SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

EK65

Équipe: 2023-24 Sabres de Buffalo
Date de création initiale: 8 mars 2023
Publié: 8 mars 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
3925 000 $
RFAANSCAP HIT
3900 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
21 750 000 $
31 350 000 $
23 250 000 $
2900 000 $
Transactions
BUF
  1. Karlsson, Erik (2 000 000 $ retained)
SJS
  1. Bryson, Jacob
  2. Comrie, Eric
  3. Jokiharju, Henri
  4. Jost, Tyson [Droits de RFA]
  5. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (BUF)
  6. Choix de 3e ronde en 2024 (BUF)
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2023
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de PHI
Logo de LAK
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
2024
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
2025
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de NSH
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2383 500 000 $71 977 737 $0 $3 145 000 $11 522 263 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
9 000 000 $9 000 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
7 142 857 $7 142 857 $
C
UFA - 7
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
855 833 $855 833 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
7 100 000 $7 100 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 7
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
AG, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance412 500 $$412K)
C, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
916 667 $916 667 $ (Bonis de performance1 850 000 $$2M)
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
4 285 714 $4 285 714 $
DG
UFA - 7
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
837 500 $837 500 $
G
RFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
687 500 $687 500 $
DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
900 000 $900 000 $
DG/DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
925 000 $925 000 $
DG
RFA - 2
900 000 $900 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
8 mars 2023 à 11 h 55
#1
Josh Anderson Sucks
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2022
Messages: 4,816
Mentions "j'aime": 2,006
Seems like a lose-lose tbh. EK could get more and Buffalo should only do this for 4+ mil retention. Everyone will be getting paid soon, so its best to get EKs deal down to 7-8 or so IMO
gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
8 mars 2023 à 12 h 17
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2023
Messages: 441
Mentions "j'aime": 131
Meh
8 mars 2023 à 12 h 21
#3
Grierless Sharks Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2017
Messages: 2,962
Mentions "j'aime": 927
Buffalo seems like the last team that needs EK65 with Dahlin and Powers.

If anyone from the Sharks went there, I figure it'd be Couture.
gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
8 mars 2023 à 12 h 28
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 1,161
Mentions "j'aime": 437
Quoting: oliver_wahlstrom
Seems like a lose-lose tbh. EK could get more and Buffalo should only do this for 4+ mil retention. Everyone will be getting paid soon, so its best to get EKs deal down to 7-8 or so IMO


No way Sharks would even get this for EK65, even with retention. Nobody is vying for that contract.
gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
8 mars 2023 à 13 h 6
#5
Démarrer sujet
Fort Erie to LA
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 281
Mentions "j'aime": 43
Quoting: saysthemachine
No way Sharks would even get this for EK65, even with retention. Nobody is vying for that contract.


That’s not a bad cap hit to take. The cap is going up in 24-25 and we have a lot of room.
8 mars 2023 à 13 h 37
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 8,133
Mentions "j'aime": 3,625
Quoting: saysthemachine
No way Sharks would even get this for EK65, even with retention. Nobody is vying for that contract.


Nobody wants a 100 point defenseman at a proper cap hit for a discount return like it has here? Oh please, get out of here
8 mars 2023 à 14 h 14
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 1,161
Mentions "j'aime": 437
Quoting: glarson17
Nobody wants a 100 point defenseman at a proper cap hit for a discount return like it has here? Oh please, get out of here


This deal could have materialized already if it were the case, while he's a year younger, giving you another year of value on the contract. He's going to be paid until he's 37. Even though he's a pretty lauded player, this level of production isn't normal for him. He's shooting 4% higher than his average, when he was healthy. It doesn't make sense to look at his production this year absent of context, or to expect most of the years remaining of his deal to match this level of production, which is why it makes sense that there was only one team in on him this TDL. (EDM)

That's not to say that he isn't a great player, or that you look at the info above and not still take the chance regardless. Just that there aren't going to be so many suiters that you'd get close to this level of an offer. Realistically, you're going to talking about 1-2 teams total who this type of move is within the real of possibility.
8 mars 2023 à 17 h 15
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 8,133
Mentions "j'aime": 3,625
Quoting: saysthemachine
This deal could have materialized already if it were the case, while he's a year younger, giving you another year of value on the contract. He's going to be paid until he's 37. Even though he's a pretty lauded player, this level of production isn't normal for him. He's shooting 4% higher than his average, when he was healthy. It doesn't make sense to look at his production this year absent of context, or to expect most of the years remaining of his deal to match this level of production, which is why it makes sense that there was only one team in on him this TDL. (EDM)

That's not to say that he isn't a great player, or that you look at the info above and not still take the chance regardless. Just that there aren't going to be so many suiters that you'd get close to this level of an offer. Realistically, you're going to talking about 1-2 teams total who this type of move is within the real of possibility.


Whose to say he won’t do this again? After all his injuries he’s stayed healthy this year and already has a career high in points this year. Likely will be the first dman to score 100 points in a season in 30 years. $9.5 mil for that is more than fair.

In this trade the sharks get a pick likely in the 20s, a pick in the 90ish range, an ahl goalie, a 4C, a 5th and a 6/7th dman. That’s a steal for Buffalo
8 mars 2023 à 18 h 11
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 1,161
Mentions "j'aime": 437
Quoting: glarson17
Whose to say he won’t do this again? After all his injuries he’s stayed healthy this year and already has a career high in points this year. Likely will be the first dman to score 100 points in a season in 30 years. $9.5 mil for that is more than fair.

In this trade the sharks get a pick likely in the 20s, a pick in the 90ish range, an ahl goalie, a 4C, a 5th and a 6/7th dman. That’s a steal for Buffalo


The odds say that he won't do this again. He's shooting 11.5%. Josi got to 96 last year shooting 8.2%, so it's not that much more impressive what EK65 is doing. Everyone regresses from record years. Josi is closer to his average this year than where he was last year. Whether or not he does it again doesn't matter because the odds are against him, his history is against him, his age is against him, and most importantly his contract is against him. There are only a couple of teams that could theortically fit him in, nobody that will do it without retention, and not enough bidders to get more for him than probably a 1st and (since Greer likes qty) a few C/D prospects. What is really of value to SJ here is the 9.5m of cap space dealing him would free up.
8 mars 2023 à 18 h 38
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 8,133
Mentions "j'aime": 3,625
Quoting: saysthemachine
The odds say that he won't do this again. He's shooting 11.5%. Josi got to 96 last year shooting 8.2%, so it's not that much more impressive what EK65 is doing. Everyone regresses from record years. Josi is closer to his average this year than where he was last year. Whether or not he does it again doesn't matter because the odds are against him, his history is against him, his age is against him, and most importantly his contract is against him. There are only a couple of teams that could theortically fit him in, nobody that will do it without retention, and not enough bidders to get more for him than probably a 1st and (since Greer likes qty) a few C/D prospects. What is really of value to SJ here is the 9.5m of cap space dealing him would free up.


Lol Karlsson on a bottom three team in the league putting up these numbers is way better than what Josi did on a playoff team last year. If what you suggest the sharks would get is true, San Jose just keeps him. Karlsson likes San Jose, the contract isn’t really an issue either as they won’t be good until it’s up.
9 mars 2023 à 9 h 19
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 1,161
Mentions "j'aime": 437
Quoting: glarson17
Lol Karlsson on a bottom three team in the league putting up these numbers is way better than what Josi did on a playoff team last year. If what you suggest the sharks would get is true, San Jose just keeps him. Karlsson likes San Jose, the contract isn’t really an issue either as they won’t be good until it’s up.


With how bad of a job Grier has been doing, I do believe SJ ends up just keeping him. He might help sell tickets during this time, and it's understandable to keep him for those reasons, but If he found any deal at all that would free up even 8m in additional cap space, most GMs in his shoes would do it.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage