SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

are the preds are now a chychrun landing spot

Créé par: Borocop
Équipe: 2024-25 Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Date de création initiale: 21 mai 2024
Publié: 21 mai 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
I think he would fit well next to Carrier or Fabbro
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
23 800 000 $
21 500 000 $
2950 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
53 750 000 $
Transactions
1.
OTT
  1. Tomasino, Philip [Droits de RFA]
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2025 (TBL)
2.
EDM
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2024 (FLA)
3.
VGK
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (OTT)
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de OTT
Logo de BOS
Logo de OTT
Logo de DET
Logo de TBL
Logo de OTT
2025
Logo de OTT
Logo de TBL
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de FLA
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
2026
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2087 700 000 $84 945 714 $850 000 $82 500 $2 754 286 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
8 205 714 $8 205 714 $
AG
UFA - 4
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
8 350 000 $8 350 000 $
C
UFA - 7
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
4 975 000 $4 975 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
863 333 $863 333 $
C, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
7 950 000 $7 950 000 $
C
UFA - 6
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
AD, C
NMC
UFA - 1
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG, AD
RFA
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
3 800 000 $3 800 000 $
C
RFA
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
2 950 000 $2 950 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
950 000 $950 000 $
AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
825 000 $825 000 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
835 000 $835 000 $
C, AD
RFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
8 050 000 $8 050 000 $
DG
UFA - 8
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
4 600 000 $4 600 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 4
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
DD
UFA
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Golden Knights de Vegas
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
DD
UFA - 4

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
21 mai à 14 h 2
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2022
Messages: 5,644
Mentions "j'aime": 3,575
Now with McD gone, I'd consider it.
Borocop, csick et AEcho a aimé ceci.
21 mai à 14 h 3
#2
xt0msx12 on X
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 5,493
Mentions "j'aime": 2,467
I can't imagine the preds moving Tomasino for Chychrun, let alone a first on top of him.
Borocop a aimé ceci.
21 mai à 14 h 5
#3
Démarrer sujet
Au-revoir Dorion
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 4,893
Mentions "j'aime": 3,217
Quoting: brady_t12
I can't imagine the preds moving Tomasino for Chychrun, let alone a first on top of him.


He was flip flopping between the AHL and NHL IIRC this year and wont be waiver ineligible anymore next season. Theyll either have to deal him while hes got value or commit to him being a full-time roster piece next year. First round pick could be conditional on something as well
csick a aimé ceci.
21 mai à 14 h 6
#4
KFTW
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 44,752
Mentions "j'aime": 25,332
Quoting: brady_t12
I can't imagine the preds moving Tomasino for Chychrun, let alone a first on top of him.


I don’t think Tomasino has as much value as he did last year
StutzlesNumber1Fan a aimé ceci.
21 mai à 14 h 6
#5
Démarrer sujet
Au-revoir Dorion
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 4,893
Mentions "j'aime": 3,217
Quoting: Ennis
Now with McD gone, I'd consider it.


I think they have the pieces at RD available to properly insulate him
21 mai à 14 h 8
#6
xt0msx12 on X
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 5,493
Mentions "j'aime": 2,467
Quoting: Borocop
He was flip flopping between the AHL and NHL IIRC this year and wont be waiver ineligible anymore next season. Theyll either have to deal him while hes got value or commit to him being a full-time roster piece next year. First round pick could be conditional on something as well


Yeah I get that, I just think that they value him really highly and are going to do everything they can to have him succeed in Nashville. If they wanted to move on from him, I think it would be part of a bigger deal for a long term piece they can keep rather than a guy with one year left.
Borocop a aimé ceci.
21 mai à 14 h 8
#7
xt0msx12 on X
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 5,493
Mentions "j'aime": 2,467
Quoting: csick
I don’t think Tomasino has as much value as he did last year


Probably not, but I'd be surprised to see them move off of him at age 22.
21 mai à 14 h 9
#8
KFTW
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 44,752
Mentions "j'aime": 25,332
Quoting: brady_t12
Probably not, but I'd be surprised to see them move off of him at age 22.


Their prospect pool is filled with wingers. They could trade him before his value goes lower
brady_t12 a aimé ceci.
21 mai à 14 h 10
#9
Démarrer sujet
Au-revoir Dorion
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 4,893
Mentions "j'aime": 3,217
Quoting: brady_t12
Yeah I get that, I just think that they value him really highly and are going to do everything they can to have him succeed in Nashville. If they wanted to move on from him, I think it would be part of a bigger deal for a long term piece they can keep rather than a guy with one year left.


I think the idea would be to extend him though
brady_t12 a aimé ceci.
21 mai à 14 h 11
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2020
Messages: 336
Mentions "j'aime": 220
I don't think so, the way I see this move is Trotz making room for the young guys already in Milwaukee. I think this move is so Statsney can have a full time role in the top4 next year
Borocop a aimé ceci.
21 mai à 15 h 29
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2022
Messages: 5,644
Mentions "j'aime": 3,575
Quoting: nativewulf
I don't think so, the way I see this move is Trotz making room for the young guys already in Milwaukee. I think this move is so Statsney can have a full time role in the top4 next year


I like Stastny but I hope not. He's not good enough for top 4 minutes. I'd rather trade Lauzon, get Chych (or anyone) as the 2LD then play Spencer on the bottom pair
21 mai à 16 h 55
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2020
Messages: 336
Mentions "j'aime": 220
Quoting: Ennis
I like Stastny but I hope not. He's not good enough for top 4 minutes. I'd rather trade Lauzon, get Chych (or anyone) as the 2LD then play Spencer on the bottom pair


Statsney had an On-Ice Expected Goals% of 54%. That was higher than every Pred's Dman not named Roman Josi. He was an AHL Allstar and mostly played with Luke Schenn as his partner, and he still had great numbers. He looked fine in a small sample size, and has earned a shot at a bigger role next year.

Saying he's not good enough for top 4 minutes when he's only 24 with only 28 games in the NHL, but a +14 +/-, and a ton of room for growth is crazy
21 mai à 16 h 58
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 24,327
Mentions "j'aime": 7,846
Kulak is worth more than a 4th, Edmonton would move him for a 2nd.
21 mai à 17 h 8
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2022
Messages: 5,644
Mentions "j'aime": 3,575
Quoting: nativewulf
Statsney had an On-Ice Expected Goals% of 54%. That was higher than every Pred's Dman not named Roman Josi. He was an AHL Allstar and mostly played with Luke Schenn as his partner, and he still had great numbers. He looked fine in a small sample size, and has earned a shot at a bigger role next year.

Saying he's not good enough for top 4 minutes when he's only 24 with only 28 games in the NHL, but a +14 +/-, and a ton of room for growth is crazy


Because he was sheltered with a relatively low quality of comp. I’m not keen on taking small sample sizes as bond then throwing rookies into the top 4 who aren’t ready. I like Stastney but I’d rather secure an ACTUAL top 4 defenseman.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage