PARAMÈTRES D’AFFICHAGE
Basculer en mode sombre
Thème automatique
COTES DES PARIS
Cotes activées
LANGUE
EN
SE CONNECTER
S'INSCRIRE
FORUMS
ARCHIVES ▾
ARCHIVES
Masses salariales des années antérieures
(Premium)
Articles
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2017 - Vegas
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2021 - Seattle
CBA ▾
CBA
FAQ - Convention collective
FAQ - Rapports de dépistage
Historique des masses salariales
Rémunération maximale du contrat d’entrée
FAQ - Liste des blessés à long terme
FAQ - Rachats de contrat
FAQ - Offre Hostile
FAQ - Ballottage
FAQ - Liste de réserve
FAQ - Repêchage d'expansion
COTES
19
DÉPISTAGE
CALCS ▾
CALCS
Calculateur de rachat de contrat
Calculateur de ballottage
Calculateur d’offre qualificative
Calculateur d’arbitrage
Calculateur d'offre hostile
Calculateur d'impôt sur le revenu
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY ▾
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY
Sommaire
Alignements détaillés
Gardiens partants
Mises à jour - Statuts des joueurs
Historique des blessures
OUTILS ▾
OUTILS
Tableau de repêchage
Comparables de contrats
Équipes affiliées
Essais professionnels
Joueurs - Liste de réserve
(Premium)
Suivi des dépenses salariales
(Premium)
Rapports de dépistage
Cas d’arbitrage
Entraîneurs
Directeurs généraux
Joueurs appartenant à la formation au moment du gel - COVID
Clauses d'échange entrant en vigueur
(Premium)
JOUEURS ▾
JOUEURS
Joueurs autonomes
Joueurs actifs
Joueurs inactifs
Contrats 35 ans et +
Contrats d’entrée
Reports du contrat d'entrée
NTC-NMC
Gains en carrière
Comparables de contrats
Essais professionnels
Rapports de dépistage
Coût par point
Coût par arrêt
Transactions
Signatures
Mouvements de personnel
Historique des blessures
Historique du ballottage
Salaire retenu
Historique des rachats de contrat
ÉQUIPES ▾
CONFÉRENCE DE L'OUEST
PACIFIQUE
Ducks d'Anaheim
Flames de Calgary
Oilers d'Edmonton
Kings de Los Angeles
Sharks de San Jose
Kraken de Seattle
Canucks de Vancouver
Golden Knights de Vegas
CENTRALE
Coyotes de l'Arizona
Blackhawks de Chicago
Avalanche du Colorado
Stars de Dallas
Wild du Minnesota
Predators de Nashville
Blues de St-Louis
Jets de Winnipeg
CONFÉRENCE DE L'EST
MÉTROPOLITAINE
Hurricanes de la Caroline
Blue Jackets de Columbus
Devils du New Jersey
Islanders de New York
Rangers de New York
Flyers de Philadelphie
Penguins de Pittsburgh
Capitals de Washington
ATLANTIQUE
Bruins de Boston
Sabres de Buffalo
Red Wings de Detroit
Panthers de la Floride
Canadiens de Montréal
Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Lightning de Tampa Bay
Maple Leafs de Toronto
INTERACTIF ▾
OUTILS INTERACTIFS
Fauteuil - DG (Simulateur de formation personnalisée)
Repêchage simulé
Simulateur de transactions (propositions de transactions)
RECHERCHER
FAUTEUIL - DG
REPÊCHAGE SIMULÉ
SIMULATEUR DE TRANSACTIONS
ÉQUIPES ▾
Ducks d'Anaheim
Coyotes de l'Arizona
Bruins de Boston
Sabres de Buffalo
Flames de Calgary
Hurricanes de la Caroline
Blackhawks de Chicago
Avalanche du Colorado
Blue Jackets de Columbus
Stars de Dallas
Red Wings de Detroit
Oilers d'Edmonton
Panthers de la Floride
Kings de Los Angeles
Wild du Minnesota
Canadiens de Montréal
Predators de Nashville
Devils du New Jersey
Islanders de New York
Rangers de New York
Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Flyers de Philadelphie
Penguins de Pittsburgh
Sharks de San Jose
Kraken de Seattle
Blues de St-Louis
Lightning de Tampa Bay
Maple Leafs de Toronto
Canucks de Vancouver
Golden Knights de Vegas
Capitals de Washington
Jets de Winnipeg
JOUEURS ▾
Joueurs autonomes
Joueurs actifs
Joueurs inactifs
Contrats 35 ans et +
Contrats d’entrée
Reports du contrat d'entrée
NTC-NMC
Gains en carrière
Rapports de dépistage
Coût par point
Coût par arrêt
Transactions
Signatures
Mouvements de personnel
Historique des blessures
Historique du ballottage
Salaire retenu
Historique des rachats de contrat
Comparables de contrats
Essais professionnels
OUTILS ▾
Tableau de repêchage
Comparables de contrats
Rapports de dépistage
Cas d’arbitrage
Essais professionnels
Entraîneurs
Directeurs généraux
Joueurs appartenant à la formation au moment du gel - COVID
Joueurs - Liste de réserve
(Premium)
Suivi des dépenses salariales
(Premium)
Clauses d'échange entrant en vigueur
(Premium)
Équipes affiliées
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY ▾
Sommaire
Alignements détaillés
Gardiens partants
Mises à jour - Statuts des joueurs
CALCS ▾
Calculateur de rachat de contrat
Calculateur de ballottage
Calculateur d’offre qualificative
Calculateur d’arbitrage
Calculateur d'offre hostile
Calculateur d'impôt sur le revenu
RAPPORTS DE DÉPISTAGE
COTES
CBA▾
FAQ - Convention collective
FAQ - Rapports de dépistage
Historique des masses salariales
Rémunération maximale du contrat d’entrée
FAQ - Rachats de contrat
FAQ - Liste des blessés à long terme
FAQ - Offre Hostile
FAQ - Ballottage
FAQ - Liste de réserve
FAQ - Repêchage d'expansion
ARCHIVES ▾
Masses salariales des années antérieures
(Premium)
Articles
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2017 - Vegas
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2021 - Seattle
FORUMS
SE CONNECTER
S'INSCRIRE
EN
Basculer en mode sombre
Cotes activées
Dekes
Dekesaladekes
Membre depuis
15 mai 2021
Équipe favorite
Bruins de Boston
Deuxième équipe favorite
Avalanche du Colorado
Messages dans les forums
2823
Messages par jour
2.7
MESSAGES
SUJETS
MENTIONS "J'AIME"
ÉQUIPES VIA FAUTEUIL-DG
Forum:
Armchair-GM
26 févr. à 15 h 55
Sujet:
cwazy overpays
that hanifin deal goes beyond a crazy overpay. sadly, a lot of calgary fans feel that's reasonable.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
26 févr. à 15 h 55
Sujet:
cwazy overpays
Maybe the most accurate title I've ever seen for an ACGM
Forum:
Armchair-GM
22 févr. à 10 h 40
Sujet:
boston
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Dekes</b></div><div>Pass doubt Harris cracks our defence, would just be depth for us.
Rather have Wotherspoon/ Lohrei over him.
Forbort gets the nod because big and PK.
Grzelcyk has the chem with mcavoy so he gets the nod aswell</div></div>
Forbot and Grzelcyk are UFAs. Lohrei has potential, Wotherspoon isn't top 6 material.
IMO Harris would be usefull for Boston, as an inssurance policy in UFAs negociations and to split the job with Lohrei,
Now, there's no way he could fetch that kind of return. a 6'3 1st rounder center AND a pick upgrade? C'mon
Forum:
Armchair-GM
22 févr. à 9 h 25
Sujet:
boston
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>habitantlecolon</b></div><div>so with the injuries, he wouldn't bring stability?</div></div>
a couple weeks of a playable defensemen isn't worth beecher and a 2nd. it's a non-starter for boston.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
18 févr. à 16 h 2
Sujet:
Time to sell and lock in Zayne Parekh
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Dekes</b></div><div>In my opinion parekh isn’t a good fit he’s a very offensive minded dman, ottawas need another RHD similar in play style to Zub.
If you can’t get levushnov
I’d hold off and trade down for 1 of
Jiricek/ Elick/ Emery who provide a stronger and more physical defensive presence.
I don’t think parekh or yakemchuk will help solve ottawas defensive struggles</div></div>
I’ve watched a lot of Parekh (admittedly not so much on Yakemchuk) but he’s not terrible defensively as I would have thought. He’s obviously offensively gifted but I also don’t think he’s a liability either in the Dzone. But I do agree sens definitely need another solid defensive Dman on the right side! Emery as a late 1st/early 2nd I could get on board with as well! Jiricek would be a great fit too!
Forum:
Armchair-GM
16 févr. à 8 h 53
Sujet:
Need offensive help
They've actually played well in 3/5 of the games after ASG, unlike most of their wins before where they got outplayed and managed to win.
As seen with the 7 middle-six forwards they have, guys like Duclair/Wennberg/Johansson won't move the needle. This team needs top6 talent and they just don't have many assets nor they should they give up 1st/2nd for rentals. Middleton is a #4/5 D.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
10 févr. à 15 h 24
Sujet:
Built for playoffs
That's close to what Philly wants, but I think there would need to be more. That deal seems like we are throwing in Seeler for free.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
9 févr. à 0 h 10
Sujet:
Trade deadline
Boston not moving Poitras
Forum:
Armchair-GM
8 févr. à 23 h 29
Sujet:
Trade deadline
Bruins sign Hanifin on July1st and keep Poitras and their #1.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
7 févr. à 17 h 49
Sujet:
Take It Or leave It On Tanev Alternative
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>WranglerWranglin</b></div><div>"The Maple Leafs expected more from Timothy Liljegren. And one costly gaffe adds to their concern"
"With high expectations going into this season, the Toronto Maple Leafs hoped the 24-year-old would take a step in his game, but that hasn't been the case."
"I don’t feel like I’m at the top of my game. I’m struggling with it right now," Liljegren said. "I’m trying to grind through it and hopefully find my groove again."
“He’s a guy we talk about daily in terms of needing and wanting more out of him”
Oh yeah, he looks ready!</div></div>
Just read that article which is exactly why I did this trade
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>mokumboi</b></div><div>Heh. If you offer two alternatives, by definition neither is "take it or leave it". :squinty </div></div>
Touché lol
Forum:
Armchair-GM
7 févr. à 17 h 41
Sujet:
Take It Or leave It On Tanev Alternative
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Dekes</b></div><div>I feel like for the last 3 years Liljegren has supposed to have a “big jump” in development and year after year he returns the same soft defenceman.
He’s almost 25 he’s entering the prime athletic peak of his career, young doesn’t get to be an excuse for him anymore</div></div>
It's the same development trajectory that Dube was taking in Calgary, obviously with a better ending regardless of what happens with Liljegren's career. Every single season, media, Flames staff, fan etc. were all saying this guy is going to have a breakout year, this is the year he makes the jump. Every single season felt like a let down. When a player is 24/25 ish teams are well aware of who they are and the fact there are negative reviews coming from the coach already on Liljegren, he's clearly not who they thought he was.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
7 févr. à 15 h 21
Sujet:
Rangers Post-Deadline
Kakko doesn't have that value. Even if you add a 1st from the Rangers, it still wouldn't get it done.
And I'm a Ranger fan
Forum:
Armchair-GM
6 févr. à 10 h 37
Sujet:
big shake
That's a brutal trade for Ottawa.
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>JuanDamienNebraska</b></div><div>Take it up with Friedman, not me.</div></div>
I've heard at least some of what Friedman has said on Chychrun, and it wasn't anything remotely close to "Chychrun expressed that he has no intention of staying in OTT longterm". If anything it was Ottawa not being sure they want to pay big money to 3 left shot D. So you probably do need to cite a source to that.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
5 févr. à 21 h 43
Sujet:
Post All-star break Trades
Holtz for Henrique is a terrible idea alone...People need to get over 2012.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
5 févr. à 0 h 4
Sujet:
Deadline
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>LuckyMoneyPuck</b></div><div>A it wouldn't be a rental if they traded for him they would be resigning him.
B. I don't think they are that high up on Wright. He was passed over this year, I'm surprised he didn't ask for a trade. They brought in an aging slowed down Tatar instead of giving him a roster spot.
Spare me the development age ..... they played Matty even younger. They just don't trust him is all there was to that situation. Why else would they find 20 games for 1 goal Andre B but not give Wright a legit chance. That just doesn't make sense for a team on the bubble of getting into the playoffs that needs help. Not unless your coach and GM don't want to win.
So I wouldn't go to hard on the Top 6 centers for next 15 years. If they had faith in him he'd be there now. I have a feeling he's going to end up asking out if they keep passing over him. They are costing him money and what they are playing over him frankly isn't that good. He should already be playing above at least 3 players there in Tatar, Yanni, and Andre B. You can even make the argument Kartye jumped him.</div></div>
So because Matty Beniers was playing well in the NHL at age 19, the new rule of thumb is that if a guy doesn't crack the NHL roster by age 19 then the team needs cut bait on the player? Good god, man, get a grip!
Also, why wouldn't you play your developing 20 year old on the NHL team? You might be right that they don't trust him, but he is developing. You don't develop as fast when you are constantly getting benched in close games and averaging 7 minutes TOI a night. You develop when you are building your confidence by regularly getting points while playing 15+ minutes a night. And if he wants to make more money, then he needs to make sure he is doing everything he can to earn his spot.
Like I said, you might be right that they might not be high on him. But cutting bait on a #4 overall pick when he is only 20 years old is a more fireable offense for a GM than making a bad pick in a draft year that was particularly crapshoot-y. There is no rush to trade a young guy on an ELC.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
4 févr. à 15 h 52
Sujet:
Bruins offseason cap situation
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Dekes</b></div><div>I can’t see bruins taking anything less than a 1st. Not really any big/ team changing UFA goalies this season with a lot of PO capable teams in need of a true starter.
LA/ Carolina/ NJ/ Detroit/ Buffalo/ Seattle all those teams want to compete some more than others, someone will cough up a 1st.
I expect him to get the same return as Darcy kuemper did with 1yr left.</div></div>
And even if they don’t, one more year with great goaltending and then Ullmark’s cap slot being allocated to a Frederic extension is not a terrible thing. It does require the emergence of young talents like Poitras and Lysell, but probably willing to take that bet
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>dgibb10</b></div><div>I could see that as a possibility, although I think the bruins would lack some leverage in this scenario that could lower the return (needing cap space to fill other major holes).
If Ullmark returned a 1st I’d say “yeah, reasonable enough”
If Ullmark returned a 2nd I’d say “yeah, reasonable enough”</div></div>
The off-season goalie market doesn’t look good and there are more good teams with bad goalie situations where I think something could happen. My guess is if a second is the best that is being offered, he’s being traded to the Western Conference. If it’s NJ acquiring him, I’d expect a first or a prospect like Holtz / later pick.
The only circumstance where I see him going to NJD for a second is if both Lindholm and Hanifin make it clear, it’s Boston and they need to clear his slot. It would require stupidity from other teams trying to leverage rather than trade
Part of me wonders if LA would be open to a big deal involving PLD and Ullmark. Hes been disappointing there and they’ve returned back to earth.
Also, I do think the extension eligibility may open Ullmark up to other teams hoping to avoid doing the Korpisalo
Forum:
Armchair-GM
4 févr. à 16 h 4
Sujet:
Bruins offseason cap situation
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>dgibb10</b></div><div>I think you’re vastly underrating holtz here. Personally the only Boston trade I see involving Holtz would be Holtz+1st for swayman.
Would value Holtz significantly higher than I value a 1st.</div></div>
There is like zero chance for a Holtz plus 1 for Swayman. I could counter with a Ullmark with ration + 1 for Mercer. I feel that’s closer, but it probably isn’t happening. I may be undervaluing him, but I am also very much wanting to give Lysell a shot after his season in Providence
All I’m saying is that if it is NJD, it’s not going to be for a second because there should be other teams purposely pursuing him considering how many teams have bad goaltending. If not, wait to the deadline and it will rear its ugly head again.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
4 févr. à 15 h 51
Sujet:
Bruins offseason cap situation
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Dekes</b></div><div>I wouldn’t say it’s hole at top 4 LHD I think they just need to give Lohrei more time in the NHL. I could see the finding like a 2A/2B type defender for Lohrei to ease him in a little easier.
As much as I would love hanifin or Chychrun it’s really not something we desperately need.
Dillon/ OEL/ Gost make more sense to me.
Skjei and Forsling I want to stay away from I think they will get overpaid.
Debrusk I feel will have to keep up the pace he’s at all season to demand 6.5 mill.
I’d say 5.25-5.75 is more his price range, Tippett who got 6.2 has been more dynamic and a better offensive threat and the league has always paid goal scorers more then 2 way players.</div></div>
Give me Hanifin or Skjeci any day of the week. Both those guys would be fine additions to the Bruins back line. This teams identify is defense, goaltending, and physical forechecking. Both those guys add to it.
I don’t see them signing JDB unless Lindholm signs an extension.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
4 févr. à 15 h 47
Sujet:
Bruins offseason cap situation
My expectation is that if they resign DeBrusk, he will be at the LW opposite Pasta with Zacha at center
OK with the second line.
The third line will be Frederic, Poitras, Geekie based on the way players are going now. My assumption is they resign one of JVR or Heinen.
I think I’d rather keep Ullmark for the balance of the year than give him up for a second. You should be able to still sign Hanifan (which I believe they are doing if he hits FA) and focus on other items. You could revisit at the trade deadline again where teams continually do the same stupid risk with goaltenders and feel the consequences.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
4 févr. à 15 h 45
Sujet:
Bruins offseason cap situation
I think they just keep Ullmark to be honest.
Debrusk at $6.5M seems like a smidge much. I would hope for between $5.5M and $6M.
I think the bruins take a run at lindholm if he hits the market, but other than that, I think they're satisfied with their centers.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
4 févr. à 15 h 40
Sujet:
Bruins offseason cap situation
In the offseason NJD will offer 2nd+prospect id expext
Forum:
Armchair-GM
4 févr. à 11 h 52
Sujet:
Sell the Rest Flames
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Duggysdanglers</b></div><div>look at the pkg for Lindholm. NH is a pretty important player.</div></div>
Bourque and Bichsel were 1st round picks and you want a 2nd for the retention, this is a huge overpay, even if Hanifin extends with Dallas this would be too much.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
4 févr. à 9 h 43
Sujet:
Sell the Rest Flames
Make it a 2025 2nd and the jets likely accept. Have to include stanley for the roster spot. How about 2025 2nd stanley and torgersson or Gustafsson?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
4 févr. à 9 h 43
Sujet:
Sell the Rest Flames
Way too much for Hanifin.
Can't see the Jets wanting to trade that 2nd rounder, would their 2025 2nd and Barron get it done?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
2 févr. à 19 h 15
Sujet:
bruins24
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Dekes</b></div><div>Lindholm for 10 mill ya that’s a pass very very easily.
I’d rather spend 11-12 on nylander or 10 on Reinhart than lindholm.
Or could just get 2 solid players for 5 mill a piece.</div></div>
I knew Nylander wouldn't leave the leafs lol. As for Reinhart, I think he's gonna be asking for upwards of 10 based on how his season's going, which IMO is a bit much. Lindholm is a more solid C than Reinhart who has been play RW with Florida.
1
2
Suivant
Page 1
Remerciements à
Guillaume Lambert-Héon
pour l'aide à la traduction de l'anglais au français
SalarySwish
| Masses salariales de la NBA par CapFriendly
Conditions d’utilisation
Politique de confidentialité
Règlements du forum
À propos de nous
FAQ - Convention collective
Nous contacter
Privacy Manager
Follow @CapFriendly
CapFriendly
CapFriendly
© 2024 CapFriendly.com