SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Repêchage Simulé

What I think every team should do (leave thoughts)

What I think every team should do (leave thoughts)

Cuvée de repêchage: 2023
Créé par: yeeteridoo
Publié: 12 avr. 2023 à 3 h 2
RONDE 1ÉQUIPEORIGINALJOUEURDéTAILS
1Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago-Obviously.
2Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus-Only other NHL-ready player in the class and one of the best freshman in NCAA history.
3Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim-Top 5 draft eligible season in Sweden ever. Already a pro.
4Logo de Sharks de San Jose-Possibly the 2nd or 3rd best player in the class but it's a tough sell to put him any higher.
5Logo de Canadiens de Montréal-Bold take but he's the best ntdp player this year. Way safer than Smith with comparable upside. Don't be fooled by production. If Moore had Smith's linemates he'd have way more points.
6Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona-Smart and intense player that seems to fit the Yotes brand of hockey.
7Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie-Probably the highest upside guy still on the board. Flyers desperately need those and they really need a center too.
8Logo de Canucks de Vancouver-Definitely has "compete" issues but probably the best pure playmakern the CHL since Marner. Great shot too. Alot of upside here.
9Logo de Capitals de Washington-Hawks will need some D reinforcments for the long term. Reinbacher has a safe floor and if you know what you're doing with him alot of upside too.
10Logo de Red Wings de Detroit-Best player still on the board in my eyes. Wings def need forwards more than D so pick makes sense to me.
11Logo de Blues de St-Louis-This is gonna seem high to a lot of people and it absolutely won't happen on draft day but he's the best player on the board here. And he fills a need. Can play any F position.
12Logo de Coyotes de l'ArizonaLogo de Sénateurs d'OttawaOne of the most natural fits of the draft. Alot of upside here if managed correctly. Would probably thrive in Arizona's system.
13Logo de Sabres de Buffalo-Colby Barlow may not have the most upside but he will probably be a good third line guy at minimum. In the Sabres situation they can afford to go for a guy like that. Already have most of their top 6 formed.
14Logo de Predators de Nashville-Preds don't have much on D apart from Josi.They could have a future top 4 guy here in ASP.
15Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh-Pens desperately need to take some risks for upside.Gulyayev is extremely boom or bust but he could really rejuvanate that cripplingly old blue line.
16Logo de Flames de Calgary-Probably the highest upside still on the board. Would fit in Calgary's current system I think.
17Logo de Red Wings de DetroitLogo de Islanders de New YorkWon't fall that much on draft day and to me Yager is a very flawed player, but it makes a lot of sense in that range to the wings here. They def need some firepower on offense and Yager is one of the best scorer's available.
18Logo de Canadiens de MontréalLogo de Panthers de la FlorideLots of upside here if managed properly. Habs definetely want some size up front and Musty would help with that.
19Logo de Jets de Winnipeg-Jets need some impovements on the defensive side of the puck and if Simashev pans out watch out.Sergachev 2.0.
20Logo de Blackhawks de ChicagoLogo de Lightning de Tampa BayHawks need everything. Honzek is a first step towards that. Hawks picked purely bpa here.
21Logo de Kraken de Seattle-Incredible upside here if developped well. Will need to improve a lot but a great project to have in Seattle's position.
22Logo de Blue Jackets de ColumbusLogo de Kings de Los AngelesIn the scenario we have here where they get Fantilli they would essentially lock up their top 3c here with Johnson. Not a lot of upside with Danielson but a high likelyhood of making the show.
23Logo de Wild du Minnesota-There he is. Wild need C bad. With Rossi and him mayybe they could have a pretty decent duo down the line. Low upside guy imo. Would fit really well in minnesota's system.
24Logo de Rangers de New YorkLogo de Stars de DallasIncredible upside here again if you know how to develop him. Would fill a need and again I think in the Rags systemhe'd be great.
25Logo de Avalanche du Colorado-Makes a lot of sense for the avs here they need C. Again similar to danielson and dalibor not a lot of upside but he'll probably help an nhl team down the line as a bottom 6 C.
26Logo de Predators de NashvilleLogo de Oilers d'EdmontonPerfect "third guy" on a line. Makes everyone around him better. Can't really have him go much lower.
27Logo de Blues de St-LouisLogo de Rangers de New YorkOne of the most underrated players in the class. Would be higher on a lot of rankings if he wasn't playing third line minutes. BPA here.
28Logo de Golden Knights de Vegas-PP specialist. Lots of upside BPA here again.
29Logo de Blues de St-LouisLogo de Maple Leafs de TorontoOne of the most skilled players in the entire draft but incosistent and small. A project but if it pans out they could have a genuine top 6 player here.
30Logo de Sharks de San JoseLogo de Devils du New JerseyAnother project here and a late riser. Sharks won't be competitive for a while so it makes sense.
31Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline-Extremely underrated. Will go much much lower on draft day but a great player with very high upside. Canes love to pick russians with this type of profile too (Trikozov).
32Logo de Maple Leafs de TorontoLogo de Bruins de BostonA really interesting project for the leafs here. If it pans out they could have a really good offensive point-producing top 4 D.
12 avr. 2023 à 4 h 8
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2022
Messages: 2,671
Mentions "j'aime": 1,027
I got Moore in the top 10 too, but i think MTL would draft Smith over him. Kent Hughes coached Smith a few years ago, they still text each others.

I could see MTL pick Moore over Michkov or Benson if Smith is picked top 4. I like MTL drafting Musty at 18. Big playmaker, could be good with Caufield.

You're too low on Dvorsky IMO. I agree he doesn't have very high upside, but teams love center. I can't see him fall out of top 10.

Vancouver or Buffalo are very likely to draft RHD. Blues would draft a bigger proven center over Bridley, probably one of Dvorsky or Danielson.
mokumboi et yeeteridoo a aimé ceci.
12 avr. 2023 à 5 h 9
#2
mokumboi
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 29,184
Mentions "j'aime": 11,314
Wow. I'm not sure you could do three worse picks for the Blues if you tried. These are beyond what lies beyond brutal. They are not taking three midgets, not taking three wingers and certainly not going anywhere near three midget wingers. If the Blues take one winger with those three 1sts it will be a decent sized surprise. And not only does this lack any notion of what the Blues need, the concept of BPA has completely eluded you (Brindley at 11??? Sawchyn and Whitelaw in the 1st round??? Oi vey... ). Light years less than zero chance they do any of this lunacy.

I'm legit not trying to be mean at all, but this is just simply horrid for the Blues. This is the their 1st round if you hate them passionately to the bone, crave nothing more than shocking pure evil revenge on them and have mind control powers out the wazoo.
12 avr. 2023 à 9 h 35
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 4,862
Mentions "j'aime": 3,238
Quoting: mokumboi
Wow. I'm not sure you could do three worse picks for the Blues if you tried. These are beyond what lies beyond brutal. They are not taking three midgets, not taking three wingers and certainly not going anywhere near three midget wingers. If the Blues take one winger with those three 1sts it will be a decent sized surprise. And not only does this lack any notion of what the Blues need, the concept of BPA has completely eluded you (Brindley at 11??? Sawchyn and Whitelaw in the 1st round??? Oi vey... ). Light years less than zero chance they do any of this lunacy.

I'm legit not trying to be mean at all, but this is just simply horrid for the Blues. This is the their 1st round if you hate them passionately to the bone, crave nothing more than shocking pure evil revenge on them and have mind control powers out the wazoo.


Careful dropping these in a comment, they're considered derogatory to that community.
HabsCanucks a aimé ceci.
12 avr. 2023 à 10 h 29
#4
mokumboi
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 29,184
Mentions "j'aime": 11,314
Quoting: Just_A_Guess
Careful dropping these in a comment, they're considered derogatory to that community.


Umm okay. I'm not talking about that community and the word still does have other meanings, but sure. Let's say tiny instead.
Just_A_Guess a aimé ceci.
12 avr. 2023 à 11 h 49
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2022
Messages: 3,808
Mentions "j'aime": 2,501
there is not gonna be only 5 dman taken in the first round, most draft like yours overate foward and underappeciate dman!
12 avr. 2023 à 12 h 12
#6
Démarrer sujet
yeeteridoo
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2023
Messages: 32
Mentions "j'aime": 3
Quoting: mokumboi
Wow. I'm not sure you could do three worse picks for the Blues if you tried. These are beyond what lies beyond brutal. They are not taking three midgets, not taking three wingers and certainly not going anywhere near three midget wingers. If the Blues take one winger with those three 1sts it will be a decent sized surprise. And not only does this lack any notion of what the Blues need, the concept of BPA has completely eluded you (Brindley at 11??? Sawchyn and Whitelaw in the 1st round??? Oi vey... ). Light years less than zero chance they do any of this lunacy.

I'm legit not trying to be mean at all, but this is just simply horrid for the Blues. This is the their 1st round if you hate them passionately to the bone, crave nothing more than shocking pure evil revenge on them and have mind control powers out the wazoo.


All 3 of these guys can play center. Also current need should't dictate draft picks for a team that needs everything on the long term future. Habs had a couple years where they drafted LD 10X times the amount they drafted RD and they are well setup now. On the long term in terms of top 6 fwd you have Buch, Kyrou and Thomas. Mayyybe Vrana. These guys would essentially complete the group. Value just isn't there for D here. Shouldn't reach for one. Willander is a low upside guy and shouldn't be a first. Dragicevic doesn't fit the blues style at all. You could try to argue Cagnoni or Akey but they are more day 2 guys to me. CHL D with their type of profile rarely go in the first round anyway (Christian Kyrou, Mats Lindgren, Ty Nelson...). Everybody drafted by the blues here are incredible upside picks and not reaches at all imo. All players way underrated by public rankings/mocks.
12 avr. 2023 à 12 h 17
#7
Démarrer sujet
yeeteridoo
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2023
Messages: 32
Mentions "j'aime": 3
Quoting: drambui
there is not gonna be only 5 dman taken in the first round, most draft like yours overate foward and underappeciate dman!


At the real draft probably. This is just my opinion on what teams should do.
drambui a aimé ceci.
12 avr. 2023 à 12 h 21
#8
Démarrer sujet
yeeteridoo
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2023
Messages: 32
Mentions "j'aime": 3
Quoting: LIRIK
I got Moore in the top 10 too, but i think MTL would draft Smith over him. Kent Hughes coached Smith a few years ago, they still text each others.

I could see MTL pick Moore over Michkov or Benson if Smith is picked top 4. I like MTL drafting Musty at 18. Big playmaker, could be good with Caufield.

You're too low on Dvorsky IMO. I agree he doesn't have very high upside, but teams love center. I can't see him fall out of top 10.

Vancouver or Buffalo are very likely to draft RHD. Blues would draft a bigger proven center over Bridley, probably one of Dvorsky or Danielson.


I agree that mtl would def pick smith ahead but I wouldn't. This is just my opinion on what they should do. Same for the Vancouver and Buffalo points.
12 avr. 2023 à 14 h 0
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 4,862
Mentions "j'aime": 3,238
Quoting: mokumboi
Umm okay. I'm not talking about that community and the word still does have other meanings, but sure. Let's say tiny instead.


I was only pointing it out before someone potentially became offended. I know what you meant though.
mokumboi et HabsCanucks a aimé ceci.
12 avr. 2023 à 14 h 57
#10
mokumboi
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 29,184
Mentions "j'aime": 11,314
Quoting: yeeteridoo
All 3 of these guys can play center.

Also current need should't dictate draft picks for a team that needs everything on the long term future.

On the long term in terms of top 6 fwd you have Buch, Kyrou and Thomas. Mayyybe Vrana. These guys would essentially complete the group.

Value just isn't there for D here. Shouldn't reach for one. Willander is a low upside guy and shouldn't be a first. Dragicevic doesn't fit the blues style at all. You could try to argue Cagnoni or Akey but they are more day 2 guys to me. CHL D with their type of profile rarely go in the first round anyway (Christian Kyrou, Mats Lindgren, Ty Nelson...). Everybody drafted by the blues here are incredible upside picks and not reaches at all imo. All players way underrated by public rankings/mocks.


Oh dear... okay, let's break it down.

1 - All three "can play" center at their current levels. In the NHL, maybe one does. Besides, the Blues do not like tiny centers, especially when all three are WILD reaches taken way too soon.

2 - This isn't even remotely true. Not sure where you got that idea, to be honest. The Blues have wingers and goalies falling out of their ears. The want Cs and Ds unless some big, fast rounded winger falls something stupid.

3 - Bruh. First of all, Thomas is a C. And the Blues also have Neighbours, Snuggerud, Bolduc and Robertsson. Two of those guys are among the top 25-30 drafted prospects in all of hockey, and another is also top 50-ish. And yes, Vrana counts. They have loads of young top 6 wingers.

4 - Ehh... none of those players should be a Blues 1st round pick. Dragicevic is a one trick pony, and the rest would indeed be major reaches. I agree with all that. However, Price, Lindstein, Bonk, Simashev, Strbak and Molendyk would not be reaches at all, they would all be excellent value for a late 1st.

So yeah, again, not trying to be mean, but you definitely do not understand the Blues pool or current station and you're big time underrating a bunch of solid D-men. These Blues picks are just really, really bad, and they are simply not happening. Not a chance in hell.
12 avr. 2023 à 19 h 12
#11
Démarrer sujet
yeeteridoo
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2023
Messages: 32
Mentions "j'aime": 3
Quoting: mokumboi
Oh dear... okay, let's break it down.

1 - All three "can play" center at their current levels. In the NHL, maybe one does. Besides, the Blues do not like tiny centers, especially when all three are WILD reaches taken way too soon.

2 - This isn't even remotely true. Not sure where you got that idea, to be honest. The Blues have wingers and goalies falling out of their ears. The want Cs and Ds unless some big, fast rounded winger falls something stupid.

3 - Bruh. First of all, Thomas is a C. And the Blues also have Neighbours, Snuggerud, Bolduc and Robertsson. Two of those guys are among the top 25-30 drafted prospects in all of hockey, and another is also top 50-ish. And yes, Vrana counts. They have loads of young top 6 wingers.

4 - Ehh... none of those players should be a Blues 1st round pick. Dragicevic is a one trick pony, and the rest would indeed be major reaches. I agree with all that. However, Price, Lindstein, Bonk, Simashev, Strbak and Molendyk would not be reaches at all, they would all be excellent value for a late 1st.

So yeah, again, not trying to be mean, but you definitely do not understand the Blues pool or current station and you're big time underrating a bunch of solid D-men. These Blues picks are just really, really bad, and they are simply not happening. Not a chance in hell.


Everyone of these guys can play C in the NHL if you develop them as such. And I don't care about what the blues like i'm talking about what I think they should do not what I think they will do. Also Sawchyn is definitely not small lol. Has a big frame.

Look at every team in past years that drafted for need. Very strong correlation with the teams that don't draft well. It's just a fact. Don't draft for current need. Objectively proven to be a bad strategy.

Snuggerud is the only possible one here and even then he's probably not a top 6 player. Bolduc will not be an nhler and neighbours tops as a 4th liner on a contender. Robertsson is a project and very far to confidently project as a top 6 player as of rn.

Price and Molendyk are in the same category than the ones i put down. Probably not first rounders. Bonk will never be anything more than a bottom pair D. Most overrated player in the class. Lindstein is not the player he was last year. Basically Salomonsson again. Strbak is not really good at all. Has a long way to go and he's way more likely to not be an nhler than to be one. Simashev is already gone in that mock draft. You could probably go for him at 11 and i'm not totally opposed to that but you'd probably tell me it's too early.

This would be a fantastic draft for the Blues. None of these guys are reaches at all. Brindley is ranked from 9 to 43 on various lists. Sawchyn 13 to 80. Whitelaw between 23 and 65. Not reaches by any means.
12 avr. 2023 à 19 h 33
#12
mokumboi
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 29,184
Mentions "j'aime": 11,314
Quoting: yeeteridoo
Everyone of these guys can play C in the NHL if you develop them as such. And I don't care about what the blues like i'm talking about what I think they should do not what I think they will do. Also Sawchyn is definitely not small lol. Has a big frame.

Look at every team in past years that drafted for need. Very strong correlation with the teams that don't draft well. It's just a fact. Don't draft for current need. Objectively proven to be a bad strategy.

Snuggerud is the only possible one here and even then he's probably not a top 6 player. Bolduc will not be an nhler and neighbours tops as a 4th liner on a contender. Robertsson is a project and very far to confidently project as a top 6 player as of rn.

Price and Molendyk are in the same category than the ones i put down. Probably not first rounders. Bonk will never be anything more than a bottom pair D. Most overrated player in the class. Lindstein is not the player he was last year. Basically Salomonsson again. Strbak is not really good at all. Has a long way to go and he's way more likely to not be an nhler than to be one. Simashev is already gone in that mock draft. You could probably go for him at 11 and i'm not totally opposed to that but you'd probably tell me it's too early.

This would be a fantastic draft for the Blues. None of these guys are reaches at all. Brindley is ranked from 9 to 43 on various lists. Sawchyn 13 to 80. Whitelaw between 23 and 65. Not reaches by any means.


Dude, you are smoking some extraordinary stuff. All of this is just wrong. So so very wrong, like often as wrong as can be, and you refuse to take corrections. C'est la vie...
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage