SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

JP_knows_it_all

Membre depuis
11 avr. 2018
Équipe favorite
Canadiens de Montréal
Deuxième équipe favorite
Blackhawks de Chicago
Messages dans les forums
640
Messages par jour
0.3
Forum: Armchair-GM18 août 2018 à 9 h 45
Forum: Armchair-GM18 août 2018 à 9 h 25
Sujet: Tic Tac To
Forum: Armchair-GM17 août 2018 à 20 h 10
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>jp_harvey</b></div><div>Look at the long term outlook...they have 55.3M$ invested in 2019-2020. So that gives them 27.7M$ of free cap space to resign Wheeler/Laine/Connor/Copp/Tanev/Chiarot/Brossoit/Dano (Myers is walking, 100% sure). It's doable, but only by trading either one of Little or Pearreault for picks &amp; prospects ONLY (no money on the books in return). Not THAT hard to do. Both players are still pretty usefull.

8M$ for Wheeler, 10M$ for Laine, 6M$ for Connor, 1.5M$ for Copp, 1.7M$ for Tanev, 850K$ for Dano, 700K$ for Brossoit or E.Comrie, 1.5M$ for Chiarot. For a total of 29.25M$ (over the cap by 1.55M$). Then trade out let's say Perreault &amp; his 4.125M$ and you're at 2.575M$ under the 83M$ cap with 22 roster players.

2.575M$ to add one player is more than enough. There you have it ?</div></div>

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>mcoach69</b></div><div>i did and it works out to 85.9 with 22 contracts and no GM is going to cut a team that close IMO</div></div>

I made a small mistake (1M$), but it still work.

8+ 10 = 18 / 18 + 6 = 24 / 24 + 1,5 = 25,5 / 25,5 + 1,7 = 27,2 / 27,2 + 0,85 = 28,05 / 28,05 + 0.7 = 28,75 / 28,75 + 1,5 = 30,25.

That's 30,25M$ of cap hit, not 29,25M$ like I previously wrote (2.55M$ over the cap). So, by shedding Perreault's contract (4.125M$), they'd have 1.575M$ of cap space to add a rookie : say, Lemieux at 839K$, they'd then have 736K$ of cap space. That is very narrow, you're right, so they'd maybe have to move Little instead of Perreault (it would create +1.16M$ of cap space to make it 1.896M$) or try and ask Wheeler &amp; Laine to take small pay cuts of 400-500K$ each or bridge K.Connor.

Still, it only shows that it is possible and it would/will not be "that" hard to do. They'll just face some hard decisions in a who to keep who to move sense and ask their players to sacrifice a tiny little bit of $$ for the well being of the team long term. And for the potential of keeping a team as cup contender for the foreseeable future, players tend to make those kinds of concessions (S.Stamkos &amp; his 8.5M$ cap hit, N.Kucherov &amp; his 9.5M$ cap hit, S.Crosby and his 8.7M$ cap hit, etc.)
Forum: Armchair-GM17 août 2018 à 19 h 21
Forum: Armchair-GM17 août 2018 à 18 h 13
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>jp_harvey</b></div><div>Look at the long term outlook...they have 55.3M$ invested in 2019-2020. So that gives them 27.7M$ of free cap space to resign Wheeler/Laine/Connor/Copp/Tanev/Chiarot/Brossoit/Dano (Myers is walking, 100% sure). It's doable, but only by trading either one of Little or Pearreault for picks &amp; prospects ONLY (no money on the books in return). Not THAT hard to do. Both players are still pretty usefull.

8M$ for Wheeler, 10M$ for Laine, 6M$ for Connor, 1.5M$ for Copp, 1.7M$ for Tanev, 850K$ for Dano, 700K$ for Brossoit or E.Comrie, 1.5M$ for Chiarot. For a total of 29.25M$ (over the cap by 1.55M$). Then trade out let's say Perreault &amp; his 4.125M$ and you're at 2.575M$ under the 83M$ cap with 22 roster players.

2.575M$ to add one player is more than enough. There you have it ?</div></div>

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>mcoach69</b></div><div>First of all your numbers are wrong jets have 11 players under contract for 19-20 at a cost of 48.6 or 54.1 if Morrissey is at 5.5. Then add 8 for Wheeler 10 for Lianne 6 for Connor total 24 for a grand total of 78.1 and 15 players 1.5 for Copp 1.7 for Tanev 81.3 17 players .775 for Niku is 82 for 18 players short 5 6 if either Perrsult or Little are moved doesn't quite add up in my books but if a SC is won can you suffer for a year</div></div>

<strong>Look at the long term outlook</strong>...<strong>in THIS scenario, since this is what we are discussing, right?</strong>

I replied to you regarding <strong>this</strong> scenario so all my numbers are perfectly fine as well as all my calculations and moves that have to happen to make it all fit under the cap .

There's no "long term outlook" in the NHL teams cap situation link, on www.capfriendly.com...I don't understand how you could have mistaken what I was saying to you.
Forum: Armchair-GM17 août 2018 à 12 h 31
Forum: Armchair-GM16 août 2018 à 13 h 25
Forum: Armchair-GM16 août 2018 à 10 h 18
Forum: Armchair-GM16 août 2018 à 10 h 9
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Goldendelicious</b></div><div>With Sekera its not about LTIR cap space...OTT.
Getting Lucic "saves" the Sens about 4mill. Not really significant because if that was the case. You're assuming Lucic will be easier to move than Ryan, not the case.
Sekera was not a great defender before and now has an achilles injury to deal with which will affect his value the next two seasons. He MIGHT return to form for the final year of his contract. Besides he has a NMC and is not going to waive to go to EDM.

Paying players north of 10mill is not ridiculous when the salary cap is going up year after year. Top players now are negotiating based total cap percentage. The only way EK doesn't sign 11 or higher would be because he signs in a tax-free state.</div></div>

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Davisoc</b></div><div>First of all Sekera goes right on LTIR, so not a problem. Lucic will be easier to move long term VS Ryan. And 9.5mill is top dollar. Its just not ridiculous money like north of 10.</div></div>

OTT is trying to lower the amount of dollars the give out to players. Having Sekera on LTIR doesn't change a thing for them since they ARE paying him his salary anyway.

For the Ryan vs Lucic debate, they already have 4 years of high dollars owed to deadweight Ryan, why would they want to switch that for deadweight Lucic?? They're only interested in taking in contracts with high AAV but low salary left. For example, a 7 years contract at 7M$ AAV with 3 years left with annual salaries of 5M$-4M$-3.5M$. It gives them 7M$ of cap hit for 3 years (21M$ total) while only having to pay 12.5M of real dollars (8.5M$ in actual savings). Also, they do NOT want contract with signing bonuses since they are a cost efficient team and doesn't have the ressources big teams have to pay big dollars on july 1st.

PLUS : Lucic has a full NMC for another 3 years. There's absolutely no way he accepts to go to bottom feeder OTT. Hell, B.Ryan has a 10 team NTC too and EDM might as well be on it!
Forum: Armchair-GM15 août 2018 à 21 h 23
Forum: Armchair-GM15 août 2018 à 20 h 48
Forum: Armchair-GM15 août 2018 à 20 h 38
Forum: Armchair-GM15 août 2018 à 20 h 36
Forum: Armchair-GM15 août 2018 à 20 h 29