SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Leafs never traded for Muzzin

Créé par: Rocket_Rusty
Équipe: 2022-23 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 26 janv. 2023
Publié: 26 janv. 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
1.
LAK
  1. Muzzin, Jake
Détails additionnels:
if the trade never occured
2.
TOR
  1. McCann, Jared
Détails additionnels:
Leafs do not trade for Muzzin, who was protected in the Seattle draft, instead the Leafs protect McCann
SEA
3.
TOR
NYI
  1. Tavares, John
Détails additionnels:
never signed
4.
TOR
COL
  1. Kerfoot, Alexander
Détails additionnels:
no Kadri trade
5.
TOR
  1. Moore, Trevor
Détails additionnels:
no Campbell trade
LAK
6.
TOR
  1. Kadri, Nazem
Détails additionnels:
never traded
CGY
7.
TOR
  1. Jarvis, Seth
Détails additionnels:
pick never traded
CAR
8.
TOR
  1. Hyman, Zach
Détails additionnels:
Re-signed
EDM
9.
TOR
EDM
  1. Rielly, Morgan
Détails additionnels:
not re-signed
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2023
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de OTT
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2024
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de OTT
2025
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2382 500 000 $78 552 283 $212 500 $500 000 $3 947 717 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AD, AG
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 640 250 $11 640 250 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
10 903 000 $10 903 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 5
Logo de Flames de Calgary
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
6 962 366 $6 962 366 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
950 000 $950 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
827 500 $827 500 $
C, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
1 875 000 $1 875 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance500 000 $$500K)
AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
1 300 000 $1 300 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 100 000 $2 100 000 $
AD, C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG/DD
NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
4 687 500 $4 687 500 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
1 700 000 $1 700 000 $
DG/DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 400 000 $1 400 000 $
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 800 000 $1 800 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
800 000 $800 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
850 000 $850 000 $
DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 400 000 $1 400 000 $
DG
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
26 janv. 2023 à 22 h 0
#1
Hockee
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2020
Messages: 2,775
Mentions "j'aime": 868
The Muzzin trade was necessary at the time because the Leafs defense was in complete shambles, had Dubas not made that trade, and just kinda rolled with the same blueline, he probably doesn't have a job today
Saskleaf a aimé ceci.
26 janv. 2023 à 22 h 6
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 6,287
Mentions "j'aime": 3,035
Why would Muzzin not being traded for effect things like Tavares being signed when Tavares was signed long before Muzzin was traded for? Half these things stem from the Tavares signing rather than the Muzzin trade.
Saskleaf a aimé ceci.
26 janv. 2023 à 22 h 14
#3
Lets Get Kraken
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 8,634
Mentions "j'aime": 3,470
Yeah, no take backs
26 janv. 2023 à 22 h 18
#4
Go leafs go
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 13,238
Mentions "j'aime": 9,189
Quoting: evelutions2
Yeah, no take backs


As @deys3232 said, people saying the Muzzin trade should be taken back forget how necessary it was at the time. The leafs defense was absolute crap and it needed some stability.

Unless you are talking about the Jarvis-Marleau trade. Then I agree
26 janv. 2023 à 22 h 20
#5
Lets Get Kraken
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 8,634
Mentions "j'aime": 3,470
Quoting: Saskleaf
As deys3232 said, people saying the Muzzin trade should be taken back forget how necessary it was at the time. The leafs defense was absolute crap and it needed some stability.

Unless you are talking about the Jarvis-Marleau trade. Then I agree


A quick look at my favorite team should tell you that I’m talking about Jarvis. Canes thank the Leafs for being quite dumb. That being said, I don’t think LA would revert the Muzzin trade
Saskleaf a aimé ceci.
26 janv. 2023 à 22 h 23
#6
Go leafs go
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 13,238
Mentions "j'aime": 9,189
Quoting: evelutions2
A quick look at my favorite team should tell you that I’m talking about Jarvis. Canes thank the Leafs for being quite dumb. That being said, I don’t think LA would revert the Muzzin trade


The team was titled “Leafs never traded for Muzzin” so my thoughts went there first, but since you were a canes fan I wasn’t sure.

Yes, that Marleau contract was dumb and the trade was necessary but still really dumb. Leafs missed out on a great player in Jarvis.

Yah I think LA is perfectly happy with that trade.
evelutions2 a aimé ceci.
26 janv. 2023 à 22 h 27
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 1,574
Mentions "j'aime": 455
Lol this is so dumb.
26 janv. 2023 à 22 h 28
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2022
Messages: 8,566
Mentions "j'aime": 3,319
Modifié 26 janv. 2023 à 22 h 58
Quoting: Saskleaf
As @deys3232 said, people saying the Muzzin trade should be taken back forget how necessary it was at the time. The leafs defense was absolute crap and it needed some stability.

Unless you are talking about the Jarvis-Marleau trade. Then I agree


Quoting: evelutions2
A quick look at my favorite team should tell you that I’m talking about Jarvis. Canes thank the Leafs for being quite dumb. That being said, I don’t think LA would revert the Muzzin trade


Dumping Marleau was necessary too, and that was the cost. There's no guarantee that they would have even drafted Jarvis anyways or that he would even be viewed in the same light as he is now (by Carolina and some Leaf fans at least).

Jarvis is good but they can do without him still, it's not like he's a top player in the league right now. Chances are that by the time he is an impact player, that the Leafs (and other teams) would have missed or got someone else in the draft.
Saskleaf a aimé ceci.
26 janv. 2023 à 23 h 4
#9
Go leafs go
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 13,238
Mentions "j'aime": 9,189
Quoting: GMBL
Dumping Marleau was necessary too, and that was the cost. There's no guarantee that they would have even drafted Jarvis anyways or that he would even be viewed in the same light as he is now (by Carolina and some Leaf fans at least).

Jarvis is good but they can do without him still, it's not like he's a top player in the league right now, chances are that by the time he is an impact player, the Leafs and other teams missed or got someone else in the draft.


Dumping Marleau was necessary. Anyone with a half a brain would have been able to plan ahead so that he was only given a 2 year contract, but apparently not Lou lol. Without dumping him the Leafs would have been absolutely screwed.

However, it doesn’t change the fact that it cost a fortune and was a bad trade, on its own without context. A first rounder to dump a one year deal is quite ridiculous.

Jarvis isn’t a superstar or anything (and like you said, no guarantees they would have picked him), but you can’t tell me a guy like Jarvis wouldn’t have been very useful considering scoring depth is probably the biggest weakness on this team.
26 janv. 2023 à 23 h 20
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2022
Messages: 8,566
Mentions "j'aime": 3,319
Modifié 26 janv. 2023 à 23 h 27
Quoting: Saskleaf
Dumping Marleau was necessary. Anyone with a half a brain would have been able to plan ahead so that he was only given a 2 year contract, but apparently not Lou lol. Without dumping him the Leafs would have been absolutely screwed.

However, it doesn’t change the fact that it cost a fortune and was a bad trade, on its own without context. A first rounder to dump a one year deal is quite ridiculous.

Jarvis isn’t a superstar or anything (and like you said, no guarantees they would have picked him), but you can’t tell me a guy like Jarvis wouldn’t have been very useful considering scoring depth is probably the biggest weakness on this team.


I'm not saying that he wouldn't have been useful, but considering that he's having a sophomore slump and only has 7 goals, I don't think he even has that rookie season if he were part of the Leafs. He would probably be more or less like Robertson in and out of the line up.

Even if he did do well though, the guy was on pace for 20 goals in his rookie season which isn't something out of the question for a lot of middle six players, and of course Jarvis doing it on his ELC would have been great value but it's still isn't enough. So, over these last 3 years since he's been drafted I don't think it makes much of a difference, it's just something that would have been nice (as far as we know).

Let's say he breaks out next season in his contract year, then you're kissing goodbye to him or Nylander or someone anyways. So that's why even in hindsight, I personally would do it again. If Jarvis was scoring around 30 goals though that would be a different story. If he ends up being a superstar after 5 years being drafted, well then it's really just unfortunate but during that time so many players would have been drafted and missed.
Saskleaf a aimé ceci.
26 janv. 2023 à 23 h 25
#11
torontos finest
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 9,560
Mentions "j'aime": 11,192
the lamest acgms are the ones that just reverse every trade. yes, if leafs didn't do these trades they would have the players they traded away or let go. or maybe not, who knows.
Saskleaf et aadoyle a aimé ceci.
26 janv. 2023 à 23 h 44
#12
Go leafs go
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 13,238
Mentions "j'aime": 9,189
Quoting: GMBL
I'm not saying that he wouldn't have been useful, but considering that he's having a sophomore slump and only has 7 goals, I don't think he even has that rookie season if he were part of the Leafs. He would probably be more or less like Robertson in and out of the line up.

Even if he did do well though, the guy was on pace for 20 goals in his rookie season which isn't something out of the question for a lot of middle six players, and of course Jarvis doing it on his ELC would have been great value but it's still isn't enough. So, over these last 3 years since he's been drafted I don't think it makes much of a difference, it's just something that would have been nice (as far as we know).

Let's say he breaks out next season in his contract year, then you're kissing goodbye to him or Nylander or someone anyways. So that's why even in hindsight, I personally would do it again. If Jarvis was scoring around 30 goals though that would be a different story. If he ends up being a superstar after 5 years being drafted, well then it's really just unfortunate but during that time so many players would have been drafted and missed.


Yah I see what you are saying. He’s not really a difference maker and it’s not the end of the world that they don’t have him. Just saying ideally you don’t pay that much to dump Marleau.

Well, ideally you only sign him 2 years in the first place lol, but you know what I mean.
GMBL a aimé ceci.
27 janv. 2023 à 0 h 8
#13
Hakuna Matata
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 33,980
Mentions "j'aime": 20,941
If this never happened than all of these would have happened

If Leafs never traded for Muzzin how does that = them not signing JT who came before lul.

Kadri would have been gone anyways as the man had b2b suspensions

And so on.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage