SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Deadline

Créé par: xercuses
Équipe: 2023-24 Blues de St-Louis
Date de création initiale: 2 nov. 2023
Publié: 2 nov. 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
STL
    I’d like to see all these players moved out with retention on the UFAs

    This will leave room for the young guns to come in
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2024
    Logo de STL
    Logo de STL
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de STL
    Logo de NYR
    Logo de STL
    Logo de STL
    Logo de STL
    2025
    Logo de STL
    Logo de STL
    Logo de STL
    Logo de STL
    Logo de STL
    Logo de STL
    2026
    Logo de STL
    Logo de STL
    Logo de STL
    Logo de STL
    Logo de STL
    Logo de STL
    Logo de STL
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2383 500 000 $63 922 262 $20 000 $432 500 $19 577 738 $
    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Logo de Blues de St-Louis
    863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance400 000 $$400K)
    C
    RFA - 3
    Logo de Blues de St-Louis
    8 125 000 $8 125 000 $
    C, AD
    UFA - 8
    Logo de Blues de St-Louis
    8 125 000 $8 125 000 $
    AD
    UFA - 8
    Logo de Blues de St-Louis
    835 833 $835 833 $
    AG, AD
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Blues de St-Louis
    6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
    C, AG
    NTC
    UFA - 5
    Logo de Blues de St-Louis
    5 800 000 $5 800 000 $
    AG, AD, C
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Blues de St-Louis
    816 667 $816 667 $
    C
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Blues de St-Louis
    3 571 429 $3 571 429 $
    C
    M-NTC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Blues de St-Louis
    1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
    AG, AD
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Blues de St-Louis
    1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Blues de St-Louis
    852 500 $852 500 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
    C
    RFA - 3
    Logo de Blues de St-Louis
    775 000 $775 000 $
    AD, C
    UFA - 1
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Logo de Blues de St-Louis
    762 500 $762 500 $
    DG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Blues de St-Louis
    6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
    DD
    NTC
    UFA - 7
    Logo de Blues de St-Louis
    6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
    G
    NTC
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Blues de St-Louis
    775 000 $775 000 $
    DG
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Blues de St-Louis
    6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
    DD
    NTC
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Blues de St-Louis
    775 000 $775 000 $
    G
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Blues de St-Louis
    800 000 $800 000 $
    DG/DD
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Blues de St-Louis
    950 000 $950 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 1
    Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
    Logo de Blues de St-Louis
    775 000 $775 000 $
    AG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Blues de St-Louis
    775 000 $775 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Blues de St-Louis
    775 000 $775 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 1

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    2 nov. 2023 à 11 h 0
    #1
    Good Opinion Haver
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2018
    Messages: 1,813
    Mentions "j'aime": 923
    I think the issue you're running into here though is that a lot of the players you're replacing those moved out with are way over exposed. Bolduc isn't even in the league right now- and not playing particularly great yet in the AHL, frankly- and he's on the top line? Has Neighbours earned a look in the top six? Has Alexandrov earned a spot in the lineup period? I don't really see the forwards we have as blocking anybody from playing time they deserve. Similarly, I'm not thrilled with how Krug and (less so) Leddy have played, but what does Tucker on the top pair do for anybody (especially Tucker himself, who looks over-exposed in a third pair role?).

    In addition, most of these vets you're moving, they're not worth anything. No one wants Krug. You're not getting a 1st or even a 2nd for Saad unless he starts playing a lot better. So what's the point? Are you willing to retain on Leddy or Krug? I might be. Are you willing to pay another team in picks or prospects to get rid of them? I think given that this team is bad that doesn't make a lot of sense.

    Really the only thing they really need to do is they need to get Perunovich more time in the lineup. He's earned an everyday position, and we have to see if his body can hold up to the rigors of an NHL regular. But that needs to happen now, not at the deadline. Otherwise, just let the chips fall with these guys. I don't see the upside in putting all your young guys in spots they aren't ready for on a team that's not going anywhere.
    exo2769 et AC14 a aimé ceci.
    2 nov. 2023 à 11 h 30
    #2
    Démarrer sujet
    Xercuses
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2021
    Messages: 13,176
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,515
    Quoting: TheEarthmaster
    I think the issue you're running into here though is that a lot of the players you're replacing those moved out with are way over exposed. Bolduc isn't even in the league right now- and not playing particularly great yet in the AHL, frankly- and he's on the top line? Has Neighbours earned a look in the top six? Has Alexandrov earned a spot in the lineup period? I don't really see the forwards we have as blocking anybody from playing time they deserve. Similarly, I'm not thrilled with how Krug and (less so) Leddy have played, but what does Tucker on the top pair do for anybody (especially Tucker himself, who looks over-exposed in a third pair role?).

    In addition, most of these vets you're moving, they're not worth anything. No one wants Krug. You're not getting a 1st or even a 2nd for Saad unless he starts playing a lot better. So what's the point? Are you willing to retain on Leddy or Krug? I might be. Are you willing to pay another team in picks or prospects to get rid of them? I think given that this team is bad that doesn't make a lot of sense.

    Really the only thing they really need to do is they need to get Perunovich more time in the lineup. He's earned an everyday position, and we have to see if his body can hold up to the rigors of an NHL regular. But that needs to happen now, not at the deadline. Otherwise, just let the chips fall with these guys. I don't see the upside in putting all your young guys in spots they aren't ready for on a team that's not going anywhere.


    I basically see them getting a top Pair guy in FA for parayko, Maybe a hanafin?
    I put bolduc on the top pair since hes the closest to an outright sniper we have right now. also he hasnt been bad but i do think he needs to start to work his ass off now
    Also the whole thunderbirds team on a whole hasnt been amazing yet
    Alexandrov has earned a spot i think, maybe putting him on the wing helps him out.
    2 nov. 2023 à 13 h 52
    #3
    exo2769
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2015
    Messages: 15,508
    Mentions "j'aime": 9,512
    What about a Jack Campbell Torey Krug swap? Lower cap hit. Gives real time for Hofer/Ellis to actually develop. Helps support Binnington.
    2 nov. 2023 à 14 h 19
    #4
    Démarrer sujet
    Xercuses
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2021
    Messages: 13,176
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,515
    Quoting: exo2769
    What about a Jack Campbell Torey Krug swap? Lower cap hit. Gives real time for Hofer/Ellis to actually develop. Helps support Binnington.


    Blues have hofer backing him up already
    Wouldn’t want to take time away from him
    Also I assume zhencko is higher on the depth chart than Ellis

    Also Krug proably won’t waive
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Soumettre le sondage