SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Sabres need to improve defense

Créé par: BigDog91
Équipe: 2023-24 Sabres de Buffalo
Date de création initiale: 5 juin 2023
Publié: 5 juin 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
12 250 000 $
21 000 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
44 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
BOS
  1. Luukkonen, Ukko-Pekka
  2. Rosén, Isak
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (BUF)
2.
BUF
  1. Murray, Matt
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (BOS)
TOR
  1. Olofsson, Victor (2 300 000 $ retained)
3.
VAN
  1. Jokiharju, Henri
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (BOS)
  3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2024 (BUF)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2023
Logo de BUF
Logo de PHI
Logo de LAK
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
2024
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
2025
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de NSH
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2283 500 000 $79 977 737 $0 $4 570 000 $3 522 263 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
9 000 000 $9 000 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
7 142 857 $7 142 857 $
C
UFA - 7
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
7 100 000 $7 100 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 7
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
6 650 000 $6 650 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
AG, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance412 500 $$412K)
C, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
855 833 $855 833 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance500 000 $$500K)
AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
4 285 714 $4 285 714 $
DG
UFA - 7
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
916 667 $916 667 $ (Bonis de performance1 850 000 $$2M)
DG/DD
UFA - 1
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 7
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance925 000 $$925K)
G
RFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
687 500 $687 500 $
DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
1 850 000 $1 850 000 $
DG/DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD
RFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
5 juin 2023 à 16 h 8
#1
CapEvasionEnthusiast
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2022
Messages: 757
Mentions "j'aime": 442
I mean it's not bad tbh, just don't see Ullmark coming back to Buffalo or a Murray trade really happening
Other than that Mayfield would be a solid add for a second pairing and Rousek as an extra forward would be pretty sick too
5 juin 2023 à 16 h 13
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2018
Messages: 2,646
Mentions "j'aime": 1,170
Canucks pass,were looking for a top 4 rd. Or a third line center. Not a fit.IMHO.
5 juin 2023 à 16 h 17
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2022
Messages: 1,515
Mentions "j'aime": 1,055
Quoting: remowilliams
Canucks pass,were looking for a top 4 rd. Or a third line center. Not a fit.IMHO.


Canucks should definitely take that. We get a 1st for Boeser which is already probably over market value, but we also get a 3rd and Jokiharju who we can either keep or flip for another pick (probably a 3rd). We're getting a 1st + 3rd + 3rd for Boeser when his value shouldn't be more than a 2nd.
sabres89 et mv21227 a aimé ceci.
5 juin 2023 à 16 h 18
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2017
Messages: 8,220
Mentions "j'aime": 6,211
Overpaying in all 3 trades. Frankly by kinda a lot.
5 juin 2023 à 16 h 25
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 9,979
Mentions "j'aime": 9,284
Canucks will gladly take that
5 juin 2023 à 16 h 25
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2017
Messages: 8,220
Mentions "j'aime": 6,211
Quoting: Epic_Ninja_Dude
Canucks should definitely take that. We get a 1st for Boeser which is already probably over market value, but we also get a 3rd and Jokiharju who we can either keep or flip for another pick (probably a 3rd). We're getting a 1st + 3rd + 3rd for Boeser when his value shouldn't be more than a 2nd.


Thank you, I thought I was crazy when I saw these. Goalies don't usually get firsts, ullmark was a perfectly fine goalie here, that went to a veteran bruins team and looked fantastic. I'm not sure why trading Rosen, 14oa 2 drafts ago, coming off a very nice ahl season, and adding upl and pick 45- that's preposterous. As for the Murray trade, getting a late first is nice, but we are sending a retained olofsson back, that's not nothing. Plus I don't like going after Murray because I don't think our owner will buy him out, so he will probably get a chance to play, which nobody wants (including murray).
KyleDubasWWEFAN a aimé ceci.
5 juin 2023 à 16 h 26
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2018
Messages: 2,646
Mentions "j'aime": 1,170
Quoting: Epic_Ninja_Dude
Canucks should definitely take that. We get a 1st for Boeser which is already probably over market value, but we also get a 3rd and Jokiharju who we can either keep or flip for another pick (probably a 3rd). We're getting a 1st + 3rd + 3rd for Boeser when his value shouldn't be more than a 2nd.


Thats where we differ.I dont think we should waste our time and assets on players we dont need.Lets use our assets to trade for players we need.As per our GM we are in a win in a couple of yrs mode.we need the right players now not in a few years.weve dont a decent job of restocking the system and first round picks are not guarenteed success.IMHO.
5 juin 2023 à 16 h 47
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2022
Messages: 2,035
Mentions "j'aime": 1,372
This is all overpayment from Sabres just for sake of making a trade. Ullmark would be nice, but rest is just pointless. VO should be moved, because of prospects already in the system, not because he should be replaced by Boeser
5 juin 2023 à 17 h 16
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2022
Messages: 1,515
Mentions "j'aime": 1,055
Quoting: remowilliams
Thats where we differ.I dont think we should waste our time and assets on players we dont need.Lets use our assets to trade for players we need.As per our GM we are in a win in a couple of yrs mode.we need the right players now not in a few years.weve dont a decent job of restocking the system and first round picks are not guarenteed success.IMHO.


Thing is it's still an overpay for Boeser. We have too many wingers, if a deal like this comes up I think we have to take it. We can take the picks we get in this deal and use them to fill those holes. We could get very good 3C for the picks, and the guy we'd get would probably be much more valuable than Boeser.
5 juin 2023 à 17 h 17
#10
ClimbSpaceDisneyland
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 97
Mentions "j'aime": 30
Quoting: remowilliams
Canucks pass,were looking for a top 4 rd. Or a third line center. Not a fit.IMHO.


Are you serious?? you are refusing a 1st and 3rd for Boeser without retention. You are delusional. Who cares about Joker. Talk about not seeing the forest for the trees.
5 juin 2023 à 17 h 32
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2018
Messages: 2,646
Mentions "j'aime": 1,170
Quoting: Epic_Ninja_Dude
Thing is it's still an overpay for Boeser. We have too many wingers, if a deal like this comes up I think we have to take it. We can take the picks we get in this deal and use them to fill those holes. We could get very good 3C for the picks, and the guy we'd get would probably be much more valuable than Boeser.


We could get a pretty rd for Boesser plus.
5 juin 2023 à 17 h 37
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2018
Messages: 2,646
Mentions "j'aime": 1,170
Quoting: KyleDubasWWEFAN
Are you serious?? you are refusing a 1st and 3rd for Boeser without retention. You are delusional. Who cares about Joker. Talk about not seeing the forest for the trees.


Quoting: KyleDubasWWEFAN
Are you serious?? you are refusing a 1st and 3rd for Boeser without retention. You are delusional. Who cares about Joker. Talk about not seeing the forest for the trees.


This is my opinion i dont really give a rats a.. what you think ,not sure you see other peoples opinions through your own.See the part at the end of my response.IN MY HONEST OPINION.
5 juin 2023 à 17 h 42
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 499
Mentions "j'aime": 233
Quoting: sabres89
Overpaying in all 3 trades. Frankly by kinda a lot.


i'd do the murray deal. picking up a first for oloffson is a win and we can afford to bury murray. he will agree to a buy out if another team will actually give him minutes in the league. if not, he'd have no choice but play well enough in the A to regain a spot and he wouldn't be bad as a 3rd goalie option. under this scenario, someone would claim comrie. maybe even toronto.
sabres89 a aimé ceci.
6 juin 2023 à 17 h 14
#14
ClimbSpaceDisneyland
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 97
Mentions "j'aime": 30
Quoting: remowilliams
This is my opinion i dont really give a rats a.. what you think ,not sure you see other peoples opinions through your own.See the part at the end of my response.IN MY HONEST OPINION.


Its wrong by a LOT! Petersen just got moved and the KINGS paid a ton. The Nucks have even less leverage than the KIngs whom arent even in cap trouble til 2024. How you think the Canucks going to fare this year.. You thinking the Nucks wont pay for the higher price AAV is delusional. I'm sorry.
6 juin 2023 à 18 h 37
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2018
Messages: 2,646
Mentions "j'aime": 1,170
Quoting: KyleDubasWWEFAN
Its wrong by a LOT! Petersen just got moved and the KINGS paid a ton. The Nucks have even less leverage than the KIngs whom arent even in cap trouble til 2024. How you think the Canucks going to fare this year.. You thinking the Nucks wont pay for the higher price AAV is delusional. I'm sorry.


I feel sorry for you.MY opinion is MINE . YOU need to hear other peoples opinion good or bad without PUSHING your opinions on other people.As i said before i dont really care if YOU like it or not, so get over yourself and move on.
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage