SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Are either of these players worth a 1st

Créé par: The_Rocket
Équipe: 2022-23 Canucks de Vancouver
Date de création initiale: 3 févr. 2023
Publié: 3 févr. 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
1.
VAN
  1. Johnsson, Andreas
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (NJD)
NJD
  1. Boeser, Brock (2 000 000 $ retained)
Détails additionnels:
Automatic 60 point pace winger for sub $5 milly
2.
VAN
  1. Comrie, Eric
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (BUF)
Détails additionnels:
Protected 1st
BUF
  1. Demko, Thatcher
Détails additionnels:
Quality starter with term at a good cap hit
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2023
Logo de VAN
Logo de NYI
Logo de NJD
Logo de BUF
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de NYR
Logo de VAN
2024
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
2025
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2182 500 000 $75 847 500 $1 250 000 $850 000 $6 652 500 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
7 350 000 $7 350 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
950 000 $950 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
825 000 $825 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 950 000 $4 950 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 4
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
3 400 000 $3 400 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
762 500 $762 500 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 150 000 $4 150 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
762 500 $762 500 $
AD, C
RFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
7 850 000 $7 850 000 $
DG
UFA - 5
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
1 800 000 $1 800 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
7 260 000 $7 260 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 800 000 $1 800 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
762 500 $762 500 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
850 000 $850 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
750 000 $750 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
750 000 $750 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
750 000 $750 000 $
AD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
3 févr. 2023 à 1 h 22
#1
GoNucks
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2022
Messages: 248
Mentions "j'aime": 109
Demko yes Boesser no
3 févr. 2023 à 1 h 24
#2
Démarrer sujet
Judd Bracket ripoff
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 6,917
Mentions "j'aime": 3,575
Quoting: JohnJohnson
Demko yes Boesser no


I think with Demko it depends heavily on health
3 févr. 2023 à 1 h 29
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2023
Messages: 3,478
Mentions "j'aime": 1,451
How is Boeser an "automatic 60 point winger"? He has had 55, 56, 45, 49 and 46 point seasons prior to this season.
Fox_Czar_Cup a aimé ceci.
3 févr. 2023 à 1 h 30
#4
BRUCE THERE IT IS
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2020
Messages: 1,635
Mentions "j'aime": 1,171
Boeser with significant retention will net a 1st. And Demko fetches a 1st depending on his play when he returns from injury
The_Rocket a aimé ceci.
3 févr. 2023 à 1 h 32
#5
Démarrer sujet
Judd Bracket ripoff
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 6,917
Mentions "j'aime": 3,575
Quoting: Onlyfairtrades1
How is Boeser an "automatic 60 point winger"? He has had 55, 56, 45, 49 and 46 point seasons prior to this season.


Automatic 60 point PACE winger. Only once in his career hd he scored at less than a 60 point pace and his career points per game is 64 points per 82 games
Mediumyeet et JohnJohnson a aimé ceci.
3 févr. 2023 à 1 h 58
#6
GoNucks
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2022
Messages: 248
Mentions "j'aime": 109
Quoting: The_Rocket
I think with Demko it depends heavily on health


Canucks won’t move him for anything less
3 févr. 2023 à 2 h 12
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2022
Messages: 2,615
Mentions "j'aime": 1,079
Demko probably, depending on the package. Boeser is not
Fox_Czar_Cup a aimé ceci.
3 févr. 2023 à 2 h 47
#8
Ex Nucks fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 17,615
Mentions "j'aime": 17,624
Only scenario where Boeser fetches a first is if the Canucks retain 50% or take another bad contract back
3 févr. 2023 à 2 h 49
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 363
Mentions "j'aime": 159
Why would the Sabres want to trade away their 1st rd pick for a goalie that's not better than the goalies they have?
Finn2016 et Fox_Czar_Cup a aimé ceci.
3 févr. 2023 à 2 h 54
#10
Ex Nucks fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 17,615
Mentions "j'aime": 17,624
Quoting: Buffalojonny
Why would the Sabres want to trade away their 1st rd pick for a goalie that's not better than the goalies they have?


Lol 15 bad games and all of a sudden Demko is worse than all the Sabres goalies? Hysterical...
3 févr. 2023 à 3 h 8
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 363
Mentions "j'aime": 159
Quoting: Juiceman
Lol 15 bad games and all of a sudden Demko is worse than all the Sabres goalies? Hysterical...


I'll take UPL any day over Demko! He has a .883 save %, and a .909 % for his career. He's an average goalie, no gm will give up a 1st for him.
3 févr. 2023 à 3 h 26
#12
me wan da poonani
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 4,857
Mentions "j'aime": 4,243
Some team could spend a 1st on Demko, but the Canucks are more likely to have to deal a 1st with Boeser then get a 1st back for him.
Patches and Björkstrand, both superior to Boeser went for nothing and next to nothing, respectively.
Boeser is getting outscored, ooutchanced and outshot at a terrible rate, meaning his points cost the Canucks a fair bit more than they are worth.

An on-ice net negative winger at 4.65m shouldn't return much of anything at this point in time.
If the Canucks can get the Björkstrand return for Boeser without retaining 50% then Alvin should jump on that opportunity.
3 févr. 2023 à 3 h 31
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2022
Messages: 599
Mentions "j'aime": 227
Demko last season is worth a 1st. Not right now though

Boeser on the other hand is worth a 3rd and 4th this season. The team would be lucky if they got a 2nd round pick or a 1st from him with salary retained.
3 févr. 2023 à 5 h 27
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 5,599
Mentions "j'aime": 4,731
Not to the Sabres he isn't. Again if UPL hadn't started playing better the last month or so it might be a more pressing need. The Sabres don't need to trade for Demko, and definitely not for a 1st if they did decide to.
Lenny54 a aimé ceci.
3 févr. 2023 à 7 h 53
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 1,219
Mentions "j'aime": 651
Modifié 3 févr. 2023 à 8 h 2
Whether Demko is worth a 1st or not is elementary as far as the Sabres are concerned...UPL has played fine, fine enough to take over the #1 goalie on the team.
Can't see the Sabres spending a 1st on a goalie as this team has more needs than a goalie right now.

My opinion for what it's worth is where in the first round the pick is...can't see a team trading a lottery pick and if protected and it goes to the 24 draft would be a big gambling bc if they weren't good in 23, there's no guarantee they will be better in 24.
3 févr. 2023 à 9 h 19
#16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 11,256
Mentions "j'aime": 8,898
Boeser definitely not. Demko not the way he has played this year, maybe in the off season but highly doubt it at the trade deadline.
3 févr. 2023 à 10 h 6
#17
Ex Nucks fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 17,615
Mentions "j'aime": 17,624
Quoting: Buffalojonny
I'll take UPL any day over Demko! He has a .883 save %, and a .909 % for his career. He's an average goalie, no gm will give up a 1st for him.


15 games bud. Don’t just look at save percentage. That’s a team stat
3 févr. 2023 à 10 h 14
#18
we miss leo k
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 5,961
Mentions "j'aime": 5,094
I don't think either of these guys gets a 1st rounder back - I agree with the idea that Boeser is probably worth a 3rd+4th with no retention, bump it to a 2nd + a prospect if Vancouver retains him down. If you're paying him $4M, you can overlook some of the warts in his game a little easier than you can at $6.65M.

As far as Demko, I don't think he's as bad as his numbers have shown this year, but I just don't think anyone's trading a 1st for any goalie - hell, Marc-Andre Fleury was the reigning Vezina winner and only got a 2nd rounder last deadline. In the last 5 years, the only goalie who was traded for a 1st rounder was the Avs trading for Darcy Kuemper before last season - and he was coming off a much better run (on a much worse team) than Demko has been on the last couple years. I just don't see a team ponying up that much value for any goalie, unless someone like Shesterkin/Sorokin/Vasilevskiy was put on the market.
3 févr. 2023 à 11 h 20
#19
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 3,236
Mentions "j'aime": 1,852
Even though no one should ever give up any significant assets for any goalie and Demko has had a bad year someone would definitely give up at least a first for Demko. Lets not forget that teams were supposedly willing to give up firsts this past summer for Gibson -- who has been on a run of mediocre to bad play that is like 4 years longer than Demko's. Buffalo and LAK would be obvious destinations, maybe SEA and DET are possible fits as well.

Boeser will absolutely not get a first, even retained. In the past 3 or so years its clear that NHL teams have completely devalued the high paid, middle tier of wingers that Boeser falls into. Bjorkstrand -- a better player coming off of a much stronger year -- got a 3rd and a 4th. Burakovsky a couple years ago with a much better contract situation got a 2nd and a 3rd. Connor Brown once again with a much better contract got a 2nd. Rakell with a much better contract got a 2nd and an ok goalie prospect. A 64 point pace certainly isn't bad, but teams want to spend the 4.5-7m that they used to spend on guys like Boeser on either centers or 2-3 guys who can in total put up a similar total and help out in other ways. Would NJD give up a first to spend 4.5m on Boeser, or would they instead keep it and spend the money on say Conor Sheary, Scott Mayfield, and a vet min extra defenseman in FA?

With Boeser especially, VAN is by far best off either swapping him for another distressed asset (Hoffman? Fabbri? Mantha?) or trying to rehabilitate his value for next years deadline when his contract becomes a bit more manageable.
The_Rocket a aimé ceci.
3 févr. 2023 à 13 h 6
#20
Démarrer sujet
Judd Bracket ripoff
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 6,917
Mentions "j'aime": 3,575
Quoting: qc14
Even though no one should ever give up any significant assets for any goalie and Demko has had a bad year someone would definitely give up at least a first for Demko. Lets not forget that teams were supposedly willing to give up firsts this past summer for Gibson -- who has been on a run of mediocre to bad play that is like 4 years longer than Demko's. Buffalo and LAK would be obvious destinations, maybe SEA and DET are possible fits as well.

Boeser will absolutely not get a first, even retained. In the past 3 or so years its clear that NHL teams have completely devalued the high paid, middle tier of wingers that Boeser falls into. Bjorkstrand -- a better player coming off of a much stronger year -- got a 3rd and a 4th. Burakovsky a couple years ago with a much better contract situation got a 2nd and a 3rd. Connor Brown once again with a much better contract got a 2nd. Rakell with a much better contract got a 2nd and an ok goalie prospect. A 64 point pace certainly isn't bad, but teams want to spend the 4.5-7m that they used to spend on guys like Boeser on either centers or 2-3 guys who can in total put up a similar total and help out in other ways. Would NJD give up a first to spend 4.5m on Boeser, or would they instead keep it and spend the money on say Conor Sheary, Scott Mayfield, and a vet min extra defenseman in FA?

With Boeser especially, VAN is by far best off either swapping him for another distressed asset (Hoffman? Fabbri? Mantha?) or trying to rehabilitate his value for next years deadline when his contract becomes a bit more manageable.


Yeah I think this is the most accurate take. GMs will pay for Centres, Right Handed defenseman, and Goalies. A good winger is worth the same as a mediocre centre on the trade market. A starting goalie is coveted especially on teams that have below average save percentages.

Only truly elite wingers like timo Meir will get big packages, likely
qc14 a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage