SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

An Outsiders Vision - CBJ

Créé par: SupremeBone
Équipe: 2024-25 Blue Jackets de Columbus
Date de création initiale: 7 mai 2024
Publié: 14 mai 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
I'd like to do more, but I have a hard time figuring out a way to move Laine. How is one supposed to value a guy with that goal scoring ability but little else?
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
22 500 000 $
22 000 000 $
45 125 000 $
44 875 000 $
1900 000 $
2800 000 $
22 000 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
1900 000 $
Transactions
1.
CBJ
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2025 (NSH)
Détails additionnels:
CBJ moves on from Boqvist as Jiricek is likely to take over any opportunities for offensive deployment. May be able to return a prospect alongside the pick.
NSH
  1. Boqvist, Adam
Détails additionnels:
With Barrie and perhaps Carrier moving on as UFAs, NSH takes a chance on a young dynamic RD to slot in between Fabbro & Schenn on the depth chart. Gives time for Ufko to develop.
2.
CBJ
  1. Choix de 5e ronde en 2024 (FLA)
Détails additionnels:
CBJ has little reason to re-sign Bean so they take the chance to get something for his rights.
FLA
  1. Bean, Jake [Droits de RFA]
Détails additionnels:
FLA seems to do well with incorporating young, offensive LD into their system and Bean could use another opportunity.
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de LAK
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de FLA
Logo de CBJ
2025
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de NSH
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de VGK
2026
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de NYR
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de PIT
Logo de CBJ
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2387 500 000 $80 780 000 $0 $4 700 000 $6 720 000 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
9 750 000 $9 750 000 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
950 000 $950 000 $ (Bonis de performance3 200 000 $$3M)
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
8 700 000 $8 700 000 $
C, AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
4 875 000 $4 875 000 $
AD, AG
RFA
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
925 000 $925 000 $
AG, C, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
5 125 000 $5 125 000 $
AD
RFA
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
AG, C
RFA
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
C
RFA
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
AG, C, AD
RFA
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
900 000 $900 000 $
AD, AG
RFA
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
9 583 333 $9 583 333 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
918 333 $918 333 $ (Bonis de performance1 000 000 $$1M)
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
5 400 000 $5 400 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
4 725 000 $4 725 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
6 250 000 $6 250 000 $
DD
NTC
UFA - 7
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
1 050 000 $1 050 000 $
G
RFA - 1
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
886 667 $886 667 $ (Bonis de performance500 000 $$500K)
DG
RFA - 3
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
900 000 $900 000 $
DG
UFA

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
14 mai à 7 h 56
#1
Be formless
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2016
Messages: 2,933
Mentions "j'aime": 1,066
Pretty solid. I would just switch Sillinger and Jenner.

I think they absolutely have to add a vet dman like Tinordi on a one year deal this year to support the young guys and provide some depth.

My one (or two) wish(es) would be finding an upgrade for Laine and/or Merzlikins.
14 mai à 8 h 17
#2
Nah.
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 4,701
Mentions "j'aime": 4,739
I like these…CBJ are at a weird place with the rebuild. A roster full of mostly young guys who just need the development and opportunity. Not really a lot of worthwhile vets who can be moved. Provorov will get moved, Laine as well (assuming he comes back healthy and can get back to the PPG player he showed flashes of), and I could see an Elvis buy-out either this off-season or next.

The G situation will need another year since Greaves is still waivers exempt, and has looked great in the AHL and limited NHL time (considering the team in front of him). Maybe Ivanov ends up being the real deal (he’s been a stud in the KHL), but he’s still best-case a few years away.

My only issue is the Marchy and Chinny contracts. I’d like to see M’s longer, and C’s shorter. He had a great breakout-season, but still had some injury problems, and I’d want to see him replicate it.
SupremeBone et CaseyFlyman a aimé ceci.
14 mai à 8 h 41
#3
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 2,659
Mentions "j'aime": 1,715
Quoting: Hockey_Soul
Pretty solid. I would just switch Sillinger and Jenner.

I think they absolutely have to add a vet dman like Tinordi on a one year deal this year to support the young guys and provide some depth.

My one (or two) wish(es) would be finding an upgrade for Laine and/or Merzlikins.

Quoting: dopplsan
I like these…CBJ are at a weird place with the rebuild. A roster full of mostly young guys who just need the development and opportunity. Not really a lot of worthwhile vets who can be moved. Provorov will get moved, Laine as well (assuming he comes back healthy and can get back to the PPG player he showed flashes of), and I could see an Elvis buy-out either this off-season or next.

The G situation will need another year since Greaves is still waivers exempt, and has looked great in the AHL and limited NHL time (considering the team in front of him). Maybe Ivanov ends up being the real deal (he’s been a stud in the KHL), but he’s still best-case a few years away.

My only issue is the Marchy and Chinny contracts. I’d like to see M’s longer, and C’s shorter. He had a great breakout-season, but still had some injury problems, and I’d want to see him replicate it.

Okay, thanks for the input! I decided to keep Merzi because I figured there wasn't a huge press to solve the problem this year and, since I don't really see a great candidate to swap with (apart from maybe Husso in Detroit), I figured it wise to leave it until next year. I feel similarly about Laine.

As for the Marchinny contracts, I can see what you mean, but I think they're well positioned to gamble a bit on Chinakhov. If you were to adjust them, would you think something like 4 * 3 for Chinakhov and 5.5 * 5 for Marchenko? Or would your aim to go long-term for Marchenko even if it costs upwards of 7mil?
14 mai à 8 h 42
#4
Yegor bomb
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2022
Messages: 788
Mentions "j'aime": 949
Unless Jiricek works on his skating and improves a lot during the off-season I do not see how he will be on the first pairing and he may not even make the team IMO. So signing a vet RD for 1 year may help or keeping Boqvist and when he gets injured you can call up Jiricek.
14 mai à 10 h 33
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2018
Messages: 2,577
Mentions "j'aime": 2,340
Quoting: SupremeBone
Okay, thanks for the input! I decided to keep Merzi because I figured there wasn't a huge press to solve the problem this year and, since I don't really see a great candidate to swap with (apart from maybe Husso in Detroit), I figured it wise to leave it until next year. I feel similarly about Laine.

As for the Marchinny contracts, I can see what you mean, but I think they're well positioned to gamble a bit on Chinakhov. If you were to adjust them, would you think something like 4 * 3 for Chinakhov and 5.5 * 5 for Marchenko? Or would your aim to go long-term for Marchenko even if it costs upwards of 7mil?


I think Merzlikins' relationship with the team is too far deteriorated to keep him around next year, but if there's no trade partner, he's a prime buyout candidate. It's more a pressing need in my eyes than most, probably.

I'd absolutely lock up Marchenko for a 6x$7M if that's what it took, he should absolutely grow into that and could become a 40-goal scorer. Chinakhov needs more regular playing time in the top-6 before we do anything more than a bridge.

Overall, I think you've done some tidy work, the values look pretty good and the lines look realistic (though I'd also swap Silly and Jenner, as well as Jiricek and Severson for now).

As for Laine: he probably gets a chance to rebound next season with Columbus, and could be traded if he starts to look like the player he has been with us (nearly ppg). If he is traded this season, though, I'd imagine it's for a decent package (like 2nd, 3rd, plus good prospect) with some heavy conditions on picks that could upgrade it to an elite package (like upgrading to a 1st if he plays 40 games, 3rd to a 2nd if he scores 20 goals, etc). Something that puts most of the risk on the acquiring team, since we don't have any pressure to move him.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage