SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Ottawa Senators

Créé par: Just_A_Guess
Équipe: 2023-24 Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Date de création initiale: 26 sept. 2023
Publié: 26 sept. 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
22 500 000 $
Transactions
1.
2.
BUF
  1. Forsberg, Anton
  2. Thomson, Lassi
  3. Choix de 4e ronde en 2024 (TBL)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de OTT
Logo de DET
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de DET
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
2025
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
2026
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2383 500 000 $82 804 880 $0 $1 850 000 $695 120 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
8 205 714 $8 205 714 $
AG
UFA - 5
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
8 350 000 $8 350 000 $
C
UFA - 8
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
4 975 000 $4 975 000 $
AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
AD, C
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
7 950 000 $7 950 000 $
C
UFA - 7
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AD
NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
863 333 $863 333 $
C, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
C
RFA
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
2 950 000 $2 950 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
775 000 $775 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
835 000 $835 000 $
C, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
775 000 $775 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 3
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 5
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
4 600 000 $4 600 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
4 600 000 $4 600 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
1 700 000 $1 700 000 $
DG/DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
837 500 $837 500 $
G
RFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance1 850 000 $$2M)
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
805 000 $805 000 $
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
762 500 $762 500 $
AG, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
775 000 $775 000 $
AG
RFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
26 sept. à 2 h 4
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2023
Messages: 2,094
Mentions "j'aime": 1,172
Pretty sure the Sabres would accept
Idk that Ottawa would do it though?
26 sept. à 7 h 17
#2
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 4,047
Mentions "j'aime": 2,627
Quoting: AntiAnalytics
Pretty sure the Sabres would accept
Idk that Ottawa would do it though?


Figure 2 years of an expensive backup for a younger, RFA backup <1mil means compensation is required. Maybe it's a bit premium but the basic premise would remain the same.
gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
26 sept. à 8 h 46
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2022
Messages: 4,578
Mentions "j'aime": 2,885
That's uhhh... quite the overpayment for UPL, who sucks
26 sept. à 10 h 6
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 5,153
Mentions "j'aime": 4,621
@AntiAnalytics
Quoting: Ennis
That's uhhh... quite the overpayment for UPL, who sucks
Is it really?
While Thomson was 19th OA in 2019, he has not demonstrated that he is a potential NHL RHD.
Among all of the first round pick from that year only 5 have played fewer NHL games than he.
Poulin, Suzuki, Beecher and Tracey have bust carved into their resumes, while Ryan Johnson decided to finish college.
In the games he has played in a Sabre uniform he appears to be NHL ready before the end of the season.
TBH, Buffalo would most likely keep Luukkonen and let the Senators go elsewhere to solve their cap issues.
26 sept. à 10 h 15
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2022
Messages: 4,578
Mentions "j'aime": 2,885
Quoting: gretzkyghosts
AntiAnalytics
Is it really?
While Thomson was 19th OA in 2019, he has not demonstrated that he is a potential NHL RHD.
Among all of the first round pick from that year only 5 have played fewer NHL games than he.
Poulin, Suzuki, Beecher and Tracey have bust carved into their resumes, while Ryan Johnson decided to finish college.
In the games he has played in a Sabre uniform he appears to be NHL ready before the end of the season.
TBH, Buffalo would most likely keep Luukkonen and let the Senators go elsewhere to solve their cap issues.


Forsberg >>>>>> UPL. a 1 for 1 swap already isn't far. UPL is garbo
26 sept. à 12 h 36
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2023
Messages: 1,587
Mentions "j'aime": 416
AZ not trading durzi (who they just traded for) for same age RFA same $ brannstrom.
you want to shed cap - obrein for kubalik fine - I know not equal value but OTT going to lose a piece or two for less to sign pinto
gretzkyghosts et Just_A_Guess a aimé ceci.
26 sept. à 12 h 58
#7
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 4,047
Mentions "j'aime": 2,627
Quoting: Ennis
That's uhhh... quite the overpayment for UPL, who sucks


Not paying for UPL, paying for 2 years of cap space and receiving UPL as a result.
gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
26 sept. à 13 h 45
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2023
Messages: 2,094
Mentions "j'aime": 1,172
Quoting: gretzkyghosts
AntiAnalytics
Is it really?
While Thomson was 19th OA in 2019, he has not demonstrated that he is a potential NHL RHD.
Among all of the first round pick from that year only 5 have played fewer NHL games than he.
Poulin, Suzuki, Beecher and Tracey have bust carved into their resumes, while Ryan Johnson decided to finish college.
In the games he has played in a Sabre uniform he appears to be NHL ready before the end of the season.
TBH, Buffalo would most likely keep Luukkonen and let the Senators go elsewhere to solve their cap issues.


Idk, not saying we would for sure
Depends how they view that prospect
gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
26 sept. à 14 h 8
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2023
Messages: 2,094
Mentions "j'aime": 1,172
Quoting: Just_A_Guess
Figure 2 years of an expensive backup for a younger, RFA backup <1mil means compensation is required. Maybe it's a bit premium but the basic premise would remain the same.


Fair point
Guess it depends on if Ottawa feels giving up that prospect is too much or not
gretzkyghosts et Just_A_Guess a aimé ceci.
26 sept. à 14 h 47
#10
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 4,047
Mentions "j'aime": 2,627
Quoting: AntiAnalytics
Fair point
Guess it depends on if Ottawa feels giving up that prospect is too much or not


I was seeing plenty of posts over the last year where he was included as the cost to dump a player. Zaitsev specifically. Zaitsev & Thomson for FC was a conversation I recall having. This would be a similar situation but they'd be receiving a much cheaper RFA option as backup tendy. Maybe the tune has changed but I still think it's fairly reasonable considering almost every team is going to want a premium to help them sign Pinto.
gretzkyghosts et AntiAnalytics a aimé ceci.
26 sept. à 15 h 4
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 10,066
Mentions "j'aime": 3,575
Modifié 26 sept. à 15 h 10
1) LOB is not needed, if he beats all of Kelly, Sokolov, Crookshank, Smejkal and Reinhardt for the 4th line LW spot, Sens will still have to pay a NHL salary to play in the AHL. He doesn't have any value, at least not for Ottawa. Which makes it Kubalik + Brannstrom for Durzi, which makes it a really bad trade. I understand this way the Sens create cap space but these players have value and are not like cap dumps.

Just remove Brannstrom and Durzi as I would much rather have Brannstrom than Durzi. The only thing he does more than Brannstrom is getting secondary assists on the PP, Brannstrom plays little PP because of the guys in front of him.

So not interested in LOB or Durzi, make it Kubalik for a pick, Yotes use him this season and sell him HIGHER at the deadline : profit

For Ottawa, moving Kubalik's AAV would be well enough space to sign Pinto to a 1 year bridge

2) This trade doesn't happen (because of Forsberg being the guy that brought Korpisalo to Ottawa) and is not even needed anyway. It's also pretty bad value for Ottawa, who also have to find a way to not lose Thomson on waivers, the guy is getting good

Quoting: gretzkyghosts
While Thomson was 19th OA in 2019, he has not demonstrated that he is a potential NHL RHD.
Among all of the first round pick from that year only 5 have played fewer NHL games than he.

Thomson looked really good last night, of course it's 1 game but he's playing for his stay in Ottawa. He played against Matthews/Marner and did really well.

And moot point on Forsberg, Sens not going to trade him and also need him at least this season to give more development to Sogaard and Merilainen.

Quoting: Just_A_Guess
I was seeing plenty of posts over the last year where he was included as the cost to dump a player. Zaitsev specifically. Zaitsev & Thomson for FC was a conversation I recall having. This would be a similar situation but they'd be receiving a much cheaper RFA option as backup tendy. Maybe the tune has changed but I still think it's fairly reasonable considering almost every team is going to want a premium to help them sign Pinto.

There hasn't been a "career path" for Thomson in Ottawa for a while because of the decisions they have made, which was even more the case with JBD being signed on a 1 way for 2 years. They have to find a way to keep both. Trading Brannstrom makes sense with all the defensive wealth/depth the Sens suddenly have

But you can forget Forsberg being traded. It's going to be either Kubalik or Brannstrom but they might just trade for a LTIR contract as well
gretzkyghosts et Just_A_Guess a aimé ceci.
26 sept. à 17 h 57
#12
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 4,047
Mentions "j'aime": 2,627
Quoting: Xspyrit
1) LOB is not needed, if he beats all of Kelly, Sokolov, Crookshank, Smejkal and Reinhardt for the 4th line LW spot, Sens will still have to pay a NHL salary to play in the AHL. He doesn't have any value, at least not for Ottawa. Which makes it Kubalik + Brannstrom for Durzi, which makes it a really bad trade. I understand this way the Sens create cap space but these players have value and are not like cap dumps.

Just remove Brannstrom and Durzi as I would much rather have Brannstrom than Durzi. The only thing he does more than Brannstrom is getting secondary assists on the PP, Brannstrom plays little PP because of the guys in front of him.

So not interested in LOB or Durzi, make it Kubalik for a pick, Yotes use him this season and sell him HIGHER at the deadline : profit

For Ottawa, moving Kubalik's AAV would be well enough space to sign Pinto to a 1 year bridge

2) This trade doesn't happen (because of Forsberg being the guy that brought Korpisalo to Ottawa) and is not even needed anyway. It's also pretty bad value for Ottawa, who also have to find a way to not lose Thomson on waivers, the guy is getting good


Thomson looked really good last night, of course it's 1 game but he's playing for his stay in Ottawa. He played against Matthews/Marner and did really well.

And moot point on Forsberg, Sens not going to trade him and also need him at least this season to give more development to Sogaard and Merilainen.


There hasn't been a "career path" for Thomson in Ottawa for a while because of the decisions they have made, which was even more the case with JBD being signed on a 1 way for 2 years. They have to find a way to keep both. Trading Brannstrom makes sense with all the defensive wealth/depth the Sens suddenly have

But you can forget Forsberg being traded. It's going to be either Kubalik or Brannstrom but they might just trade for a LTIR contract as well


Fair enough points. I don't have any skin in this one just took a swing at it. Figured the contracts I chose to move we're the obvious ones, just though that was a bit much for a backup goalie when you're cap strapped. I didn't know he was the selling feature so to speak.
Xspyrit et gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
26 sept. à 19 h 30
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 10,066
Mentions "j'aime": 3,575
Quoting: Just_A_Guess
Fair enough points. I don't have any skin in this one just took a swing at it. Figured the contracts I chose to move we're the obvious ones, just though that was a bit much for a backup goalie when you're cap strapped. I didn't know he was the selling feature so to speak.

All good. By the way, Forsberg is good, one of the most underrated goalies in the league. He's more like a 1B than a backup and both will push each others this season
Just_A_Guess et gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
26 sept. à 23 h 28
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2023
Messages: 2,094
Mentions "j'aime": 1,172
Quoting: Just_A_Guess
I was seeing plenty of posts over the last year where he was included as the cost to dump a player. Zaitsev specifically. Zaitsev & Thomson for FC was a conversation I recall having. This would be a similar situation but they'd be receiving a much cheaper RFA option as backup tendy. Maybe the tune has changed but I still think it's fairly reasonable considering almost every team is going to want a premium to help them sign Pinto.


Big difference between posts on here,
& what’s possibly in reality though
Just_A_Guess a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage