No, because we wouldn't offer it.

As much as I like the talent coming back in this trade, I wouldn't trade Bedard for anything at this point.

Arizona 6/12 Keller and Cooley would peak my interest, but ya tough to part with bedard.

No but I would take that if I’m Chicago

Ducks are better off keeping those players. Fantilli is going to be a very good player.

how to not answer the question 101.

Seems like one of these deals that hurts both teams progression long term.

Chicago is trying to execute a slow and long rebuild and while they get juicy assets for trading down, it just does not fit their timeline. Also, you just don't pass on generational talents and Connor Bedard fits the timeline and fills the biggest hole a rebuilding team needs which is a 1C.

I also believe Fantilli will be a 1C, but he is no Bedard. I believe this trade hurts Anaheim as well. They are a year or two away from being back in the playoff conversation, but trading away a franchise player in Zegras and a pot. Top 4 defender in Zellweger sets the team back years. Take Fantilli, move Zegras to the wing and continue the rebuild.

Great assets to offer--- but nothing is going to get you Bedard at this stage.
The gap between real generational talents and superstars is huge. Having generational players (like Bedard is expected to be) with contract control for 7+ years cannot be understated.

Hawks probably consider this but can't see Ducks making the offer.

neither team does this

hawks aren't trading Bedard and Anaheim isn't trading away 3 real nice pieces for one piece right now

Gee, everybody else seems to think I answered it completely, because everybody basically agreed with me.

Ducks would not do that