NTC-NMC
Gains en carrière
Comparables de contrats
Essais professionnels
Rapports de dépistage
Coût par point
Coût par arrêt
Transactions
Signatures
Mouvements de personnel
Historique des blessures
Historique du ballottage
Salaire retenu
Historique des rachats de contrat
ÉQUIPES ▾
CONFÉRENCE DE L'OUEST
PACIFIQUE
Ducks d'Anaheim
Flames de Calgary
Oilers d'Edmonton
Kings de Los Angeles
Sharks de San Jose
Kraken de Seattle
Canucks de Vancouver
Golden Knights de Vegas
CENTRALE
Coyotes de l'Arizona
Blackhawks de Chicago
Avalanche du Colorado
Stars de Dallas
Wild du Minnesota
Predators de Nashville
Blues de St-Louis
Jets de Winnipeg
CONFÉRENCE DE L'EST
MÉTROPOLITAINE
Hurricanes de la Caroline
Blue Jackets de Columbus
Devils du New Jersey
Islanders de New York
Rangers de New York
Flyers de Philadelphie
Penguins de Pittsburgh
Capitals de Washington
ATLANTIQUE
Bruins de Boston
Sabres de Buffalo
Red Wings de Detroit
Panthers de la Floride
Canadiens de Montréal
Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Lightning de Tampa Bay
Maple Leafs de Toronto
INTERACTIF ▾
OUTILS INTERACTIFS
Fauteuil - DG (Simulateur de formation personnalisée)
Repêchage simulé
Simulateur de transactions (propositions de transactions)
RECHERCHER
FAUTEUIL - DG
REPÊCHAGE SIMULÉ
SIMULATEUR DE TRANSACTIONS
ÉQUIPES ▾
Ducks d'Anaheim
Coyotes de l'Arizona
Bruins de Boston
Sabres de Buffalo
Flames de Calgary
Hurricanes de la Caroline
Blackhawks de Chicago
Avalanche du Colorado
Blue Jackets de Columbus
Stars de Dallas
Red Wings de Detroit
Oilers d'Edmonton
Panthers de la Floride
Kings de Los Angeles
Wild du Minnesota
Canadiens de Montréal
Predators de Nashville
Devils du New Jersey
Islanders de New York
Rangers de New York
Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Flyers de Philadelphie
Penguins de Pittsburgh
Sharks de San Jose
Kraken de Seattle
Blues de St-Louis
Lightning de Tampa Bay
Maple Leafs de Toronto
Canucks de Vancouver
Golden Knights de Vegas
Capitals de Washington
Jets de Winnipeg
JOUEURS ▾
Joueurs autonomes
Joueurs actifs
Joueurs inactifs
Contrats 35 ans et +
Contrats d’entrée
Reports du contrat d'entrée
NTC-NMC
Gains en carrière
Rapports de dépistage
Coût par point
Coût par arrêt
Transactions
Signatures
Mouvements de personnel
Historique des blessures
Historique du ballottage
Salaire retenu
Historique des rachats de contrat
Comparables de contrats
Essais professionnels
OUTILS ▾
Tableau de repêchage
Comparables de contrats
Rapports de dépistage
Cas d’arbitrage
Essais professionnels
Entraîneurs
Directeurs généraux
Joueurs appartenant à la formation au moment du gel - COVID
Joueurs - Liste de réserve
(Premium)
Suivi des dépenses salariales
(Premium)
Clauses d'échange entrant en vigueur
(Premium)
Équipes affiliées
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY ▾
Sommaire
Alignements détaillés
Gardiens partants
Mises à jour - Statuts des joueurs
CALCS ▾
Calculateur de rachat de contrat
Calculateur de ballottage
Calculateur d’offre qualificative
Calculateur d’arbitrage
Calculateur d'offre hostile
Calculateur d'impôt sur le revenu
RAPPORTS DE DÉPISTAGE
COTES
CBA▾
FAQ - Convention collective
FAQ - Rapports de dépistage
Historique des masses salariales
Rémunération maximale du contrat d’entrée
FAQ - Rachats de contrat
FAQ - Liste des blessés à long terme
FAQ - Offre Hostile
FAQ - Ballottage
FAQ - Liste de réserve
FAQ - Repêchage d'expansion
ARCHIVES ▾
Masses salariales des années antérieures
(Premium)
Articles
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2017 - Vegas
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2021 - Seattle
FORUMS
SE CONNECTER
S'INSCRIRE
EN
Basculer en mode sombre
Cotes activées
KentMcNally
Fall River Habs
Membre depuis
5 août 2021
Équipe favorite
Canadiens de Montréal
Messages dans les forums
864
Messages par jour
0.9
MESSAGES
SUJETS
MENTIONS "J'AIME"
ÉQUIPES VIA FAUTEUIL-DG
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Hier à 10 h 40
Sujet:
6 Newhooks is better than 3 Laines
I am not one of those people that see Lundell as a big upgrade to Montreal's roster. I think if Dach can come back and put his health issues behind him then he could be a good 2nd line center. This year they will probably draft a talented forward (Eiserman, Catton, Lindstrom) to eventually be that 2nd line player with Dach. Hopefully one of Newhook, Roy or even Mesar could fill out the 2nd line. I could see Owen Beck being a very good 3rd line center for the Habs.
With Lundell his offensive numbers have decreased each year in the league (0.67 points per game in his rookie year to 0.45 points per game last year to 0.43 points per game this year). To me that does not indicate a 2nd line center on a contending team. He is not a 2nd line center in Florida and they are a contending team.
So if Lundell is a 3rd line center, how does that impact Owen Beck's placement in the lineup moving forward?
I believe that Montreal has a top 9 forward group that could look like the following in the future:
Caufield Suzuki Slafkovsky
Newhook/Roy Dach 2024 First Round PIck
Newhook/Roy Beck Mesar/Free Agent/ 2025 draft pick
I am not saying that Lundell is bad, I just do not see a pressing need to give up assets to acquire a guy who looks like he has a ceiling of a 2nd line winger (if things turn around for him in a significant way) or a 3rd line center who would displace one of our other good prospects.
Forum:
Mock-Draft
Hier à 8 h 47
Sujet:
2024
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Big_Papa20</b></div><div>I don’t see Montreal passing on Lindstrom if he’s on the table there</div></div>
I also think that Montreal takes Catton before Helenius.
Forum:
Trade Machine Proposals
lun. à 8 h 35
Sujet:
MTL gets cap dump CHI gets protection for Bedard
I do not think that is very close to enough in order to dump Gallagher. What is the "protection for Bedard" part of the trade?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
dim. à 13 h 5
Sujet:
If Montreal is still at pick number 5
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>westcoasthabslifer</b></div><div>Moving up doesn’t really make any sense since there’s really not a consensus after 1. You could still get your #2 at 5 without doing anything. So unless it’s for #1 I don’t waste assets moving up.</div></div>
I just wonder whether there is enough of a difference between Demidov (likely #2 or #3) to Lindstrom and then from Lindstrom (somewhere between #2 and #5) to Catton to warrant looking into a possible move up in order to guarantee getting the player that Montreal wants. You may be right and it may not be worth it, but I thought it would be an interesting conversation to have.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
dim. à 12 h 53
Sujet:
If Montreal is still at pick number 5
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>GiggywithGibby</b></div><div>Who amongst Anaheim fans are saying that? I think we're all pretty aligned we need to go Levshunov.
Hopefully the top 3 order stays as is, San Jose will take Celebrini, Chicago will pass on Leshunov for a forward to play with Bedard as they've got Jones still around for quite a while, and then Anaheim can grab Leshunov.</div></div>
Back in January both Genral Lando and OLD NYI fan said in a response to a post that I put up that Anaheim would take a forward. Lando said Esierman and Old NYI just said "a forward" would go to the Ducks (you and OLF NYI actually had a back and forth about it at the time of the post). Obviously opinions can change over time (and it likely has on the Eiserman) option), but that is what i based my comment on.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
dim. à 12 h 18
Sujet:
If Montreal is still at pick number 5
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>OldNYIfan</b></div><div>I think that it's pointless to speculate on draft order until after the lotteries and we know for a fact where each team will select. Right now, I can't see Anaheim trading back from #1 (obviously) or #2, and I think that it's unlikely that the Ducks trade back from #3 unless the kid they REALLY liked at #2 is gone. I can see Anaheim moving back from #4 to #6 or #7 in return for a 2025 first, though -- again, only on draft day when the Ducks see who's left on the board. The only way that I see Anaheim making a deal BEFORE the draft is if two teams behind them win the lotteries and the Ducks drop to #5 -- but then, the teams moving up would probably like to know who they're getting, so again that suggests only a draft day trade.</div></div>
That is why I said if Montreal is at 5. I am basing the trade on the order of picks staying the same after the lottery. My trade proposals might have to happen on the draft floor after the first 2 picks are already made.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
dim. à 12 h 14
Sujet:
If Montreal is still at pick number 5
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Jded</b></div><div>How has nobody commented on what a huge overpayment that’d be to move up a few spots? And I’m an ANA fan.
I imagine it’d be tough to say no to that value even though ANA very likely misses out on who we all seem to think is ‘their guy’ in Levshunov at 5OA</div></div>
I definitely did try to make sure ithe trade proposal would be enough for Montreal to move up.
It is interesting to me that some Ducks fans seemed to be focused on getting a forward (Demidov or Libdstrom) while you think they should go after Levshunov at #3.
Personalty I think that either way Anaheim could get very close to what it wants, as I think Anaheim could get Parekh or Yakemchuk at 5 if (when) Levshunov is gone or they could get Catton at 5 If Lindstrom or Demidov are gone.
Obviously if that line of thinking applies to Anaheim at #5 one might think it should generally apply to Montreal at number 5 too, but I just think that Anaheim ihas slightly more leeway to go for a forward or a defenceman with their early pick, while I think Montreal clearly needs the best forward they can get.
We will see what happens.
Thanks for your input.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
dim. à 10 h 41
Sujet:
If Montreal is still at pick number 5
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>GuyGuyGuy</b></div><div>Hughes would take Lindstrom, but I think the pick should be Catton</div></div>
I think Catton would be a very good pick.
I am curious why Lindstrom did not return to playing in the WHL when he was expected to following his injury and surgery. Seems like he has been out quite a bit longer than expected.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
ven. à 14 h 11
Sujet:
Fresh
$8.7M is a lot for a guy who has averaged 0.80 points per game and has often been out due to injuries and other health reasons. I understand that Montreal gets to dump ARMIA, but even then I would not want Laine.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
19 mars à 11 h 30
Sujet:
Which is a bigger risk
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Bobrick</b></div><div>It's a Dach and Norris swap. That said, the bigger risk is for the Habs to take on Norris. His multiple injuries, longer contract and higher cap hit make it that way.</div></div>
I tend to agree. However, Norris does have a 35 goal season already under his belt, which is something exciting for a center as young as he is. If he could get healthy and produce near that rate I don't know whether Dach replicates that production. Plus, the Norris salary for a 35 goal scorer in the future is not bad.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
19 mars à 9 h 46
Sujet:
Trade down from 3 OA
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Habs_22_14_20</b></div><div>MTL would definitely select Cayden Lindstrom and yes, I would trade 6th + WPG Jets 1st to move up to 3rd OA
OTT 3rd round pick should be going to MTL tho</div></div>
The trade that was originally proposed, though, is not the Winnipeg pick, it is the Calgary pick in 2025 or 2026 (possibly from Florida's draft position too). There are numerous conditions on that Calgary pick, but there is a chance it will be better than the Winnipeg pick this year.
It is not a bad proposal, but it is a tough call in my opinion. If Silayev, Levshunov and Dickinson or Parekh happened to go in the top 5 for some reason then that #6 pick that Montreal gives up could be Lindstrom or Demidov anyway and then Montreal is giving up the Calgary pick without much added value to them.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
19 mars à 8 h 57
Sujet:
Emerging from the Rebuild
I don't think Montreal needs to trade a young defenceman like Struble to get a 33 year old veteran defenceman that happens to be right handed. If they wanted to get a veteran defenceman to play the right side then they should go the free agency route. This year the following similar type of defenemen are available:
Tyler Myers
Dylan DeMelo
Ilya Lybushkin
Alex Carrier
Colin MIller
Jani Hakanpaa
Troy Stecher
Robert Vortuzzo
Chad Ruhwedel
etc.
No need to give up a young player like Struble for a player that you can get in free agency (for perhaps less than $4M per year as well).
Forum:
Armchair-GM
19 mars à 8 h 0
Sujet:
Phony Dru
That is way too much for a player who, if he stayed healthy in each year that he had played so far, would have averaged between 35 and 40 points per year.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
19 mars à 7 h 56
Sujet:
Arpon Basu vision for Cole Caufield
It appears he is becoming more of a complete player. His plus/minus (for what it is worth) has improved each year and he is now more of a threat as a playmaker than he was in the past, which means teams have to play him differently (not just as a pure shooter). I think he is doing fine and will continue to get better.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
18 mars à 14 h 36
Sujet:
Positive offseason
I know that Marchessault is 33 and probably cannot command a really long deal, but I would be surprised if he signed for just 3 years, especially given the year he is having this year. This ie likely to be his last contract, so he probably wants one that takes him to 38 or 39 years old.
I think Pittsburgh would want more than that to give up the #9 pick (but I could be worng...it is Dubas after all).
I would trade Matheson somewhere else, such as a team that really needs an offensive minded D-man (Winnipeg has Morrissey already). This would maximize his trade value.
Forum:
Fauteuil - DG
16 mars à 8 h 59
Sujet:
Caufield with Jack Hughes
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>GuyGuyGuy</b></div><div>Habs fan here. I’m not a fan of Caufield. He is bad defensively and as a D in real life, I hate forwards who doesn’t commit defensively. I would probably do that deal, if Mercer agrees to a reasonable extension (8 years x 6m)
The real question is why would we ever do that Sharks trade</div></div>
Caufield’s plus/minus has improved each year. He is -7 this year. Mercer is -20
Mercer has half the points that Caufield does this year.
Forum:
Fauteuil - DG
16 mars à 8 h 54
Sujet:
Caufield with Jack Hughes
Montreal finally has a 1st line that plays well together (and Caufield and Suzuki are good friends) and they have Caufield locked up long term but the plan would be to break up the first line in the hope that (1) Mercer fits in as well as Caufield does on that line and (2) that Mercer gets signed to a long term contract and (3) that Mercer rediscovers his scoring touch (Mercer has half the points that Caufield does this year)?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
15 mars à 14 h 18
Sujet:
Another bad year and then 2 options
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Riddick19</b></div><div>Yeah Ottawa wouldn't be trading away their 2024 1st rounder... we'll take that package for the Boston/Det package though I'm sure.</div></div>
Well it is for the 2025 first round pick, not 2024. Maybe Ottawa is in the teens for a first round pick in 2025
Forum:
Armchair-GM
15 mars à 11 h 23
Sujet:
Another bad year and then 2 options
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>aedoran</b></div><div>This is a draft day trade and for most GM's there would have to be someone they really like still available at Winnipeg's pick.</div></div>
Yeah, I agree.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
15 mars à 10 h 47
Sujet:
Another bad year and then 2 options
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Shibbal18</b></div><div>Sabres specifically don't need 3 more prospects in their system. And both teams are gambling on the 2025 pick. Rather just keep it and use it at the tdl</div></div>
Using it at the trade deadline is a reasonable alternative for Buffalo.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
15 mars à 10 h 30
Sujet:
Another bad year and then 2 options
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Shibbal18</b></div><div>Don't see that Sabre trade making sense for anyone, including MTL</div></div>
Why?
It gets 3 draft prospects in Buffalo's system a year earlier than the 2025 pick so that those picks can help the Sabres sooner. Buffalo has to think that next year's team will be better than this year. so their pick next year would be at best in the teens (while still getting 3 draft picks plus possibly Harris and or Farrell from Montreal for a possible total of 5 players). There is some risk involved on both sides, but that is what GMs do in their jobs.
Forum:
Fauteuil - DG
14 mars à 19 h 34
Sujet:
Sid the kid
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>jfkst1</b></div><div>Have to get Crosby and FSG to approve first. Huberdeau deal would almost definitely be regrettable shortly. Maybe in season one.</div></div>
What/who is "FSG"?
Forum:
Mock-Draft
14 mars à 12 h 43
Sujet:
Another draft prediction
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>mokumboi</b></div><div>I don't doubt that's possible, but I have not seen any prospect ranking that has Parekh anywhere near 4, his play is roundly described as irresponsible defensively. Whereas Dickinson is almost always top 5, because he's a far better skater (and Parekh certainly is not below average, so that's saying a lot) and really has no holes in his game.
I can definitely see how a Montreal fan would favor Parekh more than a Blues fan would, but I'm struggling to connect with underselling Dickinson. He might actually be the most high floor sure thing in the whole draft.</div></div>
For what it is worth, Craig Button recently did a mock draft on TSN trade deadline day and he had Parekh at #2 overall. To be fair, though, i think that it is the only time I have seen anyone put Parekh that high. His right handedness certainly favours him over some of the lefties, but I am not sure by how much in the NHL teams' minds.
Forum:
Trade Machine Proposals
13 mars à 9 h 51
Sujet:
Giving VAN a discount
I do not think Montreal can expect to get that much for Savard in the offseason/next year. Maybe a first round pick with some retention closer to next year's trade deadline if he is playing well and is healthy. I cannot see a second round pick being added by Vancouver in any case.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
10 mars à 11 h 23
Sujet:
Playoff push
Montreal gives up too much young depth on defence without getting guaranteed NHL players back in the first 2 deals and Meier and is a very good but not necessarily elite forward to add. Plus, as the Devils fan already said, it may not be a trade that New Jersey makes either.
1
2
Suivant
Page 1
Remerciements à
Guillaume Lambert-Héon
pour l'aide à la traduction de l'anglais au français
SalarySwish
| Masses salariales de la NBA par CapFriendly
Conditions d’utilisation
Politique de confidentialité
Règlements du forum
À propos de nous
FAQ - Convention collective
Nous contacter
Privacy Manager
Follow @CapFriendly
CapFriendly
CapFriendly
© 2024 CapFriendly.com