SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Next season if the tank fails

Créé par: Kyle_Davidson
Équipe: 2023-24 Blackhawks de Chicago
Date de création initiale: 18 mars 2023
Publié: 18 mars 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
In this version of next season hawks sit out on Unrestricted Free Agency. There are some buy low/flip candidates available that the hawks could grab BUT I think they already have enough flip candidates that no signings need to be forced.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
63 000 000 $
22 000 000 $
21 150 000 $
2975 000 $
11 000 000 $
11 200 000 $
11 000 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
13 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
CHI
  1. Bailey, Josh
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (NYI)
  3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2025 (NYI)
Détails additionnels:
Would the islanders move back in the second round (assuming they don’t go on a run) and send a third in 25 to move Baileys money? The current position of the picks are 24 and 17
NYI
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (TBL)
2.
CHI
  1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (NYR)
Détails additionnels:
The rangers make the ECF
NYR
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (NYR)
Détails additionnels:
Top 10 protected in 2024
3.
CHI
  1. Höglander, Nils [Droits de RFA]
VAN
  1. Mitchell, Ian [Droits de RFA]
Détails additionnels:
I saw a Canucks ACGM that had Hoglander traded for a 4th round pick. If the Canuck’s are moving on from him this summer I think Chicago would be interested in giving Mitchell a change of scenery.
4.
CHI
  1. Ceci, Cody
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (EDM)
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (EDM)
5.
CHI
  1. Murray, Matt
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (BOS)
TOR
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (OTT)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Frais appliqués
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2023
Logo de CHI
Logo de TBL
Logo de BOS
Logo de CHI
Logo de NYI
Logo de EDM
Logo de CHI
Logo de DAL
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
2024
Logo de CHI
Logo de TBL
Logo de NYR
Logo de CHI
Logo de VAN
Logo de EDM
Logo de CHI
Logo de OTT
Logo de CGY
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
2025
Logo de CHI
Logo de TOR
Logo de CHI
Logo de DAL
Logo de CHI
Logo de NYI
Logo de CHI
Logo de NYR
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2382 500 000 $63 818 457 $0 $962 500 $18 681 543 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance505 000 $$505K)
AG, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG, C, AD
RFA - 2
1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 650 000 $2 650 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AD, C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Islanders de New York
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AD, AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
950 000 $950 000 $
C
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
758 333 $758 333 $
AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
975 000 $975 000 $
AD
RFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
859 167 $859 167 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 800 000 $3 800 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
916 667 $916 667 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
4 687 500 $4 687 500 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
800 000 $800 000 $
AD, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
758 333 $758 333 $
AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
800 000 $800 000 $
AG, C
RFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
18 mars 2023 à 12 h 11
#1
ej15 BYATCH
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2022
Messages: 1,095
Mentions "j'aime": 236
The goaltending tandem

2 injury prone goalies
2 dumps by tml
2 TERRIBLE GOALIES

flushed cheeks
Garak a aimé ceci.
18 mars 2023 à 12 h 17
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2018
Messages: 2,635
Mentions "j'aime": 1,167
Canucks pass Hoggys a keeper.IMHO.
18 mars 2023 à 12 h 17
#3
Démarrer sujet
Kyle from Chicago
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 9,786
Mentions "j'aime": 5,746
Quoting: evanjoos34
The goaltending tandem

2 injury prone goalies
2 dumps by tml
2 TERRIBLE GOALIES

flushed cheeks

Celebrate losing for Celebrini
ej15DaTMLfan et Garak a aimé ceci.
18 mars 2023 à 12 h 18
#4
Démarrer sujet
Kyle from Chicago
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 9,786
Mentions "j'aime": 5,746
Quoting: remowilliams
Canucks pass Hoggys a keeper.IMHO.


Might be a good idea, but if you are moving him this trade seems fair.
remowilliams a aimé ceci.
18 mars 2023 à 12 h 21
#5
Ex Nucks fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 17,615
Mentions "j'aime": 17,624
Quoting: Kyle_Davidson
Might be a good idea, but if you are moving him this trade seems fair.


No reason to move him for a player that will probably never be as good as him
18 mars 2023 à 12 h 24
#6
Hawks Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 2,590
Mentions "j'aime": 1,598
Honestly, with the Hawks luck, this is a playoff team LOL
18 mars 2023 à 12 h 24
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2021
Messages: 14,999
Mentions "j'aime": 12,084
I feel like it’s more likely the isles buy out Bailey. They need the picks
18 mars 2023 à 12 h 38
#8
Démarrer sujet
Kyle from Chicago
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 9,786
Mentions "j'aime": 5,746
Quoting: Db1899
I feel like it’s more likely the isles buy out Bailey. They need the picks


They still have “most” of their picks over the next 3 drafts and are only losing out on 1 in this trade. I’m not going to act like I know the islanders situation all that well but I think they would do well with the cap flexibility now.
18 mars 2023 à 12 h 47
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2021
Messages: 14,999
Mentions "j'aime": 12,084
Quoting: Kyle_Davidson
They still have “most” of their picks over the next 3 drafts and are only losing out on 1 in this trade. I’m not going to act like I know the islanders situation all that well but I think they would do well with the cap flexibility now.


they would buy him out for 2 reasons. 1. His contract is buyout friendly 2. It lets him choose where he wants to go
18 mars 2023 à 13 h 5
#10
Démarrer sujet
Kyle from Chicago
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 9,786
Mentions "j'aime": 5,746
Quoting: Db1899
they would buy him out for 2 reasons. 1. His contract is buyout friendly 2. It lets him choose where he wants to go

That’s a good way to treat a veteran, so respect there. His buyout looks just alright to me though, you save just about half of his cap hit in year 1 and add on an extra year at about 1.2 million. To me the money you save in a buyout doesn’t seem like it would help the islanders in a significant enough way. Who would you be able to sign for 2.4 AAV that would be a significant upgrade on what Bailey does?
18 mars 2023 à 14 h 23
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2021
Messages: 14,999
Mentions "j'aime": 12,084
Quoting: Kyle_Davidson
That’s a good way to treat a veteran, so respect there. His buyout looks just alright to me though, you save just about half of his cap hit in year 1 and add on an extra year at about 1.2 million. To me the money you save in a buyout doesn’t seem like it would help the islanders in a significant enough way. Who would you be able to sign for 2.4 AAV that would be a significant upgrade on what Bailey does?


Pierre Engvall
18 mars 2023 à 14 h 48
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2021
Messages: 3,507
Mentions "j'aime": 783
Yeah, Leafs easily pass. You're not getting a first in a Murray dump when it costed a 2nd to dump Zaitsev
18 mars 2023 à 18 h 27
#13
Backn 2da leff-JFK
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 1,079
Mentions "j'aime": 388
Dear Blackhawks fans…you want Matvei Michkov

Whoever does not take Michkov at 2 will regret it for decades
Kyle_Davidson a aimé ceci.
18 mars 2023 à 20 h 3
#14
Démarrer sujet
Kyle from Chicago
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 9,786
Mentions "j'aime": 5,746
Quoting: Babatunde
Yeah, Leafs easily pass. You're not getting a first in a Murray dump when it costed a 2nd to dump Zaitsev


They literally did this trade last season, only difference was instead of Murray it was Mrazek. Given that Dubas may be unemployed at the time of the draft the team could go in a different direction, but saying it’s an easy pass is dumb.
18 mars 2023 à 20 h 6
#15
Démarrer sujet
Kyle from Chicago
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 9,786
Mentions "j'aime": 5,746
Quoting: CannaHawk
Dear Blackhawks fans…you want Matvei Michkov

Whoever does not take Michkov at 2 will regret it for decades

I would absolutely take him at 3 or 4, but Fantilli is too fantastic of a piece to pass up. He is comparable to Toews, and Number 1 centers like that are so hard to find.
19 mars 2023 à 10 h 52
#16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2021
Messages: 3,507
Mentions "j'aime": 783
Quoting: Kyle_Davidson
They literally did this trade last season, only difference was instead of Murray it was Mrazek. Given that Dubas may be unemployed at the time of the draft the team could go in a different direction, but saying it’s an easy pass is dumb.


It is an easy pass, Mrazek had two years left. Murray is a UFA after next season
19 mars 2023 à 21 h 0
#17
Démarrer sujet
Kyle from Chicago
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 9,786
Mentions "j'aime": 5,746
Quoting: Babatunde
It is an easy pass, Mrazek had two years left. Murray is a UFA after next season


I don’t see the term as a big consideration in that trade, 1-2 years didn’t make a difference for the hawks, and actually was probably a bonus for cap floor considerations. At the very least the hawks didn’t charge “more” to take on the term in the trade and for the leafs the cap hit needed to go no matter what.
20 mars 2023 à 8 h 12
#18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2021
Messages: 3,507
Mentions "j'aime": 783
Quoting: Kyle_Davidson
I don’t see the term as a big consideration in that trade, 1-2 years didn’t make a difference for the hawks, and actually was probably a bonus for cap floor considerations. At the very least the hawks didn’t charge “more” to take on the term in the trade and for the leafs the cap hit needed to go no matter what.


Murray isn't as useless as Mrazek, the biggest difference between the two is that one can make a save and the other can't. There are endless options that won't have to involve our 2023 first like putting him on LTIR (if he agrees) or retaining $2M and having a team trade for him. We can dump his entire contract similar to what the Sens dumped Zaitsev for. If buying him out is the only way to get rid of his contract, that works as well considering his buyout isn't bad and we can screw OTT over where they have to retain 25%
20 mars 2023 à 12 h 10
#19
TheRealKyleDavidson
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2022
Messages: 467
Mentions "j'aime": 162
Quoting: Babatunde
Murray isn't as useless as Mrazek, the biggest difference between the two is that one can make a save and the other can't. There are endless options that won't have to involve our 2023 first like putting him on LTIR (if he agrees) or retaining $2M and having a team trade for him. We can dump his entire contract similar to what the Sens dumped Zaitsev for. If buying him out is the only way to get rid of his contract, that works as well considering his buyout isn't bad and we can screw OTT over where they have to retain 25%


Lmao buy him out with what money? The leafs need every penny they can get especially once their annual first round exit happens and they get desperate in free agency.
20 mars 2023 à 19 h 46
#20
Démarrer sujet
Kyle from Chicago
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 9,786
Mentions "j'aime": 5,746
Quoting: Babatunde
Murray isn't as useless as Mrazek, the biggest difference between the two is that one can make a save and the other can't. There are endless options that won't have to involve our 2023 first like putting him on LTIR (if he agrees) or retaining $2M and having a team trade for him. We can dump his entire contract similar to what the Sens dumped Zaitsev for. If buying him out is the only way to get rid of his contract, that works as well considering his buyout isn't bad and we can screw OTT over where they have to retain 25%


With what picks would you dump his contract if it came to that? When you consider the projected positions of the draft picks then you are moving back half of one round. It’s strange that you would want to give up a comparable package to what OTT paid (high 2nd, future 4th) but wouldn’t move back ~16 spots for the same service.
21 mars 2023 à 11 h 14
#21
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2021
Messages: 3,507
Mentions "j'aime": 783
Quoting: Kyle_Davidson
With what picks would you dump his contract if it came to that? When you consider the projected positions of the draft picks then you are moving back half of one round. It’s strange that you would want to give up a comparable package to what OTT paid (high 2nd, future 4th) but wouldn’t move back ~16 spots for the same service.


Deep draft, can't see us moving back. Besides, buying Murray out or keeping him on LTIR would be much better
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage