PARAMÈTRES D’AFFICHAGE
Basculer en mode sombre
Thème automatique
COTES DES PARIS
Cotes activées
LANGUE
EN
SE CONNECTER
S'INSCRIRE
FORUMS
ARCHIVES ▾
ARCHIVES
Masses salariales des années antérieures
(Premium)
Articles
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2017 - Vegas
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2021 - Seattle
CBA ▾
CBA
FAQ - Convention collective
FAQ - Rapports de dépistage
Historique des masses salariales
Rémunération maximale du contrat d’entrée
FAQ - Liste des blessés à long terme
FAQ - Rachats de contrat
FAQ - Offre Hostile
FAQ - Ballottage
FAQ - Liste de réserve
FAQ - Repêchage d'expansion
COTES
DÉPISTAGE
CALCS ▾
CALCS
Calculateur de rachat de contrat
Calculateur de ballottage
Calculateur d’offre qualificative
Calculateur d’arbitrage
Calculateur d'offre hostile
Calculateur d'impôt sur le revenu
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY ▾
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY
Sommaire
Alignements détaillés
Gardiens partants
Mises à jour - Statuts des joueurs
Historique des blessures
OUTILS ▾
OUTILS
Tableau de repêchage
Comparables de contrats
Équipes affiliées
Essais professionnels
Joueurs - Liste de réserve
(Premium)
Suivi des dépenses salariales
(Premium)
Rapports de dépistage
Cas d’arbitrage
Entraîneurs
Directeurs généraux
Joueurs appartenant à la formation au moment du gel - COVID
Clauses d'échange entrant en vigueur
(Premium)
JOUEURS ▾
JOUEURS
Joueurs autonomes
Joueurs actifs
Joueurs inactifs
Contrats 35 ans et +
Contrats d’entrée
Reports du contrat d'entrée
NTC-NMC
Gains en carrière
Comparables de contrats
Essais professionnels
Rapports de dépistage
Coût par point
Coût par arrêt
Transactions
Signatures
Mouvements de personnel
Historique des blessures
Historique du ballottage
Salaire retenu
Historique des rachats de contrat
ÉQUIPES ▾
CONFÉRENCE DE L'OUEST
PACIFIQUE
Ducks d'Anaheim
Flames de Calgary
Oilers d'Edmonton
Kings de Los Angeles
Sharks de San Jose
Kraken de Seattle
Canucks de Vancouver
Golden Knights de Vegas
CENTRALE
Coyotes de l'Arizona
Blackhawks de Chicago
Avalanche du Colorado
Stars de Dallas
Wild du Minnesota
Predators de Nashville
Blues de St-Louis
Jets de Winnipeg
CONFÉRENCE DE L'EST
MÉTROPOLITAINE
Hurricanes de la Caroline
Blue Jackets de Columbus
Devils du New Jersey
Islanders de New York
Rangers de New York
Flyers de Philadelphie
Penguins de Pittsburgh
Capitals de Washington
ATLANTIQUE
Bruins de Boston
Sabres de Buffalo
Red Wings de Detroit
Panthers de la Floride
Canadiens de Montréal
Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Lightning de Tampa Bay
Maple Leafs de Toronto
INTERACTIF ▾
OUTILS INTERACTIFS
Fauteuil - DG (Simulateur de formation personnalisée)
Repêchage simulé
Simulateur de transactions (propositions de transactions)
RECHERCHER
FAUTEUIL - DG
REPÊCHAGE SIMULÉ
SIMULATEUR DE TRANSACTIONS
ÉQUIPES ▾
Ducks d'Anaheim
Coyotes de l'Arizona
Bruins de Boston
Sabres de Buffalo
Flames de Calgary
Hurricanes de la Caroline
Blackhawks de Chicago
Avalanche du Colorado
Blue Jackets de Columbus
Stars de Dallas
Red Wings de Detroit
Oilers d'Edmonton
Panthers de la Floride
Kings de Los Angeles
Wild du Minnesota
Canadiens de Montréal
Predators de Nashville
Devils du New Jersey
Islanders de New York
Rangers de New York
Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Flyers de Philadelphie
Penguins de Pittsburgh
Sharks de San Jose
Kraken de Seattle
Blues de St-Louis
Lightning de Tampa Bay
Maple Leafs de Toronto
Canucks de Vancouver
Golden Knights de Vegas
Capitals de Washington
Jets de Winnipeg
JOUEURS ▾
Joueurs autonomes
Joueurs actifs
Joueurs inactifs
Contrats 35 ans et +
Contrats d’entrée
Reports du contrat d'entrée
NTC-NMC
Gains en carrière
Rapports de dépistage
Coût par point
Coût par arrêt
Transactions
Signatures
Mouvements de personnel
Historique des blessures
Historique du ballottage
Salaire retenu
Historique des rachats de contrat
Comparables de contrats
Essais professionnels
OUTILS ▾
Tableau de repêchage
Comparables de contrats
Rapports de dépistage
Cas d’arbitrage
Essais professionnels
Entraîneurs
Directeurs généraux
Joueurs appartenant à la formation au moment du gel - COVID
Joueurs - Liste de réserve
(Premium)
Suivi des dépenses salariales
(Premium)
Clauses d'échange entrant en vigueur
(Premium)
Équipes affiliées
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY ▾
Sommaire
Alignements détaillés
Gardiens partants
Mises à jour - Statuts des joueurs
CALCS ▾
Calculateur de rachat de contrat
Calculateur de ballottage
Calculateur d’offre qualificative
Calculateur d’arbitrage
Calculateur d'offre hostile
Calculateur d'impôt sur le revenu
RAPPORTS DE DÉPISTAGE
COTES
CBA▾
FAQ - Convention collective
FAQ - Rapports de dépistage
Historique des masses salariales
Rémunération maximale du contrat d’entrée
FAQ - Rachats de contrat
FAQ - Liste des blessés à long terme
FAQ - Offre Hostile
FAQ - Ballottage
FAQ - Liste de réserve
FAQ - Repêchage d'expansion
ARCHIVES ▾
Masses salariales des années antérieures
(Premium)
Articles
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2017 - Vegas
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2021 - Seattle
FORUMS
SE CONNECTER
S'INSCRIRE
EN
Basculer en mode sombre
Cotes activées
DQavis
DQtalks
Membre depuis
19 juill. 2021
Équipe favorite
Canadiens de Montréal
Deuxième équipe favorite
Golden Knights de Vegas
Messages dans les forums
538
Messages par jour
0.5
MESSAGES
SUJETS
MENTIONS "J'AIME"
ÉQUIPES VIA FAUTEUIL-DG
Forum:
Armchair-GM
8 avr. à 11 h 27
Sujet:
Smelling playoffs
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>OldNYIfan</b></div><div>Los Angeles has greater priorities than adding to the left side of the defense, like investing in goalies, getting a quality winger for Pierre-Luc DuBois and maybe even keeping Matt Roy. Personally, I'd much rather re-sign Viktor Arvidsson for three years than add Michael Matheson for two.</div></div>
In my opinion arvidsson only gonna be like 3.5 for 2-3 years he missed the whole yr so gonna be cheap
Forum:
Armchair-GM
8 avr. à 10 h 56
Sujet:
Smelling playoffs
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>MitchJr</b></div><div>Of course you can propose anything you want, everyone entitled to their opinion. No need to take shots at Leafs just because I disagree with you . I could have pointed out that Habs are heading to 3rd straight last place finish in division, the Leafs just 🧹 you, and trading a 1st for a washed up defender on the worst team in the division did not make a ton of sense 🤷🏻</div></div>
Um washed up defender but analytics like friedman and others saying if he was available he was worth a first a prospect and more? Okay bud
And i think you meant florida swept toronto who is a rd one exit for how many years? And 1 rd 3 in ur whole existence
Also it was 3-1 🫶🏻
24-13 😎
4-1 3rd period against boston
3-2 against tampa
Just sad
Forum:
Armchair-GM
8 avr. à 10 h 50
Sujet:
Smelling playoffs
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>evelutions2</b></div><div>Buffalo isn’t taking on a worse cap dump if they move Skinner. Toronto (or anyone else for that matter) won’t be paying a 1st for Savard. LA isn’t doing that when they already have Anderson and Gavrikov on the depth charts. They might look for a 3LD player, but doubtful they spend assets on a higher end LD to play 3LD. And since Montreal won’t have the 1sts from Toronto or LA, Canes won’t be moving Necas for the leftovers. Canes would also not want futures unless a separate trade can be arranged in which the Canes bring in a Necas replacement/upgrade.</div></div>
Matheson is better the anderson and gavrikov
There and 2nd and 3rd pairing dmen matheson is elite now and can log top minutes and qb the pp.
Fiala-Kopy-Kempe
Moore-Danault-Byfield
Kaliyev-Dubios-Laffierriere
Grunderson-Turcotte-Thomas
Anderson-Doughty
Matheson-Roy
Gavrikov-Spence
Clarke
This would be a good lineup with some depth signings
Matheson would add more goals to this team alr logging around 60pts by end of season with mtl with a more loaded team like this might push the same or higher.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
8 avr. à 10 h 42
Sujet:
Smelling playoffs
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>MitchJr</b></div><div>Give it up bud, no team is giving you a 1st for Savard. If any team was dumb enough to do it - it would have been at TDL that just passed. Zero reason to waste assets now when Leafs (or any team) can address their needs via FA.</div></div>
You act like savard needs to be moved this is my gm and i can do what i want if u think a 25-32 pick is bad for a quality rhd then u dont know hockey but wait forgot toronto is a rd 1 exit so ig 16-20 is a lil high for savard 😊
Forum:
Armchair-GM
8 avr. à 10 h 24
Sujet:
He was scratched again
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>fullblowncaniac90</b></div><div>Taking Savard while dealing KK only clears a little over a million. Not worth taking next to nothing for Necas for that little cap relief. They can fit both Necas and Guentzel under the cap with a KK buyout anyway.</div></div>
Huh? 2 1rst B prospect 4th line depth 13th fwd and a vet
Can 50% on savard or armia
And your telling me it takes a 1rst (25-32)
A 2nd (57-64)
A B+ rhd prospect morrow
And a young center who has potential?
Is a better deal then sending necas suzuki and kk
For a top 4 puck eating defender or defensive 3rd liner
Depth forward in pinard who can play all over the lineup and pk. Ylonen whos basically just a swap for suzuki who havent done much with their careers and maybe relocation helps.
B prospects in barron or kidney (barrons pretty much nhl ready just a few defensive structures need to learn)
And 2 first anywhere from 12-32 cgy definitely wont be a bottom 10 team so top 10 protection isnt even bad
And how much do you even think necas cost
Savard 50%
2 first
kidney
can prob get it done
Ylonen pinard for kk and suzuki
Is the exact same value as kk is expensive and value goes down.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
8 avr. à 8 h 53
Sujet:
He was scratched again
How about this trade?
Carolina: rhp ylonen 1rst wpj 1rst Cgy (top 10 protected)
One of savard or Armia (3.5m each)
One of kidney or Barron
(Could resign guentzel over necas and kk now)
Mtl: kk necas suzuki
Forum:
Armchair-GM
8 avr. à 8 h 48
Sujet:
Retooling
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>RazorSeider53</b></div><div>"YOU HAVE TO GET RID OF PETRY!
... So take this washed up winger with two years left on his contract at twice the cap hit!"
Makes sense.</div></div>
Didnt say you have to and ig 26 goals on the season is washed up winger? Lol
Saad would lead all wingers on your roster with goals
(Raymond has 26 so tied)
Forum:
Armchair-GM
8 avr. à 8 h 46
Sujet:
Retooling
Also just wanna say didnt mean to put 2 2nds in savard trade
Forum:
Armchair-GM
8 avr. à 8 h 45
Sujet:
Retooling
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>xercuses</b></div><div>Why would the blues do any of these moves?</div></div>
Cuz they get better?? lol
Kane duchene lindholm > saad
Petry savard > parayko (yeah hes better but these are 2 vets spread out in the top 6 and for half the price).
Forum:
Armchair-GM
8 avr. à 8 h 43
Sujet:
Retooling
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>RazorSeider53</b></div><div>We have Debrincat for the next three years and yet you want to take Saad's cap off your hands and your justification is so he can "Play with Kane".
**** we should sign Toews and trade for Panarin too. Who needs defense? Just play those four with Kane.</div></div>
Buddy do you not know ur own team you got
Chariot-Sieder
Walman-Holl
Edvidsson
Maata
and you want petry? Instead of getting smo like montour pesce??? In FA
With saad your lines
Debrincat-Larkin-Kane
Saad-Compher-Raymond
Rasmussen-Copp-Perron
Fabbri-Veleno-Sprong
Forum:
Armchair-GM
8 avr. à 8 h 33
Sujet:
Ifnt this yr then next yr
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>xercuses</b></div><div>2 cap dumps and a 2nd for Parayko?
This might be the worst offer I’ve seen for him on here. Congrats I guess</div></div>
You act as if ceci and kane arent worth nothing
to me on stl kane is worth 20+ goals
(For 13 years out of 15 kanes been a 20+ goal guy every season) stl needs goals and a body like kane
Ceci will have trade stock at deadline cuz hes rhd and if he plays great that will just go up.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
8 avr. à 8 h 28
Sujet:
Smelling playoffs
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Hockeyfan1986</b></div><div>Would you pay a 1st for a guy that will be bottom pairing? Only way it would be a 1st if there would be retention, and Montreal already has 3 of them can't take more until offseason (Edmundson will be off).
At the TDL Matt Roy or Hronek would have been the only two options for the RD(for long term resigning) for Leafs to pay a 1st, and both Kings and Canucks are in the playoff picture.</div></div>
Lube c
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Hockeyfan1986</b></div><div>Would you pay a 1st for a guy that will be bottom pairing? Only way it would be a 1st if there would be retention, and Montreal already has 3 of them can't take more until offseason (Edmundson will be off).
At the TDL Matt Roy or Hronek would have been the only two options for the RD(for long term resigning) for Leafs to pay a 1st, and both Kings and Canucks are in the playoff picture.</div></div>
Lube cost 700k less just move smo down savard is 2x the player at 5x the cost thats why hronek and roy werent going no where
Besides if ur a cup team and get offered from a seller savard top 4 dmen logs 20 minutes + pk blockshots and is a stay at home guy leader veteran won a cup making 1.75 50% and can play anywhere in the lineup
you would trade your 25-32 pick
Forum:
Armchair-GM
8 avr. à 7 h 18
Sujet:
Smelling playoffs
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>AntiAnalytics</b></div><div>Here’s why the Buffalo trade has ZERO CHANCE of happening
1- we don’t need the Cap saving, PLENTY of room
2- sure Skinner had a “down” season, but almost everyone did for us this year- see: Tage, Tuch, Cozens, etc etc
And even with his struggles this year, he’s still gonna put up numbers on par with Anderson’s best year of his entire career
3- Anderson blows & we’d have no interest whatsoever
4- after next year, we can get out of Skinner’s contract fairly painlessly (and that’s IF we’d even want to)
5- while getting that first would be tempting, our prospect pool is so loaded that we don’t really “need” it- we just aren’t looking for futures, & are trying to win now. Even in a down season, Skinner helps us win games as one of our leading goal scorers</div></div>
Doesnt matter then will save are first keep 3.5 kap which is 11 and sign smo better in Free agency if i were gm
Forum:
Armchair-GM
8 avr. à 7 h 17
Sujet:
Smelling playoffs
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>JamieG613</b></div><div>The Leafs wouldn't not trade a 1st for Savard at the deadline and then all of a sudden think it's a good idea in the offseason</div></div>
Cuz they rather have lube for pucks whos ass compared to savard. Savard was high priced 1rst prospect maybe more at the tdl
Savard blocks shots
Kills penalties
Plays heavy minutes
Would trive at top 6 and pk time in toronto
Savard won cup vet and experienced
Rielly-?
Mccabe-Lily
Beniot-Savard
Forum:
Armchair-GM
4 avr. à 14 h 19
Sujet:
Who gets extended 24-25
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Caniac2000</b></div><div>Canes decline the Nashville trade. A 3rd ain't enough for KK.
Otherwise, the trades are okay. For contracts, Too high on Necas, too high on Teuvo, too high on Carrier, too high on Drury, too high on Jost, too high on Sprong.</div></div>
As you like to mention p/60 you think a guy like sprong who scores at over 3-3.5 p/60 the last 2 seasons is not worth 4yrs 3.5 as hes always a top performer on any team hes played on with all different minutes wetheres its 1rst or 4th line
Forum:
Armchair-GM
3 avr. à 18 h 23
Sujet:
CanesCanucks
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>DQavis</b></div><div>The only % necas dominates in goal scoring is missing the net oppenents blocking his shots has a worst percentage in all danger goal shots. He only has a better s% which is 4% better then caufield and only has 2 more goals
Caufield is better in all danger changes and goals creating rebounds and starting the plays to create goals more primary points and assists. Doesnt get his shot blocked as much as necas or misses the net as much with about 70+ more shots
Career wise the only stat necas seems better at is assisting and thats 4 more % over career when caufield like u said is tiny gets injured and everyone sees him as a sniper.
The only real **** u have been saying is necas has less ice time and better p/60 then again if caufield wasnt slacking in goals his p\60 would be better the difference is only 0.22 while caufield shoots at 0.74 which is 0.39 less then necas so come back next season cuz we know pt wise assist wise caufield is better this season but not goals atm u cant make up stats on false truth like its the truth necas has 52 pts like y cant say anything that changes that everyone would rather a 23 yr old winger who has 56 pts then a 25yr old winger who has 52.</div></div>
Also idk if ur aware but necas alson played with aho jarvis svech terrivainen and kk last season so all those guys were 40-60+ pts it his one above his normal average
Forum:
Armchair-GM
3 avr. à 18 h 12
Sujet:
CanesCanucks
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Caniac2000</b></div><div>I'm sorry, what? Necas is better defensively, and has a better points per 60. You go on to talk about all sorts of other stuff I can't be bothered to read, so let's skip ahead to where you say because Jarvis is having a breakout year Necas isn't better than Caufield. This couldn't be further from the truth. Svechnikov is worse than Guentzel, does that mean Svechnikov isn't better than Slafkovksy? That's a really poor way of thinking about this.
You then mention the roster. Necas doesn't play with most of them! He never plays with Staal, Drury, Martinook, or Noesen. He rarely plays with Aho. You can rotate the defense, sure, but most of their production is secondary on the powerplay. If you look at Carolina's system, the entire point is to get the puck back to the point for shots from the defensemen and look for tips and rebounds. It's why Carolina's system strangles offensive talent. Necas is doing this on an EXTREMELY tight defensive leash, and Caufield can play normal hockey and still is being outproduced relative to the ice time. Add in everything else, I just do not see how you can argue Caufield is the better player here.</div></div>
The only % necas dominates in goal scoring is missing the net oppenents blocking his shots has a worst percentage in all danger goal shots. He only has a better s% which is 4% better then caufield and only has 2 more goals
Caufield is better in all danger changes and goals creating rebounds and starting the plays to create goals more primary points and assists. Doesnt get his shot blocked as much as necas or misses the net as much with about 70+ more shots
Career wise the only stat necas seems better at is assisting and thats 4 more % over career when caufield like u said is tiny gets injured and everyone sees him as a sniper.
The only real **** u have been saying is necas has less ice time and better p/60 then again if caufield wasnt slacking in goals his p\60 would be better the difference is only 0.22 while caufield shoots at 0.74 which is 0.39 less then necas so come back next season cuz we know pt wise assist wise caufield is better this season but not goals atm u cant make up stats on false truth like its the truth necas has 52 pts like y cant say anything that changes that everyone would rather a 23 yr old winger who has 56 pts then a 25yr old winger who has 52.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
3 avr. à 17 h 58
Sujet:
CanesCanucks
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Caniac2000</b></div><div>I'm sorry, what? Necas is better defensively, and has a better points per 60. You go on to talk about all sorts of other stuff I can't be bothered to read, so let's skip ahead to where you say because Jarvis is having a breakout year Necas isn't better than Caufield. This couldn't be further from the truth. Svechnikov is worse than Guentzel, does that mean Svechnikov isn't better than Slafkovksy? That's a really poor way of thinking about this.
You then mention the roster. Necas doesn't play with most of them! He never plays with Staal, Drury, Martinook, or Noesen. He rarely plays with Aho. You can rotate the defense, sure, but most of their production is secondary on the powerplay. If you look at Carolina's system, the entire point is to get the puck back to the point for shots from the defensemen and look for tips and rebounds. It's why Carolina's system strangles offensive talent. Necas is doing this on an EXTREMELY tight defensive leash, and Caufield can play normal hockey and still is being outproduced relative to the ice time. Add in everything else, I just do not see how you can argue Caufield is the better player here.</div></div>
As i said this season necas is better i looked at advanced stats and his p/60 is 2.56 caufield is 2.34 or smt close like that all ik is 0.22 difference caufield only has 200 more even minutes necas also missed 5 games thats abt 85 minutes+take aways giveaways and faceoff% caufield better gwg overtime caufield better playoffs caufield better high danger meduim danger low danger caufield better goals created shot rebound create caufield better necas has more shots blocked and missed then caufield and career bro ur looking at 1 season over career
Forum:
Armchair-GM
3 avr. à 15 h 6
Sujet:
CanesCanucks
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Montreal1st</b></div><div>Carolina has far better players, that is why they are a better team. Necas is far more open to play his game that Cole is, as NHL teams have game plans to stop opposing snipers especially on teams with poor depth. With that said look at Caufield's Shot%, it is unsustainably low this year. Snake bitten or teams taking away his shooting lanes? Probably a little of both but with a normal year's Shot% he would be hitting 40 already. Necas is good, mind you his +/- is the same as Caufield's yet they are on opposite ends of team success this year. What does that tell you? GWG is another marker where they are on opposite ends of the stick.</div></div>
As i said caufield better defensively better takes aways less give aways hes smaller too is what the other dude loved to mention so must be way easier to not give away the puck and to take the puck away from him then necas right? Ha no.
With 155 less regular season games has 5 less gwg also pretty sure caufield set a record for most gwg at the age of 22.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
3 avr. à 14 h 55
Sujet:
CanesCanucks
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Caniac2000</b></div><div>Necas is the significantly better player now. Necas is older, but that's a big upgrade. That's the kind of thing you're going to have to part with if you want Necas. He's the more valuable player right now. He's outproducing Caufield in less ice time with weaker linemates in a system that kills offensive talent. He's also half a foot bigger than Caufield</div></div>
Half a foot bigger 14lbs heavier lol.
Worse defensively
Less primary pts
Meaning he doesnt nesessarily drive his line
Caufield scores better high meduim and low danger chances.
The only reason necas pts\60 is better then caufields this year is cuz necas is scoring goals at 1.13 and caufield is scoring at .74 or smt and his percentage is 7-8 and necas is 11-11.5 forget. No doubt necas is good id love for mtl to trade for him cuz hes rfa and cap will get tighter for carolina as yes hes really speedy and crafty but the stats dont dominate his all around game compared to caufield you mention his minutes his linemates those are factors but if ur having a younger guy like jarvis take ur minutes and ur top pairing your not better then him.
Suzuki 71pts
Caufield 56.
Matheson 52 pts
slaf who only has 42 pts
Next up newhook 27 pts
Carolina has
Aho 85ts
Guentzel 68 pts (14 in 11 with car)
Jarvis 62
Necas 52
Terrivainen 48
Svech 46 in 54
Skjei 42
Burns 39
Noesen slavin martinook staal drury all have more pts then newhook except drury ties so what would happen if caufield stepped up his goal shooting % and score goals and had a roster like this?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
3 avr. à 14 h 20
Sujet:
CanesCanucks
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Caniac2000</b></div><div>Yet, Necas has a higher Points/60 minutes because he doesn't get as much ice time. He has a worse quality of linemate and still outproduces Caufield during the time on ice... stop it now. I'm not going around in a circle here. Necas is better.</div></div>
Do your research bud pts/60 by .3 thats it and thats this season hes 2 years older 158 more games 28 more playoff games has less pt% over career less g% over career if hes getting less minutes then caufield theres a reason. And idk if u know this but when u get a 90 on a essay and then get a zero on your next it brings ur average down alot necas missed 4 games which means he missed 65 ish playing time minutes. He has more giveaways less take aways the caufield.
If u think .3 this season and 2yrs older 186 games more experienced is better then caufield then thats all u 💋
Forum:
Armchair-GM
3 avr. à 13 h 58
Sujet:
CanesCanucks
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Caniac2000</b></div><div>Necas plays with Kuznetsov and Teravainen... Caufield plays with Suzuki and Slafkovsky. Quality of team has no place here, Caufield has the better linemates LOL. Necas has 4 less points in 4 less games,,, Necas is the better producer, better playmaker, faster skater, stronger and larger player (underrated aspect of Necas, dude is 6'2) and he doesn't have Caufield's lingering injury issues... want me to keep going or...?</div></div>
Wdym better producer lol i just told u caufield has more pts on a worse team. Necas has 12 more penalties minutes this season then caufield has in his entire career
Caufield better pt% career 71.7. Necas 68.17
Caufield better g% career 37.5 Necas 27.4
Necas 41.1
Playoffs
necas 48 games 7 goals 14 assist
Caufield 20 games 4 goals 8 assist (rookie season)
I think we know who preforms at a better goal scoring and pt scoring percentage. Oh ya did i mention rookie season.
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Caniac2000</b></div><div>Caufield is 23. He's got 74 goals and 66 assists for 140 points. Right? His career highs are this year, and he might make 60 points. Necas had a 60 point pace in his age 22 season, when the pandemic shortened the season to 56 games and he put up 41 points anyway (65 point pace). So, what's your point here? Other than Necas has better career numbers in a system that strangles offensive talent AND with lesser linemates because he doesn't play with Aho while Caufield plays with Suzuki? You're just repeating the same thing, and ignoring that Caufield's injury issues also affect his value</div></div>
Lmao whats caufield injury issue? Hasnt missed a game this season missed 36 games last season cuz he got cross checked to the shoulder ya totally his fault when a sniper who was scoring at a 48 goal past has a messed should ur team is def gonna keep playing him.
The year before that in like the first 30 games caufield had like 5 pts was sent down to the Ahl fired ducharme and hired msl he came back scoring goals and pts at a really high percent ppg wise so ya lets talk abt that while in the last 30+games still ending up with more pts and goals then necas on one of the worst habs team in nhl history. Want to talk abt necas scoring at a 61 pt pace in the shortened season well caufield scored at a 60.5 pt pace his first season then necas scores at 11 lmao in his first season. With the multuple rd 3s in necas playoff career suprised he only has 7 goals and 21 pts while caufields rookie playoffs stats is way better.
Caufield scores better produces better % wise so wtv u say stats are stats
So ya bring up pt scoring % goal scoring % playoff inmpact scoring % bring up point pace like caufield still trumps him in those categories
Forum:
Armchair-GM
3 avr. à 13 h 34
Sujet:
CanesCanucks
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Caniac2000</b></div><div>No, this is flawed at its base. Necas is the better player between him and Caufield, and while Caufield is younger, his setting career highs with 50 points. Necas is coming off a 70 point year. Montreal need to be the one adding here, not Carolina. If you drop Harris, Strubble, and the 1st, it's probably closer to a realistic deal for Carolina. As it, easy no.</div></div>
Read my other comment u sound like a fool and know nothing abt caufields game
In total games played each player has
Necas has 4 seasons and 27 games
Caufield has 2 seasons and 33 games
Caufield better point scoring percentage in reg and playoffs better goal scorer as necas has 2 more goals then him this season with 4 less points then caufield
Last season 28 goals in 82 caufield 26 in 46 the year before that 78 games for necas 14 goals 26 assist 40 pts caufield 67 games 23 goals 20 assist 43 pts on arguably the worst habs team and history and im pretty sure most injuries in nhl history. Year before that was caufields rookie year scoring at a 32 goal paste and necas scored at a 21 in pretty much his second season games wise. So yea care to rebuttal????
Forum:
Armchair-GM
3 avr. à 13 h 21
Sujet:
CanesCanucks
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Caniac2000</b></div><div>Necas, in this example, signs 8 years meaning the control argument is nonsense. It actually would favor the team having Necas. Caufield's not a better scorer if he can't stay in the lineup to score goals. Necas, ironically, has a better career high in goals. Necas is the better player, he's the more valuable player with an 8 year deal like this.</div></div>
Let’s just say caufield has a better point scoring percentage career wise 71.7 and necas at 68.17 and necas has been on a wagon team btw they dont suck.
Necas has 2 more goals then caufield this season and 4 less points on a good team btw. Last season necas had 28 goals in 82 and caufield had 26 in 46 yes necas is the better scorer 😂 oh and the year before that had 9 more goals 3 more pts in 11 less games on a horrible mtl team like they havent been that bad and that much injuries since ww2. Caufield younger better contract can score better playmaker better playoff performer
Want me to keep cooking? 😭😭
Forum:
Armchair-GM
6 févr. à 23 h 25
Sujet:
my lines next game
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>ricochetii</b></div><div>The one scoring line:
Caufield - Suzuki - Slafkovsky
The something to prove line:
Ylonen - Gignac - Anderson
The relatively safe line:
Pezzetta - Evans - RHP
The just don't F up line:
Pearson - Condotta - Armia</div></div>
armia is good bro kills penalties scores and shutdown good on boards he just has a bad contract lol every team would want him at 1 mil
Premier
2
3
Suivant
Page 2
Remerciements à
Guillaume Lambert-Héon
pour l'aide à la traduction de l'anglais au français
SalarySwish
| Masses salariales de la NBA par CapFriendly
Conditions d’utilisation
Politique de confidentialité
Règlements du forum
À propos de nous
FAQ - Convention collective
Nous contacter
Privacy Manager
Follow @CapFriendly
CapFriendly
CapFriendly
© 2024 CapFriendly.com