SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

dynasty

Créé par: Mattydsnipes
Équipe: 2023-24 Ducks d'Anaheim
Date de création initiale: 28 sept. 2023
Publié: 28 sept. 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
87 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
CBJ
  1. Terry, Troy
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (BOS)
2.
MTL
  1. Zegras, Trevor [Droits de RFA]
3.
OTT
    Future Considerations
    4.
    ANA
    1. Grubauer, Philipp
    2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (SEA)
    3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2025 (SEA)
    Rachats de contrats
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2024
    Logo de ANA
    Logo de ANA
    Logo de SEA
    Logo de ANA
    Logo de PIT
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de ANA
    Logo de ANA
    Logo de ANA
    Logo de ANA
    2025
    Logo de ANA
    Logo de ANA
    Logo de SEA
    Logo de ANA
    Logo de ANA
    Logo de ANA
    Logo de ANA
    Logo de ANA
    2026
    Logo de ANA
    Logo de ANA
    Logo de ANA
    Logo de ANA
    Logo de ANA
    Logo de ANA
    Logo de ANA
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2683 500 000 $78 014 167 $0 $10 175 000 $5 485 833 $
    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    950 000 $950 000 $ (Bonis de performance3 500 000 $$4M)
    AD, AG
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
    950 000 $950 000 $ (Bonis de performance3 250 000 $$3M)
    C
    RFA - 3
    Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
    8 700 000 $8 700 000 $
    C, AD, AG
    M-NTC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
    3 650 000 $3 650 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
    894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
    C, AG
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
    6 250 000 $6 250 000 $
    AD, AG
    NTC
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
    5 825 000 $5 825 000 $
    AG, C
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
    5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
    C, AD
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
    5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
    AD, AG
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
    2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
    1 800 000 $1 800 000 $
    C, AG
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
    1 295 000 $1 295 000 $
    AG, AD
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
    850 000 $850 000 $
    C, AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
    775 000 $775 000 $
    AD
    RFA - 1
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
    6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
    DG/DD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
    7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
    DD
    RFA - 3
    Logo de Kraken de Seattle
    5 900 000 $5 900 000 $
    G
    NTC
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
    2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
    DG/DD
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
    4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
    DD
    NTC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
    812 500 $812 500 $
    G
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
    925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance925 000 $$925K)
    DG/DD
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
    2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
    800 000 $800 000 $
    G
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
    850 000 $850 000 $
    DG/DD
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
    775 000 $775 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
    762 500 $762 500 $
    DG
    UFA - 1

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    28 sept. à 23 h 42
    #1
    Future Ducks legend
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2022
    Messages: 7,525
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,646
    This one ought to be good, let me grab the popcorn.
    28 sept. à 23 h 43
    #2
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mars 2023
    Messages: 433
    Mentions "j'aime": 181
    Other than Gru having a NTC through the year, Seattle might bite.
    AEcho a aimé ceci.
    28 sept. à 23 h 59
    #3
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: nov. 2018
    Messages: 14,013
    Mentions "j'aime": 5,562
    Zegras isn't worth any 1st ova pick hence the reason he was selected 9th and all of Hughes, Kakko, Dach, Turcotte and Cozens went before him. Even in a redraft, I doubt he even goes top 5 (Hughes, Seider, Byram, Cozens,, Broberg, Knight, Boldly are top 7 with Caufield, Kakko, Dach and Zegras fighting for 8-11)
    29 sept. à 1 h 11
    #4
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2016
    Messages: 1,447
    Mentions "j'aime": 588
    Quoting: Campabee
    Zegras isn't worth any 1st ova pick hence the reason he was selected 9th and all of Hughes, Kakko, Dach, Turcotte and Cozens went before him. Even in a redraft, I doubt he even goes top 5 (Hughes, Seider, Byram, Cozens,, Broberg, Knight, Boldly are top 7 with Caufield, Kakko, Dach and Zegras fighting for 8-11)


    https://theathletic.com/3690768/2022/10/19/nhl-redraft-2019/?amp=1

    https://www.sportskeeda.com/amp/ice-hockey/should-jack-hughes-picked-1-redrafting-2019-nhl-draft

    https://montrealhockeynow.com/2022/12/31/montreal-canadiens-2019-nhl-re-draft-caufield-dach-rank-high-xhekaj-surprises/

    https://twitter.com/JFreshHockey/status/1686384273316851719

    These are literally just the first 4 links on Google for 2019 redraft. Z is 2-4.

    Nail Yakupov was a 1st overall pick, let’s not pretend like that’s some infallible pedestal.

    You can be against the trade, that’s more than understandable. But if this is your argument, please just stop
    OldNYIfan, squashmaple, TrevorsZebras and 1 other person a aimé ceci.
    29 sept. à 1 h 11
    #5
    Mr.
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2022
    Messages: 3,227
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,036
    Zegras isn't getting you the 1st overall pick
    29 sept. à 3 h 24
    #6
    Once a Kings Fan Too
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2018
    Messages: 37,282
    Mentions "j'aime": 22,591
    Quoting: SMH
    Zegras isn't getting you the 1st overall pick

    Slafkovsky isn't getting you Stutzle. And Slafkovsky certainly isn't getting you Dahlin or Power, either. The fact that he was drafted first in his class is utterly meaningless.
    squashmaple, Bobrick et Xspyrit a aimé ceci.
    29 sept. à 6 h 14
    #7
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: nov. 2018
    Messages: 14,013
    Mentions "j'aime": 5,562
    Quoting: Jded
    https://theathletic.com/3690768/2022/10/19/nhl-redraft-2019/?amp=1

    https://www.sportskeeda.com/amp/ice-hockey/should-jack-hughes-picked-1-redrafting-2019-nhl-draft

    https://montrealhockeynow.com/2022/12/31/montreal-canadiens-2019-nhl-re-draft-caufield-dach-rank-high-xhekaj-surprises/

    https://twitter.com/JFreshHockey/status/1686384273316851719

    These are literally just the first 4 links on Google for 2019 redraft. Z is 2-4.

    Nail Yakupov was a 1st overall pick, let’s not pretend like that’s some infallible pedestal.

    You can be against the trade, that’s more than understandable. But if this is your argument, please just stop


    Your right I forgot about Yakupov, so maybe Zegras would be worth one 1st over all pick lol.

    As for your links, it's good that some people think he would go top 5, I don't agree with them. Byram still has the potential to be one of the top 20 d men in the league and I love CC but I don't think he goes top 5 either. I stand by my earlier statement that I seriously doubt in a redraft that Zegras would go top 5. He isn't better than Hughes or Seider, Boldly scores more than Zegras so those are for sure the top 3. Byram would still be taken top 5 since the only thing keeping him from stardom is his health, if he can get that sorted out he would be top 3. Cozens is a top 5 pick for me since he has gotten progressively better every year and put up more goals as well. Knight is one of if not the best goalie prospect since Price and IMO goes 6th. Then you have Caufield, Zegras, Dach and Kakko fighting for 7th. I think you have to go with Zegras as 7th since he has put up the most points of the 4 and has been healthy, Caufiled would be next cause he is probably the best pure scorer out of the draft. Kakko goes 9th and Dach 10th just cause while Dach is trending the right way Kakko has already turned his career around, next year might be a whole different story depending on how well Dach does as our 2C lol. Again these are just my opinions and why I say I doubt Zegras goes top 5 in a redraft. You can provide a million links if you want but you aren't going to change my mind on who I think would go top 5.
    29 sept. à 7 h 12
    #8
    Monty and Prime pls
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2023
    Messages: 4,005
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,449
    Quoting: Campabee
    Zegras isn't worth any 1st ova pick hence the reason he was selected 9th and all of Hughes, Kakko, Dach, Turcotte and Cozens went before him. Even in a redraft, I doubt he even goes top 5 (Hughes, Seider, Byram, Cozens,, Broberg, Knight, Boldly are top 7 with Caufield, Kakko, Dach and Zegras fighting for 8-11)


    Byram, Broberg and Knight aren’t top 5.

    Zegras and Caufield are

    Hughes
    Seider
    Caufield
    Cozens
    Zegras
    Boldy
    Byram
    Dach
    Knight
    Newhook
    Macceli
    Pinto
    Kakko
    SMH et OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
    29 sept. à 8 h 56
    #9
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: nov. 2018
    Messages: 14,013
    Mentions "j'aime": 5,562
    Quoting: GuyGuyGuy
    Byram, Broberg and Knight aren’t top 5.

    Zegras and Caufield are

    Hughes
    Seider
    Caufield
    Cozens
    Zegras
    Boldy
    Byram
    Dach
    Knight
    Newhook
    Macceli
    Pinto
    Kakko


    Maybe not in your opinion but in my opinion they are. Also Boldly is above Caufield based on position, health, scoring and 2 way game.
    29 sept. à 17 h 21
    #10
    Monty and Prime pls
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2023
    Messages: 4,005
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,449
    Quoting: Campabee
    Maybe not in your opinion but in my opinion they are. Also Boldly is above Caufield based on position, health, scoring and 2 way game.

    Broberg is not even full time nhler. Knight is a backup
    OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
    30 sept. à 10 h 53
    #11
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2016
    Messages: 10,066
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,574
    Modifié 30 sept. à 11 h 8
    lol at Brännström being traded for Future Considerations

    The guy was one of the best #5 D-man in the league at 23 y/o last season, his advanced metrics and eye test clearly shows that he could do more than that...

    Also, trading Zegras for Slafkovsky is pretty bad for Anaheim

    Quoting: GuyGuyGuy
    Hughes
    Seider
    Caufield
    Cozens
    Zegras
    Boldy
    Byram
    Dach
    Knight
    Newhook
    Macceli
    Pinto
    Kakko

    It's a bit early to have the re-draft in depth but as of now my Top-7 would be (because there's a significant drop after these 7) :

    Hughes
    Seider
    Cozens
    Zegras
    Byram
    Boldy
    Caufield


    Then you have (not in order) Kakko, Dach, Maccelli, Tomasino, Pinto, York, Newhook, Harvey-Pinard and several others that need more NHL time

    You're ranking Caufield too high IMO. Goal scoring is very valuable but what guys like Cozens and Boldy offer overall is more valuable.
    OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
    30 sept. à 11 h 39
    #12
    Monty and Prime pls
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2023
    Messages: 4,005
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,449
    Quoting: Xspyrit
    lol at Brännström being traded for Future Considerations

    The guy was one of the best #5 D-man in the league at 23 y/o last season, his advanced metrics and eye test clearly shows that he could do more than that...

    Also, trading Zegras for Slafkovsky is pretty bad for Anaheim


    It's a bit early to have the re-draft in depth but as of now my Top-7 would be (because there's a significant drop after these 7) :

    Hughes
    Seider
    Cozens
    Zegras
    Byram
    Boldy
    Caufield


    Then you have (not in order) Kakko, Dach, Maccelli, Tomasino, Pinto, York, Newhook, Harvey-Pinard and several others that need more NHL time

    You're ranking Caufield too high IMO. Goal scoring is very valuable but what guys like Cozens and Boldy offer overall is more valuable.


    I’m an habs fan it’s only natural to have him that high
    Xspyrit a aimé ceci.
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Soumettre le sondage