SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Toronto style teardown

Créé par: Theflash9193
Équipe: 2017-18 Canucks de Vancouver
Date de création initiale: 13 août 2017
Publié: 13 août 2017
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Build a long-term champion...


Sign free agents to allow the young guys an extra year to develope. Plain and simple.

Sedins are top 6 players which in today's nhl gets a 1st and a prospect for 1 player. Since we have two I stuck with it still. Technically you'd be paying 5.25 per sedin and they each can get at least 50 points, probably more cuz Ottawa is a better team.


Pittsburgh trade is simple, they need a third line playmaking center. I simply traded them a top 4 defenceman and a 2nd-3rd line center. In return I got a top 4 defenceman back.


Edler trade because Washington looks like they need help on their left side and Edler can bring physicality and some offence.

Tanev is traded for sergachev, ik this might be annoying for him to be traded again but here's the reason.

- Tanev is one of the best shot suppression D and he plays on a crap team like canucks, imagine playing with hedman. He's also still young too and has a good salary.

- sergachev is still an unknown talent. No one knows for sure if he'll be an effective prospect which makes sense because that's like with any prospect.

- tanevs value is a 1st and a good prospect

- a top rhd is exactly what tampa needs they are so close to winning a championship And they also have more young talent on the cusp.


The canucks will also have a lot of young talent in...

Horvat boeser maata Juolevi pettersson dahlen Demko sergachev Stecher virtanen Gudbranson Siegenthaler gadjovich gaudette Hutton Baertschi Granlund Lind

Whoever proves roster worthy will be added plain and simple but that will take a year or two.

Built strong in net, and strong on defence.

The the draft the canucks take Andrei svechnikov/dahlin and Adam boqvist. Team that's deep gets deeper.

They also look to trade whoever they signed the following deadline or off-season.

Kids will be in minors tell they are ready
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
65 250 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
12 000 000 $
12 000 000 $
12 000 000 $
21 000 000 $
11 000 000 $
11 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
VAN
  1. Brown, Logan
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2018 (OTT)
OTT
  1. Sedin, Henrik (3 500 000 $ retained)
  2. Sedin, Daniel
Détails additionnels:
Sedins still top 6 players, plus at the deadline they'll be gotten for a discount because half the season is over.

Sedins get to play with karlsson and Burrows again
2.
VAN
  1. Siegenthaler, Jonas
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2018 (WSH)
3.
VAN
  1. Choix de 6e ronde en 2018 (DAL)
4.
5.
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2018
Logo de VAN
Logo de OTT
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de WSH
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de DAL
Logo de VAN
2019
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
2020
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2375 000 000 $54 413 225 $0 $945 000 $20 586 775 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
1 850 000 $1 850 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
C
UFA - 6
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD
UFA - 2
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 5
900 000 $900 000 $
AD, AG, C
UFA - 1
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
4 375 000 $4 375 000 $
AD, C
NTC
UFA - 4
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD
UFA
900 000 $900 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
700 000 $700 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
3 333 225 $3 333 225 $
DG
UFA - 5
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
3 666 667 $3 666 667 $
G
UFA - 3
2 800 000 $2 800 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
925 000 $925 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
G
UFA - 2
650 000 $650 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
750 000 $750 000 $
DG
RFA - 1
755 000 $755 000 $ (Bonis de performance95 000 $$95K)
DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
13 août 2017 à 20 h 46
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 368
Mentions "j'aime": 24
PIT trade make zero sense though, because we could have chased both those players in free agency if we wanted in. They don't fit in to the cap structure Rutherford likes and Gagner, a play making center, is not what we need. We need a 3rd line center who's very good defensively and can add some offense, not a offensively talented by often absent scoring line center who isn't consistant enough to be a 2C and who's not been a PKer. Del Zotto hasn't played a full season ... he barely plays half seasons and his D is also suspect and his offense is basically moot because we have (2) 50pt Dman.
13 août 2017 à 20 h 52
#2
Démarrer sujet
Canucks contenders
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 158
Mentions "j'aime": 18
Well it makes sense you'd question this TRADE as it's not your regular lowry+Dani for Sheary+pouliot.
MajesticWalrus a aimé ceci.
13 août 2017 à 20 h 53
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 724
Mentions "j'aime": 100
The Toronto tear down included trading players and retaining or taking salaries in return. Your trades likely don't happen because you have traded to much cap to teams without much cap space.
13 août 2017 à 20 h 56
#4
Démarrer sujet
Canucks contenders
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 158
Mentions "j'aime": 18
Quoting: orignalsix
The Toronto tear down included trading players and retaining or taking salaries in return. Your trades likely don't happen because you have traded to much cap to teams without much cap space.


If these trades are done at the deadline there should be salary room for all teams
13 août 2017 à 21 h 5
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2017
Messages: 3,009
Mentions "j'aime": 350
Quoting: Ess
PIT trade make zero sense though, because we could have chased both those players in free agency if we wanted in. They don't fit in to the cap structure Rutherford likes and Gagner, a play making center, is not what we need. We need a 3rd line center who's very good defensively and can add some offense, not a offensively talented by often absent scoring line center who isn't consistant enough to be a 2C and who's not been a PKer. Del Zotto hasn't played a full season ... he barely plays half seasons and his D is also suspect and his offense is basically moot because we have (2) 50pt Dman.


Malkin is good defensively and Crosby is decent defensively and on top of that Crosby's great at faceoffs so a very good defensive Center is not critical. Gagner is great offensively and would be great with Hagelin and Kessel so that we can finally have three 1st lines again. And Maata is only on our team right now for one thing, his offense, which is totally invisible right now whereas del zotto is established and would do what he can't. And as for fitting in the cap, Pittsburgh has more than 3 million in cap space and losing Maata adds a little over 4 million to the cap space. That's 7 million, Gagner is on a contract that's a little over 3 million and del zotto is 3 million. That's 6 million. Pittsburgh would have around 1 million in cap space.
13 août 2017 à 21 h 32
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 368
Mentions "j'aime": 24
Quoting: MajesticWalrus
Quoting: Ess
PIT trade make zero sense though, because we could have chased both those players in free agency if we wanted in. They don't fit in to the cap structure Rutherford likes and Gagner, a play making center, is not what we need. We need a 3rd line center who's very good defensively and can add some offense, not a offensively talented by often absent scoring line center who isn't consistant enough to be a 2C and who's not been a PKer. Del Zotto hasn't played a full season ... he barely plays half seasons and his D is also suspect and his offense is basically moot because we have (2) 50pt Dman.


Malkin is good defensively and Crosby is decent defensively and on top of that Crosby's great at faceoffs so a very good defensive Center is not critical. Gagner is great offensively and would be great with Hagelin and Kessel so that we can finally have three 1st lines again. And Maata is only on our team right now for one thing, his offense, which is totally invisible right now whereas del zotto is established and would do what he can't. And as for fitting in the cap, Pittsburgh has more than 3 million in cap space and losing Maata adds a little over 4 million to the cap space. That's 7 million, Gagner is on a contract that's a little over 3 million and del zotto is 3 million. That's 6 million. Pittsburgh would have around 1 million in cap space.


Are you suggestion PIT PK with Malkin and Crosby? We lost our 2 PK centers in Bonino and Cullen (who's more than likely not coming back). Rowney can and has PK, but PKing with Malking or Crosby means they're not optimizing their energy and time creating offense, etc. PIT needs a center who can replace Bonino on the PK more than they need more point production.

Maatta was projected to be a 2way defender, not just a point producer. He's on the PK more than he is the PP, and while he's struggles often he's 23 and has room to grow, or be traded for everyday pieces rather than 2 players who might show up and provide some offense.
Quoting: Theflash9193
Well it makes sense you'd question this TRADE as it's not your regular lowry+Dani for Sheary+pouliot.


When was the last time I posted that trade before today?
14 août 2017 à 0 h 59
#7
Fantasy Hockey Pro
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 5,052
Mentions "j'aime": 2,226
Caps have no cap space to make that trade, and none of those trades even are close to similar value or realistic.
14 août 2017 à 1 h 41
#8
Emotionally in 2018
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2016
Messages: 9,290
Mentions "j'aime": 3,387
Teams don't have enough cap space to pull this off. Not to mention how off the value is for most of them
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage