SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

offseason

Créé par: Braisman7
Équipe: 2023-24 Bruins de Boston
Date de création initiale: 3 juin 2023
Publié: 3 juin 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Varly, Bergy/krecji, and toews sign bonus deals
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
2775 000 $
2775 000 $
12 750 000 $
22 200 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
21 000 000 $
11 000 000 $
55 500 000 $
11 000 000 $
CRÉÉANSCAP HIT
One of, Krecji or Bergy
11 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
BOS
  1. Joseph, Pierre-Olivier
  2. Smith, Ty [Droits de RFA]
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (PIT)
2.
BOS
  1. Hanifin, Noah (2 475 000 $ retained)
  2. Lindholm, Elias (2 425 000 $ retained)
Détails additionnels:
Both players signs 8-year exts
CGY
  1. DeBrusk, Jake
  2. Grzelcyk, Matt
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (PIT)
  4. Choix de 3e ronde en 2023 (BOS)
  5. Choix de 3e ronde en 2025 (BOS)
Détails additionnels:
3rd round picks go to ARI to retain salary on CGY players
Both players extend with CGY
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2023
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de LAK
2024
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
2025
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2383 500 000 $79 236 668 $4 500 000 $0 $4 263 332 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 125 000 $6 125 000 $
AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
One of, Krecji or Bergy
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
Logo de Bruins de Boston
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 425 000 $2 425 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
11 250 000 $11 250 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AG
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
C
UFA
Logo de Bruins de Boston
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
C, AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 3
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
800 000 $800 000 $
C, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 200 000 $2 200 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
775 000 $775 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
762 500 $762 500 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Flames de Calgary
-1 237 500 $-1 237 500 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 7
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
G
RFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
DG
NTC, NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Bruins de Boston
4 100 000 $4 100 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
G
UFA - 4
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
825 000 $825 000 $
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 137 500 $1 137 500 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
775 000 $775 000 $
DG/DD
RFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
3 juin 2023 à 11 h 31
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 11,496
Mentions "j'aime": 4,562
Value going to CGY seems lite
Gofnut999 a aimé ceci.
3 juin 2023 à 11 h 32
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2023
Messages: 199
Mentions "j'aime": 69
Bad deal for Calgary

Let me break it down.

#1 Centre
Top pairing Defenseman

For
Top 6 winger
5/6 d man
1st round pick.

Not good at all.
Gofnut999 a aimé ceci.
3 juin 2023 à 11 h 32
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 19,650
Mentions "j'aime": 8,773
Quoting: ON3M4N
Value going to CGY seems lite


Seems? Lol.
3 juin 2023 à 11 h 34
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 19,650
Mentions "j'aime": 8,773
Quoting: Flames1217
Bad deal for Calgary

Let me break it down.

#1 Centre
Top pairing Defenseman

For
Top 6 winger
5/6 d man
1st round pick.

Not good at all.


Oh but your retaining. So that makes up for it. laugh

It’s so bad.
Flames1217 a aimé ceci.
3 juin 2023 à 11 h 42
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 12,565
Mentions "j'aime": 5,450
Deal doesn't happen but their extensions doesn't match the Bruins' timeline and even if it did, I'm certainly not signing soon-to-be 30yo Lindholm to an eight-year contract.

Quoting: Flames1217
Bad deal for Calgary

Let me break it down.

#1 Centre
Top pairing Defenseman

For
Top 6 winger
5/6 d man
1st round pick.

Not good at all.


Calgary shouldn't do it but the breakdown is poor.

Lindholm isn't a 1C. Best-case, he's a fringe 1C. Hanifin has had one great season but he's a second pair D on a championship team just like Lindholm is a 2C. Grzelcyk is a second-pair D, not a 5/6.
3 juin 2023 à 11 h 59
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 1,723
Mentions "j'aime": 535
I think you're ripping off both teams here. Ullmark's NMC is going to decrease the amount of value Sweeney can ask for him because there's less teams bidding. OPJ + 2nd is fair value for Ullmark.
PensGMwannabe a aimé ceci.
3 juin 2023 à 12 h 13
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 603
Mentions "j'aime": 277
Pens decline
3 juin 2023 à 16 h 32
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2023
Messages: 199
Mentions "j'aime": 69
Quoting: bhavikp27
Deal doesn't happen but their extensions doesn't match the Bruins' timeline and even if it did, I'm certainly not signing soon-to-be 30yo Lindholm to an eight-year contract.



Calgary shouldn't do it but the breakdown is poor.

Lindholm isn't a 1C. Best-case, he's a fringe 1C. Hanifin has had one great season but he's a second pair D on a championship team just like Lindholm is a 2C. Grzelcyk is a second-pair D, not a 5/6.


Lindholm is 100% a #1 centre. Not even going to argue this one.

Top pairing could be defined as a #2 defender. Pretty sure that Hanifin fits that bill to a T. Guy munches minutes, plays in all situations and really allows Anderson to do his thing offensively. Worse case scenario without any bias he is a 2/3 defender as I don't think there is any team in the league that he wouldn't be in their top 4.

I am not a big fan of Grzelyck and neither are the some of Bruin fans (he is always in proposals). I personally don't consider him a true top 4 defender. In the playoffs he was deployed in a bottom pairing role and was also scratched. Grzelyck would have trouble cracking the Flames lineup on a nightly basis.

I like DeBrusk though and would welcome him to the Flames any day if the price was right.
3 juin 2023 à 17 h 4
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 12,565
Mentions "j'aime": 5,450
Quoting: Flames1217
Lindholm is 100% a #1 centre. Not even going to argue this one.

Top pairing could be defined as a #2 defender. Pretty sure that Hanifin fits that bill to a T. Guy munches minutes, plays in all situations and really allows Anderson to do his thing offensively. Worse case scenario without any bias he is a 2/3 defender as I don't think there is any team in the league that he wouldn't be in their top 4.

I am not a big fan of Grzelyck and neither are the some of Bruin fans (he is always in proposals). I personally don't consider him a true top 4 defender. In the playoffs he was deployed in a bottom pairing role and was also scratched. Grzelyck would have trouble cracking the Flames lineup on a nightly basis.

I like DeBrusk though and would welcome him to the Flames any day if the price was right.


I guess it's okay to be wrong about Lindholm.

That's called coaching decisions. Hanifin playing on top pair doesn't mean he's one, it's because Sutter used him in this role. I did say Hanifin was a top4 D. Grzelcyk is in the trade proposals because the Bruins need to clear cap space, he's fairly paid and has one year left on his contract so they should trade him and get a pick in return, not because he's a bad D. If anything, it's the opposite. In 3/4 playoffs games Grzelcyk played this season, he was on the top pair with McAvoy. Additionally, the Bruins had Lindholm and Orlov, two top4 Ds they could use which is why Grzelcyk played less. The decision to scratch him was also a (poor) coaching decision which does not impact his level of play. Grzelcyk would be in any team's top6.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage