SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Stanley Cup

Créé par: McSorley
Équipe: 2023-24 Kings de Los Angeles
Date de création initiale: 16 mars 2023
Publié: 16 mars 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
1925 000 $
RFAANSCAP HIT
1775 000 $
1775 000 $
1775 000 $
1775 000 $
2775 000 $
2900 000 $
2900 000 $
2900 000 $
2800 000 $
1800 000 $
2850 000 $
23 000 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
64 166 666 $
1775 000 $
1775 000 $
1775 000 $
33 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
LAK
  1. Deslauriers, Nicolas (800 000 $ retained)
  2. Seeler, Nick
PHI
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2023 (PIT)
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2024 (LAK)
2.
LAK
  1. Xhekaj, Arber
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2023 (MTL)
3.
LAK
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2024 (TOR)
Détails additionnels:
Any team
4.
LAK
    FC
    PHI
    1. Grundström, Carl
    2. Petersen, Cal
    3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2023 (MTL)
    Frais de résiliation
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2023
    Logo de LAK
    Logo de LAK
    Logo de LAK
    Logo de LAK
    2024
    Logo de LAK
    Logo de LAK
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de LAK
    Logo de LAK
    2025
    Logo de LAK
    Logo de LAK
    Logo de LAK
    Logo de LAK
    Logo de LAK
    Logo de LAK
    Logo de LAK
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2383 500 000 $80 521 666 $0 $3 712 500 $2 978 334 $

    Formation

    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
    5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
    10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
    C
    NMC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
    3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
    AD, C
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
    4 200 000 $4 200 000 $
    AG, AD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 5
    Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
    5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
    C
    NMC
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
    4 250 000 $4 250 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
    7 875 000 $7 875 000 $
    AD, AG
    NMC
    UFA - 6
    Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
    894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance2 650 000 $$3M)
    AG, C
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
    894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
    AD, AG
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
    4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
    1 675 000 $1 675 000 $
    C
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
    950 000 $950 000 $
    AG, AD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 3
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
    4 125 000 $4 125 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 8
    Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
    11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
    DD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
    1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
    G
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
    4 166 666 $4 166 666 $
    DG
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
    3 150 000 $3 150 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
    3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
    G
    UFA - 5
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    828 333 $828 333 $
    DG/DD
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
    863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
    DD
    RFA - 3
    Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
    Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
    775 000 $775 000 $
    C, AG, AD
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
    900 000 $900 000 $
    C, AG, AD
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
    775 000 $775 000 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 1

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    16 mars 2023 à 6 h 36
    #1
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: août 2018
    Messages: 6,310
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,226
    So this is in offseason.

    Seeler is probably worth a 3rd at the moment, or a 4th, you have a mid to late 3rd and a 4th in 2024, so lets say Seeler is worth just a bit less than that 3rd, so you want 3 years of retention AND Deslauriers for a bit less than a probable late 4th TWO drafts away?

    Its not the 800k, its that PHI loses a retention spot for 3 yrs. Deslauriers is worth a late 3rd in 2023 or 2024 definitely, but asking for 3 years of retention makes that pick a high 3rd in 2023 at least, which you dont have. deslauriers with retention is probably BOTH those picks alone.

    Ultimately it would be extremely poor choice by PHI to even consider it. Its too light from LAK.

    And then throwing Petersen, who PHI dioesnt need/want for a 3rd and Grundstrom (who they also dont really need)? in? I think Petersen cost at least a late 3rd to move at the moment, but PHI isnt the place, and they have alot of winger options better than grundstrom.

    PHI will have cap space so just join the two deals and make it realistic: Deslauriers at 50% and Seeler for cap dump Petersen, two 3rds and a 4th and a meh prospect, Akili Thomas?
    16 mars 2023 à 7 h 1
    #2
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mars 2021
    Messages: 253
    Mentions "j'aime": 28
    Mtl says no
    16 mars 2023 à 7 h 20
    #3
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: oct. 2022
    Messages: 1,278
    Mentions "j'aime": 511
    Quoting: Hammerwise
    So this is in offseason.

    Seeler is probably worth a 3rd at the moment, or a 4th, you have a mid to late 3rd and a 4th in 2024, so lets say Seeler is worth just a bit less than that 3rd, so you want 3 years of retention AND Deslauriers for a bit less than a probable late 4th TWO drafts away?

    Its not the 800k, its that PHI loses a retention spot for 3 yrs. Deslauriers is worth a late 3rd in 2023 or 2024 definitely, but asking for 3 years of retention makes that pick a high 3rd in 2023 at least, which you dont have. deslauriers with retention is probably BOTH those picks alone.

    Ultimately it would be extremely poor choice by PHI to even consider it. Its too light from LAK.

    And then throwing Petersen, who PHI dioesnt need/want for a 3rd and Grundstrom (who they also dont really need)? in? I think Petersen cost at least a late 3rd to move at the moment, but PHI isnt the place, and they have alot of winger options better than grundstrom.

    PHI will have cap space so just join the two deals and make it realistic: Deslauriers at 50% and Seeler for cap dump Petersen, two 3rds and a 4th and a meh prospect, Akili Thomas?


    I like your counter proposal. Good for a rebuilding team and good for a team that lacks touchness and cap space.
    Hammerwise a aimé ceci.
    16 mars 2023 à 7 h 21
    #4
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: oct. 2022
    Messages: 1,278
    Mentions "j'aime": 511
    Quoting: pmorin21
    Mtl says no


    That would be funny if Hughes declined Xhekaj for a young 40-50 point OFD.
    16 mars 2023 à 7 h 41
    #5
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: août 2018
    Messages: 6,310
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,226
    Quoting: McSorley
    I like your counter proposal. Good for a rebuilding team and good for a team that lacks touchness and cap space.


    Kill two birds with one stone - you take PHI's cap issue and we take yours...instead of Gavrikov, PHI offers Sanheim, Deslauriers at 50%, they take Grundstrom, Petersen, kind of thing
    16 mars 2023 à 8 h 42
    #6
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mars 2021
    Messages: 253
    Mentions "j'aime": 28
    Quoting: McSorley
    That would be funny if Hughes declined Xhekaj for a young 40-50 point OFD.


    You can't say he would do the same in MTL. It would not be funny if Xhekaj move to the Kings, do +30 points, fights like hells, and Durzi does -20 points in only 50 games.
    I rather keeps Wifi! He's a hell of a player. Taller and bigger, finally a player who the Habs needs.
    16 mars 2023 à 8 h 54
    #7
    Hop on the Slaftrain
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: févr. 2019
    Messages: 16,131
    Mentions "j'aime": 20,442
    Quoting: McSorley
    That would be funny if Hughes declined Xhekaj for a young 40-50 point OFD.


    Why would Blake propose it then?
    pmorin21 et habitantlecolon a aimé ceci.
    16 mars 2023 à 9 h 28
    #8
    Le patriote
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: déc. 2018
    Messages: 6,258
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,372
    Quoting: McSorley
    That would be funny if Hughes declined Xhekaj for a young 40-50 point OFD.


    I can get behind that if Struble can prove to be a better suitor for stay at home and toughness grit. Durzi is a good kids too, but yeah why Blake would do that!!
    16 mars 2023 à 18 h 47
    #9
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: oct. 2022
    Messages: 1,278
    Mentions "j'aime": 511
    Quoting: SevenLeg
    Why would Blake propose it then?


    Because the Kings already have Doughty and Clarke. Need a big physical dman more.
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Soumettre le sondage