SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

We Should Move a LD

Créé par: SJSGM
Équipe: 2022-23 Sharks de San Jose
Date de création initiale: 26 janv. 2023
Publié: 26 janv. 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
now that we have MacDonald, we currently are at EIGHT NHL-caliber Left Defensemen. Vlasic, Ferraro, Megna, Knyzhov, Harrington, Simek, MacDonald, and Cicek (not even including Nutivaara). All but TWO of these guys are signed until next year and Knyzhov is an RFA so assuming he's recovered from his injury fine, we already have SEVEN LD signed for next year. I think we should trade at minimum one, and up to three. We could run next season with Vlasic (assuming no buyout), Ferraro, Knyzhov, and Simek. Cicek and MacDonald can play AHL and be brought up if there's an injury. I haven't watched MacDonald so hard to say and if Cicek starts playing better he could be the 7th defenseman. I like Megna but he could be the odd man out. I like his size and so would other teams, he might be the odd man out as I wouldn't play him over Vlasic, Ferraro, or Knyzhov. I also saw that he was added to Seravalli's trade target list recently. Let me know what y'all think.

My lines for next game after Nieto trade below (w/out Megna)
Transactions
SJS
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2024 (NYR)
NYR
  1. Megna, Jaycob
Détails additionnels:
anywhere
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2023
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de CAR
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de CBJ
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de VAN
2024
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de VGK
Logo de NYR
Logo de SJS
Logo de COL
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
2025
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2382 500 000 $74 517 501 $0 $0 $7 982 499 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
6 750 000 $6 750 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
750 000 $750 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
4 725 000 $4 725 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 050 000 $1 050 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
C
UFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
950 000 $950 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
750 000 $750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 025 000 $1 025 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
DG
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
DG/DD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
750 000 $750 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
762 500 $762 500 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
750 000 $750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
AD, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $$250K)
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
775 000 $775 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
850 000 $850 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
835 000 $835 000 $
DG
RFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
26 janv. 2023 à 20 h 32
#1
Rangers_Fan__
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 68
Mentions "j'aime": 6
My counter offer: NYR trade a 2023 3rd to San Jose for Megna 50% retained
SJSGM a aimé ceci.
26 janv. 2023 à 20 h 36
#2
Démarrer sujet
go Sharks go
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 862
Mentions "j'aime": 396
Quoting: Rangers_Fan_
My counter offer: NYR trade a 2023 3rd to San Jose for Megna 50% retained


I mean for only a few 100k in retention I think I would do it, I like the value. The only reason an NHL team might not want to is since you can only retain on three and we’re already retaining Burns. So only one more retention for this year and next, but I would say yes.
26 janv. 2023 à 21 h 12
#3
Lets Get Kraken
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 8,487
Mentions "j'aime": 3,403
Quoting: SJSGM
I mean for only a few 100k in retention I think I would do it, I like the value. The only reason an NHL team might not want to is since you can only retain on three and we’re already retaining Burns. So only one more retention for this year and next, but I would say yes.


It depends on whether the Sharks plan on retooling or going full rebuild. My guess is rebuild, with Meier likely gone by the deadline, Karlsson possibly gone in the summer, and whatever other moving parts get shipped out. With the 2 remaining retention slots for this year, if I’m the Sharks, go scorched earth and sell off as much high prizes as possible without completely destroying the team. Barabanov and Ferraro at half retention would draw quite the haul, or if Hertl is willing to waive, he would bring in possibly the biggest haul of all, at just over 4mil with half retention and signed for long term. Probably shouldn’t trade whoever the LD who compliments Karlsson just to keep EK65 value up as high as possible.
poeticentropy a aimé ceci.
26 janv. 2023 à 21 h 41
#4
MGITBPITNHL
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 3,495
Mentions "j'aime": 1,530
The Rangers would be a good suitor for a 3LD, but I must admit… I’ve never heard of this guy lol
26 janv. 2023 à 22 h 0
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 8,017
Mentions "j'aime": 3,565
I wouldn’t move megna for that. League minimum deal, 6’6” 220 and having a great year both offensively and defensively. I wouldn’t move him unless they get a 2nd or a 3rd and a prospect
CheechYou a aimé ceci.
27 janv. 2023 à 15 h 1
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 1,629
Mentions "j'aime": 531
I wouldn't worry too much about LD/RD too much. Yes it's not ideal but these are pros that can play on the opposite side from what is on their bio
27 janv. 2023 à 22 h 3
#7
Démarrer sujet
go Sharks go
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 862
Mentions "j'aime": 396
Quoting: Masonh618
The Rangers would be a good suitor for a 3LD, but I must admit… I’ve never heard of this guy lol


probably a 3rd pair defenseman but is playing top pair right now with EK65. good size at 6'6 220. just a reliable defensive-defenseman that can provide a bit of physicality.
Masonh618 a aimé ceci.
28 janv. 2023 à 16 h 41
#8
MGITBPITNHL
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 3,495
Mentions "j'aime": 1,530
Quoting: SJSGM
probably a 3rd pair defenseman but is playing top pair right now with EK65. good size at 6'6 220. just a reliable defensive-defenseman that can provide a bit of physicality.


I can't complain about having that on my Rangers lol. Basically a 3rd pair Ben Harpur (instead of present-day 7D Ben Harpur)?
30 janv. 2023 à 18 h 51
#9
Démarrer sujet
go Sharks go
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 862
Mentions "j'aime": 396
Quoting: Masonh618
I can't complain about having that on my Rangers lol. Basically a 3rd pair Ben Harpur (instead of present-day 7D Ben Harpur)?


not too familiar with Harpur to be honest but he’s definitely a capable 3rd pairing defensive defenseman.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage