Éditer l'avatar
  • png, jpeg
  • La grandeur minimale recommandée se veut de 800px par 800px
  • Grandeur maximale: 1MB
Glisser l'image pour repositionner
Sauvegarder
Annuler

Dotz789

Membre depuis
17 oct 2017
Équipe préférée
Capitals de Washington
Deuxième équipe préférée
Sharks de San Jose
Localisation
SJ
Messages dans les forums
157
Messages par jour
0,13
Sujets de discussion
38
Forum: Armchair-GMTue at 11:36 pm
Sujet: Complete tear down rebuild
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>ZiggyPalffy</b></div><div>One problem, none of those guys can be traded...

No one wants Kane.

No one wants Karlsson.

Vlasic is more likely to be a 7x5 buyout than traded.

Jones can't be traded unless you pay at least a 2nd and retain half and even then probably not.

This team is stuck with those contracts, the last thing they should do is rebuild, that would be the ugliest fee build the NHL has ever seen.

Let Seattle take Burns, buyout Vlasic, get rid of Jones somehow, sign Ullmark and Halak, stop resigning Marleau, and try to fill vacant roster spots with younger faster quality players via call up, trade, or free agency.

Kane Couture Lablanc
Meier Hertl Palmieri?
Donato ? Leonard
Nieto Gregor True

Simek Karlsson
Ferraro ?
Knyzhov ?

Ullmark
Halak

Make sure both the other RD's are good defensively and can kill penalties. Karlsson is washed up defensively and never was very good in that area. Don't use him on the PK unless someone's injured.

I would trade Merkley for a young defensive or two way RD. The last thing the sharks need is another offensive defenseman especially on the right side.</div></div>

Agree mostly with what you’re saying. I just wish Wilson gets booted after this year. Sharks management needs a tear down also. I think Kane would fetch a 2nd or 3rd from a team that wants a power forward who puts up ~25 goals per. I know he’s got attitude issues but If the coach in there can handle that I think he’s an asset on any team who wants him
Forum: Armchair-GM25 oct 2020 à 10 h 17
Sujet: Few finishing touches
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>gegemoroo</b></div><div>This might happen with one of the two signings but not both. Right now would love it to be Hamonic rather than Duclair since I agree with jfrojelin that he demands more money.
Love me that team though!</div></div>

I just can’t see a guy like Duclair making more than 1.5-2M in a flat cap year.. especially someone who’s so offensive he’s a defensive liability. On the other hand , Hamonic has been on the decline the last 3-4 years but he’s still young enough at just turning 30 that he can hopefully turn it around and bet on himself. Sometimes guys just need a new look and some fresh teammates. With him I really don’t think he’ll be making more than 3M this upcoming season. A similar guy for reference as far as point production and play style is a Radko Gudas who just signed a 2.5M AAV this off season
Forum: NHL Signings14 oct 2020 à 15 h 10
Sujet: Montreal Canadiens signed Jake Allen (2 Years / $2,875,000 AAV)
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>OldmanWebber</b></div><div>I agree that having 13M+ in goalies is not ideal. But the problem is not with Allen's 2.8. With Price making 10.5M you are always going to have too much tied up in goalies. Unfortunately that is where Montreal find themselves.</div></div>

It’s one thing to pay an elite goalie what he deserves.. even if it’s 1-2M overpayment than it is to overpay a mediocre, inconsistent, “backup” who is about to go downhill fast. Bad cap management all around. Prime example of why MTL will not be cup contenders or a top 5 team for the next decade minimum. Sad such a storied franchise is being run into the ground by an incompetent no neck. You know that guy who sold arguably his best player for an injury prone 3rd liner and paid him more than what he would’ve paid his best player.. Domi/Anderson trade.
Forum: NHL Signings14 oct 2020 à 14 h 28
Sujet: Montreal Canadiens signed Jake Allen (2 Years / $2,875,000 AAV)
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Danny12357</b></div><div>I really dislike the Jake Allen trade, giving up an asset in a cap dump for a goalie who is considerably overpaid didn't seem like a good move given the goalies available this summer.

But the trade is done, the signing is fine. Jake Allen hasn't been a very good goalie, but he did have a good year last year in a reduced role, so making $2.8M seems like an OK fit. I know it's a lot to add to Price's contract, but that contract is bad on it's own, you don't make things worse by not getting an decent back up if that's what's needed. Also, Montreal needs to expose a goalie, so they can now expose Allen as he will meet the criteria. So overall, it's fine.

I hate what Bergevin has done this summer in terms of strategy, but I wouldn't let that paint my view of each move as if they are all automatically bad. Bergevin is a weird GM, he has made some of the best, and worst trades and signings I have seen in the last 3-5 years. I never know what to expect.</div></div>

The part that doesn’t do it for me is he’s set to make 4.3M this upcoming season from his previous contract and then 2.8M for two more years. Not quite sure why MTL would want to keep him on the books for two extra years. I could see the re-signing for 1 but not 2 plus when you have other guys you’re trying to keep and sign. Having 13M+ tied up in two goalies isn’t great cap management. Seattle expansion draft is next summer ...