SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

New Trade Deadline ideas

Créé par: Klara
Équipe: 2022-23 Sharks de San Jose
Date de création initiale: 9 févr. 2023
Publié: 9 févr. 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Feel free to burn me in the comments, unless you are BCarlo25
Transactions
1.
SJS
  1. Levi, Devon [Liste de réserve]
  2. Mittelstadt, Casey
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (BUF)
BUF
  1. Bonino, Nick
  2. Meier, Timo (3 000 000 $ retained)
Détails additionnels:
Any reason why I haven't seen anybody propose a trade like this yet?
2.
SJS
  1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (TOR)
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (TOR)
Détails additionnels:
Late 1st and Late 2nd
TOR
  1. Barabanov, Alexander
  2. Reimer, James
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (SJS)
  4. Choix de 3e ronde en 2023 (CAR)
Détails additionnels:
Early 2nd and Early 3rd (It really isn't as much movement as you think people)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2023
Logo de SJS
Logo de BUF
Logo de TOR
Logo de SJS
Logo de SEA
Logo de SJS
Logo de CBJ
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de VAN
2024
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de TOR
Logo de SJS
Logo de VGK
Logo de SJS
Logo de COL
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
2025
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2182 500 000 $72 266 668 $0 $32 500 $10 233 332 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
AG, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
6 750 000 $6 750 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
4 725 000 $4 725 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
750 000 $750 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
950 000 $950 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
916 667 $916 667 $
C, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
750 000 $750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
750 000 $750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
C
UFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 050 000 $1 050 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
850 000 $850 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
DG/DD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
867 500 $867 500 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
G
RFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
DG
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
762 500 $762 500 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
750 000 $750 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
AD, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $$250K)
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
9 févr. 2023 à 18 h 29
#1
Bad Take Bot v1.02
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 2,683
Mentions "j'aime": 1,879
I also find the idea of Toronto theoretically buying back Barabanov after losing him on waivers to be hilarious.
gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
9 févr. 2023 à 18 h 32
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 27,116
Mentions "j'aime": 14,135
I don't believe buffalo will trade Levi under any circumstances
RavensShadow a aimé ceci.
9 févr. 2023 à 18 h 32
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 11,197
Mentions "j'aime": 5,207
don't see TOR going for Barabanov after it was such an awful fit for some reason last time. Value good or not I just don't see that happening.
gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
9 févr. 2023 à 18 h 36
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2023
Messages: 3,041
Mentions "j'aime": 1,024
Dubas just said he would not be trading 1st (or Knies) for rentals; of course that might not be true. The picks coming back help (as you pointed out) but no need for Reimer & Barabanov not the type of player we need imo
gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
9 févr. 2023 à 18 h 43
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 10,959
Mentions "j'aime": 4,535
Quoting: Klara
I also find the idea of Toronto theoretically buying back Barabanov after losing him on waivers to be hilarious.


You traded him to us for a player no one remembers, Suomela i think.
9 févr. 2023 à 18 h 49
#6
Shibbal18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2016
Messages: 25,166
Mentions "j'aime": 8,983
Sabres don't need retention, nor Bonino, but other than that they'd probably offer one of their plethora of quality forward prospects instead of Levi
sabres89, Lenny54 et RavensShadow a aimé ceci.
9 févr. 2023 à 18 h 50
#7
Démarrer sujet
Bad Take Bot v1.02
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 2,683
Mentions "j'aime": 1,879
Quoting: Rob32sjsharks
You traded him to us for a player no one remembers, Suomela i think.


ah your right, it was so pointless, I forgot it was even a trade.
9 févr. 2023 à 18 h 52
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2022
Messages: 1,982
Mentions "j'aime": 1,344
Quoting: littlejerryseinfeld
I don't believe buffalo will trade Levi under any circumstances


This is very tempting, tbh. If Meier does not go above 8,5 on 8 yrs deal, I would really really consider that.
jordanrules a aimé ceci.
9 févr. 2023 à 18 h 54
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 10,959
Mentions "j'aime": 4,535
Quoting: Klara
ah your right, it was so pointless, I forgot it was even a trade.


I never will. from day 1 he has been a fantastic addition to the team.
yes he isn't a goal scorer and his defense while not bad, could be better.
but his puck movement 50/50 battles along the boards and passing have been superb.
the perfect complimentary piece for a line.
Last year i wondered if it was just because of being with Hertl and Meier, but this year with Couture he is still putting up solid numbers and Couture is having his best season in the last few years. cant be a coincidence.
9 févr. 2023 à 19 h 0
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 27,116
Mentions "j'aime": 14,135
Quoting: Czu8iks
This is very tempting, tbh. If Meier does not go above 8,5 on 8 yrs deal, I would really really consider that.


It is tempting
9 févr. 2023 à 19 h 2
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2023
Messages: 441
Mentions "j'aime": 131
Pass
gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
9 févr. 2023 à 19 h 24
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 1,047
Mentions "j'aime": 847
I don’t think a Carolina 3rd counts as an early third.
9 févr. 2023 à 19 h 26
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 8,017
Mentions "j'aime": 3,565
Both are bad trades for San Jose imo. Don’t trade a 40 goal scorer for a goalie. San Jose isn’t moving a 50 point cheap winger with a pick in the 30s for a pick in the 20s
9 févr. 2023 à 19 h 28
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2017
Messages: 8,123
Mentions "j'aime": 6,130
Quoting: Shibbal18
Sabres don't need retention, nor Bonino, but other than that they'd probably offer one of their plethora of quality forward prospects instead of Levi


Yeah, I mean just looking at the Athletics prospect rankings, we had 4 forwards (savoie, kulich, ostlund, and rosen) plus Levi at 4th. That's a bunch of first round picks, three of which play center, that belong to a team that has been scoring pretty well. From a value standpoint, if you wanted a prospect, the forwards should be more appealing. We need a goalie, goalie prospects are voodoo, and center prospects are very valuable (first round ones anyways).
gretzkyghosts, BUFF36, homiedaclown and 1 other person a aimé ceci.
9 févr. 2023 à 19 h 32
#15
Démarrer sujet
Bad Take Bot v1.02
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 2,683
Mentions "j'aime": 1,879
Quoting: sabresparaavida
I don’t think a Carolina 3rd counts as an early third.


Oops, that can be considered the 2024 SJ 3rd then.
9 févr. 2023 à 19 h 35
#16
Démarrer sujet
Bad Take Bot v1.02
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 2,683
Mentions "j'aime": 1,879
Quoting: sabres89
Yeah, I mean just looking at the Athletics prospect rankings, we had 4 forwards (savoie, kulich, ostlund, and rosen) plus Levi at 4th. That's a bunch of first round picks, three of which play center, that belong to a team that has been scoring pretty well. From a value standpoint, if you wanted a prospect, the forwards should be more appealing. We need a goalie, goalie prospects are voodoo, and center prospects are very valuable (first round ones anyways).


The sharks haven't had a good goalie prospect in a million years, and they have only long shot prospects. Goalie prospects are a lot more certain a few years after the draft versus at the draft.
9 févr. 2023 à 19 h 35
#17
Démarrer sujet
Bad Take Bot v1.02
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 2,683
Mentions "j'aime": 1,879
Quoting: glarson17
Both are bad trades for San Jose imo. Don’t trade a 40 goal scorer for a goalie. San Jose isn’t moving a 50 point cheap winger with a pick in the 30s for a pick in the 20s


Strongly strongly disagree, especially on the BUF trade.
9 févr. 2023 à 19 h 49
#18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2022
Messages: 381
Mentions "j'aime": 262
I think Buffalo could agree to that IF they could get Portillo to sign.
Klara et BUFF36 a aimé ceci.
9 févr. 2023 à 19 h 57
#19
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 5,591
Mentions "j'aime": 4,729
Change it to Portillo and I will add a 2024 2nd
Lenny54 et RavensShadow a aimé ceci.
9 févr. 2023 à 19 h 57
#20
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 1,210
Mentions "j'aime": 649
Quoting: Shibbal18
Sabres don't need retention, nor Bonino, but other than that they'd probably offer one of their plethora of quality forward prospects instead of Levi


Agreed matter of fact put Portillo in Levi's place and add a little something else.

In Adam's presser today he mentioned Levi and didn't say anything about Portillo when asked about the future of the goaltending.
BUFF36, sabres89 et Shibbal18 a aimé ceci.
9 févr. 2023 à 20 h 2
#21
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 1,210
Mentions "j'aime": 649
Quoting: Klara
The sharks haven't had a good goalie prospect in a million years, and they have only long shot prospects. Goalie prospects are a lot more certain a few years after the draft versus at the draft.


how bout Portillo, Ostlund and a 24 first.
I went to the 24 first bc I think Adams wants one more solid draft.
With 3 seconds it gives him some maneuverability at the draft to move back into the 1st round or secure a defenseman at the TDL
BUFF36 et homiedaclown a aimé ceci.
9 févr. 2023 à 20 h 5
#22
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 7,136
Mentions "j'aime": 3,156
Quoting: Klara
The sharks haven't had a good goalie prospect in a million years, and they have only long shot prospects. Goalie prospects are a lot more certain a few years after the draft versus at the draft.


Sabres aren’t gonna move Levi though
Even though UPL has been good for us, Levi is still seen as our goalie of the future

We are deep at forward prospects though,
we’d likely include 1 or 2 of them in a trade to you guys
Lenny54 a aimé ceci.
9 févr. 2023 à 20 h 6
#23
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 7,136
Mentions "j'aime": 3,156
Quoting: KingMurray
I think Buffalo could agree to that IF they could get Portillo to sign.


Still highly unlikely
Better bet that we’d send them Portillo & a forward prospect
Lenny54 et KingMurray a aimé ceci.
9 févr. 2023 à 20 h 8
#24
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 5,591
Mentions "j'aime": 4,729
Quoting: Lenny54
how bout Portillo, Ostlund and a 24 first.
I went to the 24 first bc I think Adams wants one more solid draft.
With 3 seconds it gives him some maneuverability at the draft to move back into the 1st round or secure a defenseman at the TDL


20 to 65 could be the sweet spot for D in this upcoming draft.
Lenny54 a aimé ceci.
9 févr. 2023 à 20 h 12
#25
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 257
Mentions "j'aime": 62
I feel the Sabres would rather trade one of the 4 first round prospects than give up 23 first. I also don’t see the Sabres going after timo who is outside the Sabres pay structure
Lenny54 a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage