SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

This is what to do Brendan

Créé par: MacanBayangan
Équipe: 2023-24 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 25 mai 2023
Publié: 25 mai 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Have retained on Matthews and Nylander to get maximum returns. Although the team loses two core players and may step backward initially there is definitely enough young promise there to challenge soon and can be argued the lineup is a lot more balanced. Would hope that Byfield can become the eventual 1C in this scenario.

Overall the D and goaltending gets a big step up and who knows, if this team made the playoffs then that is what might make the difference if we continue to not light it up consistently in the playoffs.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
2900 000 $
33 000 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
31 800 000 $
21 000 000 $
55 000 000 $
2900 000 $
Transactions
1.
TOR
  1. Byfield, Quinton
  2. Clarke, Brandt
  3. Iafallo, Alex
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (LAK)
LAK
  1. Matthews, Auston (5 820 125 $ retained)
Détails additionnels:
Matthews retained for one year and signs eight year extension with LA (meaning they get a 1C in his prime for nine years)
2.
TOR
  1. Andersson, Rasmus
  2. Dubé, Dillon
Détails additionnels:
Leafs get a 1RD and a very promising player for the future.
CGY
  1. Brodie, TJ
  2. Niemelä, Topi
  3. Nylander, William (3 481 183 $ retained)
Détails additionnels:
Nylander again 50% retained and signs eight year extension with Calgary. Brodie does a job for a year and Niemela can be long term replacement for Andersson.
3.
TOR
  1. Demko, Thatcher
  2. Garland, Conor
Détails additionnels:
Leafs get a starter plus a tough RW with term.
VAN
  1. Liljegren, Timothy
  2. Murray, Matt
  3. Samsonov, Ilya [Droits de RFA]
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (LAK)
Détails additionnels:
Van get a 1st + Samsonov + young RD, but have to eat Murray's cap for a year. But they still end up shedding cap in this deal.
4.
TOR
  1. Sharangovich, Yegor [Droits de RFA]
Détails additionnels:
Looks to be surplus to requirements so playing swapsies
NJD
  1. Robertson, Nicholas
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2024 (NYI)
  3. Choix de 4e ronde en 2024 (TOR)
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2023
Logo de BOS
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2024
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de CHI
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de OTT
2025
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de CHI
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2383 500 000 $82 703 475 $0 $3 500 000 $796 525 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
10 903 000 $10 903 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
925 000 $925 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance2 650 000 $$3M)
AG, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 950 000 $4 950 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 300 000 $2 300 000 $
AG, AD, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 800 000 $1 800 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 100 000 $2 100 000 $
AD, C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
900 000 $900 000 $
C, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 150 000 $1 150 000 $
AD, C, AG
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 6
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
7 500 000 $7 500 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
766 667 $766 667 $
G
RFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 3
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
900 000 $900 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
800 000 $800 000 $
DG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
25 mai 2023 à 5 h 22
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2022
Messages: 8,566
Mentions "j'aime": 3,319
Modifié 25 mai 2023 à 5 h 35
Probably should consider that wherever it may be, Matthews might only agree to sign for 5 or 6 years. So, that could affect the return as well. Either way, I don't see LA parting with both Byfield and Clarke in any trade (especially Clarke), and I wouldn't be surprised if they acquired Matthews without including either. Clarke is the future of the LA defense and his ELC should come in pretty handy.

The CGY trade is also very wishful thinking. CGY is likely to lose two of their top 4 D (Tanev and Hanifin) sooner rather than later, I don't think Conroy is looking to weaken his team by trading a cost-effective player with 3 more years.
MisstheWhalers et Kalopsia a aimé ceci.
25 mai 2023 à 5 h 27
#2
PDG over PDO
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 4,976
Mentions "j'aime": 4,044
Canucks pass, gonna take a lot more than that package of spare parts for us to part with Demko.
MisstheWhalers, Kalopsia, remowilliams and 1 other person a aimé ceci.
25 mai 2023 à 5 h 34
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2018
Messages: 6,310
Mentions "j'aime": 2,226
Modifié 25 mai 2023 à 5 h 43
Those are pretty high returns, but ultimately not sure how well long term it leaves the other teams or whether it provides them with what THEY want.

Also theres some big maybes offered by the Leafs. Take for example the trading of Samsonov's rights, who might be had for free if the leafs cant pay someone to take murray FIRST, or the upside of Niemala, hes a very good RD prospect and certainly the star defensive prospect of the Leafs, but hes not a sure thing top 4 NHLer at this point, and also the current baggage/taste in the mouth of some of the key offerings, (CGY wanting Brodie back?), like liljegren, entering his expiring RFA year, unestablished as a top 4 dman in his 5th pro season and only dressed in 5 of 11 playoff games = you're not selling high. Samsonov's rights or Liljegren probably is the price ALMOST for someone to take Murray, who at 4.6mil is too unreliable (who is more often than not on IR, and the LTIR cap benefit is less relevant for a rebuilding team) for even a backup role. Or 24 yr old Sharangovich who's played two whole seasons and put up 40+ and 30+ pts for late in the round 3rd and 4th TWO drafts away and robertson, who's value is probably a 3rd, NJ probably gets more, but not sure why NJ would take that? And while CGY might be interested, they need a RD more in the organization than another winger.

But ultimately a team that finished the regular season in the top 6 of teams, brings in NINE new starters? Their window is still NOW, I just cant see trading 2 of the big 3, even though it likely ends with a better TEAM.
GMBL et MisstheWhalers a aimé ceci.
25 mai 2023 à 7 h 38
#4
MisstheWhalers
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 23,554
Mentions "j'aime": 12,308
Might get Byfield but probably not getting Clarke.

Calgary isn't trading Andersson.

Some decent pieces going to Vancouver but unlikely they're trading Demko, they'd be crazy to imo.

Nj is better off keeping Sharangovich then trade him for that, cant see Robertson's stock being very high.
soooonk a aimé ceci.
25 mai 2023 à 8 h 12
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 1,250
Mentions "j'aime": 465
That Nylander trade is pretty damn bad for the Leafs lmao
25 mai 2023 à 8 h 22
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 6,348
Mentions "j'aime": 4,426
LAs best course of action is to wait.

The Kings still need to get their starting goalie and LD.

After July 1st Matthews dictates wheee he goes, if that’s LA they are trading from a position of strength.

If he makes it to free agency the Kings get Kopitar and Arvidsson off the books.

For LA it’s a no brainer, the team gets more well rounded and becomes a more enticing destination by not going for Matthews at all this season.
25 mai 2023 à 8 h 51
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2021
Messages: 4,122
Mentions "j'aime": 2,131
Devils take that and run.
25 mai 2023 à 8 h 54
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2021
Messages: 4,122
Mentions "j'aime": 2,131
Quoting: Hammerwise
Those are pretty high returns, but ultimately not sure how well long term it leaves the other teams or whether it provides them with what THEY want.

Also theres some big maybes offered by the Leafs. Take for example the trading of Samsonov's rights, who might be had for free if the leafs cant pay someone to take murray FIRST, or the upside of Niemala, hes a very good RD prospect and certainly the star defensive prospect of the Leafs, but hes not a sure thing top 4 NHLer at this point, and also the current baggage/taste in the mouth of some of the key offerings, (CGY wanting Brodie back?), like liljegren, entering his expiring RFA year, unestablished as a top 4 dman in his 5th pro season and only dressed in 5 of 11 playoff games = you're not selling high. Samsonov's rights or Liljegren probably is the price ALMOST for someone to take Murray, who at 4.6mil is too unreliable (who is more often than not on IR, and the LTIR cap benefit is less relevant for a rebuilding team) for even a backup role. Or 24 yr old Sharangovich who's played two whole seasons and put up 40+ and 30+ pts for late in the round 3rd and 4th TWO drafts away and robertson, who's value is probably a 3rd, NJ probably gets more, but not sure why NJ would take that? And while CGY might be interested, they need a RD more in the organization than another winger.

But ultimately a team that finished the regular season in the top 6 of teams, brings in NINE new starters? Their window is still NOW, I just cant see trading 2 of the big 3, even though it likely ends with a better TEAM.


Sharangovich is a surplus, he didn't make a dent in the playoffs and is going to get passed by new young talent coming up. Not that the Devils are completely against the cap, but would rather have the flexibility and more of a right fit on the 3rd line as he shouldn't be making the top 6 without a few injuries.
Hammerwise a aimé ceci.
25 mai 2023 à 9 h 9
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2018
Messages: 6,310
Mentions "j'aime": 2,226
Quoting: NJDevils1317
Sharangovich is a surplus, he didn't make a dent in the playoffs and is going to get passed by new young talent coming up. Not that the Devils are completely against the cap, but would rather have the flexibility and more of a right fit on the 3rd line as he shouldn't be making the top 6 without a few injuries.


I think Jersey gets more, I dont think theyd move shara only to get robertson and some low in the round picks two drafts away. He might be surplus, but hes got better value than that
MisstheWhalers a aimé ceci.
25 mai 2023 à 10 h 37
#10
Marner rocks
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 3,878
Mentions "j'aime": 869
Adding another year to JT legs, he should be LW because he just can't get back to support. Don't see that power forward added to the top 6 in the matthews trade.
25 mai 2023 à 11 h 47
#11
FlaminMoe
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 80
Mentions "j'aime": 31
Quoting: MisstheWhalers

Calgary isn't trading Andersson


Echo this. I wouldn't be surprised if Calgary gives him a good look for captaincy.
MisstheWhalers a aimé ceci.
25 mai 2023 à 13 h 38
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2021
Messages: 4,122
Mentions "j'aime": 2,131
Quoting: Hammerwise
I think Jersey gets more, I dont think theyd move shara only to get robertson and some low in the round picks two drafts away. He might be surplus, but hes got better value than that


Maybe, but there are many who don't even want to chance it with his QO and move on and try out guys like Foote and Clarke on an ELC than pay Sharangovich $2m. I don't want to overvalue a player so much as to hold out for a 2nd when depth picks is where this scouting report has done well.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage