PARAMÈTRES D’AFFICHAGE
Basculer en mode sombre
Thème automatique
COTES DES PARIS
Cotes activées
LANGUE
EN
SE CONNECTER
S'INSCRIRE
FORUMS
ARCHIVES ▾
ARCHIVES
Masses salariales des années antérieures
(Premium)
Articles
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2017 - Vegas
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2021 - Seattle
CBA ▾
CBA
FAQ - Convention collective
FAQ - Rapports de dépistage
Historique des masses salariales
Rémunération maximale du contrat d’entrée
FAQ - Liste des blessés à long terme
FAQ - Rachats de contrat
FAQ - Offre Hostile
FAQ - Ballottage
FAQ - Liste de réserve
FAQ - Repêchage d'expansion
COTES
DÉPISTAGE
CALCS ▾
CALCS
Calculateur de rachat de contrat
Calculateur de ballottage
Calculateur d’offre qualificative
Calculateur d’arbitrage
Calculateur d'offre hostile
Calculateur d'impôt sur le revenu
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY ▾
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY
Sommaire
Alignements détaillés
Gardiens partants
Mises à jour - Statuts des joueurs
Historique des blessures
OUTILS ▾
OUTILS
Tableau de repêchage
Comparables de contrats
Équipes affiliées
Essais professionnels
Joueurs - Liste de réserve
(Premium)
Suivi des dépenses salariales
(Premium)
Rapports de dépistage
Cas d’arbitrage
Entraîneurs
Directeurs généraux
Joueurs appartenant à la formation au moment du gel - COVID
Clauses d'échange entrant en vigueur
(Premium)
JOUEURS ▾
JOUEURS
Joueurs autonomes
Joueurs actifs
Joueurs inactifs
Contrats 35 ans et +
Contrats d’entrée
Reports du contrat d'entrée
NTC-NMC
Gains en carrière
Comparables de contrats
Essais professionnels
Rapports de dépistage
Coût par point
Coût par arrêt
Transactions
Signatures
Mouvements de personnel
Historique des blessures
Historique du ballottage
Salaire retenu
Historique des rachats de contrat
ÉQUIPES ▾
CONFÉRENCE DE L'OUEST
PACIFIQUE
Ducks d'Anaheim
Flames de Calgary
Oilers d'Edmonton
Kings de Los Angeles
Sharks de San Jose
Kraken de Seattle
Canucks de Vancouver
Golden Knights de Vegas
CENTRALE
Coyotes de l'Arizona
Blackhawks de Chicago
Avalanche du Colorado
Stars de Dallas
Wild du Minnesota
Predators de Nashville
Blues de St-Louis
Jets de Winnipeg
CONFÉRENCE DE L'EST
MÉTROPOLITAINE
Hurricanes de la Caroline
Blue Jackets de Columbus
Devils du New Jersey
Islanders de New York
Rangers de New York
Flyers de Philadelphie
Penguins de Pittsburgh
Capitals de Washington
ATLANTIQUE
Bruins de Boston
Sabres de Buffalo
Red Wings de Detroit
Panthers de la Floride
Canadiens de Montréal
Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Lightning de Tampa Bay
Maple Leafs de Toronto
INTERACTIF ▾
OUTILS INTERACTIFS
Fauteuil - DG (Simulateur de formation personnalisée)
Repêchage simulé
Simulateur de transactions (propositions de transactions)
RECHERCHER
FAUTEUIL - DG
REPÊCHAGE SIMULÉ
SIMULATEUR DE TRANSACTIONS
ÉQUIPES ▾
Ducks d'Anaheim
Coyotes de l'Arizona
Bruins de Boston
Sabres de Buffalo
Flames de Calgary
Hurricanes de la Caroline
Blackhawks de Chicago
Avalanche du Colorado
Blue Jackets de Columbus
Stars de Dallas
Red Wings de Detroit
Oilers d'Edmonton
Panthers de la Floride
Kings de Los Angeles
Wild du Minnesota
Canadiens de Montréal
Predators de Nashville
Devils du New Jersey
Islanders de New York
Rangers de New York
Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Flyers de Philadelphie
Penguins de Pittsburgh
Sharks de San Jose
Kraken de Seattle
Blues de St-Louis
Lightning de Tampa Bay
Maple Leafs de Toronto
Canucks de Vancouver
Golden Knights de Vegas
Capitals de Washington
Jets de Winnipeg
JOUEURS ▾
Joueurs autonomes
Joueurs actifs
Joueurs inactifs
Contrats 35 ans et +
Contrats d’entrée
Reports du contrat d'entrée
NTC-NMC
Gains en carrière
Rapports de dépistage
Coût par point
Coût par arrêt
Transactions
Signatures
Mouvements de personnel
Historique des blessures
Historique du ballottage
Salaire retenu
Historique des rachats de contrat
Comparables de contrats
Essais professionnels
OUTILS ▾
Tableau de repêchage
Comparables de contrats
Rapports de dépistage
Cas d’arbitrage
Essais professionnels
Entraîneurs
Directeurs généraux
Joueurs appartenant à la formation au moment du gel - COVID
Joueurs - Liste de réserve
(Premium)
Suivi des dépenses salariales
(Premium)
Clauses d'échange entrant en vigueur
(Premium)
Équipes affiliées
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY ▾
Sommaire
Alignements détaillés
Gardiens partants
Mises à jour - Statuts des joueurs
CALCS ▾
Calculateur de rachat de contrat
Calculateur de ballottage
Calculateur d’offre qualificative
Calculateur d’arbitrage
Calculateur d'offre hostile
Calculateur d'impôt sur le revenu
RAPPORTS DE DÉPISTAGE
COTES
CBA▾
FAQ - Convention collective
FAQ - Rapports de dépistage
Historique des masses salariales
Rémunération maximale du contrat d’entrée
FAQ - Rachats de contrat
FAQ - Liste des blessés à long terme
FAQ - Offre Hostile
FAQ - Ballottage
FAQ - Liste de réserve
FAQ - Repêchage d'expansion
ARCHIVES ▾
Masses salariales des années antérieures
(Premium)
Articles
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2017 - Vegas
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2021 - Seattle
FORUMS
SE CONNECTER
S'INSCRIRE
EN
Basculer en mode sombre
Cotes activées
DoctorBreakfast
Below Market Value
Membre depuis
8 nov. 2015
Équipe favorite
Stars de Dallas
Messages dans les forums
1426
Messages par jour
0.5
MESSAGES
SUJETS
MENTIONS "J'AIME"
ÉQUIPES VIA FAUTEUIL-DG
Forum:
NHL
20 oct. 2022 à 10 h 47
Sujet:
Whats Your Favourite All Time Jersey?
<a href="http://www.nhluniforms.com/Panthers/Panthers04.html" rel="nofollow noreferrer noopener" target="_blank">Any of these former Panthers jerseys. Beautiful color scheme, great striping patterns, and the superior logo.</a>
Forum:
NHL
21 sept. 2022 à 10 h 35
Sujet:
Rathbone vs. Walsh
Not sure these are even real players
Forum:
NHL
16 sept. 2022 à 11 h 54
Sujet:
Rasmus Sandin or Nicolas Hague
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>NHLfan10506</b></div><div>"Nicolas Hague, a Haiku"
by HelmutCool and Knuckles
<em>Over Sandin, Take Hague
You can't teach the man to size.
It rhymes, but its vague. </em></div></div>
First line is six syllables. Haikus go 5-7-5
Forum:
NHL
16 août 2022 à 11 h 36
Sujet:
Stronger back end?
St. Louis' blue line is pretty bad, yet it doesn't really have that reputation since they have historically been one of the better defensive teams plus they were covered by good goaltending this past season; but I would still say it's better than Vancouver's.
Krug, Faulk, and Leddy are all pretty weak defensively, while Parayko is not the same high-end defenseman he was a few seasons ago. Scandella's washed, Mikkola and Bortuzzo are just third-pair defensemen, and Perunovich is just a younger, less-talented version of Krug.
Hughes is better than all of St. Louis' defensemen, but it's quite a drop-off from there. Schenn wasn't terrible last season, but I still think he's playing too high in the lineup and probably won't repeat his success. OEL was quite better than advertised, but likely won't return to his peak form. Myers is bad, but we all been knew that. I quite like Dermott, but I don't see him playing higher than the third pair. And Rathbone and Poolman are just third pairing guys.
If I had to rank them all
1. Hughes
2. Parayko
3. Krug
4. Ekman-Larsson
5. Faulk
6. Dermott
7. Schenn
8. Throw the rest down here somewhere
Forum:
NHL
15 août 2022 à 15 h 49
Sujet:
Analytics are ruining your brains
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>LloydminsterLarry</b></div><div>“I don't see the value in having a guy that also plays poorly on the ice.”
NHL GMs sure do though and that’s been my point over and over again. What a guy like Reaves does better than most of the league is put in a short shift but throw a couple huge hits that get momentum back to his team. He’s made an entire career out of it.</div></div>
Like someone mentioned earlier, just because an NHL GM does something doesn't mean it's a good move, as we see time and time again. How do we even know that his hits provided any kind of momentum? He's spent most of his career playing on teams that are good in spite of him, so one could argue that the teams could've succeeded and regained momentum without whatever his contributions were in the 8-9 minutes he plays.
Forum:
NHL
15 août 2022 à 11 h 27
Sujet:
Analytics are ruining your brains
Hockey analysis has come a long way compared to just 5 years ago. The data is better, more research is done, people are understanding how to contextualize better, and we have more now to consume than ever. If you think about it, the on-ice ideas that are emphasized by those in the analytics sphere are essentially the same as what old heads have been preaching for decades.
Getting pucks on net = increasing your shot attempts
Get to the dangerous areas = improving your shot quality, which ties into expected goals
Net-front battles = prevent the opposition from taking those high xG shots and prevent your goalie from being screened
Creating/preventing odd-man rushes = rush chances are shown to be of higher quality than chances created on the cycle or forecheck
...and so on and so forth.
I guarantee you that 90-95% of the findings from analytics spheres align with the general consensus. The problem most people have are with the edge cases, which they then use to dismiss the entirety of analytics. The on-ice arguements are essentially the same, albeit the wordings differ. Most everyone will agree that today's game is far different than the game from even a decade ago. It's a possession-based game, physicality is emphasized less, etc.
A lot of the polarization comes from how off-ice/locker room effects come into play. It's pretty clear that guys like Ryan Reaves are not valuable to the modern game, in terms of on-ice impact; he plays very limited minutes and the team does not control play when he is on the ice. The arguments for Reaves state that he provides a morale boost to his teammates, he's a locker room guy, etc. The problem with that is how can we even know that's the case when we're not around the team and we don't know what's going on behind the scenes, other than the canned statements we hear in interviews? I'm sure that most, if not all, teams have guys that are good in the room, so as long as there aren't guys that are a detriment to team morale, I don't see the value in having a guy that also plays poorly on the ice.
Forum:
NHL
12 août 2022 à 13 h 21
Sujet:
2022-2023 Standing predictions
<strong>Atlantic</strong>
1. Toronto
2. Florida
3. Tampa Bay
4. Boston - WC1
5. Ottawa
6. Detroit
7. Montreal
8. Buffalo
<strong>Metro</strong>
1. Carolina
2. Pittsburgh
3. NY Rangers
4. Washington - WC2
5. New Jersey
6. Columbus
7. NY Islanders
8. Philadelphia
<strong>Central</strong>
1. Colorado
2. Minnesota
3. Nashville
4. St. Louis - WC1
5. Dallas - WC2
6. Winnipeg
7. Chicago
8. Arizona
<strong>Pacific</strong>
1. Calgary
2. Vegas
3. Edmonton
4. Los Angeles
5. Vancouver
6. Seattle
7. Anaheim
8. San Jose
Forum:
NHL
10 août 2022 à 13 h 39
Sujet:
Noah Hanifin or Travis Sanheim
Hanifin does look better since he plays on the much stronger team, but I think if they swapped teams, Sanheim would look better than Hanifin even does now. Hanifin playing with Ristolainen seems like a disaster to me, while Sanheim playing with Ristolainen seems like slightly less of a disaster. I've always been high on Sanheim though (I think he's better than Provorov) so maybe there's some bias, but I would take Sanheim most days of the week.
Forum:
NHL
10 août 2022 à 13 h 36
Sujet:
Bruins...Competitive?
I think they'll be better than people expect. A top six of Bergeron, Marchand, Pastrnak, Hall, Krejci, and Smith is quite formidable; the depth is a little suspect, and any long-term injury in their top six would be a big obstacle.
Their blue line is their biggest strength, in my opinion. Lindholm-McAvoy has potential to be one of the best pairings in the league, assuming Lindholm can play like the Lindholm of old. Grzelcyk-Carlo is a very nice second pair to have, even if I'm not that high on Carlo, I'm very bullish on Grzelcyk. Reilly is a fine third pair guy, so hopefully whoever he gets saddled with (likely Forbort) doesn't poop the bed too badly.
Goaltending is a big question mark though (evergreen statement). Swayman has looked good in the games he's played, so we'll see if he can keep it up; but Ullmark wasn't great last season so if he can just be average-ish, Boston should be okay. They play behind one of the better defensive teams in the league so they shouldn't be overly taxed.
Forum:
NHL
10 août 2022 à 13 h 25
Sujet:
Philip Danault or Vincent Trocheck
It's closer than I thought it would be at first glance, but I would still take Danault. I think his better two-way ability makes up for his lesser offensive skill compared to Trocheck. His offensive game really did break out as well once he started playing with a more dynamic player in Arvidsson this season. I think not having to be <strong>the guy</strong> and getting to play behind Kopitar helped elevate his game.
Forum:
NHL
10 août 2022 à 13 h 18
Sujet:
Andrei Svechnikov or Matthew Boldy
Boldy has only played about a half of a season, so it's fair to be cautious, but he did look reeeally good in those games. When comparing rookie years, it's not an exactly congruent comparison as Svechnikov was two years younger than Boldy and played with generally less-skilled players (Martinook and Wallmark vs. Fiala and Gaudreau, their most common linemates).
Personally, I would take Svechnikov simply because I like what he's shown over four seasons; but Boldy is still very good and could easily end up the better player.
Forum:
NHL Signings
8 août 2022 à 11 h 48
Sujet:
Boston Bruins signed Patrice Bergeron (1 Year / $5,000,000 AAV)
Who?
Forum:
NHL Signings
4 août 2022 à 10 h 48
Sujet:
Anaheim Ducks signed John Klingberg (1 Year / $7,000,000 AAV)
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Knuckl3s</b></div><div>Isn't fowler actually defensively responsible though?</div></div>
He's probably the best of those four, but having him as your most defensively responsible blue liner is far from ideal.
Forum:
NHL Signings
29 juill. 2022 à 16 h 10
Sujet:
Anaheim Ducks signed John Klingberg (1 Year / $7,000,000 AAV)
Gibson is gonna have his work cut out for him with Fowler, Shattenkirk, Drysdale, and Klingberg on the blue line.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
29 juill. 2022 à 14 h 42
Sujet:
If Nobody Else Wants Klingberg
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>PointStamkosVasilevskiy219188</b></div><div>You nailed it. Besides, Klingberg's better on the PP than all 3.</div></div>
Agreed. Ducks are likely using this as a way to get assets at the trade deadline, and so they can push Shattenkirk and Drysdale down the lineup; Shattenkirk because he pretty much sucks at this point in his career, and Drysdale because he's still pretty young and they don't wanna feed him to the wolves as much.
With those four defensemen, however, plus whatever they have leftover there isn't much in the way of solid defensive play. John Gibson is gonna have his work cut out for him.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
29 juill. 2022 à 14 h 14
Sujet:
If Nobody Else Wants Klingberg
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>DoctorBreakfast</b></div><div>I feel like if Klingberg were to take a one-year prove-it deal, he'd go to a team where he could play on the first PP unit since that's where he shines the most. I can't see him getting top PP time over Hedman.</div></div>
Perfect timing! Although he signed with Anaheim who has three capable puck-moving/PP defensemen in Fowler, Shattenkirk, and Drysdale. Should be interesting.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
29 juill. 2022 à 11 h 40
Sujet:
If Nobody Else Wants Klingberg
I feel like if Klingberg were to take a one-year prove-it deal, he'd go to a team where he could play on the first PP unit since that's where he shines the most. I can't see him getting top PP time over Hedman.
Forum:
NHL
25 juill. 2022 à 15 h 4
Sujet:
Chris Tanev or Brett Pesce
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Knuckl3s</b></div><div>Wait, you really believe Pesce gets dragged down by Skjei? I mean I'll admit that it sounds like Skjei is pretty mediocre analytically and he's not on a great value contract, but I've heard other Canes fans say they're arguably the best shutdown pair in the league</div></div>
I think a lot of their perceived value comes from the fact that they play in a really good system that can hide a lot of deficiencies. And I would obviously disagree with the notion that they're one of the best shutdown pairs in the league. I'm sure they complement each other's skillsets in a way that makes them better together than apart, i.e. Skjei's skating/transition play paired with Pesce's defensive abilities, so perhaps they are a better pairing than I'm giving them credit for.
But on an individual basis, I personally think Skjei would be better suited in a third pairing role, while Pesce would be better suited playing with Slavin, as they were truly one of the best shutdown pairings in the league for the couple seasons they did play together. Of course that would make the blue line much more top-heavy and less balanced, so it's likely not ideal from a team-building perspective.
Forum:
NHL
25 juill. 2022 à 14 h 38
Sujet:
Chris Tanev or Brett Pesce
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Knuckl3s</b></div><div>Can definitely make the case that Pesce is a more valuable asset, but wow, I didn't actually expect someone to proclaim that Tanev is the better defenseman</div></div>
I think he's surprised a lot of folks by continuing to be elite defensively this far into his career, especially since he has quite the injury history, although he has missed virtually no time over the past three seasons. He looked to be on the downswing during his last season in Vancouver, but he rebounded in Calgary and has held up his reputation as a defensive stalwart. He does turn 33 this season, so I also wouldn't be surprised if his game ended up taking a nosedive or if he misses time due to injury, causing Pesce to overtake him.
Pesce is still quite good and I do think he's underrated since Slavin get a lot more of the praise and attention, but I think he gets dragged down by having to play a lot with Brady Skjei, who in my opinion is one of the more overrated players in the NHL. He'll likely still get overlooked since Carolina now has their shiny new (old?) toy in Brent Burns.
Forum:
NHL
25 juill. 2022 à 14 h 18
Sujet:
Chris Tanev or Brett Pesce
I think Tanev is the better defenseman, albeit not by much, but when you factor in age/contract/injuries I would definitely take Pesce, who also has a bit more offense to his game then Tanev.
Forum:
NHL Signings
22 juill. 2022 à 15 h 1
Sujet:
Columbus Blue Jackets signed Patrik Laine (4 Years / $8,700,000 AAV)
He was the next Sidney Crosby after all!
Forum:
NHL Signings
13 juill. 2022 à 13 h 25
Sujet:
Tampa Bay Lightning signed Anthony Cirelli (8 Years / $6,250,000 AAV)
This is a much more reasonable deal than the Sergachev signing.
Forum:
NHL Signings
13 juill. 2022 à 13 h 19
Sujet:
Tampa Bay Lightning signed Mikhail Sergachev (8 Years / $8,500,000 AAV)
I get the 8 years, but holy f that's a lot of money
Forum:
NHL Signings
13 juill. 2022 à 12 h 32
Sujet:
St. Louis Blues signed Robert Thomas (8 Years / $8,125,000 AAV)
Smooth
Forum:
NHL Signings
13 juill. 2022 à 12 h 10
Sujet:
Detroit Red Wings signed Marco Kasper (3 Years / $1,918,333 AAV)
Wake up babe, new ELC max amount just dropped.
Premier
2
3
Suivant
Page 2
Remerciements à
Guillaume Lambert-Héon
pour l'aide à la traduction de l'anglais au français
SalarySwish
| Masses salariales de la NBA par CapFriendly
Conditions d’utilisation
Politique de confidentialité
Règlements du forum
À propos de nous
FAQ - Convention collective
Nous contacter
Privacy Manager
Follow @CapFriendly
CapFriendly
CapFriendly
© 2024 CapFriendly.com