PARAMÈTRES D’AFFICHAGE
Basculer en mode sombre
Thème automatique
COTES DES PARIS
Cotes activées
LANGUE
EN
SE CONNECTER
S'INSCRIRE
FORUMS
ARCHIVES ▾
ARCHIVES
Masses salariales des années antérieures
(Premium)
Articles
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2017 - Vegas
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2021 - Seattle
CBA ▾
CBA
FAQ - Convention collective
FAQ - Rapports de dépistage
Historique des masses salariales
Rémunération maximale du contrat d’entrée
FAQ - Liste des blessés à long terme
FAQ - Rachats de contrat
FAQ - Offre Hostile
FAQ - Ballottage
FAQ - Liste de réserve
FAQ - Repêchage d'expansion
COTES
DÉPISTAGE
CALCS ▾
CALCS
Calculateur de rachat de contrat
Calculateur de ballottage
Calculateur d’offre qualificative
Calculateur d’arbitrage
Calculateur d'offre hostile
Calculateur d'impôt sur le revenu
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY ▾
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY
Sommaire
Alignements détaillés
Gardiens partants
Mises à jour - Statuts des joueurs
Historique des blessures
OUTILS ▾
OUTILS
Tableau de repêchage
Comparables de contrats
Équipes affiliées
Essais professionnels
Joueurs - Liste de réserve
(Premium)
Suivi des dépenses salariales
(Premium)
Rapports de dépistage
Cas d’arbitrage
Entraîneurs
Directeurs généraux
Joueurs appartenant à la formation au moment du gel - COVID
Clauses d'échange entrant en vigueur
(Premium)
JOUEURS ▾
JOUEURS
Joueurs autonomes
Joueurs actifs
Joueurs inactifs
Contrats 35 ans et +
Contrats d’entrée
Reports du contrat d'entrée
NTC-NMC
Gains en carrière
Comparables de contrats
Essais professionnels
Rapports de dépistage
Coût par point
Coût par arrêt
Transactions
Signatures
Mouvements de personnel
Historique des blessures
Historique du ballottage
Salaire retenu
Historique des rachats de contrat
ÉQUIPES ▾
CONFÉRENCE DE L'OUEST
PACIFIQUE
Ducks d'Anaheim
Flames de Calgary
Oilers d'Edmonton
Kings de Los Angeles
Sharks de San Jose
Kraken de Seattle
Canucks de Vancouver
Golden Knights de Vegas
CENTRALE
Coyotes de l'Arizona
Blackhawks de Chicago
Avalanche du Colorado
Stars de Dallas
Wild du Minnesota
Predators de Nashville
Blues de St-Louis
Jets de Winnipeg
CONFÉRENCE DE L'EST
MÉTROPOLITAINE
Hurricanes de la Caroline
Blue Jackets de Columbus
Devils du New Jersey
Islanders de New York
Rangers de New York
Flyers de Philadelphie
Penguins de Pittsburgh
Capitals de Washington
ATLANTIQUE
Bruins de Boston
Sabres de Buffalo
Red Wings de Detroit
Panthers de la Floride
Canadiens de Montréal
Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Lightning de Tampa Bay
Maple Leafs de Toronto
INTERACTIF ▾
OUTILS INTERACTIFS
Fauteuil - DG (Simulateur de formation personnalisée)
Repêchage simulé
Simulateur de transactions (propositions de transactions)
RECHERCHER
FAUTEUIL - DG
REPÊCHAGE SIMULÉ
SIMULATEUR DE TRANSACTIONS
ÉQUIPES ▾
Ducks d'Anaheim
Coyotes de l'Arizona
Bruins de Boston
Sabres de Buffalo
Flames de Calgary
Hurricanes de la Caroline
Blackhawks de Chicago
Avalanche du Colorado
Blue Jackets de Columbus
Stars de Dallas
Red Wings de Detroit
Oilers d'Edmonton
Panthers de la Floride
Kings de Los Angeles
Wild du Minnesota
Canadiens de Montréal
Predators de Nashville
Devils du New Jersey
Islanders de New York
Rangers de New York
Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Flyers de Philadelphie
Penguins de Pittsburgh
Sharks de San Jose
Kraken de Seattle
Blues de St-Louis
Lightning de Tampa Bay
Maple Leafs de Toronto
Canucks de Vancouver
Golden Knights de Vegas
Capitals de Washington
Jets de Winnipeg
JOUEURS ▾
Joueurs autonomes
Joueurs actifs
Joueurs inactifs
Contrats 35 ans et +
Contrats d’entrée
Reports du contrat d'entrée
NTC-NMC
Gains en carrière
Rapports de dépistage
Coût par point
Coût par arrêt
Transactions
Signatures
Mouvements de personnel
Historique des blessures
Historique du ballottage
Salaire retenu
Historique des rachats de contrat
Comparables de contrats
Essais professionnels
OUTILS ▾
Tableau de repêchage
Comparables de contrats
Rapports de dépistage
Cas d’arbitrage
Essais professionnels
Entraîneurs
Directeurs généraux
Joueurs appartenant à la formation au moment du gel - COVID
Joueurs - Liste de réserve
(Premium)
Suivi des dépenses salariales
(Premium)
Clauses d'échange entrant en vigueur
(Premium)
Équipes affiliées
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY ▾
Sommaire
Alignements détaillés
Gardiens partants
Mises à jour - Statuts des joueurs
CALCS ▾
Calculateur de rachat de contrat
Calculateur de ballottage
Calculateur d’offre qualificative
Calculateur d’arbitrage
Calculateur d'offre hostile
Calculateur d'impôt sur le revenu
RAPPORTS DE DÉPISTAGE
COTES
CBA▾
FAQ - Convention collective
FAQ - Rapports de dépistage
Historique des masses salariales
Rémunération maximale du contrat d’entrée
FAQ - Rachats de contrat
FAQ - Liste des blessés à long terme
FAQ - Offre Hostile
FAQ - Ballottage
FAQ - Liste de réserve
FAQ - Repêchage d'expansion
ARCHIVES ▾
Masses salariales des années antérieures
(Premium)
Articles
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2017 - Vegas
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2021 - Seattle
FORUMS
SE CONNECTER
S'INSCRIRE
EN
Basculer en mode sombre
Cotes activées
Flames22
Flames22
Membre depuis
17 juin 2016
Équipe favorite
Flames de Calgary
Messages dans les forums
225
Messages par jour
0.1
MESSAGES
SUJETS
MENTIONS "J'AIME"
ÉQUIPES VIA FAUTEUIL-DG
Forum:
NHL Signings
9 oct. 2020 à 23 h 3
Sujet:
Calgary Flames signed Christopher Tanev (4 Years / $4,500,000 AAV)
Not sure how I feel about this one yet. Initial thought was why didn't we just resign Brodie instead, but apparently Tanev is pretty steady back there.
I hope that we play him with Giordano (not Hanifin). Hanifin struggled a bit when paired with a defensive guy in Hamonic, but really started coming into his own when he played with Andersson. I hope we keep that pair together and see what Giordano and Tanev can do together.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
9 oct. 2020 à 20 h 3
Sujet:
Lines your thoughts
Management has (finally) suggested that Sam Bennett will be playing 2nd or 3rd line centre this year. So I would put him where you currently have Lindholm, move Lindholm back to the right side and Tkachuk back to the left side.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
6 oct. 2020 à 14 h 41
Sujet:
Stamkos for Backlund plus
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>ElPhantasmo</b></div><div>Phew, tough to swallow Dube in that trade and I think I would rather have Killorn than Johnson. I think Mange is going to be about a million higher than that, and Czarnik is not being re-signed. I'm liking the general direction of the roster, though I feel that Stammer is kind of made from glass.</div></div>
Yeah I agree, I'm not thrilled about losing Dubé either. I had initially tried to do the trade with Mangiapane instead, but I don't think he saves Tampa enough money for them to bite. As for Czarnik, like you, I also can't see him being resigned, but I'm not sure who else goes in that third line RW spot instead. Maybe Virtanen or Fast, but they will probably be too expensive. Maybe you move Gawdin up to the third line and sign a guy for league minimum for the 4th line, but gotta be careful who that is as we wouldn't want to kill Phillips' development.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
6 oct. 2020 à 12 h 51
Sujet:
Stamkos and Montour
Love the idea here, the team's centre depth here is fantastic. Really would love to see something like this work out.
If only there were a way to keep Gaudreau in the fold and not have to get rid of any current roster pieces to fit Stamkos. I know it won't happen (works neither from a salary cap perspective nor from a fair trade value perspective), but the thought of having a Gaudreau-Stamkos-Lindholm first line, and a second line with Monahan at centre is tantalizing.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
6 oct. 2020 à 12 h 45
Sujet:
Stamkos and Montour
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Bigboi69</b></div><div>Ryan is not worth anything more than 1.5</div></div>
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>EddieShore</b></div><div>Are you honestly trying to say Ryan is anywhere near the quality of player that Johnson is? lol man</div></div>
Clearly you folks aren't familiar with Ryan. While putting up marginally fewer points than Johnson, he does so with significantly less ice time and with lower quality linemates. Furthermore, Ryan's underlying numbers are far better than are Jonhson's. And perhaps most importantly, Ryan is extremely important in the faceoff dot, as he wins over 55% of his draws, many of which are crucial defensive zone draws. Oh and Ryan is a PK specialist too.
I would argue that he is an extremely useful player, and absolutely is worth the $3 million he is paid. Definitely a better contract than Johnson (as useful as Johnson might otherwise be).
Forum:
Armchair-GM
5 oct. 2020 à 0 h 12
Sujet:
Pens
I can't see the Flames giving up a 1st for Murray. I like Murray and I think he's a good goalie, but there are just too many other goalies of similar quality out there that we could get in free agency without having to give up the asset (Markstrom, Holtby if he can regain form, etc.). That's not to mention the other reportedly available goalies who might cost us an asset but would probably come as part of a bigger deal (Andersen, Korpisalo, Kuemper, Rask, maybe one the NYR goalies, etc. ). And we could always resign Talbot and I'd be okay with that too. It's a buyer's market so in my estimation, it's not the best idea to pay a first round pick.
I also think Pittsburgh will have a tough time getting a huge return on any Murray deal, as the team does not exactly have great leverage in negotiation. Their cap is already tight, and I can't imagine ownership will want to go into the season with 3 goalies on the roster. Pittsburgh has to make a move so they might have to settle for less than they hope with Murray and/or make a bigger 'hockey' deal.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
4 oct. 2020 à 19 h 10
Sujet:
Hanifin to Colorado
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Richard88</b></div><div>Timmins is very much NHL ready. He played a couple of games in the playoffs against Dallas for example.</div></div>
In that case, I think Calgary would be very interested. It would save us some money, give us a really nice young piece moving forward, and a good pick in this year's deep draft. I guess the question is whether it's something Sakic would really want to do. Either way, interesting idea!
Forum:
Armchair-GM
4 oct. 2020 à 19 h 2
Sujet:
Hanifin to Colorado
There seems to be pretty good value here, Calgary definitely thinks about it. The only thing is that from the Flames' perspective, Hanifin is (or at least should be) here to stay for a long time. When paired with Andersson in the playoffs, the two of them did pretty well. He's got a team-friendly deal and is still super young. Calgary's not rebuilding, so Timmins would have to be pretty close to NHL-ready. Is he? If so, Calgary might think about it.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
4 oct. 2020 à 18 h 27
Sujet:
Awesome Middle-Six
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Different_Perspective_85</b></div><div> I'm not sure Virtanen has the same skillset as Hudler (lack creativity and vision) but may be a Ferland comparable. I'm not sure you'll have to trade for him though as the Canucks can't afford to qualify him so he may just become a UFA at which point they could acquire him on a "prove it" contract without expending assets. I'd also suggest maybe he stay to the bottom 6 until you see if the reputation of his work ethic is accurate or not. Definitely worth a look though!</div></div>
Good points on Virtanen. I liked Ferland on that line back in the day because he had a good shot and was pretty good at supporting Gaudreau and Monahan, without doing anything too complicated. Haven't watched a lot of Virtanen but it sounds like he could be similar.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
4 oct. 2020 à 17 h 22
Sujet:
Awesome Middle-Six
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>MethodMan</b></div><div>what the **** is this crap? Virtanen is a bottom 6 winger that was a healthy scratch in the playoffs.</div></div>
Well, the point of this ACGM is to highlight the solid middle-six that this team could have, that's where I spent most of my time. I just put in a top line RW that would work with cap. That being said, I think Virtanen would play a similar role to the one that Hudler played a couple of years ago. Maybe not the best player in the world, but will keep up with Gaudreau and Monahan/be a good complement.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
3 oct. 2020 à 12 h 30
Sujet:
I dont want to but if we happen to rebuild
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>MethodMan</b></div><div>I didn't just throw up in my mouth, it's all over the keyboard, screen and wall.
Proposals this bad should cost you your fan card.</div></div>
lol I didn't say I wanted this to happen, just curious about what the team could look like if we did rebuild. Four first round draft picks in a deep draft this year, as well as some solid young players in Cozens, Tippett and Newhook seemed pretty appealing to me.
Truth be told, I actually think Calgary is closer to being a contender than people give them credit for. A couple of smart additions this offseason and Calgary could ice a very good team next year.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
3 oct. 2020 à 12 h 18
Sujet:
I dont want to but if we happen to rebuild
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>leafs101</b></div><div>problem is you've got to go all in or all out. How's Tkachuk and Andersson gonna take it when you trade every other high end player?</div></div>
Fair point, but we forget that those guys are only 22 and 23 years old, respectively. I figure they can be part of the long term plans. You're right, they might not be happy about it.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
30 sept. 2020 à 22 h 22
Sujet:
I think a relatively quiet offseason is most likely
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>NickC1988</b></div><div>Ho-Sang isn't going to be on the top line, like, ever. He's not a top line AHLer at this point.</div></div>
Fair enough. I just figured that we are so thin a RW already, and I don't wanna break up the other line combos, so why not give the guy a shot alongside Gaudreau and Monahan. Probably wishful thinking but the guy's only 24 so maybe he could find a home.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
23 sept. 2020 à 9 h 46
Sujet:
St Louis Sign and Trade
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>GrinReaper</b></div><div>Look back in past trades for UFA rights you’ll see I’m right plus your nuts if you want him at 8 yrs anyways have him at 7 for nothing is a much better options
Past history has shown theses deals could have a condition if he signs why would give the blues anything other then a mid round pick Petro picks where he wants to sign trade away a bunch of players and then he signs in TO anyways I don’t think you understand how this works you get his right the condition which I don’t think is aloud under the new CBA could be the 5th becomes a 3rd if he signs in Calgary other wise the blues get the 5th</div></div>
They have changed the CBA since then (as you seem to recognize). Teams are no longer allowed to trade conditional picks on a player signing or not. Now they simply have to give up the pick and hope that the player signs. Or, teams can trade a more substantial amount because they know that the player has already been technically signed (a sign then trade, as I'm suggesting here).
Either way, I got this idea from TSN and Pierre Lebrun, who explained yesterday that this sign and trade option is a real possibility. He also explicitly mentioned that St. Louis would not be interested if they were only getting a 5th round pick in return. See <a href="https://www.tsn.ca/nhl/video/lebrun-sees-vegas-toronto-and-calgary-as-best-landing-spots-for-pietrangelo~2029574" rel="nofollow noreferrer noopener" target="_blank">https://www.tsn.ca/nhl/video/lebrun-sees-vegas-toronto-and-calgary-as-best-landing-spots-for-pietrangelo%7E2029574</a>
Forum:
Armchair-GM
23 sept. 2020 à 9 h 39
Sujet:
How can they Get Hanifin without using Debrusk
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>KakkoForMauriceRichardAward</b></div><div>CGY isn't moving Hanfin, since Giordano can't play top pairing minutes every night anymore</div></div>
While it is pretty unlikely that the Flames move him, they would be open to it if it meant getting a top line centre, a top 4 RD, or a top 6 RW. The reason I suggested moving him to St. Louis was because he was part of a bigger deal in which Calgary got two of those three list items (Kyrou + Pietrangelo; see my other post).
In terms of the Boston roster, it's tough to see a good fit for a fair return. Carlo or McAvoy would obviously be awesome for us, but I know that there is a less than 0 percent chance you trade either one (and even if there was a chance, Calgary would have to add a massive piece going back). And while Studnicka looks alright, I can't see the Flames trading Hanifin for such an unproven player.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
19 sept. 2020 à 14 h 16
Sujet:
Ekblad and Arvidsson
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>jcambers</b></div><div>Unfortunately, the Flames don't become a better team with these moves. If you're going to move Monahan, you better replace him with a legit #1 defenceman.</div></div>
See my comments above. Ekblad is the legit number one defeceman for years to come.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
19 sept. 2020 à 13 h 34
Sujet:
Ekblad and Arvidsson
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>stacksOFFstacks</b></div><div>No they sure as hell are not.
Ekblads a 3D right now at best.</div></div>
I think that's a bit of a stretch. The man put up 41 points in 67 games, he put up a relative corsi of 3.5, and a +12 on an okay-at-best team. Oh and he's 24 years old while playing a valued position (RD). Yes, Calgary's giving up some good players, but let's be honest, so is Florida.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
19 sept. 2020 à 13 h 30
Sujet:
Ekblad and Arvidsson
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>cody_tugak</b></div><div>As an oilers fan, I'd like to keep the battle of Alberta interesting so I'd have to say No, no no no no no, this would break the flames and it would be like sr men's playing against the peewee hockey team, this would put the flames in hell and would have to draft numerous quality centers to be back to where they are today</div></div>
Thing is the Flames need to be drafting numerous quality centres either way. Our pipeline of centres is thin as is.
Why am I trading Monahan then? Because as good as he is, I don't see this team winning a cup with him as #1C. Trade him for good pieces now while you can, and try to get your eventual replacement through the draft. Let Lindholm hold down the fort till then; I think he's gonna put up similar numbers to Monahan in that role anyway.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
18 sept. 2020 à 15 h 8
Sujet:
Three Team Trade With Carolina and Toronto
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>BCAPP</b></div><div>Leafs don't accept either.</div></div>
Why don't the leafs like it? They get their cap under control, get a young and solid top 4 RHD, and an awesome youngster winger who would really help for playoff time.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
18 sept. 2020 à 15 h 2
Sujet:
Three Team Trade With Carolina and Toronto
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>shmoeman</b></div><div>its a cool trade but no way the canes accept</div></div>
Is it because of including Necas? Is he untouchable?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
18 sept. 2020 à 14 h 57
Sujet:
Three Team Trade With Carolina and Toronto
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Salzy</b></div><div>Ducks arent moving Rakell for a LHD, Rakell starts with Andersson</div></div>
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>HadesOfSoCal</b></div><div>Ducks don’t need LHD</div></div>
Cool cool. I saw this trade suggestion posted by a Ducks fan a while back and thought it could work well for both teams, but yeah that makes sense.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
17 sept. 2020 à 18 h 50
Sujet:
2020_21
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>mikearky</b></div><div>Wings not taking toxic Lucic and his horrible contract, not even for a 1st.</div></div>
What makes Lucic "toxic"?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
11 sept. 2020 à 13 h 35
Sujet:
EATING ERIKSSON
I don't mind the Flames deal at all. Would maybe prefer a RH defenseman coming back instead of Mahura, but Rakell is a pretty tempting offer. Good work.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
10 sept. 2020 à 11 h 18
Sujet:
If the Panthers Really Lose Their Minds Like Really
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>newballcoach</b></div><div>Not to be rude, but if you have to rely on a team absolutely losing their minds it's probably not a good idea.
With the flat cap you are losing at least one of Tkachuk, Gaudreau and Barkov in 2 years. I doubt Seattle is going to be willing to take on big contracts in that same flat cap world.</div></div>
You're correct, it's definitely not a good idea lol but a guy can dream.
That said, the way I look at it, we could trade Backlund to a team like Buffalo or Pittsburgh. I think we can also work out a deal with Lucic/Seattle which makes all parties involved happy. If not, there's also a chance that he retires. That's already $10.5 million in savings, and Giordano comes off the books at the same time as Barkov/Gaudreau/Tkachuk, so there are some savings to be made there as well. Again, not saying it's a good idea, but I think it's possible.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
7 sept. 2020 à 17 h 51
Sujet:
Blockbuster
Calgary is not trading their best player, their best prospect and the very solid Mangiapane for a package that does not include a bonafide number 1 NHL Centre. Calgary easily declines this.
Premier
2
3
Suivant
Page 2
Remerciements à
Guillaume Lambert-Héon
pour l'aide à la traduction de l'anglais au français
SalarySwish
| Masses salariales de la NBA par CapFriendly
Conditions d’utilisation
Politique de confidentialité
Règlements du forum
À propos de nous
FAQ - Convention collective
Nous contacter
Privacy Manager
Follow @CapFriendly
CapFriendly
CapFriendly
© 2024 CapFriendly.com