SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Consensus CBJ ACGM - Attempt 1

Créé par: CaseyFlyman
Équipe: 2023-24 Blue Jackets de Columbus
Date de création initiale: 1 juin 2023
Publié: 1 juin 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
As any fan on here knows, there's a ton of prospective trades and signings that pop up constantly surrounding each team. Some are wild, some are okay, and sometimes (rarely) we end up with something that makes sense for all parties involved. This is an attempt to take some ideas around Columbus and both consolidate them into one ACGM and get a near-consensus agreement from all parties on them so we can settle value once and for all.

Will it work? Almost definitely no. Will trying restore some of my sanity? Also almost definitely no. Let's give it a shot.

I'll revise and post updated attempts as I can and as the comments progress. It's an attempt at good-faith, fair-value, which is probably my first mistake already.

First and foremost, the near-consensus CBJ items of business:
1. Boone Jenner isn't available, so don't ask. I've seen it so many times, but it boils down to his value internally being way higher than any other team should be willing to pay, plus the fact that every team seems to want a player like him, which would up the market value. The offer would have to be ridiculous, it would get shot down by every other fanbase here. Let's just save our breath and move on.

2. Texier isn't available, so don't ask. The team supported him all year, he's finally back, I'm not going to ignore the human element and move him.

3. Marner isn't getting traded to Columbus. The interest was there when he was an RFA, but that was years ago and before both Laine and Gaudreau. Now there's no need, and no interest.

4. The 3rd OA pick isn't available. Columbus HAS to get a potential franchise center, or use it to trade for one, that fits the timeline (under 25, under team control, and a true 1C/star player). A move like that almost never happens, and the list of centers that fit that bill is shorter than the list of $10M+ players in the SC Final this year. I'm just going to assume CBJ make the pick, and select the best center prospect available, which is most likely Leo Carlsson. He's probably not in the NHL next year, so he'll end up in the non-roster.

Bored? Great. Let's get to the rest:
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
2975 000 $
2925 000 $
CRÉÉANSCAP HIT
Carlsson, Leo
3925 000 $
Transactions
1.
CBJ
  1. Grzelcyk, Matt
Détails additionnels:
Columbus gets a capable transition LD that can either get flipped at the deadline, or signed to a reasonable extension. Svozil or Mateychuk are likely pushing for an NHL spot next season, so the former seems most likely.
BOS
  1. Roslovic, Jack
Détails additionnels:
Seen on an ACGM by @Schood1c, and it seemed to be widely accepted. Boston is rumored to be shopping Grzelcyk, and this gets them some middle-6 help.
2.
CBJ
  1. Hayes, Kevin (2 000 000 $ retained)
Détails additionnels:
Columbus does need a transition center, as Jenner isn't suited for 1C, I'm not sold on Laine working there long-term, Sillinger likely starts in the AHL, Carlsson is in Sweden, and Johnson is locked into LW.
PHI
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2023 (WPG)
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (CBJ)
Détails additionnels:
Any single pick higher than a 2nd is too high for Columbus. This year's second is 34th OA in a stacked draft, so Columbus tries to send next year's instead. Adding WPG's 4th to even up value?
3.
CBJ
  1. Murray, Matt
  2. Choix de 5e ronde en 2023 (TOR)
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (TOR)
Détails additionnels:
Murray starts on LTIR and ends up in the AHL, then is possibly flipped at the deadline for a late-round draft pick. There's no chance he ends up in the NHL with Merzlikins and Tarasov already there, barring injury to one of them.
TOR
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2023 (CBJ)
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2023 (CBJ)
Détails additionnels:
Toronto pays a hefty price to move Murray with no retention. Columbus adds picks for a more even value, but is hesitant to lose two out of this year's draft. Toronto adds this year's 5th to appease those fears.
4.
CBJ
  1. Kulak, Brett
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (EDM)
Détails additionnels:
Columbus gets more reasonably-priced short-term LD help, and upgrades a pick. They clear out the RD logjam with (IMO) the most redundant player likely to fetch the highest price on the market.
EDM
  1. Peeke, Andrew
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2024 (LAK)
Détails additionnels:
Edmonton gets a young, minute-munching, cheap, locked-up RD upgrade over Desharnais or Ceci.
Rachats de contrats
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2023
Logo de CBJ
Logo de LAK
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CGY
Logo de BOS
Logo de TOR
Logo de CBJ
2024
Logo de CBJ
Logo de TOR
Logo de EDM
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
2025
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de VGK
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2383 500 000 $68 735 595 $0 $3 950 000 $14 764 405 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
9 750 000 $9 750 000 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
1 571 429 $1 571 429 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance1 850 000 $$2M)
AG, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
8 700 000 $8 700 000 $
C, AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
1 525 000 $1 525 000 $
AG, C, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
975 000 $975 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
800 000 $800 000 $
AD, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
1 600 000 $1 600 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
975 000 $975 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
9 583 333 $9 583 333 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
918 333 $918 333 $ (Bonis de performance1 000 000 $$1M)
DD
RFA - 3
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
5 400 000 $5 400 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 687 500 $3 687 500 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
2 600 000 $2 600 000 $
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
1 050 000 $1 050 000 $
G
RFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
900 000 $900 000 $
AD, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
4 687 500 $4 687 500 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
950 000 $950 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $$250K)
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
825 000 $825 000 $
DG/DD
RFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
1 juin 2023 à 13 h 2
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 2,267
Mentions "j'aime": 699
Leafs decline. Sooner to buy out Murray than give away a first for a 3rd
1 juin 2023 à 13 h 3
#2
Oiler_fan60
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2022
Messages: 669
Mentions "j'aime": 178
Would be hard to do that trade while sending out kulak
1 juin 2023 à 13 h 4
#3
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2018
Messages: 1,879
Mentions "j'aime": 1,500
It's a starting point, but I want to know what you think. The glaring issues I still see are:
1. Bean isn't on the NHL roster
2. Danforth as 3C doesn't sit right with me, Jenner is better suited for that role which means we'd still need a 2C.
3. The LAK 1st is burning a hole in my pocket.

Maybe there's a package involving Bean + LAK 1st for a legit 2C? What are the options out there?
1 juin 2023 à 13 h 5
#4
Dolzhenkov Is Coming
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2022
Messages: 3,571
Mentions "j'aime": 5,124
I think Murray to Columbus just isn't going to happen. Jarmo has not taken on a cap dump in his entire tenure as GM and the $6M he is owed in real cash is likely too large a pill for McConnell to swallow for some draft capital.
CaseyFlyman, Ajp_18 et Civil_Eng_PE a aimé ceci.
1 juin 2023 à 13 h 8
#5
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2018
Messages: 1,879
Mentions "j'aime": 1,500
Quoting: SNipeSHowInc
Leafs decline. Sooner to buy out Murray than give away a first for a 3rd


That's 100% valid, it looks like his buyout is $687,500 this upcoming season and $2,000,000 next, which might hurt. Is there a trade you'd consider to avoid that? Columbus could take it or leave it.
1 juin 2023 à 13 h 9
#6
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2018
Messages: 1,879
Mentions "j'aime": 1,500
Quoting: Oiler_fan88
Would be hard to do that trade while sending out kulak


If Columbus trades for Gryz, Kulak wouldn't fill a direct need...maybe Peeke for a 2nd straight-up?
1 juin 2023 à 13 h 10
#7
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2018
Messages: 1,879
Mentions "j'aime": 1,500
Quoting: dk325
I think Murray to Columbus just isn't going to happen. Jarmo has not taken on a cap dump in his entire tenure as GM and the $6M he is owed in real cash is likely too large a pill for McConnell to swallow for some draft capital.


That's the most likely trade to get cut entirely from Attempt #2. I've seen it a bunch so I wanted to use it as a feeler, but my guess is Columbus would be indifferent at best, even for a 1st.
Ajp_18 a aimé ceci.
1 juin 2023 à 13 h 11
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 19,646
Mentions "j'aime": 8,773
While the trade works in principle. Boston really needs to move Grizz without taking cap back. Picks or prospects preferred.
Civil_Eng_PE et ethanwinters a aimé ceci.
1 juin 2023 à 13 h 14
#9
Yegor bomb
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2022
Messages: 776
Mentions "j'aime": 942
Quoting: Gofnut999
While the trade works in principle. Boston really needs to move Grizz without taking cap back. Picks or prospects preferred.


Yeah, I feel like Jack can be sent somewhere else and the Boston trade is more likely going to be Bemstrom + a 3rd.

Also, Bean is not getting buried. He is 100% getting traded or he's on the main squad next year. He isn't bad enough to get sat in the AHL, he'd 100% get picked up on waivers
1 juin 2023 à 13 h 14
#10
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2018
Messages: 1,879
Mentions "j'aime": 1,500
Quoting: Gofnut999
While the trade works in principle. Boston really needs to move Grizz without taking cap back. Picks or prospects preferred.


What would the price be, would Calgary's 3rd get it done? Or Roslovic with retention instead, then Boston adds a pick to even up?
1 juin 2023 à 13 h 14
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2018
Messages: 9,851
Mentions "j'aime": 6,441
Quoting: CaseyFlyman
If Columbus trades for Gryz, Kulak wouldn't fill a direct need...maybe Peeke for a 2nd straight-up?


No, because Columbus would need to fill that role of 3rd pair LD with someone, Boqvist and Blankenburg can’t be 100% trusted to be in the line up for all 82 games, Peeke or in this case Kulak can be.

Honestly with Columbus’s injury history on the backend have int a lot of depth on the blueline will be a need for us so we aren’t having to trust to play Berni as the top pair LHD next season.
Civil_Eng_PE a aimé ceci.
1 juin 2023 à 13 h 17
#12
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2018
Messages: 1,879
Mentions "j'aime": 1,500
Quoting: Civil_Eng_PE
Yeah, I feel like Jack can be sent somewhere else and the Boston trade is more likely going to be Bemstrom + a 3rd.

Also, Bean is not getting buried. He is 100% getting traded or he's on the main squad next year. He isn't bad enough to get sat in the AHL, he'd 100% get picked up on waivers


Jack probably stays to start the year and gets moved half-retained at the deadline, but I liked this proposal too. Bemstrom + CGY's 3rd would probably work for CBJ.

And yes, Bean isn't getting buried, that's my glaring issue #1 that would get fixed in the 2nd iteration. I'd either move him as part of a package for a 2C or nix the Kulak deal and just keep him on the 3rd pair.
Civil_Eng_PE a aimé ceci.
1 juin 2023 à 13 h 18
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 19,646
Mentions "j'aime": 8,773
Quoting: CaseyFlyman
What would the price be, would Calgary's 3rd get it done? Or Roslovic with retention instead, then Boston adds a pick to even up?


No, neither of those options work.

Grizz will take a minimum of a 2nd. And Boston does not have draft capital to spare.
CaseyFlyman a aimé ceci.
1 juin 2023 à 13 h 19
#14
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2018
Messages: 1,879
Mentions "j'aime": 1,500
Quoting: Ajp_18
No, because Columbus would need to fill that role of 3rd pair LD with someone, Boqvist and Blankenburg can’t be 100% trusted to be in the line up for all 82 games, Peeke or in this case Kulak can be.

Honestly with Columbus’s injury history on the backend have int a lot of depth on the blueline will be a need for us so we aren’t having to trust to play Berni as the top pair LHD next season.


In this instance, we still have Bean buried in the AHL...I'm not sold on him being a reliable 3LD, but it's an option. Otherwise, maybe a UFA? Or a package of Bean + LAK 1st + ??? for someone like Hanifin, which I've seen a lot? I agree with you on injury history at D, that's a major concern.
1 juin 2023 à 13 h 25
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 19,646
Mentions "j'aime": 8,773
Maybe if Bs move Ullmark and Hall without taking cap back this works. Otherwise it doesn’t.
1 juin 2023 à 13 h 25
#16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2018
Messages: 9,851
Mentions "j'aime": 6,441
Quoting: CaseyFlyman
In this instance, we still have Bean buried in the AHL...I'm not sold on him being a reliable 3LD, but it's an option. Otherwise, maybe a UFA? Or a package of Bean + LAK 1st + ??? for someone like Hanifin, which I've seen a lot? I agree with you on injury history at D, that's a major concern.


Bean isn’t good, he likely gets one more shot at the NHL and is gone. He isn’t really in the window of playing much next season (also agin injury history). I wouldn’t be seeking the farm to fix the 3rd pair LD option unless it’s a cheap trade or someone if giving a guy on a 1 year deal away to make cap room.

Fixing the 2nd pair with Kulak or Gry seems like the best option imo, and letting the kids develop, this isn’t the summer to make major changes to the team after all the injuries last year.
CaseyFlyman a aimé ceci.
1 juin 2023 à 13 h 31
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 2,267
Mentions "j'aime": 699
Quoting: CaseyFlyman
That's 100% valid, it looks like his buyout is $687,500 this upcoming season and $2,000,000 next, which might hurt. Is there a trade you'd consider to avoid that? Columbus could take it or leave it.


Probably a lower pick or a lower end prospect? I’m not certain, I just know in this draft especially that first round pick is extra valuable
CaseyFlyman a aimé ceci.
1 juin 2023 à 13 h 44
#18
Oiler_fan60
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2022
Messages: 669
Mentions "j'aime": 178
Quoting: CaseyFlyman
If Columbus trades for Gryz, Kulak wouldn't fill a direct need...maybe Peeke for a 2nd straight-up?


If we can get rid of ceci for sure
CaseyFlyman a aimé ceci.
1 juin 2023 à 15 h 48
#19
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2022
Messages: 409
Mentions "j'aime": 407
I just don't get why Kevin Hayes should be worth more than Oliver Bjorkstrand at the same cap hit.

There were salary considerations at play but Philly has no leverage in moving him because they've been loud about him not fitting the Torts system anymore. He's been a C/W and doesn't have fantastic faceoffs or defense (according to HockeyVis Philly was better with him off the ice). Oliver Bjorkstrand had absolutely fantastic defense despite not having great play connectivity which limited his offensive ceiling (which was still as high as Hayes').

I don't see why, additionally, Hayes is so desired with Roslovic so panned. They aren't terribly dissimilar players and Roslovic is younger and cheaper (AND right handed). He's got less of a brain but fantastic feet and PK experience. The CBJ PK was better with him on than it was without (according to HockeyViz). Kevin Hayes didn't PK at all and played against easier competition. Additionally, Roslovic 1/2 retained can be a high value asset to a contender with limited cap space (sort of like how Brandon Hagel was overvalued because his cap hit is so low) and a competent coach.

As much as I don't mind Kulak and Grzelcyk, I don't think we do both. They do sort of work (Gryz doesn't PK, Kulak is bad at 5 on 5 but was good at PK) but I think Bean gets another chance. There is some encouraging underlying metrics in his play before injury. It wasn't overall good, don't get me wrong, but he flashes some active skills that fit where the CBJ D is going. His value won't get lower than it is now. We might as well give him a 3rd pair chance while he's under contract.
1 juin 2023 à 19 h 25
#20
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2018
Messages: 407
Mentions "j'aime": 239
The Hayes deal seems fine. Idk that anyone really knows what his return would be right now. He had a great season but everyone knows the contract is a little tough. Even if he puts up good numbers again.

All in all, I could see this being the return but the retention is what chaps me. That kind of retention is valuable. I’d argue more valuable that what is there but I guess we’ll see.

Edit: it also counts as one of our 3 players with retention, and I don’t think that’s enough of a return given that PHi will soon be using all 3 of those retention spots
1 juin 2023 à 19 h 30
#21
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 72
Mentions "j'aime": 31
The Hayes deal is fine from the Flyers perspective and more or less what I expect an actual deal to look like should it come to fruition.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage