SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Boeser Trade

Créé par: Lancebmx
Équipe: 2022-23 Devils du New Jersey
Date de création initiale: 29 janv. 2023
Publié: 29 janv. 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
VAN
  1. Johnsson, Andreas
  2. Walsh, Reilly
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (NJD)
Détails additionnels:
Johnsson for cap purposes so no retention is needed
Rachats de contrats
Frais appliqués
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2023
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
2024
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
2025
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2382 500 000 $82 146 625 $0 $482 500 $353 375 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
7 250 000 $7 250 000 $
C
UFA - 5
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
5 450 000 $5 450 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
C
UFA - 8
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
6 650 000 $6 650 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
2 375 000 $2 375 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance400 000 $$400K)
AD, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
3 200 000 $3 200 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
975 000 $975 000 $
C
RFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
825 000 $825 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
1 125 000 $1 125 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
9 000 000 $9 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
3 400 000 $3 400 000 $
G
UFA - 3
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
3 166 667 $3 166 667 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
4 400 000 $4 400 000 $
DD
UFA - 5
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
2 800 000 $2 800 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
DG/DD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
4 166 666 $4 166 666 $
DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
750 000 $750 000 $
AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
4 125 000 $4 125 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
795 000 $795 000 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
874 125 $874 125 $
C, AG
RFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
29 janv. 2023 à 9 h 49
#1
do not Devil my ass
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 4,880
Mentions "j'aime": 4,254
Retention is still needed cus Boeser is maybe worth half his AAV.
If Björkstrand got a 3rd + 4th, and Patches went for future considerations, both superior wingers to Boeser, I see no reason for why Boeser should return anything higher than a 5th rd pick.
Devil a aimé ceci.
29 janv. 2023 à 10 h 56
#2
GoNucks
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2022
Messages: 248
Mentions "j'aime": 109
Quoting: Tintin
Retention is still needed cus Boeser is maybe worth half his AAV.
If Björkstrand got a 3rd + 4th, and Patches went for future considerations, both superior wingers to Boeser, I see no reason for why Boeser should return anything higher than a 5th rd pick.

Because Vegas and Columbus were forced to move those players because they were over the cap after acquiring eichel and gaudreau. There is nothing forcing Vancouver to move Boesser, so a team will have to offer something of value to aquire him
canucksfan43 a aimé ceci.
29 janv. 2023 à 11 h 7
#3
matt
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 602
Mentions "j'aime": 220
Quoting: Tintin
Retention is still needed cus Boeser is maybe worth half his AAV.
If Björkstrand got a 3rd + 4th, and Patches went for future considerations, both superior wingers to Boeser, I see no reason for why Boeser should return anything higher than a 5th rd pick.


50-60p players are paid more than 3.3mil dawg.
canucksfan43 a aimé ceci.
29 janv. 2023 à 12 h 10
#4
do not Devil my ass
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 4,880
Mentions "j'aime": 4,254
Quoting: JohnJohnson
Because Vegas and Columbus were forced to move those players because they were over the cap after acquiring eichel and gaudreau. There is nothing forcing Vancouver to move Boesser, so a team will have to offer something of value to aquire him

Quoting: mbaer84
50-60p players are paid more than 3.3mil dawg.

First off, it's not really so that the Canucks are swimming in cap space.
It's been heavily reported that the Canucks are looking to move Boeser's cap without expecting much of value coming back to them, why else would they allow Boeser's agent / representation to reach out to other teams asking how he'd fit into their rosters.

Boeser is (and always has) produced at a decent rate, but he is still getting heavily outscored, outchanced and outshot at 5v5.
The Canucks are paying a very heavy price for the points Boeser is putting up, and I don't mean that in terms of cap hit but in that Boeser is responsible for giving up more goals against than he facilitates for the Canucks.
The question really isn't whether Boeser's overall game (good and bad) is worth half his cap hit, it's whether he is worth anything it all, let alone a 2nd and and NHL ready RHD in Walsh.
29 janv. 2023 à 13 h 25
#5
GoNucks
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2022
Messages: 248
Mentions "j'aime": 109
Quoting: Tintin
First off, it's not really so that the Canucks are swimming in cap space.
It's been heavily reported that the Canucks are looking to move Boeser's cap without expecting much of value coming back to them, why else would they allow Boeser's agent / representation to reach out to other teams asking how he'd fit into their rosters.

Boeser is (and always has) produced at a decent rate, but he is still getting heavily outscored, outchanced and outshot at 5v5.
The Canucks are paying a very heavy price for the points Boeser is putting up, and I don't mean that in terms of cap hit but in that Boeser is responsible for giving up more goals against than he facilitates for the Canucks.
The question really isn't whether Boeser's overall game (good and bad) is worth half his cap hit, it's whether he is worth anything it all, let alone a 2nd and and NHL ready RHD in Walsh.

The fact that Boesser is getting out chanced and outscored shouldn’t be an indictment of his play. It’s a result of his environment. Everyone on the team not named Petterson is also being outchanced.
29 janv. 2023 à 13 h 41
#6
do not Devil my ass
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 4,880
Mentions "j'aime": 4,254
Quoting: JohnJohnson
The fact that Boesser is getting out chanced and outscored shouldn’t be an indictment of his play. It’s a result of his environment. Everyone on the team not named Petterson is also being outchanced.


Well, isn't Boeser part of that environment?
Is he the only player on the Canucks not accountable for giving up more goals, chances and shots against?

Of all Canucks players getting at least 400 minutes of ice time at 5v5 this season:
Boeser ranks 5th last in GF% at 44.6
Boeser ranks tied for last (with Lazar) in xGF% at 43.3, that's 2.5 percentage points lower than the Canucks average.
A bottom 5 team in the NHL are getting overall actively worse when Boeser steps onto the ice, that's a damning indictment of his level of play this season.
I get that Boeser's key assets relates to scoring and production, but for 6.65m AAV the results he puts up in the above metrics are wholly unacceptable.

Boeser is also below 50% in both Corsi and Fenwick differentials fwiw.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage