SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Getting 1 more D and CATAH HAHT

Équipe: 2023-24 Kings de Los Angeles
Date de création initiale: 29 mars 2023
Publié: 29 mars 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
33 900 000 $
1950 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
55 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
LAK
  1. Smith, Nathan [Droits de RFA]
2.
LAK
  1. Hart, Carter (1 000 000 $ retained)
PHI
  1. Kupari, Rasmus [Droits de RFA]
  2. Petersen, Cal
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (LAK)
  4. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (LAK)
3.
MTL
  1. Roy, Matt
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (LAK)
Frais de résiliation
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2023
Logo de PIT
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
2024
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
2025
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2184 000 000 $83 680 667 $0 $3 712 500 $319 333 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
AD, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
7 875 000 $7 875 000 $
AD, AG
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
4 200 000 $4 200 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance2 650 000 $$3M)
AG, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
4 250 000 $4 250 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
1 300 000 $1 300 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
1 675 000 $1 675 000 $
C
RFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
AD, AG
RFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
2 979 000 $2 979 000 $
G
RFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
4 125 000 $4 125 000 $
DG
UFA - 8
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 3
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
1 700 000 $1 700 000 $
DG/DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
4 875 000 $4 875 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
950 000 $950 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 3

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
29 mars 2023 à 21 h 54
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 6,378
Mentions "j'aime": 4,447
Can never seperate Doughty and Anderson, both are at their best when paired together.

I'd rather have Roy over Matheson who has been perfect paired with Gavrikov.

Eventually, when Clarke and/or Spence and/or Durzi are ready for top-4 minutes, you can pair them with Gavrikov and Roy and Durzi have already played well together.

The Hart package is too much, the Kings will just take their chances with either trying to get Korpi or give Petersen another shot. Petersen's buyout next year won't be too bad, and buried he's really not worth losing 1st, 2nd, and Kupari
29 mars 2023 à 22 h 12
#2
VAN
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2022
Messages: 6,122
Mentions "j'aime": 1,873
What about Durzi for Matheson and Clarke bottom pair with him? Keep Roy
29 mars 2023 à 22 h 32
#3
Misses Danault
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2022
Messages: 296
Mentions "j'aime": 178
Hard no from the Habs. Matheson is:
A) Our best defenceman (on pace for 60 points if he'd not been hurt)
B) A recent acquisition
C) On an excellent deal

If we absolutely had to move him we'd not be looking to take a defenceman back as we already have too many
29 mars 2023 à 22 h 53
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 1,246
Mentions "j'aime": 316
Quoting: reelnb
Hard no from the Habs. Matheson is:
A) Our best defenceman (on pace for 60 points if he'd not been hurt)
B) A recent acquisition
C) On an excellent deal

If we absolutely had to move him we'd not be looking to take a defenceman back as we already have too many


you have a lot of left handed D (Guhle, Xhekaj, Harris, Matheson, Edmunson). Habs RHD consists of Savard, Barron, Kovacevic, maybe Mailloux in future. Moving Matheson for Roy would be good. Moving Matheson for Durzi would be even better cause he's younger. Montreals still years away from competing if Matheson is still there when competing id be surprised. Guhle Durzi pairing would be sick.
30 mars 2023 à 1 h 0
#5
Nick
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 2,574
Mentions "j'aime": 818
Quoting: jedihonesy
you have a lot of left handed D (Guhle, Xhekaj, Harris, Matheson, Edmunson). Habs RHD consists of Savard, Barron, Kovacevic, maybe Mailloux in future. Moving Matheson for Roy would be good. Moving Matheson for Durzi would be even better cause he's younger. Montreals still years away from competing if Matheson is still there when competing id be surprised. Guhle Durzi pairing would be sick.


Quoting: jedihonesy
you have a lot of left handed D (Guhle, Xhekaj, Harris, Matheson, Edmunson). Habs RHD consists of Savard, Barron, Kovacevic, maybe Mailloux in future. Moving Matheson for Roy would be good. Moving Matheson for Durzi would be even better cause he's younger. Montreals still years away from competing if Matheson is still there when competing id be surprised. Guhle Durzi pairing would be sick.


Maybe, but why would the Habs trade Matheson for that return when he could probably fetch a tone next deadline at this rate
30 mars 2023 à 7 h 45
#6
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 13,508
Mentions "j'aime": 3,060
That's a hard pass from the Flyers. Trading a 24 year old franchise goalie would not be in their best interest.
30 mars 2023 à 9 h 16
#7
Jeff Gorton
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 2,206
Mentions "j'aime": 519
Quoting: jedihonesy
you have a lot of left handed D (Guhle, Xhekaj, Harris, Matheson, Edmunson). Habs RHD consists of Savard, Barron, Kovacevic, maybe Mailloux in future. Moving Matheson for Roy would be good. Moving Matheson for Durzi would be even better cause he's younger. Montreals still years away from competing if Matheson is still there when competing id be surprised. Guhle Durzi pairing would be sick.


Only way Matheson is moved for another d man from the kings is a deal for Clarke. Habs dont need dmen that badly unless they are major improvements on who we already have. Roy is 28. Only a year younger than Matheson
30 mars 2023 à 10 h 14
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2022
Messages: 1,660
Mentions "j'aime": 997
Quoting: Prime_Jimbo
What about Durzi for Matheson and Clarke bottom pair with him? Keep Roy


I doubt Montreal would even move Matheson for Roy, he's local, locked up longer term on a good contract, and is their only D that has effective in tough minutes who isn't a rookie. But at least Roy makes sense as a he's a really good RD. There's almost zero chance Montreal would move Matheson for Durzi, they'd be better off just keeping Barron in the NHL.
30 mars 2023 à 10 h 28
#9
VAN
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2022
Messages: 6,122
Mentions "j'aime": 1,873
Quoting: Burnout
I doubt Montreal would even move Matheson for Roy, he's local, locked up longer term on a good contract, and is their only D that has effective in tough minutes who isn't a rookie. But at least Roy makes sense as a he's a really good RD. There's almost zero chance Montreal would move Matheson for Durzi, they'd be better off just keeping Barron in the NHL.


Ya those are certainly factors but by the time Matheson's deal is ending is more likely when Montreal is turning the corner. Durzi's age would and rfa control would be a big plus.
30 mars 2023 à 11 h 2
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2022
Messages: 1,660
Mentions "j'aime": 997
Quoting: Prime_Jimbo
Ya those are certainly factors but by the time Matheson's deal is ending is more likely when Montreal is turning the corner. Durzi's age would and rfa control would be a big plus.


Montreal wants Matheson now to help bring along Montreal's young D. When Montreal's turning the corner, they want to be building around some of Hutson, Guhle, Harris/Xhekaj, Barron, Mailloux and whoever else they have drafted or will draft. Having a guy like Matheson now who can play tough minutes now and help prospects deal with the full range of pressures (Matheson was a hyped prospect who showed flashes, struggled with pressure for years before putting it all together a couple of seasons ago) is more valuable than what Durzi would bring them. Roy at least makes sense in that he can play a tougher role, plays the right side and has strong on-ice impacts.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage