Forums/Armchair-GM

Who wants Peeke

Créé par: Hockey_Mind
Équipe: 2023-24 Blue Jackets de Columbus
Date de création initiale: 14 mars 2023
Publié: 15 mars 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
It’s June 28th. We’re at the NHL entry draft and Columbus is about to take Bedard 1OA.

Jarmo informs his fellow GMs that he’s listening to offers on Peeke.

Make an offer.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
21 250 000 $
21 150 000 $
11 525 000 $
CRÉÉANSCAP HIT
Bedard, Connor
3950 000 $
Transactions
1.
2.
CBJ
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (MTL)
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2025 (EDM)
Détails additionnels:
This is just the initial ask.

Make an offer.
Rachats de contrats
ANNÉE DE REPÊCHAGE1E RONDE2E RONDE3E RONDE4E RONDE5E RONDE6E RONDE7E RONDE
2023
Logo de CBJ
Logo de LAK
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CGY
Logo de CBJ
Logo de WPG
Logo de BOS
Logo de CBJ
2024
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de MTL
Logo de CBJ
Logo de LAK
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
2025
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de EDM
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de VGK
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2383 500 000 $67 176 666 $0 $4 550 000 $16 323 334 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
9 750 000 $9 750 000 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
8 700 000 $8 700 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance1 850 000 $$2M)
AG, C
RFA - 1
Bedard, Connor
950 000 $950 000 $
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
1 525 000 $1 525 000 $
AG, C, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
C
RFA - 1
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
1 600 000 $1 600 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
AD, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
1 150 000 $1 150 000 $
AD
RFA
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
9 583 333 $9 583 333 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
918 333 $918 333 $ (Bonis de performance1 000 000 $$1M)
DD
RFA - 3
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
5 400 000 $5 400 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Flames de Calgary
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
2 600 000 $2 600 000 $
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
1 050 000 $1 050 000 $
G
RFA - 2
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
825 000 $825 000 $
DG/DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
2 333 333 $2 333 333 $
DG/DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
975 000 $975 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
900 000 $900 000 $
AD, AG
RFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
15 mars à 10 h 20
#1
Virgin
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2022
Messages: 198
Mentions "j'aime": 41
why not boqvist?
Ajp_18 a aimé ceci.
15 mars à 10 h 22
#2
GO FLAMES GO
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 16,594
Mentions "j'aime": 9,510
We would need retention to take Roslovic. 300k space with a 18 man roster
15 mars à 10 h 33
#3
Pop Pop
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 13,568
Mentions "j'aime": 7,515
I'm not sure you get 2 2nds but he's cost controlled you'll get something decent.
Hockey_Mind et Prime_Jimbo a aimé ceci.
15 mars à 12 h 11
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 943
Mentions "j'aime": 765
i'm fully on team buy out gudbranson
15 mars à 13 h 8
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2018
Messages: 9,803
Mentions "j'aime": 6,400
I’d rather move Boqvist who has been majorly sheltered since coming back from injury, offensive zone starts, PP and against the other teams 3rd or 4th line only. Gudbranson and Peeke has been playing vs the other teams top lines when they should be playing vs the 3rd or 4th line and in shutdown roles. Columbus has a bad problem where they have solid depth player playing to high up the line up.
Hockey_Mind a aimé ceci.
15 mars à 15 h 49
#6
Indy
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2022
Messages: 178
Mentions "j'aime": 143
Quoting: Gmonwy
We would need retention to take Roslovic. 300k space with a 18 man roster


I know y'all are heading to Cap Hell but I would absolutely give you relief for 50% personally. Its only 1 year on our end and I really want the Gudbranson whisperer on our team. Like in my own Armchair roster my highest priority would be getting Zadorov as an LHD3 to pair with Gudbranson when really we really should be an LHD2 on the open market but really CBJ needs 2 defensemen on the left side while waiting for the kids to develop and Zadorov fits that timeline perfectly!
15 mars à 15 h 54
#7
GO FLAMES GO
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 16,594
Mentions "j'aime": 9,510
Quoting: Indy
I know y'all are heading to Cap Hell but I would absolutely give you relief for 50% personally. Its only 1 year on our end and I really want the Gudbranson whisperer on our team. Like in my own Armchair roster my highest priority would be getting Zadorov as an LHD3 to pair with Gudbranson when really we really should be an LHD2 on the open market but really CBJ needs 2 defensemen on the left side while waiting for the kids to develop and Zadorov fits that timeline perfectly!


Would it be 1:1 or would we have to add? I may make a team based on this concept.
15 mars à 15 h 55
#8
Démarrer sujet
Be formless
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2016
Messages: 2,212
Mentions "j'aime": 647
Quoting: Gmonwy
Would it be 1:1 or would we have to add? I may make a team based on this concept.


Columbus would need something back for retaining. It could be a later pick, like maybe a 4th.
15 mars à 15 h 57
#9
Indy
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2022
Messages: 178
Mentions "j'aime": 143
Modifié 15 mars à 16 h 3
Quoting: Gmonwy
Would it be 1:1 or would we have to add? I may make a team based on this concept.


I was just thinking about doing that was based around picks but I was just throwing my 2 cents in. In my unpublished roster I was going to offer a 2024 2nd and 2023 3rd but didn't want to insult Calgary with something like that so I was thinking of something that would work. While we need a LHD2 for sure I am personally not happy with Bean being the LHD3 next year and while I love Blankenburg to death he gets injured a lot so I think Columbus really needs an additional LHD3 for 2-3 years while Mateychuck and Svozil finish their development. Plus I love a guy that can hopefully help 4x4 show some life, the idea of having 2 big guys taking defensive zone faceoffs and ensuring nobody parks their *** right in front of the crease would be great as I seen enough of that this year.
15 mars à 16 h 3
#10
GO FLAMES GO
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 16,594
Mentions "j'aime": 9,510
Quoting: Indy
I was just thinking about doing that was based around picks but I was just throwing my 2 cents in. While we need a LHD2 for sure I am personally not happy with Bean being the LHD3 next year and while I love Blankenburg to death he gets injured a lot so I think Columbus really needs an additional LHD3 for 2-3 years while Mateychuck and Svozil finish their development. Plus I love a guy that can hopefully help 4x4 show some life, the idea of having 2 big guys taking defensive zone faceoffs and ensuring nobody parks their *** right in front of the crease would be great as I seen enough of that this year.


Can he play on the wing?
15 mars à 16 h 6
#11
Indy
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2022
Messages: 178
Mentions "j'aime": 143
Quoting: Gmonwy
Can he play on the wing?


That's honestly where she should be playing. Personally I have defended the kid saying he will probably be much better on the wing because being a center is too much responsibility for him. He's so gifted but his hockey IQ is...inconsistent. Personally I think if he ends on the wing he probably could highroll into a 2nd liner with all that raw talent he has and why I said I want to see him on the wing before CBJ dumps him. Our problem is we don't have enough Centers and way too many wings right now so there wouldn't be a spot for him there here.
Hockey_Mind a aimé ceci.
16 mars à 14 h 8
#12
Démarrer sujet
Be formless
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2016
Messages: 2,212
Mentions "j'aime": 647
Modifié 16 mars à 14 h 14
Quoting: Brian_Lee_Harvey_Oswald
why not boqvist?


Quoting: BJ_Lover
i'm fully on team buy out gudbranson


Quoting: Ajp_18
I’d rather move Boqvist who has been majorly sheltered since coming back from injury, offensive zone starts, PP and against the other teams 3rd or 4th line only. Gudbranson and Peeke has been playing vs the other teams top lines when they should be playing vs the 3rd or 4th line and in shutdown roles. Columbus has a bad problem where they have solid depth player playing to high up the line up.


Buying out Gudbranson isn't going to happen because he's too much of a leader in the room and his presence is needed with such a young blue-line.

I like Peeke, he is solid as a 3rd pair defensive d-man, but CBJ need dmen who can score also, and aside from Werenski, Boqvist (and maybe Bean when he's healthy) is the only other scoring dmen.

With Jiricek coming in next year I think he'll be a little more balanced offensively and defensively, but I don't expect him to put up more than 25 points in his rookie year, so he's probably more likely to replace one of those three defensive guys so Boqvist can create some offense on the second pair.

Blankenburg, Peeke and Gudbranson are all defensive and should be on the third pair. Peeke has the most value of those three so I think he's gone.
16 mars à 14 h 56
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2018
Messages: 9,803
Mentions "j'aime": 6,400
Quoting: Hockey_Mind
Buying out Gudbranson isn't going to happen because he's too much of a leader in the room and his presence is needed with such a young blue-line.

I like Peeke, he is solid as a 3rd pair defensive d-man, but CBJ need dmen who can score also, and aside from Werenski, Boqvist (and maybe Bean when he's healthy) is the only other scoring dmen.

With Jiricek coming in next year I think he'll be a little more balanced offensively and defensively, but I don't expect him to put up more than 25 points in his rookie year, so he's probably more likely to replace one of those three defensive guys so Boqvist can create some offense on the second pair.

Blankenburg, Peeke and Gudbranson are all defensive and should be on the third pair. Peeke has the most value of those three so I think he's gone.


Columbus also has more offensive defenseman coming and Peeke is arguably the best defensive game we now have and he still has some offensive potential, reminder he is still only 24. Boqvist has the most value and honestly if he isn’t on the PP he’s basically useless, Bean is in the same boat but since he is a LHD Columbus probably should keep him and let him run on PP2 and Werenski on PP1.
Hockey_Mind a aimé ceci.
16 mars à 15 h 5
#14
Démarrer sujet
Be formless
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2016
Messages: 2,212
Mentions "j'aime": 647
Quoting: Ajp_18
Columbus also has more offensive defenseman coming and Peeke is arguably the best defensive game we now have and he still has some offensive potential, reminder he is still only 24. Boqvist has the most value and honestly if he isn’t on the PP he’s basically useless, Bean is in the same boat but since he is a LHD Columbus probably should keep him and let him run on PP2 and Werenski on PP1.


You're not wrong. I think it just depends on what deals or FAs are available and what Jarmo can pull off. There are definitely a lot of options this summer to revamp the defense.
Ajp_18 a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage