SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

ColonelX

Evans truther
Membre depuis
16 juill. 2019
Équipe favorite
Canadiens de Montréal
Messages dans les forums
2506
Messages par jour
1.4
Forum: Armchair-GM1 févr. à 5 h 30
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>GiggywithGibby</b></div><div>Why, if you are Anaheim, do you trade Zegras out for a chance to draft another Zegras? We already hit with Zegras, we risk missing with 6OA, Anaheim has no chance to win the trade, at best they break even, at worst they trade Zegras for a bust.

So no, doesn't get it done. It's not like Dach who was a reclamation project when MTL bought him.</div></div>
I'm not the author of this AGM but I get the sense you hold Zegras in much higher regard than most fans of other teams. I don't think most view him as an offensive superstar that's simply limited by the team he's on but instead see him as an undeniably skilled but flawed playmaker (whether ultimately at C or W). I can infer that some of this may be the result of your perception that other team's fans have been undervaluing Zegras and, given some of what I've seen, I can agree. However, I think it's a disproportionate response to call a swap for a 6th overall pick "at best a break even".

As for what you'd stand to win, there are a number of high-end prospects likely available that can fill a variety of roles ANA might have better use of. Whether it be a RD like Levshunov, a powerforward like Lindstrom (though you have McTavish &amp; Gauthier), an elite goal scorer like Eiserman, etc. Further, swapping Zegras for another high-end ELC contract likely better aligns with when the team is likely to start competing (~2 to 3 years once the young D establish themselves) and allows extra cap flexibility in the medium-term future. Sure there's some risk, but there are plenty of ways for ANA to win such a trade and any suggestion otherwise strikes me as being willfully blind to them.
Forum: Armchair-GM18 déc. 2023 à 10 h 58
Forum: NHL Signings12 sept. 2023 à 13 h 52