SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Mantha to NJ for Playoffs

Créé par: srof12
Équipe: 2022-23 Devils du New Jersey
Date de création initiale: 1 mars 2023
Publié: 1 mars 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Adding Mantha makes us deeper and bigger. Could play up the lineup in a pinch.

Caps fans. Don't roast me. What would he realistically cost with some retention? His production looks pretty low this year.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
3950 000 $
Transactions
NJD
  1. Mantha, Anthony (1 500 000 $ retained)
WSH
  1. Blackwood, Mackenzie
  2. Foote, Nolan
  3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2024 (NJD)
Détails additionnels:
3rd becomes 23 2nd if Devils reach 2nd round or ECF

I have no clue what Mantha would cost in a trade. Do caps fans want him gone to free space? What is he worth right now?
Rachats de contrats
Frais appliqués
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2023
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
2024
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de COL
Logo de NJD
2025
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2382 500 000 $77 302 458 $0 $482 500 $5 197 542 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
C
UFA - 8
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
5 450 000 $5 450 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
7 250 000 $7 250 000 $
C
UFA - 5
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance400 000 $$400K)
AD, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
2 375 000 $2 375 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Capitals de Washington
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
975 000 $975 000 $
C
RFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
825 000 $825 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
3 200 000 $3 200 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
874 125 $874 125 $
C, AG
RFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
1 125 000 $1 125 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
9 000 000 $9 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
3 400 000 $3 400 000 $
G
UFA - 3
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
3 166 667 $3 166 667 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
4 400 000 $4 400 000 $
DD
UFA - 5
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
850 833 $850 833 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
G
RFA - 2
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
950 000 $950 000 $
DG/DD
RFA - 3
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
4 166 666 $4 166 666 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
DG/DD, AG
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
4 125 000 $4 125 000 $
G
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
1 mars 2023 à 11 h 30
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 39,600
Mentions "j'aime": 18,154
Is he any good though? Surely there are better, cheaper, options.
1 mars 2023 à 12 h 23
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 3,236
Mentions "j'aime": 1,852
With no retention, take him for free. With retention though there would need to be something more significant coming back than what you have here, otherwise caps will just wait and make a decision in the offseason
1 mars 2023 à 12 h 41
#3
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2022
Messages: 74
Mentions "j'aime": 25
Quoting: qc14
With no retention, take him for free. With retention though there would need to be something more significant coming back than what you have here, otherwise caps will just wait and make a decision in the offseason


Theoretically we could make this same trade with no retention. There's space. But a 3rd/2nd and a decent prospect in Foote for retaining 1.5 million feels pretty fair no?
1 mars 2023 à 12 h 45
#4
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2022
Messages: 74
Mentions "j'aime": 25
Quoting: NHLfan10506
Is he any good though? Surely there are better, cheaper, options.


He's probably not worth 5.7 right now, but he was on average a 2.3 GSVA player and averaged a 55 point pace over the previous 3 seasons. I think he could get back close to that with us. Not many guys available with that kind of upside with size, and relatively cheap, trade asset wise. He's missed a bunch of time recently but it's a relatively low risk, high reward swing, that, at worst is only on the books for another season.
1 mars 2023 à 12 h 49
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 39,600
Mentions "j'aime": 18,154
Quoting: srof12
He's probably not worth 5.7 right now, but he was on average a 2.3 GSVA player and averaged a 55 point pace over the previous 3 seasons. I think he could get back close to that with us. Not many guys available with that kind of upside with size, and relatively cheap, trade asset wise. He's missed a bunch of time recently but it's a relatively low risk, high reward swing, that, at worst is only on the books for another season.


Alright, I am at least intrigued. Not sold yet though.
srof12 a aimé ceci.
1 mars 2023 à 12 h 53
#6
Craig Laughlin Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2019
Messages: 5,216
Mentions "j'aime": 5,708
I can't imagine Washington would entertain any trade that involved retention given that they'll need cap space for next year and trading Mantha would be because of said cap space issues. I personally think Washington should hold onto him and let him play top 6 minutes under a different coach, but if they were to trade him, I don't think this return is very appealing to DC.

Washington has been reportedly only been entertaining trade offers for good value, no meager returns, which makes me think Mantha is unlikely to move (since most would agree his value is quite tarnished right now), and in this trade itself Blackwood brings no value to DC and would be viewed as a dump for them (wouldn't get time over Kumper and Lindgren). The Foote + Cond. 3rd part isn't horrible, (about what Washington had to add in to upgrade from Vrana to Mantha) but I think Washington would keep him for next year if the offer didn't start with a 2nd based on the previous trades/extension choices.
srof12 a aimé ceci.
1 mars 2023 à 13 h 16
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 3,236
Mentions "j'aime": 1,852
Quoting: srof12
Theoretically we could make this same trade with no retention. There's space. But a 3rd/2nd and a decent prospect in Foote for retaining 1.5 million feels pretty fair no?


Sure it's fair but doesn't mean its the best option for washington. They clearly are not gearing up to make the playoffs this year so they don't need the cap space right now. Laviolette almost certainly won't be back and a new coach might give Mantha higher usage. More teams will probably be willing to take a risk on Mantha in the summer when he only has one year left and their strategies are a bit more set. There's just no real downside to waiting on a Mantha move until this summer unless there is truly an offer you can't refuse. BMac has already proven he's not moving guys just to move them with the Jensen extension. Foote and a 3rd are nice, but not that nice.
srof12 a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage