SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Jetts Sharks

Créé par: sharcuda22
Équipe: 2022-23 Sharks de San Jose
Date de création initiale: 6 févr. 2023
Publié: 6 févr. 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
LA trade is not the focus, or realistic. Whatcha think about the Jetts trade, saw it in a Masiak article
Transactions
1.
SJS
  1. McGroarty, Rutger [Liste de réserve]
  2. Samberg, Dylan
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (WPG)
2.
SJS
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2023 (NJD)
PIT
  1. Bonino, Nick (1 025 000 $ retained)
3.
SJS
  1. Petersen, Cal
  2. Spence, Jordan
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (LAK)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2023
Logo de SJS
Logo de WPG
Logo de SJS
Logo de CAR
Logo de NJD
Logo de SJS
Logo de SEA
Logo de SJS
Logo de CBJ
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de VAN
2024
Logo de SJS
Logo de LAK
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de VGK
Logo de SJS
Logo de COL
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
2025
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2382 500 000 $75 493 335 $0 $350 000 $7 006 665 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
894 167 $894 167 $
AG
RFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
6 750 000 $6 750 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
4 725 000 $4 725 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
916 667 $916 667 $
C, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
750 000 $750 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
950 000 $950 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
C
UFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 050 000 $1 050 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
750 000 $750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
850 000 $850 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance350 000 $$350K)
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
DG/DD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
DG
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
DD
UFA - 4
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
762 500 $762 500 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
AD, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $$250K)
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
750 000 $750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
6 févr. 2023 à 22 h 29
#26
Démarrer sujet
sharcuda22
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2022
Messages: 1,742
Mentions "j'aime": 550
Quoting: sharcuda22
I am not disagreeing with you, I said that in the description...
buying out Peterson comes with a 5 mil cap hit followed by 100,000, followed by 2 years at 1.6 million according to the buy out calculator. so you'd really do it to get 4 million in space to add this year + next year you'd save the 5 to buy him out.. after that you can probably manage. Is 9mil cap dump worth spence + first


ah just saw your post about the burying him next year as well so it would be saving 3.86 +1.6+2.1 =7.5 ish
6 févr. 2023 à 22 h 30
#27
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 14,506
Mentions "j'aime": 6,125
Quoting: sharcuda22
ah just saw your post about the burying him next year as well so it would be saving 3.86 +1.6+2.1 =7.5 ish


$3.85 + $1M + $2M
6 févr. 2023 à 22 h 40
#28
MisstheWhalers
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 23,627
Mentions "j'aime": 12,353
Quoting: Windjammer
Unfortunately, I don't think there's even a slight chance Meier signs long term in Winnipeg. Plus as you mentioned the Jets really need to save dollars to sign PLD and then Helly and Scheifele the following year plus with any luck get a good top 4 RHD. They just don't have the cap space for a high dollar winger.


Yeah I just don't see Meier signing in Winnipeg, hope Chevy focuses on a guy with some term or some lower cost additions then adding a guy who while a great player is likely just a rental.

Also don't see their defense as its presently built being anywhere remotely close to a defense that could win a cup, if good assets like 1sts/A-prospects are gonna be traded it should probably be for a dman even if they have too much cap tied up on the blueline.
Windjammer a aimé ceci.
6 févr. 2023 à 22 h 48
#29
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 15,696
Mentions "j'aime": 6,969
Quoting: MisstheWhalers
Yeah I just don't see Meier signing in Winnipeg, hope Chevy focuses on a guy with some term or some lower cost additions then adding a guy who while a great player is likely just a rental.

Also don't see their defense as its presently built being anywhere remotely close to a defense that could win a cup, if good assets like 1sts/A-prospects are gonna be traded it should probably be for a dman even if they have too much cap tied up on the blueline.


Right. Ideally the Jets would be able to find a top 4 RHD and a top 9 forward. I think we'd both agree that isn't likely, but a younger, top 4 defenseman with some team control left would definitely be worth moving the 1st and/or top assets for. Then as you said they'd just need to balance the salaries in the off season to bring the defense cost down a bit.
MisstheWhalers a aimé ceci.
6 févr. 2023 à 23 h 8
#30
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 11,155
Mentions "j'aime": 4,640
Quoting: sharcuda22
ah just saw your post about the burying him next year as well so it would be saving 3.86 +1.6+2.1 =7.5 ish


that amount is 100% worth a 1st plus. given past deals we have seen
7 févr. 2023 à 9 h 39
#31
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 626
Mentions "j'aime": 408
I would do this trade in a heartbeat for WPG if there was some kind of extension negotiated with Meier. Hell, I'd even take a 3 to 4 year deal. Unfortunately, I don't see Meier extending and a $10M QO for another year is just nuts. I actually have this identical trade in my draft, but it's for my eyes only when I feel like fantasizing smile
7 févr. 2023 à 10 h 8
#32
Démarrer sujet
sharcuda22
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2022
Messages: 1,742
Mentions "j'aime": 550
Quoting: CF18GM
I would do this trade in a heartbeat for WPG if there was some kind of extension negotiated with Meier. Hell, I'd even take a 3 to 4 year deal. Unfortunately, I don't see Meier extending and a $10M QO for another year is just nuts. I actually have this identical trade in my draft, but it's for my eyes only when I feel like fantasizing smile

the jets would definitely have an idea of whether or not meier would extend before the deal was made
7 févr. 2023 à 14 h 20
#33
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 3,649
Mentions "j'aime": 1,620
Quoting: sharcuda22
oh to be an illiterate kings fan. life would be simple and blissful. Point of this discussion was to talk about the Winnipeg trade but alas, I have incurred the wrath of all of the kings fans who could have just chosen not to comment, but instead need to make a point about an unrealistic trade to someone who *checks notes* called the trade unrealistic.

Posters like you say things like “unrealistic “ because you know the post is going to get **** on.

Hence why you’re getting **** on. Period.
7 févr. 2023 à 14 h 27
#34
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2022
Messages: 87
Mentions "j'aime": 22
Quoting: Windjammer
Way too much from Winnipeg for a rental, no chance they consider that.


Agree with you, @Windjammer... these are two (2) assets (McGroarty & Samberg) that should remain with Jets.. there are other assets that can be used in trade discussions.
Windjammer a aimé ceci.
7 févr. 2023 à 14 h 35
#35
Démarrer sujet
sharcuda22
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2022
Messages: 1,742
Mentions "j'aime": 550
Quoting: KINGS67
Posters like you say things like “unrealistic “ because you know the post is going to get **** on.

Hence why you’re getting **** on. Period.


I did it cuz it was fun and I didn't want to just post a 30 second one trade team, I apologize I forgot LA critical thinking skills areeeeeee ____________
7 févr. 2023 à 15 h 51
#36
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 3,649
Mentions "j'aime": 1,620
Quoting: sharcuda22
I did it cuz it was fun and I didn't want to just post a 30 second one trade team, I apologize I forgot LA critical thinking skills areeeeeee ____________

“LA trade is not the focus, or realistic”

My point is just don’t do it when you know it’s crap.

In the back of your mind you thought some LA fan would agree with you. That’s why posters have to add unrealistic (even though I hope it is).

Have a good day
7 févr. 2023 à 19 h 13
#37
Démarrer sujet
sharcuda22
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2022
Messages: 1,742
Mentions "j'aime": 550
Quoting: KINGS67
“LA trade is not the focus, or realistic”

My point is just don’t do it when you know it’s crap.

In the back of your mind you thought some LA fan would agree with you. That’s why posters have to add unrealistic (even though I hope it is).

Have a good day


good lord u must be the life of parties my guy. I put unrealistic because it aint gonna happen. And never in my life have I hopped to engage with a kings fan and you are a prime example of why
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage