SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Goodrow Buyout Makes More Sense Than a Trade

Créé par: Shakabakes
Équipe: 2023-24 Rangers de New York
Date de création initiale: 8 mai 2023
Publié: 8 mai 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
22 250 000 $
55 500 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
11 100 000 $
1900 000 $
Transactions
SJS
  1. Jones, Zachary [Droits de RFA]
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (NYR)
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2023
Logo de NYR
Logo de COL
Logo de NYR
Logo de WPG
2024
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
2025
Logo de NYR
Logo de DAL
Logo de NYR
Logo de MIN
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2283 500 000 $83 397 082 $610 892 $965 000 $102 918 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Rangers de New York
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Rangers de New York
8 500 000 $8 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Rangers de New York
2 100 000 $2 100 000 $
AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
11 642 857 $11 642 857 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Rangers de New York
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
C, AD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Rangers de New York
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance450 000 $$450K)
AG
RFA - 3
Logo de Rangers de New York
4 437 500 $4 437 500 $
C, AG
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
828 333 $828 333 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
AG
RFA - 2
900 000 $900 000 $
C, AG
UFA
Logo de Rangers de New York
800 000 $800 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
762 500 $762 500 $
C
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Rangers de New York
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 6
Logo de Rangers de New York
5 666 667 $5 666 667 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Rangers de New York
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
G
UFA
Logo de Rangers de New York
797 500 $797 500 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance400 000 $$400K)
DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
787 500 $787 500 $
DG
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
8 mai 2023 à 11 h 48
#1
KFTW
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 42,157
Mentions "j'aime": 23,514
Nah Ottawa would take him
Andy_Dick a aimé ceci.
8 mai 2023 à 11 h 51
#2
Pop Pop
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 14,461
Mentions "j'aime": 8,213
He's not the most attractive guy with that contract but someone might bite. The rangers are gonna make moves so he might be a piece in somewhere.
8 mai 2023 à 12 h 0
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 1,161
Mentions "j'aime": 437
I've been yelling about this since the moment it was signed. It's like it was designed to be bought out around now. 2 years of extra cap space vs his AAV and then a negligible cap hit to follow, further minimized with the cap going up. No need to trade him, especially not if it costs anything/retention.
NYR1983, Shakabakes et Jimbo1119 a aimé ceci.
8 mai 2023 à 12 h 31
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 6,210
Mentions "j'aime": 2,510
Quoting: saysthemachine
I've been yelling about this since the moment it was signed. It's like it was designed to be bought out around now. 2 years of extra cap space vs his AAV and then a negligible cap hit to follow, further minimized with the cap going up. No need to trade him, especially not if it costs anything/retention.


Agreed. It’s amazing how many of us have been saying it and yet no one seems to hear/understand it.
Shakabakes et saysthemachine a aimé ceci.
8 mai 2023 à 12 h 48
#5
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 2,988
Mentions "j'aime": 877
Quoting: csick
Nah Ottawa would take him


What would you give up for him?
8 mai 2023 à 12 h 53
#6
KFTW
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 42,157
Mentions "j'aime": 23,514
Quoting: Shakabakes
What would you give up for him?


I would take him for a 3rd or 4th if Cat goes somewhere and we get futures. Could really use him in our bottom 6
Shakabakes a aimé ceci.
8 mai 2023 à 13 h 3
#7
Kravtsov_Stan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 1,676
Mentions "j'aime": 652
Goodrow buyout would mean paying a guy who doesn't play for you till the 2031-32 season, I don't want to pay a guy who isn't playing for the next decade. I'd rather just pay the 3/4th that probably won't turn into anything to get rid of him now no strings attached
8 mai 2023 à 13 h 8
#8
Torresing
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2022
Messages: 1,805
Mentions "j'aime": 705
Quoting: csick
I would take him for a 3rd or 4th if Cat goes somewhere and we get futures. Could really use him in our bottom 6[/quote
8 mai 2023 à 13 h 9
#9
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 2,988
Mentions "j'aime": 877
Quoting: csick
I would take him for a 3rd or 4th if Cat goes somewhere and we get futures. Could really use him in our bottom 6


I would take that.

Sucks to give up on Goodrow so quickly. We genuinely love his game. But the Cap crunch is a harsh reality.

Freeing up Cap space is the name of the game. For this, I would do it.
Fox_Czar_Cup a aimé ceci.
8 mai 2023 à 13 h 11
#10
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 2,988
Mentions "j'aime": 877
Quoting: Kravtsov_Stan
Goodrow buyout would mean paying a guy who doesn't play for you till the 2031-32 season, I don't want to pay a guy who isn't playing for the next decade. I'd rather just pay the 3/4th that probably won't turn into anything to get rid of him now no strings attached


If we could unload him for a meager return, then that's the 1st option.

After that, I would take the Buyout over having to package Premium Prospects/Picks with him. Not paying other teams to take him.
Fox_Czar_Cup a aimé ceci.
8 mai 2023 à 13 h 14
#11
Kravtsov_Stan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 1,676
Mentions "j'aime": 652
Quoting: Shakabakes
If we could unload him for a meager return, then that's the 1st option.

After that, I would take the Buyout over having to package Premium Prospects/Picks with him. Not paying other teams to take him.


You wont have to attach premium assets. Its at most a 2nd rounder (kinda doubt it would be) and even then Im fine with that. Draft picks are overvalued anyways if you look at how many 2-4th rounders make it to the NHL
8 mai 2023 à 14 h 20
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2023
Messages: 346
Mentions "j'aime": 134
Sharks really like Barabanov and have a logjam at LD (even though Jones is pretty good).

What about Cuylle and McConnell-Barker instead of the 2nd?
8 mai 2023 à 14 h 25
#13
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 2,988
Mentions "j'aime": 877
Quoting: matthias893
Sharks really like Barabanov and have a logjam at LD (even though Jones is pretty good).

What about Cuylle and McConnell-Barker instead of the 2nd?


Nah. Rangers would look elsewhere, then.

Even though he's a completely different player, we could probably grab Nino from Winnipeg at half retention for a 2nd. Just to spitball.
8 mai 2023 à 14 h 53
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2023
Messages: 346
Mentions "j'aime": 134
Makes sense. Barbanov might be a good fit on the Rangers especially with salary retained, just aren't really looking for LD prospects.
8 mai 2023 à 15 h 0
#15
Jimbo1119
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 1,808
Mentions "j'aime": 755
Quoting: saysthemachine
I've been yelling about this since the moment it was signed. It's like it was designed to be bought out around now. 2 years of extra cap space vs his AAV and then a negligible cap hit to follow, further minimized with the cap going up. No need to trade him, especially not if it costs anything/retention.


And I believe the buyout gets friendlier with each passing year...so if a team were to take him on to add playoff grit- while other young players begin to accumulate playoff experience, if that team decides they no longer need what he offers after a year or two- that team will have options with him: move him or buy him out.
8 mai 2023 à 15 h 33
#16
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 2,988
Mentions "j'aime": 877
Quoting: Jimbo1119
And I believe the buyout gets friendlier with each passing year...so if a team were to take him on to add playoff grit- while other young players begin to accumulate playoff experience, if that team decides they no longer need what he offers after a year or two- that team will have options with him: move him or buy him out.


Year 4 of the Buyout is the harshest, and that total is literally his current Cap hit.

Years 5-8 are just over $1.2M. Which is still a nuisance, but probably manageable when the Cap ceiling skyrockets.
Jimbo1119 a aimé ceci.
8 mai 2023 à 16 h 55
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 26
Mentions "j'aime": 8
If Goodrow was a UFA this summer, teams would be lining up to give him 4 years at 3.6M.
Shakabakes a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage